Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,167 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 2,106,522
Pageviews Today: 2,926,999Threads Today: 696Posts Today: 13,869
10:08 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

BREAKING: Klayman files for deportation of Barack Obama

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 53966348
United States
10/04/2014 12:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: Klayman files for deportation of Barack Obama
WND EXCLUSIVE

 Quoting: Present and Aware


fight

FLUSH this excrement!!


.
Carnac The Magnificent

User ID: 63577067
United States
10/04/2014 12:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: Klayman files for deportation of Barack Obama
BWAHAHAHAH!!!

WND is now the ONION on Steroids.... STUPID Stories that are true.
Have a nice day = GFY. GFY = Go Fuck Yourself. If this offends you then have a nice day.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 39796034
United States
10/04/2014 01:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: Klayman files for deportation of Barack Obama
Barack Obama's mother was a US citizen. Even if you could prove he were born in Kenya, it wouldn't mean a damn thing.

Most important thing is for the Republicans to get a Senate majority and then find something to impeach him for or, failing that, wait until his term ends.

Enough of this Birther stuff. It's a useless distraction.
 Quoting: Getz


According to "his fake bc" his father is Kenyan so he can NOT be a natural born citizen but.. "maybe a citizen through his mother ( if she is his mother).

However his Indonesian papers say he is an Indonesian citizen and he took aid as a foreign student to attend college.

Connect the dots.
SW Fla Pirate

User ID: 57893461
United States
10/04/2014 01:10 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: Klayman files for deportation of Barack Obama
Orly Taitz filed a motion back in July, 2014 Emergency Application for Stay of Transportation of Illegal Aliens from the Southern District of Texas to California and Other Areas Around the Country Due to Serious Threat to Public Health, Spread of Infectious Diseases,

MOTION to Expedite due to Exigent Circumstances of Deadly Ebola Epidemic by Orly Taitz, filed.

[link to www.orlytaitzesq.com]


judge
Getz

User ID: 61930547
United States
10/04/2014 01:11 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: Klayman files for deportation of Barack Obama
Barack Obama's mother was a US citizen. Even if you could prove he were born in Kenya, it wouldn't mean a damn thing.

Most important thing is for the Republicans to get a Senate majority and then find something to impeach him for or, failing that, wait until his term ends.

Enough of this Birther stuff. It's a useless distraction.
 Quoting: Getz


According to "his fake bc" his father is Kenyan so he can NOT be a natural born citizen but.. "maybe a citizen through his mother ( if she is his mother).

However his Indonesian papers say he is an Indonesian citizen and he took aid as a foreign student to attend college.

Connect the dots.
 Quoting: NightWisp


I absolutely believe that Obama claimed to be a foreign citizen to get college tuition. However, no court has ever found that Obama is not a natural citizen for constitutional purposes and this is because none of his opponents in any presidential election ever challenged his claim that he is. The courts won't hear ANY suit from ANYBODY else. They've dismissed them all for lack of standing and will continue to do so.

Birthers simply can't understand that the courts do not want to rule on this or remove Obama from office because they know they can't.

Obama became president according to the Constitution and can only be removed from office as president as the Constitution prescribes.

It's no more complicated than that. You people can attack me all you want, but I've watched these cases closely and can affirmatively tell you that you're wasting your fucking time and engaging in delusional wishful thinking if you think some judge is just going to say, "Duur, Obama gotta leave da White House 'cause he not born in Hawaii!"
Galfeslaf

User ID: 58974470
United States
10/04/2014 01:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: Klayman files for deportation of Barack Obama
...


Jesus, you sound like a psychopath. You claim you dont like it, yet you argue ruthlessly for it. What the previous poster said was true.. we have a fraud. Are you some kind of corporate lawyer? The guy is not a president as per our constitution. What a way to cheer for the home team, ass.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 55674029


I despise Obama. Go search the site and you'll find plenty of my comments that demonstrate it.

Maybe he is a fraud, but NOBODY who has ever had standing to sue has ever done so. Since they didn't, he ran as a candidate and won.

Have you paid attention to any of the Birther lawsuits? Any single one? They keep getting dismissed for lack of standing. You know why? Because the courts won't involve themselves unless someone who is actually directly injured by running against Obama brings the suit.

