Chemtrails are real. Look up for more than a second. Believe your own eyes.

[link to www.accuweather.com]

[link to www.climatecentral.org]

I obviously understand more about our atmosphere than you will ever know.

Just reading through your posts proves that you couldn't be more ignorant if you wanted to be.

Go ahead, tell me how added water vapor from jet engines
wouldn't freeze and persist if the air was saturated with respect to ice at -40.

This should be good...

You don't even have basic knowledge. Stop kidding yourself. You're a fucking moron.


The only evidence i have of your expertise, is your knowledge that water vapor freezes at -40. Oh, and you're pretty good at name calling.

Why dont you explain to me how this magic water vapor can spread out from horizon to horizon eventually forming a cloud deck entirely created from the emissions of aircraft. Thats some serious persistence. You obviously dont know the difference between a regular contrail, and a chemtrail.

You arrogant douche poser

*facepalm*

No, that's not what I'm saying.

I'm saying that just because you see something shiny on the ground, doesn't mean it fell from the trails in the sky...or wasn't there to begin with. How about you pick up some of these reflective particles and study them a little closer...instead of making STUPID assumptions.

Yup, all day long.

The only evidence i have of your expertise, is your knowledge that water vapor freezes at -40. Oh, and you're pretty good at name calling.

Why dont you explain to me how this magic water vapor can spread out from horizon to horizon eventually forming a cloud deck entirely created from the emissions of aircraft. Thats some serious persistence. You obviously dont know the difference between a regular contrail, and a chemtrail.

You arrogant douche poser


That's the point you're missing. If the air is saturated, it can't absorb any more water. That's what saturated means. And just as where clouds form compared to the area outside of the cloud, the area inside the cloud has atmospheric conditions within it to allow the cloud to stay in the sky for hours.

You people who claim trails shouldn't persist are also claiming clouds shouldn't last for more than a few minutes.

www.atmos-chem-phys.net/9/1357/2009/acp-9-1357-2009.pdf

[link to www.google.com (secure)]

With such a closed mind; you are incapable of grasping the motive of those in power. Their 'achievable outcomes' are increasingly evident. The level of deception and corruption working against your very existence is thrown in your face every day. You choose to subscribe to some of those narratives but then draw a mental line in the sand for others. It's ok. Some people are like that. Don't ask me for evidence of ecocide, genocide, or any other crime against planet Earth. The evidence is horrifying. Depleted Uranium, Fukushima, Oil spills, fracking, ocean pollution, Air pollution, deforestation, plastics, Geo-engineering...

oh wait... there is only one reality in this equation that doesn't seem to have a clear solution for you. I'm sorry. That's mind control.

"You arrogant douche poser"

The irony

That's the point you're missing. If the air is saturated, it can't absorb any more water. That's what saturated means. And just as where clouds form compared to the area outside of the cloud, the area inside the cloud has atmospheric conditions within it to allow the cloud to stay in the sky for hours.

You people who claim trails shouldn't persist are also claiming clouds shouldn't last for more than a few minutes.


Persist, maybe. But expand and overlap. C'mon.

I just posted two links...

Absolutely!

That's the point you're missing. If the air is saturated, it can't absorb any more water. That's what saturated means. And just as where clouds form compared to the area outside of the cloud, the area inside the cloud has atmospheric conditions within it to allow the cloud to stay in the sky for hours.

You people who claim trails shouldn't persist are also claiming clouds shouldn't last for more than a few minutes.


Jet engines don't eject enough vapor to form clouds, that vapor dissipates into surrounding atmophere and dissapears. The modified chemtrail planes have nozzles along the wing, that eject these substances that form the persistent chemical rails.

Jet engines don't eject enough vapor to form clouds, that vapor dissipates into surrounding atmophere and dissapears. The modified chemtrail planes have nozzles along the wing, that eject these substances that form the persistent chemical rails.

Thought you'd repeat it because it's just so damn funny?



Last Edited by SnakeAirlines on 06/25/2014 12:40 PM

Oh, wait. The EPA pdf you posted was a kundalini experience. Consider me converted.

No shit...but, they add enough to push the level of saturation past the point where the air can't hold the moisture that was there and the added moisture from the engine. The air was VERY close to saturation and then the plane adds just enough to put it over the top.

And just because you make statements of fact about "nozzles" and "substances" doesn't mean you won't be called on it!

What you people call "nozzles" for "chemtrails" are no such thing! And I have yet to see evidence of any "substances" associated with the trails.

Sometimes they insist on showing how ignorant the want to remain.

I thought the first one would be too technical for you...

It seems I was right...

Oh, I see. A closed mind is one that requires some sort of evidence, right. Gotcha.

What SAL? Pffft.

Don't waste your time on these people, this is their job, to deny, they know the truth, they get paid to deny and spread misinformation. Spend your time more wisely, show your family friends anybody that will listen what is going on. You will not convince these people, no matter how much you try, they get paid to do this shit, waste your time and deny the truth.

Yeah, don't listen. You might learn something eh?

Why do you lie about people you don't know? it's not my job to post the facts as I understand them! What "misinformation"?! YOU are the liar here.

Don't worry...I don't think that is ever going to happen.

That's sad. Education is key. Learn. Reference stuff for yourself. Someone posts, I reference before replying. I learn, educate myself. It's a good thing.

Actually I've learned so much from glp, from physics to woo woo.

It's all good :)

Last Edited by Elemental on 06/25/2014 01:08 PM

You would've been one of the people saying relativity wasn't true until the experiments were carried out. Turns out you would've been wrong. There is evidence of geo-engineering you refuse to acknowledge but even without it you'd have to be a Jew in the 1940s to ignore the reality unfolding around you. They might as well name the 'Weather Channel' the 'Air Traffic Channel' at this point. I only argue with shills to challenge my own concept of reality. I've never wavered in this subject. Neither has the disinformation. You are allowed to believe anything else you'd like, without protest, except this. It doesn't matter where you are or who you know. This topic is forbidden to be questioned. They are contrails. End of discussion. If you believe otherwise you have no concept of the scientific method and no knowledge of the present accepted truth of reality.

You have zero evidence that your digital technology isn't sentient either. Believe what you like. Don't tell me my view of reality is incorrect though. You have zero evidence of that. You've never taken instrumentation of aircraft condensation trails at high altitude. You're just trusting that no one else except Obama's elite scientific council has either.

Let us believe what we'd like. There's plenty of other candidates for the 'you have no evidence of that' floating around on the board to get your opinionator fix for the day.

Oh look! Now everybody's flying to grandma's!

Get in a plane , make an he hrs long contrail, record it.