Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,139 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 553,686
Pageviews Today: 695,471Threads Today: 171Posts Today: 2,621
06:17 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 59123600
United States
06/27/2014 07:45 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse
MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 59022802
United States
06/27/2014 08:07 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse
Not a real engineer... research the guy. can you point me to a real accredited professional civil engineer who claims that this was not a collapse from impact & fire? I have never seen one.

What I see is architects (not qualified), and other people who have a passing interest or some double major in some other type of engineering from 30 years ago, never practiced, etc.

Love to see something from someone credible - thanks.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 59569017
06/27/2014 08:12 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse
Not a real engineer... research the guy. can you point me to a real accredited professional civil engineer who claims that this was not a collapse from impact & fire? I have never seen one.

What I see is architects (not qualified), and other people who have a passing interest or some double major in some other type of engineering from 30 years ago, never practiced, etc.

Love to see something from someone credible - thanks.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 59022802


It should be obvious that anyone seeking a govt contract to make money from or needs govt permission or licensure to make a living is NOT going to accuse the very entity they need approval from of corruption and subversion, just sayin...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 56039511
Canada
06/27/2014 09:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse
The 911 "conspiracy" is open and shut against vs the government fairytale version ....

are there still people that believe the "official" version ?

they should be playing scrabble vs a turnip
Rumplestillskin

User ID: 54723460
United States
06/27/2014 03:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse
Architects and Engineers for 911 truth isn't enough?
What are they 13,000 strong now?
I have a feeling something is about to give in this arena finally.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 37415179
United States
06/27/2014 03:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse
The shillery is strong in this thread.

Quite frankly, a high school understanding of basic Newtonian principals disproves total collapse as it happened.

How can 15-20% of the mass falling downward, vaporize the remaining structure at near free fall velocity?

It can't, no impact or fire or weakening theory can explain how the entire building turned to dust with molten steel "like a foundry".

Shill elsewhere losers.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 41360524
United States
07/24/2014 02:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse
Not a real engineer... research the guy. can you point me to a real accredited professional civil engineer who claims that this was not a collapse from impact & fire? I have never seen one.

What I see is architects (not qualified), and other people who have a passing interest or some double major in some other type of engineering from 30 years ago, never practiced, etc.

Love to see something from someone credible - thanks.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 59022802


Yes, read Dr. Judy Wood's book, "Where did the towers go"?

She has a B.S. in Civil Engineering, a M.S. in Engineering Mechanics, and a Ph.D. in Materials Engineering Science.

And yes, she claims it was not a collapse from impact and fire.

Her book is a must read.
The South Park Agenda

User ID: 38529043
United States
07/24/2014 02:18 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse
Not a real engineer... research the guy. can you point me to a real accredited professional civil engineer who claims that this was not a collapse from impact & fire? I have never seen one.

What I see is architects (not qualified), and other people who have a passing interest or some double major in some other type of engineering from 30 years ago, never practiced, etc.

Love to see something from someone credible - thanks.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 59022802


Yes, read Dr. Judy Wood's book, "Where did the towers go"?

She has a B.S. in Civil Engineering, a M.S. in Engineering Mechanics, and a Ph.D. in Materials Engineering Science.

And yes, she claims it was not a collapse from impact and fire.

Her book is a must read.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 41360524


doesn't she believe that they used a sat to do it? with fake planes?
Stuff and goodies...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 57155441
United States
07/24/2014 02:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse
Architects and Engineers for 911 truth isn't enough?
What are they 13,000 strong now?
I have a feeling something is about to give in this arena finally.
 Quoting: Rumplestillskin


Who can "pull it" off is the question. ;)
The South Park Agenda

User ID: 38529043
United States
07/24/2014 02:37 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse
MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse


 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 59123600



Stuff and goodies...
Cavaignac

User ID: 60450835
United Kingdom
07/24/2014 02:45 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse
Not a real engineer... research the guy. can you point me to a real accredited professional civil engineer who claims that this was not a collapse from impact & fire? I have never seen one.

