Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,081 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,119,664
Pageviews Today: 1,672,054Threads Today: 445Posts Today: 8,036
03:44 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject Rosetta Comet Orbiter -** Colourful Comet ** Cooking for Comets ** Dusty Spaceberg ** Search for Philae ** Landing sum up Vid ** Pictures* < 20V
Poster Handle Anonymous Coward
Post Content
Everything that Rosetta has found so far has falsified electric comet beliefs, here is a quick list:

That is wrong and you know it - where is your dirty snowball? Your desperation in trying to deflect away from this observation of 'no dirty snowball' says a lot about your scientific methodology.

What do you say to Holgar's Sierks declaration that 67p looks nothing like they expected - where is your "smooth hull shaped body" - predicted by classical theory.



A cold surface, not thousand of degrees.

Where has Plasma/Electrical theory predicted that comets should be thousands of degrees?

The specific prediction is that where electrical machining occurs on the cliffs and angular surfaces (that shouldn't be there in classical theory) high energy plasma events will take place. How does your dirty sublimating snowball produce X-Rays?

Why is Rosetta hotter than your dirty snowball prediction?

A porous dusty surface, not rock or iron.

All photographed comets have had the same rocky appearance, StarDust captured minerals in the comet tail that can only come from high temperature formation - how does your dirty snowball explain the presence of Olivine and other minerals found on rocky planets.

Early water emission, EC says comets are bone dry.

Water or OH- ions?

Icy patches on the surface, EC says comets are hot and dry.

No it doesn't it says comets are rocky bodies similar to asteroids. Which is what the pictures seem to show.


No sparky action, EC says Rosetta would have been destroyed by thousands of km long lightning boltzzz.


No it doesn't, there is a fundamental difference between a satellite slowly adjusting and coming into orbit where charges equalize and an impactor fired at thousands of mph from a distance.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 60853632


THIS ^^

OP is a astro shillple

i can't wait for the op to eat his words
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:



News