Do you understand? The courts do not want to get involved in this and don't believe they can. They understand the Constitution and are all saying the same thing: You want to get rid of Obama? Congress has to do it, not us.

It amazes me that Birthers love to hold up the Constitution as the reason why Obama can't be president but ignore all the reasons why the Constitution says he is and how he must be removed from office.
 Quoting: Getz


Where does it say the President can be a non-natural born citizen, or that the role of President can devolve upon a non-natural born citizen? Why don't you read your toilet paper again. It is pretty clear about the matter - to the point of saying that whoever is in the line of succession may not even become President unless the are a natural born citizen. Pretty clearly prohibited if you ask me.
 Quoting: Galfeslaf


When have the courts ever defined what a "Natural Born Citizen" who is eligible to serve as president really is? I'll save you some time: they haven't. Maybe they should, but they never have.

The Democratic party determined that Obama was eligible, the Republican candidates in both 2008 and 2012 refused to claim he was not. No federal court has ruled that Obama is not a natural born citizen. Not ever.

The courts aren't going to touch it. In six years of these Birther lawsuits, the courts have dismissed them as fast as they can and they'll dismiss this one too. Even if the court in this case doesn't, they can't have Obama removed from office.

That's all I'm saying. This is all meaningless.
 Quoting: Getz


I see where you're coming from now. I think you are an accidental government shill. Meaning, you're intending to do good and be right regarding this subject, but you accept too many of the government and media's lies and false reasoning as truth. I've been there bro. So...sorry if what I say next hurts.

First off, federal judicial procedures and roles have been perverted and corrupted. I mean seriously...case law was introduced and accepted. Their reasoning is of no importance to anyone anymore. They pull a turd out of their butts and call it a diamond and we are then compelled to agree? Nah, bro.

Second, where in the Constitution does it say that it is not only the foundation of all laws and legal authority in the US, but it is also a dictionary? I believe it says that it was by, for and of the people. When they wrote it, they wrote it with the intent of everyone being able to understand it. Meaning, it is interpretable by the people as well. The people didn't need the Constitution to be a dictionary, because the words and terms used were well known, and if they were not well known, they could just look it up. The term "natural born citizen" was coined once and ever since then it has kept the same definition - all from "the Law of Nations" by Vattel.

But, if you do require the Constitution to be a dictionary or give a definition for each word it uses, then tell me from the Constitution what "Arms" are, or what "Privacy" is. Betcha can't find a definition in the Constituion. Does that mean that those words are meaningless and thus unenforcebale - having no legal weight?

Give me a break.

It's "WE THE PEOPLE" whose interpretation matters - as long as it is correct and not misguided by disinfo from propagandists. The interpretation that matters is not "ASSHAT PERVERTS IN ROBES, BETRAYING THEIR OATHS AND THEIR NATION BY PULLING INTERPRETATIONS OUT OF THEIR ASSES FOR THE BENEFIT OF A FEW".
Galfeslaf

User ID: 58974470
United States
10/04/2014 01:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: Klayman files for deportation of Barack Obama
...


I despise Obama. Go search the site and you'll find plenty of my comments that demonstrate it.

Maybe he is a fraud, but NOBODY who has ever had standing to sue has ever done so. Since they didn't, he ran as a candidate and won.

Have you paid attention to any of the Birther lawsuits? Any single one? They keep getting dismissed for lack of standing. You know why? Because the courts won't involve themselves unless someone who is actually directly injured by running against Obama brings the suit.

Do you understand? The courts do not want to get involved in this and don't believe they can. They understand the Constitution and are all saying the same thing: You want to get rid of Obama? Congress has to do it, not us.

It amazes me that Birthers love to hold up the Constitution as the reason why Obama can't be president but ignore all the reasons why the Constitution says he is and how he must be removed from office.
 Quoting: Getz


Where does it say the President can be a non-natural born citizen, or that the role of President can devolve upon a non-natural born citizen? Why don't you read your toilet paper again. It is pretty clear about the matter - to the point of saying that whoever is in the line of succession may not even become President unless the are a natural born citizen. Pretty clearly prohibited if you ask me.
 Quoting: Galfeslaf


When have the courts ever defined what a "Natural Born Citizen" who is eligible to serve as president really is? I'll save you some time: they haven't. Maybe they should, but they never have.