What I see is architects (not qualified), and other people who have a passing interest or some double major in some other type of engineering from 30 years ago, never practiced, etc.

Love to see something from someone credible - thanks.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 59022802


Yes, read Dr. Judy Wood's book, "Where did the towers go"?

She has a B.S. in Civil Engineering, a M.S. in Engineering Mechanics, and a Ph.D. in Materials Engineering Science.

And yes, she claims it was not a collapse from impact and fire.

Her book is a must read.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 41360524


doesn't she believe that they used a sat to do it? with fake planes?
 Quoting: The South Park Agenda


She is a specialist in teeth, not buildings. All her work was in dentistry stress. She thinks a star wars death ray was fired from the moon but fell apart when questioned on the who, what, why and how and has no evidence to back up her claims. She is so nuts she was debunked in a very funny interview by other nutjobs.
The Game
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 55785855
United States
07/24/2014 03:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse
Not a real engineer... research the guy. can you point me to a real accredited professional civil engineer who claims that this was not a collapse from impact & fire? I have never seen one.

What I see is architects (not qualified), and other people who have a passing interest or some double major in some other type of engineering from 30 years ago, never practiced, etc.

Love to see something from someone credible - thanks.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 59022802


Yes, read Dr. Judy Wood's book, "Where did the towers go"?

She has a B.S. in Civil Engineering, a M.S. in Engineering Mechanics, and a Ph.D. in Materials Engineering Science.

And yes, she claims it was not a collapse from impact and fire.

Her book is a must read.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 41360524


doesn't she believe that they used a sat to do it? with fake planes?
 Quoting: The South Park Agenda


She is a specialist in teeth, not buildings. All her work was in dentistry stress. She thinks a star wars death ray was fired from the moon but fell apart when questioned on the who, what, why and how and has no evidence to back up her claims. She is so nuts she was debunked in a very funny interview by other nutjobs.
 Quoting: Cavaignac

you are a liar
Cavaignac

User ID: 60450835
United Kingdom
07/24/2014 03:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse
...


Yes, read Dr. Judy Wood's book, "Where did the towers go"?

She has a B.S. in Civil Engineering, a M.S. in Engineering Mechanics, and a Ph.D. in Materials Engineering Science.

And yes, she claims it was not a collapse from impact and fire.

Her book is a must read.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 41360524


doesn't she believe that they used a sat to do it? with fake planes?
 Quoting: The South Park Agenda


She is a specialist in teeth, not buildings. All her work was in dentistry stress. She thinks a star wars death ray was fired from the moon but fell apart when questioned on the who, what, why and how and has no evidence to back up her claims. She is so nuts she was debunked in a very funny interview by other nutjobs.
 Quoting: Cavaignac

you are a liar
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 55785855


No im not, do 5 minutes of your own research for a change. Most of the science in her book was actually written by Tracy Blevins/Prostert who changed her mind the instant she was offered a job on wall street.
The Game
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 55785855
United States
07/24/2014 03:27 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse
...


doesn't she believe that they used a sat to do it? with fake planes?
 Quoting: The South Park Agenda


She is a specialist in teeth, not buildings. All her work was in dentistry stress. She thinks a star wars death ray was fired from the moon but fell apart when questioned on the who, what, why and how and has no evidence to back up her claims. She is so nuts she was debunked in a very funny interview by other nutjobs.
 Quoting: Cavaignac

you are a liar
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 55785855


No im not, do 5 minutes of your own research for a change. Most of the science in her book was actually written by Tracy Blevins/Prostert who changed her mind the instant she was offered a job on wall street.
 Quoting: Cavaignac

I am sure I have done more research than you. what is melting point of WTC steel? what is max. temp of jet fuel fire? I hear your mom calling you.
Cavaignac

User ID: 55549768
United Kingdom
07/24/2014 03:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse
...


