How many of you Fappening supporters would change your tune if it was your daughter whose privacy was ripped from her against her will.

The tears of feminism taste so sweet to me...

its a psyop

So because someone earns their living doing something, that gives people the right to take it from them against their will? Your logic, it makes perfect sense.

Yes, we have less privacy than at any point in history. Does that give you the right to illegally obtain information about someone that they don't want you to have? Is that truly morally acceptable to you?

They may be just fucking actresses to you, but to their friends and family they are, you know, human beings. Just like you. Just like your daughter.

If I'm out in public not wearing a shirt, there's no reason why you shouldn't be looking at my tits, and it would clearly be stupid of me to try to force you not to look. If I'm out in public with a shirt on, there's no reason why you should be ripping my shirt off to look at my tits against my will..

Take her response into account. At the very least she is angry that she was violated, more likely she is so embarrassed and ashamed that she wants to commit suicide. I know I would be.

You don't think you'd care? I expected that a man would do anything to protect his daughter's honor, including beating the shit out of any man who thought he could violate her against her will in such a way..

I don't think I saw anyone being physically attacked against their will.

Also stop saying that we should all treat women like our daughters mothers or sisters. Let me explain something to you. If your dad treated your mom the same way he treated you we would be in serious trouble as a species. The whole Idea makes no fucking sense.

Ok Jennifer, we got it, you're upset, now let it go ffs....

Haha well I was hoping for enlightenment but I never found it. I suppose I won't, at least here anyway.

First of all, my daughter isn't a fucking whore that takes and posts nude pictures of herself and second........

Stupid bitches should know better than to think their shit is safe ANYWHERE!

Sorry, OP, lost cause.. It's hard for many of the men here to imagine having ANY stable relationship with a woman, let alone a daughter.

Do you mean if my daughter agreed to her boyfriend, at the time, taking sexual photos with her 100% consent?

And then releasing his private property, totally within the law?

Is that what you mean?

If someone doesn't want anyone to know who they are in their nudies, they shouldn't show their face. That's how I did it.

Don't be dense, you know what I mean. Of course you're going to treat your daughter differently than your wife when it comes to sex.. At least if you aren't into incest.

When it comes to respecting another human being enough not to steal their identity, I think saying treat a stranger as you would want them to treat your daughter is perfectly legit.

Also, do you understand the concept of identity theft? News flash, breaking into someone's personal account and stealing their photos is identity theft, and also illegal.

First of all, men enjoy taking pictures of themselves and sending them to women, does that make them whores? No, it makes them humans who enjoy sexual intimacy, just like women. Number of partners or your holier-than-thou judgmental attitude about that number has nothing to do with it. Would a virgin letting her husband take naughty pictures of her on their wedding night be a whore? By your standards.. yes.

Secondly, the person who committed the crime is the man, not the woman. Yes, the woman made the mistake of trusting the wrong man, but, at the end of the day it wasn't the woman who was in the wrong, she was just taken advantage of, it was the man posting those revenge pics who is in the wrong.

That is the point that nobody seems to be getting. At the end of the day the people who will be getting the blame are the victims, not the actual perpetrators.

Oh, those silly whores should have protected themselves.

and

These men are heroes for releasing this fapping material!

not

Wtf is wrong with these men for being douchebags and breaking the intimate trust that was placed on them.

There is a difference. You don't need to use the Cloud service, which allows you to access your photo database from various devices. This service makes it easier for someone to hack.

You can turn it off if you want to keep your photos isolated on a single device. You should turn it off if you are worried about someone breaching into your data. If all you have is benign photos and music files, then you probably don't care about then Cloud being on or off.

As any consumer of internet pornography, myself included, can tell you – where such hacks, authentic and staged, are now commonplace – there's something different about looking at images that were not intended for our consumption that separates them from the run-of-the-mill feelings of titillation we experience when looking at professional pornography. It feels like we've stolen a piece of the woman's soul.

It certainly doesn't hurt that in a case like this the photos themselves have literally been stolen. Whether through a reported iCloud security breach as seems to be the story here, hacking into someone's email, or the far more common, but no less violating, act of jilted lovers uploading photos whose safekeeping they were alone entrusted with, the end result is the same for the third party viewer: It's as if we've gotten something over on the woman. One need not furrow very deep into the comments sections under the current scandal to find evidence of this mindset. This particular cache of photos is regularly referred to as a “treasure trove,” or a “mother load,” or as a “win.” The currency in question is, of course, female sexuality, and not just the standard issue objectified variety, but rather specifically the purloined, unauthorized kind.

“When you're not supposed to see it, if it was given to somebody else,” he explained of the appeal of hacked photos. “...it's like you're taking away something from them. You judge them and compare yourself to them and feel better about yourself. It's all about what you're not supposed to be doing.”

As men, we get to have it both ways: chiding our partners into sending us images, heaping praise upon the bodies of women we find attractive who have done so (and brutally mocking those we don't), then turning around and castigating them as sluts when they actually comply and it better suits our narrative. A girlfriend who sends you a naked selfie is a hero to most men, until she doesn't want to do so anymore, at which point she's a whore who sends out naked photos of herself.

It all comes back to the question of access. Men, particularly younger men raised on a steady diet of sexting and amateur porn, feel entitled to the bodies of women.

But in this hunt we've lost track of what the sexiest thing about a woman is in the first place: her permission, her desire, her saying, to us, “yes.”

That's the exact opposite of what we're after when it comes to hacked photos. We thrill at violating her lack of permission, because the forbidden knowledge, the glimpse into her soul (through the lens of her breasts), is a rarer commodity.

We're seeing the performer as human, but we're only excited because she didn't want us to. The titillation factor doesn't come in her saying yes to the actual intended recipient of the photo, but because we know she's tacitly saying no to us, and yet we've beaten her.

We've beaten her.

It's not just a piece of her body we're after here, it's a piece of her soul.

I just don't understand why any woman would even want to have a picture of herself with c u m all over her face.

Other than porn stars who make a living doing it, I just don't get it. There is no way in hell my wife would let me take a picture of her that way. I don't think I would want to anyway.

Someone like jlaw earns millions making legit movies, so what was she thinking? I wont knock her for taking the facial, but then going that extra step and posing for a pic or "home movie" of that... its just beyond my comprehension. Especially this day and age of hacked celeb porn

First of all, men enjoy taking pictures of themselves and sending them to women, does that make them whores? No, it makes them humans who enjoy sexual intimacy, just like women. Number of partners or your holier-than-thou judgmental attitude about that number has nothing to do with it. Would a virgin letting her husband take naughty pictures of her on their wedding night be a whore? By your standards.. yes.

Secondly, the person who committed the crime is the man, not the woman. Yes, the woman made the mistake of trusting the wrong man, but, at the end of the day it wasn't the woman who was in the wrong, she was just taken advantage of, it was the man posting those revenge pics who is in the wrong.

That is the point that nobody seems to be getting. At the end of the day the people who will be getting the blame are the victims, not the actual perpetrators.

Oh, those silly whores should have protected themselves.

and

These men are heroes for releasing this fapping material!

not

Wtf is wrong with these men for being douchebags and breaking the intimate trust that was placed on them.

How would you know...you think your daughter is gonna say "hey dad wanna check out my tits and pussy I just captured with the new Iphone you purchased for me"...

Are u ignorant or just a literal inane dumbass...

And with your logic if I'm in my house and changing clothes but someone manages to somehow drill a peep whole or install some surveilance camera to spy on me then its my fault for thinking I was safe in the privacy of my own house...your the most ignorant individual ever...and unfortunatley your daughter will prolly so even worse s*** with a role model such as yourself...