The Democratic party determined that Obama was eligible, the Republican candidates in both 2008 and 2012 refused to claim he was not. No federal court has ruled that Obama is not a natural born citizen. Not ever.

The courts aren't going to touch it. In six years of these Birther lawsuits, the courts have dismissed them as fast as they can and they'll dismiss this one too. Even if the court in this case doesn't, they can't have Obama removed from office.

That's all I'm saying. This is all meaningless.
 Quoting: Getz


I see where you're coming from now. I think you are an accidental government shill. Meaning, you're intending to do good and be right regarding this subject, but you accept too many of the government and media's lies and false reasoning as truth. I've been there bro. So...sorry if what I say next hurts.

First off, federal judicial procedures and roles have been perverted and corrupted. I mean seriously...case law was introduced and accepted. Their reasoning is of no importance to anyone anymore. They pull a turd out of their butts and call it a diamond and we are then compelled to agree? Nah, bro.

Second, where in the Constitution does it say that it is not only the foundation of all laws and legal authority in the US, but it is also a dictionary? I believe it says that it was by, for and of the people. When they wrote it, they wrote it with the intent of everyone being able to understand it. Meaning, it is interpretable by the people as well. The people didn't need the Constitution to be a dictionary, because the words and terms used were well known, and if they were not well known, they could just look it up. The term "natural born citizen" was coined once and ever since then it has kept the same definition - all from "the Law of Nations" by Vattel.

But, if you do require the Constitution to be a dictionary or give a definition for each word it uses, then tell me from the Constitution what "Arms" are, or what "Privacy" is. Betcha can't find a definition in the Constituion. Does that mean that those words are meaningless and thus unenforcebale - having no legal weight?

Give me a break.

It's "WE THE PEOPLE" whose interpretation matters - as long as it is correct and not misguided by disinfo from propagandists. The interpretation that matters is not "ASSHAT PERVERTS IN ROBES, BETRAYING THEIR OATHS AND THEIR NATION BY PULLING INTERPRETATIONS OUT OF THEIR ASSES FOR THE BENEFIT OF A FEW".
 Quoting: Galfeslaf


Oh...another mistake you made is believing that Obama's "opponents" would challenge his legitimacy to become President. Why would they? They're all playing on the same team, against the people....and they had legitimacy problems of their own. McCain isn't a natural born citizen and neither is Romney. If you're still not convinced that they're in on this together, consider the next spotlighted candidates from the Republican side: Cruz and Rubio...possible Jindall as well. All non-natural born citizens. There's a plan here dude. Lastly, if that didn't cook your potatoes, think about the reason why no one on the right challenged his legitimacy in any kind of official way. If Obama is - according to the Right - so terrible, why not press the easy button and ensure he doesn't get into the White House or is removed once he's there?
Getz

User ID: 61930547
United States
10/04/2014 01:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: Klayman files for deportation of Barack Obama
...


I despise Obama. Go search the site and you'll find plenty of my comments that demonstrate it.

Maybe he is a fraud, but NOBODY who has ever had standing to sue has ever done so. Since they didn't, he ran as a candidate and won.

Have you paid attention to any of the Birther lawsuits? Any single one? They keep getting dismissed for lack of standing. You know why? Because the courts won't involve themselves unless someone who is actually directly injured by running against Obama brings the suit.

Do you understand? The courts do not want to get involved in this and don't believe they can. They understand the Constitution and are all saying the same thing: You want to get rid of Obama? Congress has to do it, not us.

It amazes me that Birthers love to hold up the Constitution as the reason why Obama can't be president but ignore all the reasons why the Constitution says he is and how he must be removed from office.
 Quoting: Getz


Where does it say the President can be a non-natural born citizen, or that the role of President can devolve upon a non-natural born citizen? Why don't you read your toilet paper again. It is pretty clear about the matter - to the point of saying that whoever is in the line of succession may not even become President unless the are a natural born citizen. Pretty clearly prohibited if you ask me.
 Quoting: Galfeslaf


When have the courts ever defined what a "Natural Born Citizen" who is eligible to serve as president really is? I'll save you some time: they haven't. Maybe they should, but they never have.