She is a specialist in teeth, not buildings. All her work was in dentistry stress. She thinks a star wars death ray was fired from the moon but fell apart when questioned on the who, what, why and how and has no evidence to back up her claims. She is so nuts she was debunked in a very funny interview by other nutjobs.
 Quoting: Cavaignac

you are a liar
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 55785855


No im not, do 5 minutes of your own research for a change. Most of the science in her book was actually written by Tracy Blevins/Prostert who changed her mind the instant she was offered a job on wall street.
 Quoting: Cavaignac

I am sure I have done more research than you. what is melting point of WTC steel? what is max. temp of jet fuel fire? I hear your mom calling you.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 55785855


Steel didn't melt it buckled so your question is pointless. Now go read the truth about Judy and Tracy.
The Game
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 55785855
United States
07/24/2014 12:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse
...

you are a liar
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 55785855


No im not, do 5 minutes of your own research for a change. Most of the science in her book was actually written by Tracy Blevins/Prostert who changed her mind the instant she was offered a job on wall street.
 Quoting: Cavaignac

I am sure I have done more research than you. what is melting point of WTC steel? what is max. temp of jet fuel fire? I hear your mom calling you.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 55785855


Steel didn't melt it buckled so your question is pointless. Now go read the truth about Judy and Tracy.
 Quoting: Cavaignac

we all knew you would not answer a simple question. THE BUILDING TURNED TO DUST YOU FRAUD. how can steel turn to dust in 1 second or less? time for you to run and hide.
Cavaignac

User ID: 60450835
United Kingdom
07/24/2014 01:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse
...


No im not, do 5 minutes of your own research for a change. Most of the science in her book was actually written by Tracy Blevins/Prostert who changed her mind the instant she was offered a job on wall street.
 Quoting: Cavaignac

I am sure I have done more research than you. what is melting point of WTC steel? what is max. temp of jet fuel fire? I hear your mom calling you.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 55785855


Steel didn't melt it buckled so your question is pointless. Now go read the truth about Judy and Tracy.
 Quoting: Cavaignac

we all knew you would not answer a simple question. THE BUILDING TURNED TO DUST YOU FRAUD. how can steel turn to dust in 1 second or less? time for you to run and hide.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 55785855


It didnt turn to dust, stop watching nutjobs on youtube and actually go and look at the pictures of the wreckage.
The Game
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 55785855
United States
07/24/2014 01:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse
...

I am sure I have done more research than you. what is melting point of WTC steel? what is max. temp of jet fuel fire? I hear your mom calling you.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 55785855


Steel didn't melt it buckled so your question is pointless. Now go read the truth about Judy and Tracy.
 Quoting: Cavaignac

we all knew you would not answer a simple question. THE BUILDING TURNED TO DUST YOU FRAUD. how can steel turn to dust in 1 second or less? time for you to run and hide.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 55785855


It didnt turn to dust, stop watching nutjobs on youtube and actually go and look at the pictures of the wreckage.
 Quoting: Cavaignac

got hundreds of pictures. vids show towers turning to dust mid-air. you can lie about it all you want, everyone knows you are lying.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 55785855
United States
07/25/2014 08:46 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse
bump

yep. I knew I heard his mama calling his name
kybeam
User ID: 54698973
United States
07/26/2014 07:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse
Imagine the WTC as a large iron bird cage. Can you burn an iron bird cage until it warps? Can a aluminum plane full of fuel? All the concrete floors could have been removed and the cage would still be standing. It takes a torch to cut iron, not a fuel fire. How could an engine operate if the fuel burned hot enough to melt or disfigure the metal?
kybeam
User ID: 54698973
United States
07/26/2014 07:10 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse
Does anyone really think an aluminum airplane can penitrate several concrete walls and then disintegrate, dissappear into yards of soil, bring down large iron structures and even destroy a building that wasn't hit by anything?
If aluminum could do all that it did that day you could make aluminum bullets. Are there aluminum bullets?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 55785855
United States
07/29/2014 02:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 60856225
United States
07/29/2014 02:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse
The shillery is strong in this thread.

Quite frankly, a high school understanding of basic Newtonian principals disproves total collapse as it happened.

How can 15-20% of the mass falling downward, vaporize the remaining structure at near free fall velocity?

It can't, no impact or fire or weakening theory can explain how the entire building turned to dust with molten steel "like a foundry".

