How the Moon Formed: Lunar Rocks Support Giant Impact Theory --SITCHIN RIGHT AGAIN | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 58555069 Germany 06/06/2014 11:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25058092 Australia 06/06/2014 11:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
The_Walking_Guy (OP) User ID: 53586335 Canada 06/06/2014 11:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
The_Walking_Guy (OP) User ID: 53586335 Canada 06/06/2014 11:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Hydra User ID: 58952750 Germany 06/07/2014 06:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | A new analysis of lunar rocks now supports the idea that the moon was born in a gigantic collision between the nascent Earth and a mysterious planet-size rock, scientists say. Quoting: The_Walking_Guy Earth formed about 4.5 billion years ago, and scientists think the moon came into being shortly afterward. The prevailing explanation for the moon's origin, known as the Giant Impact Hypothesis, is that it resulted from two protoplanets (or embryonic worlds) that slammed together [link to www.space.com] yup...Sitchin right again... Hmmm ... Sitchin right again? Did he publish his collision theory before 1946 ? If not, he is just one of the many who adopted it. Reginald Aldworth Daly: "Origin of the Moon and Its Topography" - published in: Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, volume 90, number 2, 1946, page 104119: [link to www.jstor.org] . :ase26122019: Annular Solar Eclipse - December 26, 2019 - Kannur, Kerala, India |
The_Walking_Guy (OP) User ID: 53586335 Canada 06/07/2014 11:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | A new analysis of lunar rocks now supports the idea that the moon was born in a gigantic collision between the nascent Earth and a mysterious planet-size rock, scientists say. Quoting: The_Walking_Guy Earth formed about 4.5 billion years ago, and scientists think the moon came into being shortly afterward. The prevailing explanation for the moon's origin, known as the Giant Impact Hypothesis, is that it resulted from two protoplanets (or embryonic worlds) that slammed together [link to www.space.com] yup...Sitchin right again... Hmmm ... Sitchin right again? Did he publish his collision theory before 1946 ? If not, he is just one of the many who adopted it. Reginald Aldworth Daly: "Origin of the Moon and Its Topography" - published in: Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, volume 90, number 2, 1946, page 104119: [link to www.jstor.org] . He not only adopted it, but he applied it to the theory of Nibiru. A theory that has been called sound, in print, by at least one astrophysicist. I Walk. |
Hydra User ID: 58952750 Germany 06/07/2014 11:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | A new analysis of lunar rocks now supports the idea that the moon was born in a gigantic collision between the nascent Earth and a mysterious planet-size rock, scientists say. Quoting: The_Walking_Guy Earth formed about 4.5 billion years ago, and scientists think the moon came into being shortly afterward. The prevailing explanation for the moon's origin, known as the Giant Impact Hypothesis, is that it resulted from two protoplanets (or embryonic worlds) that slammed together [link to www.space.com] yup...Sitchin right again... Hmmm ... Sitchin right again? Did he publish his collision theory before 1946 ? If not, he is just one of the many who adopted it. Reginald Aldworth Daly: "Origin of the Moon and Its Topography" - published in: Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, volume 90, number 2, 1946, page 104119: [link to www.jstor.org] . He not only adopted it, but he applied it to the theory of Nibiru. Yup...Sitchin wrong again . :ase26122019: Annular Solar Eclipse - December 26, 2019 - Kannur, Kerala, India |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 875256 United States 06/07/2014 11:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |