Supporting articles, such as Red Cross team attacked are easily proven fakes.
[
link to abcnews.go.com]
Take a look at the article linked above, and then apply the B.S. filter.
There are six things that will be in an article of this type that is real. WHO, WHAT WHEN WHERE WHY and HOW. If you are missing any of the six, it is virtually assured to be fake.
1. WHO: They named no names. If the attack was real, the names of the people on the team would have been stated.
2. WHEN: They gave no time of the attack.
3. WHERE: No specific location, just a geographic region 100 miles across.
And, though they gave the what, "how", and why, which they had to to spin a lie, they did not give a good enough why in my opinion and provided NO PICTURES
PICTURES OF VANDALIZED CARS AND TERRIFIED RED CROSS WORKERS OR IT DID NOT HAPPEN. A stock photo of an Ebola sign DOES NOT CUT IT.
And about articles titled "I have never seen so many bodies before" PICTURES OR IT DID NOT HAPPEN, PERIOD END OF DISCUSSION