9/11 DEBATE CHALLENGE: Credentialed Professionals Need Only Apply

Another chance for unregistered Architect Richard Gageto line his pockets you mean?

Thread: Richard Gage Gives Himself A Near 7% Payrise

shillery (rhymes w/hillary LOL) will fail

"FAQ #6: Why does AE911Truth represent only a small percentage of architects and engineers?

AE911Truth accordingly places its spotlight on the evidence for the controlled demolition of the WTC skyscrapers, and asks that people not simply believe any explanation blindly, but rather, consider all of the pertinent facts according to the scientific method.

It should also be noted that the failure to condemn the official story by such a ‘majority’ should not be viewed as an endorsement of it. One should not assume that the individuals comprising the majority opinion have all been exposed to all the relevant information on the topic. For example, a recent survey revealed that 75% of New Yorkers had never seen video footage of the destruction of WTC Building 7. It’s also true that most architects and engineers know nothing at all about the third worst structural failure in modern history.

To illustrate, a general lack of knowledge about the explosive WTC evidence was displayed among A/E professionals at the September 11, 2011, NYC premiere of the AE911Truth film, "9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out," when an individual who held a professional engineer's license asked during the Q&A session why he had never heard of AE911Truth. An architect at the same screening was found in tears over the terrible implications of the evidence.

Fox News Channel host Geraldo Rivera expressed great surprise when he invited Tony Szamboti, a mechanical engineer and signer of the AE911Truth petition, on his program in late 2010. For years prior to that, Mr. Rivera was dismissive of the 9/11 truth movement, but stated that he was, "much more open-minded about it… due to the involvement of 9/11 family members and the 1,300 architects and engineers.” In reference to the Remember Building 7 campaign, he said:
"What caught my eye is their claim that more than 1,300 architects and engineers examined the evidence about Building 7 and disagree with the official report issued by the National Institute of Standards and Technology."
It is also important to note that during each of over 200 live presentations of the evidence detailed in our documentary, 9/11: Blueprint for Truth, a show of hands afterwards consistently revealed that at least 85% of those who were either unsure or who accepted the prevailing opinion about the Twin Towers’ destruction beforehand wound up agreeing with the evidence for controlled demolition after seeing it. "

[link to www.ae911truth.org]

There is no question that #7 was brought down with controlled demolition. Anyone, even without 'credentials' can clearly see that just with common sense.

A skyscraper does not collapse at free fall speed because it had a little camp fire burning in it. There were buildings closer to the towers that remained standing and they had more damage.

And it goes without saying that #7, being the archive records office for the FBI, IRS, major insurance companies, banks, etc...would make it a primary target by those who would do such a thing.

Bump because there is nothing more important than 9/11 truth.

"Jet fuel can't melt steel it's unpossible!!!"

- Michael Jerkoff's cousin in the Popular Mechanics article

con-man from hell.

Conspiracy crap is quite a profitable business.

FUCK AN A!

If anyone thinks 9/11 was real and not controlled demolition

then they are complete idiots

one doesn't have to be a ''credentialed professional'' to look at building 7 and the towers coming down to

see it was demolition...


All it takes is intelligence higher than 60 IQ warmed over

to know this was a false flag