The Democratic party determined that Obama was eligible, the Republican candidates in both 2008 and 2012 refused to claim he was not. No federal court has ruled that Obama is not a natural born citizen. Not ever.

The courts aren't going to touch it. In six years of these Birther lawsuits, the courts have dismissed them as fast as they can and they'll dismiss this one too. Even if the court in this case doesn't, they can't have Obama removed from office.

That's all I'm saying. This is all meaningless.
 Quoting: Getz


I see where you're coming from now. I think you are an accidental government shill. Meaning, you're intending to do good and be right regarding this subject, but you accept too many of the government and media's lies and false reasoning as truth. I've been there bro. So...sorry if what I say next hurts.

First off, federal judicial procedures and roles have been perverted and corrupted. I mean seriously...case law was introduced and accepted. Their reasoning is of no importance to anyone anymore. They pull a turd out of their butts and call it a diamond and we are then compelled to agree? Nah, bro.

Second, where in the Constitution does it say that it is not only the foundation of all laws and legal authority in the US, but it is also a dictionary? I believe it says that it was by, for and of the people. When they wrote it, they wrote it with the intent of everyone being able to understand it. Meaning, it is interpretable by the people as well. The people didn't need the Constitution to be a dictionary, because the words and terms used were well known, and if they were not well known, they could just look it up. The term "natural born citizen" was coined once and ever since then it has kept the same definition - all from "the Law of Nations" by Vattel.

But, if you do require the Constitution to be a dictionary or give a definition for each word it uses, then tell me from the Constitution what "Arms" are, or what "Privacy" is. Betcha can't find a definition in the Constituion. Does that mean that those words are meaningless and thus unenforcebale - having no legal weight?

Give me a break.

It's "WE THE PEOPLE" whose interpretation matters - as long as it is correct and not misguided by disinfo from propagandists. The interpretation that matters is not "ASSHAT PERVERTS IN ROBES, BETRAYING THEIR OATHS AND THEIR NATION BY PULLING INTERPRETATIONS OUT OF THEIR ASSES FOR THE BENEFIT OF A FEW".
 Quoting: Galfeslaf


How can I be an "accidental shill"? Either you think I'm paid to advance the government's interests or I'm not.

Let's go point by point on what you said, besides that...

First: "federal judicial procedures and roles have been perverted and corrupted."

Okay, then why do Birthers think that the federal judiciary is going to do a damn thing to get rid of Obama?

Second: "where in the Constitution does it say that it is not only the foundation of all laws and legal authority in the US, but it is also a dictionary?"

It doesn't say it's a dictionary. The judiciary has to determine what the Founder's intent was when there is doubt about interpreting the Constitution (see Article 3)--when they choose to hear a case, that is. In the case of Obama's citizenship, the federal judiciary has refused to hear the evidence and affirmatively say that Barack Obama isn't eligible to be president. They never will and so he is.

Then there's this quote: "ASSHAT PERVERTS IN ROBES, BETRAYING THEIR OATHS AND THEIR NATION BY PULLING INTERPRETATIONS OUT OF THEIR ASSES FOR THE BENEFIT OF A FEW".

Again: Why would you expect the courts to resolve what only Congress can under the Constitution if this is what you think of them?
Getz

User ID: 61930547
United States
10/04/2014 01:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: Klayman files for deportation of Barack Obama
Your next point: "Oh...another mistake you made is believing that Obama's "opponents" would challenge his legitimacy to become President. Why would they?"

I didn't speculate on that.

I only noted that they're probably the only people who had standing in court to do so and they didn't. The federal courts have rules about what cases they will hear, what evidence they will admit, and all that.

The ONLY point I've stuck to is that the courts will not rule against Obama's legitimacy and even if they did, they cannot remove him from office under the Constitution.

Birthers are masturbating because they keep trying to get the courts to undo the 2008 and 2012 elections. It can't happen. Obama can only be removed through impeachment; before the end of his term, that is.
Galfeslaf

User ID: 58974470
United States
10/04/2014 02:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: Klayman files for deportation of Barack Obama
...


