U.S. sending hundreds more troops to Africa, in addition to the 3,000 already announced to help ebola response - Page 2

Users Online Now: 1,287 (Who's On?)		Visitors Today: 295,923
Pageviews Today: 468,670	Threads Today: 169	Posts Today: 2,934
05:08 AM

Page 1 2 Bottom Search Replies Previous Page Next Page
Search Terms: Highlight Matches
U.S. sending hundreds more troops to Africa, in addition to the 3,000 already announced to help ebola response
Anonymous Coward User ID: 63034783 United States 10/02/2014 06:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: U.S. sending hundreds more troops to Africa, in addition to the 3,000 already announced to help ebola response this has got to improve americas image in the world and i think it makes sense, if ebola isn't controlled in africa it will inevitably beomce a pandemic for that matter if it continues to spread and persists the chance of a new more contagious form emerging is even greater
4thhorseman User ID: 15383548 United States 10/02/2014 06:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: U.S. sending hundreds more troops to Africa, in addition to the 3,000 already announced to help ebola response Sending more victims.. SICSEMPERTYRANIS Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum Vi veri universum vivus vici "There is nothing more deceptive than an obvious fact". Arthur Conan Doyle "Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth". Arthur Conan Doyle MOLON LABE [link to www.usavsus.info]
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29047130 United States 10/02/2014 06:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: U.S. sending hundreds more troops to Africa, in addition to the 3,000 already announced to help ebola response Fight it over there, rather than at home. Oh wait...
Anonymous Coward User ID: 62499745 United States 10/02/2014 06:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: U.S. sending hundreds more troops to Africa, in addition to the 3,000 already announced to help ebola response the only thing we should be bringing there are some cleansing fire bombs

Anonymous Coward User ID: 20983850 United States 10/02/2014 06:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: U.S. sending hundreds more troops to Africa, in addition to the 3,000 already announced to help ebola response I wonder how many of these troops are loyal to the Obama army and not to the USA.
Anonymous Coward User ID: 63529979 Canada 10/02/2014 06:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: U.S. sending hundreds more troops to Africa, in addition to the 3,000 already announced to help ebola response You cannot attach "BREAKING" to a story you didn't break asshole. You are essentially taking credit for someone else's work. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 63543377 I didn't add breaking to it you fool Quoting: < DL > Look at your title shit-for-brains. The honor of "breaking" goes to the person who wrote the story not some dim witted nut job on a conspiracy site that is copying the story. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 63543377 He is only letting us know there's been a breaking story in the news reTARD
Anonymous Coward User ID: 63529979 Canada 10/02/2014 06:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: U.S. sending hundreds more troops to Africa, in addition to the 3,000 already announced to help ebola response BREAKING: U.S. sending hundreds more troops to Africa, in addition to the 3,000 already announced, to help ebola response [link to twitter.com] Quoting: < DL > If they are going to do anything it should be shoot anyone boarding an airplane Other then that waste of time. Anyways they may be needed in the US way things are going.
Anonymous Coward User ID: 63540855 United States 10/02/2014 07:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: U.S. sending hundreds more troops to Africa, in addition to the 3,000 already announced to help ebola response BREAKING: U.S. sending hundreds more troops to Africa, in addition to the 3,000 already announced, to help ebola response [link to twitter.com] Quoting: < DL > Nice how we have troops to do everything but guard American soil. Pfffffft........ Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25710268
Anonymous Coward User ID: 6858912 United States 10/02/2014 08:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: U.S. sending hundreds more troops to Africa, in addition to the 3,000 already announced to help ebola response We are sending in troops to fight a disease.. what a joke. Its a war on ebola being controlled by a guy that wants ebola to win. Good god its insulting at this point. This is so stupid. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 55674029 And while you're at it... what better way to take out a standing strong army? Why would anyone subject your standing army to a deadly disease from a 3rd world country?? This is madness!!! Where's all those mission workers? The army's not supposed to be health care workers to a third world country! Quoting: ceawaves So true. Supposedly, those who have survived ebola, are immune to the disease for 10 years or more. Using this information, Africa should have it's own healthcare force to take care of the sick people since this disease has been there since 1976. They should have the immune people take care of the sick people, and maybe, just maybe, this would slow down the spread. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6858912 Since march of this year, There have been 3900 reported "confirmed" cases of Ebola in Africa. It was reported that 2000 died. Not knowing the ages of the survivors, I would guess at least 1500 of them were adults who are now immune. They should be caring for the sick. [link to www.cdc.gov] Going back to 2004, there would be about 100 more survivors. Which at this point would all be adults and able to be caretakers. These are the ones that should be helping in the "hotzone". At least they are less likely to become infected. Or better yet spread it to another country.
Page 1 2 Top Previous Page Next Page

GLP