The dialogue continues……



Karen Hudes1 day ago

This is what is happening with Fukushima: [link to s3.amazonaws.com (secure)]
Reply ·

chugiakian1 day ago

+Karen Hudes What is this document?
Reply ·

Karen Hudes1 day ago

This is a draft agreement to replace paper fractional reserve fiat currency in all the countries of the world with gold from the Global Debt Facility, so the world's citizens don't have to pay interest on country indebtedness. These were mailed yesterday to the embassies in Tokyo; an earlier draft was sent by email, and I followed up with hard copies at the request of a member of Japan's House of Delegates.
Reply ·

chugiakian23 hours ago (edited)

+Karen Hudes No disrespect, but I still don't get it. This draft agreement addresses cleaning up the disaster at Fukushima Daiichi. What does the Central Bank Cartel have to do with Fukushima? (Other than both are controlled by the Japanese Yakuza). How is the countries indebtedness going to curtail the mess at Fukushima? Fukushima will never go away. They will NEVER be able to clean up that mess, EVER! Our government has already agreed to burden US tax payers with the cost to clean up the mess at Fukushima. This carries little weight in trying to get TEPCO, or Japan, to pay for the damages, costs of relocating their citizens, costs to pay for medical expenses, or potential damages in the current lawsuit filed in San Diego (by US Servicemen/women who's lives were altered by radiation exposure), let alone paying for the costs to clean this mess up.
It almost appears that Fukushima was thrown into this document as an after thought.
This document appears to be written on a word document with a border around it to make it appear somewhat 'fancy'. You say this document was sent by email to embassies in Tokyo? Why? For what purpose? To try to get someones attention? The Japanese Government is bowing to the wishes of TPTB, Why would they sign such a document?
This document hides behind some code name person 666…REALLY? C-mon!
It needs to be agreed upon and signed by more than any one person in the government or any one person at the Central Bank. Who would sign such a document anyways? (After all, it was written by a code name person). If someone did sign it, Then their name would be exposed, Right? Would they want a target on their head? How is this draft agreement, going to replace anything? Tokyo has no control over the Cabal, nor over any other central bank in the rest of the world. What power do they carry? It would be as if they were signing their own death sentence. Real change needs to come from the ground up.
If you are that change agent, then I commend you, but you need to state it clearly. People are tired of half truths, dis-information, mis-information as well as lack of information. If you are a champion for truth, Then stand up for truth, say so, then act accordingly.
Kindest Regards.
C
Show less
Reply ·

h.thomas ackermann23 hours ago

+chugiakian Superb questioning and analysis on another person who has no clue what it is we are facing. To post some ridiculous financial agreement / instrument to explain "What's happening in Fukushima" is irritating the flea on the dogs tail.
We are in the fight for all life - who gives a shit who owns what or is going to pay for this catastrophe without end !
Their ignorance is COMPLICITY!!
Great response.
Thank you
Read more
Reply ·

takai32120 hours ago

+chugiakian I second h.thomas ackermann's comment regarding your superb questioning and analysis. Thank You.
Reply ·

Karen Hudes1 hour ago

You don't think unlimited funding to throw at the problem is a good idea? Wake up or dry up or both
Reply ·

chugiakian2 seconds ago

+Karen Hudes With all due respect, NO, I do not think that throwing unlimited funding at Fukushima will fix anything, Is it a good idea? Well, Japan is already considering throwing free money at companies, who want to recycle high value metals from radioactive debris, then take the discarded recycled radioactive metals and sell them to consumers, so, no, Money alone will not solve the issues at Fukushima Daiichi…The technology needed to clean up Fukushima Daiichi, Chernobyl, Hanford, WIPP, or any other nuclear disaster HAS NOT BEEN DEVELOPED YET! The HALF-LIFE of uranium, depending on the type, can be upwards of 700 Million to 4.5 Billion years! Reactor #3 was a MOX Fuel Reactor (look up MOX FUEL). TEPCO can't even get close to it. In short, It will never go away.
I am very much awake. I have been following the events of Fukushima since 3/11/2011. But I digress...
Lets get back to the question at hand, I argue that this document you present is not an official document at all. It appears to be a piece of paper with some ideas on it. Who is the actual author? Some undercover code named person? Who will sign their name on it and to agree to it? And agree to whom? If this document, was to be an agreement that is designed to get someone to replace the fiat currency, that is one thing, however, you, or whoever wrote it, interjects TEPCO and the Fukushima Daiichi in the draft, which I again, argue are completely different issues. If anything, in the next draft, the NRC should be included. They regulate All of the Nuclear facilities, however, rather than protecting the consumers, they protect their interests, to perpetuate Nuclear Energy, and keep people from disrupting their agenda.
Furthermore, this document could never be agreed to by any one person, nor any one country. How about, you produce the actual email, who it was from, who it was addressed to, along with the body of the text sent, along with any replies received. This would be more 'official' and could perhaps be traced back through a FOIA request.
People do not want secrecy, They want the truth. This so called document is riddled with secrecy and appears to be more of a ransom demand letter, from
This code named person, whom Wolfgang Struck supposedly represents and would receive 1/4 of 1% of whatever, payable to a bank of his choice? I would think that it would be the code name person who would pay Wolfgang Struck for his services, and not Japan being on the hook for paying this individual.
Without hard facts and truth revealed openly, I would have to call this document fake.