Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,282 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 434,276
Pageviews Today: 697,734Threads Today: 237Posts Today: 3,600
08:35 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

How the Moon Formed: Lunar Rocks Support Giant Impact Theory --SITCHIN RIGHT AGAIN

 
The_Walking_Guy
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 53586335
Canada
06/06/2014 10:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
How the Moon Formed: Lunar Rocks Support Giant Impact Theory --SITCHIN RIGHT AGAIN
A new analysis of lunar rocks now supports the idea that the moon was born in a gigantic collision between the nascent Earth and a mysterious planet-size rock, scientists say.

Earth formed about 4.5 billion years ago, and scientists think the moon came into being shortly afterward. The prevailing explanation for the moon's origin, known as the Giant Impact Hypothesis, is that it resulted from two protoplanets (or embryonic worlds) that slammed together

[link to www.space.com]

yup...Sitchin right again...
I Walk.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 58555069
Germany
06/06/2014 11:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How the Moon Formed: Lunar Rocks Support Giant Impact Theory --SITCHIN RIGHT AGAIN
[link to sitchiniswrong.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25058092
Australia
06/06/2014 11:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How the Moon Formed: Lunar Rocks Support Giant Impact Theory --SITCHIN RIGHT AGAIN
LOL sitchin.

spare us the bullshit
The_Walking_Guy  (OP)

User ID: 53586335
Canada
06/06/2014 11:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How the Moon Formed: Lunar Rocks Support Giant Impact Theory --SITCHIN RIGHT AGAIN
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58555069


wtflol
I Walk.
The_Walking_Guy  (OP)

User ID: 53586335
Canada
06/06/2014 11:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How the Moon Formed: Lunar Rocks Support Giant Impact Theory --SITCHIN RIGHT AGAIN
LOL sitchin.

spare us the bullshit
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25058092


Sitchin has nothing to do with the article, so read it will ya?
I Walk.
Hydra

User ID: 58952750
Germany
06/07/2014 06:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How the Moon Formed: Lunar Rocks Support Giant Impact Theory --SITCHIN RIGHT AGAIN
A new analysis of lunar rocks now supports the idea that the moon was born in a gigantic collision between the nascent Earth and a mysterious planet-size rock, scientists say.

Earth formed about 4.5 billion years ago, and scientists think the moon came into being shortly afterward. The prevailing explanation for the moon's origin, known as the Giant Impact Hypothesis, is that it resulted from two protoplanets (or embryonic worlds) that slammed together

[link to www.space.com]

yup...Sitchin right again...
 Quoting: The_Walking_Guy

Hmmm ... Sitchin right again?

Did he publish his collision theory before 1946 ?

If not, he is just one of the many who adopted it.

Reginald Aldworth Daly: "Origin of the Moon and Its Topography" - published in: Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, volume 90, number 2, 1946, page 104119: [link to www.jstor.org]

.
:ase26122019:
Annular Solar Eclipse - December 26, 2019 - Kannur, Kerala, India
The_Walking_Guy  (OP)

User ID: 53586335
Canada
06/07/2014 11:27 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How the Moon Formed: Lunar Rocks Support Giant Impact Theory --SITCHIN RIGHT AGAIN
A new analysis of lunar rocks now supports the idea that the moon was born in a gigantic collision between the nascent Earth and a mysterious planet-size rock, scientists say.

Earth formed about 4.5 billion years ago, and scientists think the moon came into being shortly afterward. The prevailing explanation for the moon's origin, known as the Giant Impact Hypothesis, is that it resulted from two protoplanets (or embryonic worlds) that slammed together

[link to www.space.com]

yup...Sitchin right again...
 Quoting: The_Walking_Guy

Hmmm ... Sitchin right again?

Did he publish his collision theory before 1946 ?

If not, he is just one of the many who adopted it.

Reginald Aldworth Daly: "Origin of the Moon and Its Topography" - published in: Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, volume 90, number 2, 1946, page 104119: [link to www.jstor.org]

.
 Quoting: Hydra


He not only adopted it, but he applied it to the theory of Nibiru. A theory that has been called sound, in print, by at least one astrophysicist.
I Walk.
Hydra

User ID: 58952750
Germany
06/07/2014 11:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How the Moon Formed: Lunar Rocks Support Giant Impact Theory --SITCHIN RIGHT AGAIN
A new analysis of lunar rocks now supports the idea that the moon was born in a gigantic collision between the nascent Earth and a mysterious planet-size rock, scientists say.

Earth formed about 4.5 billion years ago, and scientists think the moon came into being shortly afterward. The prevailing explanation for the moon's origin, known as the Giant Impact Hypothesis, is that it resulted from two protoplanets (or embryonic worlds) that slammed together

[link to www.space.com]

yup...Sitchin right again...
 Quoting: The_Walking_Guy

Hmmm ... Sitchin right again?

Did he publish his collision theory before 1946 ?

If not, he is just one of the many who adopted it.

Reginald Aldworth Daly: "Origin of the Moon and Its Topography" - published in: Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, volume 90, number 2, 1946, page 104119: [link to www.jstor.org]

.
 Quoting: Hydra


He not only adopted it, but he applied it to the theory of Nibiru.
 Quoting: The_Walking_Guy


Yup...Sitchin wrong again

.
:ase26122019:
Annular Solar Eclipse - December 26, 2019 - Kannur, Kerala, India
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 875256
United States
06/07/2014 11:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How the Moon Formed: Lunar Rocks Support Giant Impact Theory --SITCHIN RIGHT AGAIN
Only an idiot could believe that theory.
Orbital motion of the moon completely destroys that theory.





GLP