Shill elsewhere losers.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 37415179


Stop looking inward and look off world for an origin not of man made.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 60856225
United States
07/29/2014 02:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse
Does anyone really think an aluminum airplane can penitrate several concrete walls and then disintegrate, dissappear into yards of soil, bring down large iron structures and even destroy a building that wasn't hit by anything?
If aluminum could do all that it did that day you could make aluminum bullets. Are there aluminum bullets?
 Quoting: kybeam 54698973


lol....
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 219824
United States
07/29/2014 02:16 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse
It didnt turn to dust, stop watching nutjobs on youtube and actually go and look at the pictures of the wreckage.

 Quoting: Cavaignac


Explain how WTC 7 collapsed by controlled demolition, into its own footprint. You know, without being hit by a plane.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 52395565
United States
07/29/2014 02:20 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse
Not a real engineer... research the guy. can you point me to a real accredited professional civil engineer who claims that this was not a collapse from impact & fire? I have never seen one.

What I see is architects (not qualified), and other people who have a passing interest or some double major in some other type of engineering from 30 years ago, never practiced, etc.

Love to see something from someone credible - thanks.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 59022802



Well ... how about YOUR OWN EYES watching the video of WTC 7 coming down?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 219824
United States
07/29/2014 02:24 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse
Not a real engineer... research the guy. can you point me to a real accredited professional civil engineer who claims that this was not a collapse from impact & fire? I have never seen one.

What I see is architects (not qualified), and other people who have a passing interest or some double major in some other type of engineering from 30 years ago, never practiced, etc.

Love to see something from someone credible - thanks.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 59022802



Well ... how about YOUR OWN EYES watching the video of WTC 7 coming down?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 52395565


Better yet, coming down ten minutes after the BBC talking head announced it had collapsed, while it stood smoldering over her shoulder in the background. Then the Beeb had "technical difficulties" and "lost the satellite feed" after realizing the fuckup.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 45485322
United States
07/29/2014 02:25 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse
MIT engineer? That makes him some kind of authority? There are thousands of engineers from dozens of schools in this country but I'm certainly not going to blindly follow some goober's theory just because he went to MIT. Now, if you can show a pattern of thought from numerous engineers from a number of different schools, that's different.

Why do some people think that just because some guy has a degree from a well-known school that they are THE ONLY authority on the subject. Oh, but if it is in video form and posted on the Net it must be true?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 52395565
United States
07/29/2014 02:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse
Not a real engineer... research the guy. can you point me to a real accredited professional civil engineer who claims that this was not a collapse from impact & fire? I have never seen one.

What I see is architects (not qualified), and other people who have a passing interest or some double major in some other type of engineering from 30 years ago, never practiced, etc.

Love to see something from someone credible - thanks.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 59022802


You sound like a smart guy. Skeptical. It's good to be skeptical. It's good to base your beliefs on fact. And I agree with you that a lot of things that seem unusual actually have scientific explanations. However, \ I'm tripped up by the evidence of thermite in the wreckage, and by the video of WTC 7 coming down. I'm also tripped up by accounts of secret work being done on the building in the weeks leading up to 9/11.

Now consider the following. You don't have to believe that it was a conspiracy of the U.S. govt or Israel. You don't have to believe it was missiles not airplanes. You don't have to believe it was airplanes on remote control. You don't have to believe it was nuclear.

ALL you have to believe is that desperate situations sometimes require horrific decisions.

Those buildings were coming apart. People above the crash zones were doomed. No way to rescue them, they were dying of smoke inhalation and burns.

What was the worst case scenario? They could topple over. At 1300' feet tall (that's about 1/4 of a mile) each, potentially a 1/4 mile radius in lower Manhattan would've been incinerated. Tens of thousands of people killed, a firestorm started that could sweep uptown and destroy all of Manhattan.

Let's say that someone in their wisdom, at some point, had already instrumented those things to come down in their footprints. Against just such a scenario.

On that day a decision was made, and carried out. Of course no one can admit it. How could they?

News








We're dropping truth bombs like it's the end of days!