Surely Ebola is more contagious than 1.9? | |
artMan User ID: 60231903 Sweden 08/20/2014 04:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
artMan User ID: 60231903 Sweden 08/20/2014 04:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
phillk6751 User ID: 3570422 United States 08/20/2014 05:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Obviously since I wasn't happy with the calculated ROI I decided to graph out the ROI line-by-line. I produced a graph and an Average (based on the assumption that a month has 30.5 days)... Here's a link to the album with screenshots: [link to imgur.com] ROI Average: 2.08 ROI Calculations per line item uses formula: (Number of new cases since last record / Days between records) Multiply 30.5 to get cases/month at current rate Add previous data total cases Then divide by previous data total cases to get the monthly infection rate. Basically: ([(#New / DateDiff) * 30.5] + [Last Rec Total]) / [Last Rec Total] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 20589235 United States 08/20/2014 05:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Agreed that it is still too early to get a good handle on the RO, but with that said it is definitely high enough to create an Major Epidemic in the areas where it is currently concentrated. The REAL question going forward is how well that Epidemic can be contained to those areas, particularly if it starts to really run. "IF" it can be virtually 100% contained to the three countries that currently have it embedded into their population then the disease will eventually burn itself out ... this is why everybody is jumping onto ANY potential cases that come out of those three countries. It would help the containment effort IF air travel was mostly cut off AND most road travel was also cut off into and out of the affected countries. Some trade would have to continue since the local population NEEDS FOOD and basic supplies, but limited trade via ocean freighters could serve that function (with freighter crews mostly kept isolated from the local populous when they are in port). We really won't know the answer to this problem for another 60 days UNLESS before then the disease runs the current blockade and gets a strong foothold elsewhere (ie: Lagos Nigeria is everybody's nightmare). |
phillk6751 User ID: 3570422 United States 08/20/2014 05:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yeah, unfortunately from looking at the official numbers and graphing them, something just plain doesn't seem right. The fact that the rate of infection doesn't seem to match whatsoever between the 3 major areas infected (Guinea, Liberia, Sierra Leone) and to a lesser degree Nigeria...something seems off. The cases vs deaths follow inverse patterns between Guinea and Liberia. (And Sierra Leone is a bit different too) This might indicate a genetic factor...whether it's the viral genetics or the human genetics we may never know....If I were to guess, I'd say we're dealing with 2-3 different strains of Ebola between those 3 countries. |
Zcat User ID: 27761196 United States 08/20/2014 06:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You should all get STEM from eclipse [link to www.eclipse.org] and use that. It is a good modelling tool. The ROI is unknown as its africa and they have shit for information handling. Def over 2. The fatality rate is also not 55%, it is 88% > Thread: Actual DEATH rate from CONFIRMED EBOLA ~88% - 1350 Dead now Zcat |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 43489392 United States 08/20/2014 09:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Meaning some people infect none others, whilst others infect more than 2 - it averages out that the infection rate is around 1.9. And it varies during outbreaks. Month one of an outbreak could be as high as 5 infected from one patient, then following months is less than one to balance out with the over all infection rate over time being 1.9. Averages and Exponential, two simple maths that humans find difficult to grasp. Its not their fault, its how the brain is wired to deal with other things. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 61931754 Germany 08/20/2014 09:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 60035161 United States 08/20/2014 09:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Adding a trendline to the ROI values that I posted yields: Quoting: phillk6751 ROI = .2987ln(x) + 1.6546 where X=1 is March 2014 Here's numbers for the remainder of the year: Month, Projected, ROI, New Proj ROI, New Proj Infections Aug-14 3101 1.934 2.190 3,510 Sep-14 5,507 1.776 2.236 6,933 Oct-14 10,446 1.897 2.276 12,532 Nov-14 19,814 1.897 2.311 24,139 Dec-14 37,584 1.897 2.342 46,412 I guess we wait and see where this data takes us. I'm not too happy with the Projected ROI because the raw ROI data used to make the log curve looks like a sideways enlongated S and not a log function yet...so this formula is likely to change dramatically, which is why i only provided 5 months of projections. Sounds about right to me. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 57728576 United States 08/21/2014 09:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Brady and two of his colleagues pooled available data to estimate how many doses would be required to fight the epidemic, identifying key risk groups that require help and looking at probable levels of exposure. They found "up to 30,000 people so far would have required experimental drugs and vaccines" in the current outbreak. [link to www.cnn.com] That's over ten times the reported number by WHO and that "SO FAR", increasingly probably hourly. Time to get the spread sheet out and redo the estimates. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 56144605 United States 08/21/2014 10:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | From statistical data on the Ebola 2014 Wiki page Quoting: Anonymous Coward 61480222 Average Death Rate: 0.611 Average Rate of Infection: 1.928 REALLY? One person infects only two people? It sure sounds like the numbers are a lot higher to me. If anyone can give evidence that this number is higher, please post here. in nigeria there are 20 cases of ebola from one patient/Patrick Sawyer this is within one month of his death in lagos |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 56144605 United States 08/21/2014 10:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 61480222 United States 08/21/2014 10:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Status right now: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 61931754 Guinea 579 cases396 deaths Sierra Leone 907 cases374 deaths Liberia 972 cases576 deaths Nigeria 15 cases4 deaths 5 deaths Nigeria 5th is a doctor they SAID WAS RECOVERED [link to theextinctionprotocol.wordpress.com] |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 61480222 United States 08/21/2014 10:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Get ready for a shocker! Read this: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57728576 Brady and two of his colleagues pooled available data to estimate how many doses would be required to fight the epidemic, identifying key risk groups that require help and looking at probable levels of exposure. They found "up to 30,000 people so far would have required experimental drugs and vaccines" in the current outbreak. [link to www.cnn.com] That's over ten times the reported number by WHO and that "SO FAR", increasingly probably hourly. Time to get the spread sheet out and redo the estimates. But vaccines kill anyway - if not be ebola - then by cancer. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 57728576 United States 08/21/2014 10:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Get ready for a shocker! Read this: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57728576 Brady and two of his colleagues pooled available data to estimate how many doses would be required to fight the epidemic, identifying key risk groups that require help and looking at probable levels of exposure. They found "up to 30,000 people so far would have required experimental drugs and vaccines" in the current outbreak. [link to www.cnn.com] That's over ten times the reported number by WHO and that "SO FAR", increasingly probably hourly. Time to get the spread sheet out and redo the estimates. But vaccines kill anyway - if not be ebola - then by cancer. Did you see what I wrote: The number given in the article is over ten times the reported number by WHO and that "SO FAR", increasingly probably hourly. |