Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,114 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,279,190
Pageviews Today: 1,819,813Threads Today: 503Posts Today: 9,578
02:49 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Sandy Hook: Am I reading correctly? Ginsberg says "no gunshots" in Halstead's call?

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 59279213
United States
06/16/2014 09:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Sandy Hook: Am I reading correctly? Ginsberg says "no gunshots" in Halstead's call?
Ginsberg's "updated" (9:46:54 shot removed) file on the Sandy Hook gunshots is 182028.

For some reason, he shows zero gunshots in Barbara Halstead's call.

If that's updated, I'd hate to see finalized.

There are a *ton* of gunshots in that call.

Maybe I'm missing something.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 52552836
United States
06/17/2014 04:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Sandy Hook: Am I reading correctly? Ginsberg says "no gunshots" in Halstead's call?
I count 16, with additional shots implied.

In addition, at least "two" of these are doubles, i.e. two weapons fired almost simultaneously, or I suppose some kind of weapon that fires two bullets almost-at-once (obviously unlikely).
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 59630175
United States
06/25/2014 09:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Sandy Hook: Am I reading correctly? Ginsberg says "no gunshots" in Halstead's call?
Yep--it's official.

The number of shots in the veritable barrage audible on Barbara Halstead's call that Paul Ginsberg can hear?

Zero.

What the hell is up with THAT.

Only thing I can think of is that he was working with Call 2 instead of Call 1--Call 2 being a modified version of Call 1, with the gunshot sounds drastically muted.





GLP