Where does it say the President can be a non-natural born citizen, or that the role of President can devolve upon a non-natural born citizen? Why don't you read your toilet paper again. It is pretty clear about the matter - to the point of saying that whoever is in the line of succession may not even become President unless the are a natural born citizen. Pretty clearly prohibited if you ask me.
 Quoting: Galfeslaf


When have the courts ever defined what a "Natural Born Citizen" who is eligible to serve as president really is? I'll save you some time: they haven't. Maybe they should, but they never have.

The Democratic party determined that Obama was eligible, the Republican candidates in both 2008 and 2012 refused to claim he was not. No federal court has ruled that Obama is not a natural born citizen. Not ever.

The courts aren't going to touch it. In six years of these Birther lawsuits, the courts have dismissed them as fast as they can and they'll dismiss this one too. Even if the court in this case doesn't, they can't have Obama removed from office.

That's all I'm saying. This is all meaningless.
 Quoting: Getz


I see where you're coming from now. I think you are an accidental government shill. Meaning, you're intending to do good and be right regarding this subject, but you accept too many of the government and media's lies and false reasoning as truth. I've been there bro. So...sorry if what I say next hurts.

First off, federal judicial procedures and roles have been perverted and corrupted. I mean seriously...case law was introduced and accepted. Their reasoning is of no importance to anyone anymore. They pull a turd out of their butts and call it a diamond and we are then compelled to agree? Nah, bro.

Second, where in the Constitution does it say that it is not only the foundation of all laws and legal authority in the US, but it is also a dictionary? I believe it says that it was by, for and of the people. When they wrote it, they wrote it with the intent of everyone being able to understand it. Meaning, it is interpretable by the people as well. The people didn't need the Constitution to be a dictionary, because the words and terms used were well known, and if they were not well known, they could just look it up. The term "natural born citizen" was coined once and ever since then it has kept the same definition - all from "the Law of Nations" by Vattel.

But, if you do require the Constitution to be a dictionary or give a definition for each word it uses, then tell me from the Constitution what "Arms" are, or what "Privacy" is. Betcha can't find a definition in the Constituion. Does that mean that those words are meaningless and thus unenforcebale - having no legal weight?

Give me a break.

It's "WE THE PEOPLE" whose interpretation matters - as long as it is correct and not misguided by disinfo from propagandists. The interpretation that matters is not "ASSHAT PERVERTS IN ROBES, BETRAYING THEIR OATHS AND THEIR NATION BY PULLING INTERPRETATIONS OUT OF THEIR ASSES FOR THE BENEFIT OF A FEW".
 Quoting: Galfeslaf


How can I be an "accidental shill"? Either you think I'm paid to advance the government's interests or I'm not.

Let's go point by point on what you said, besides that...

First: "federal judicial procedures and roles have been perverted and corrupted."

Okay, then why do Birthers think that the federal judiciary is going to do a damn thing to get rid of Obama?

Second: "where in the Constitution does it say that it is not only the foundation of all laws and legal authority in the US, but it is also a dictionary?"

It doesn't say it's a dictionary. The judiciary has to determine what the Founder's intent was when there is doubt about interpreting the Constitution (see Article 3)--when they choose to hear a case, that is. In the case of Obama's citizenship, the federal judiciary has refused to hear the evidence and affirmatively say that Barack Obama isn't eligible to be president. They never will and so he is.

Then there's this quote: "ASSHAT PERVERTS IN ROBES, BETRAYING THEIR OATHS AND THEIR NATION BY PULLING INTERPRETATIONS OUT OF THEIR ASSES FOR THE BENEFIT OF A FEW".

Again: Why would you expect the courts to resolve what only Congress can under the Constitution if this is what you think of them?
 Quoting: Getz


I don't expect them to. Just because judges say something doesn't mean I am going to accept their judgement as fact or law. He is not the President. Put 1 million judges in from of me to tell me he is the President, and I'll tell those million judges how wrong they are. "Interpreting" the Constitution does not mean "Interpreting" in a creative way. It quite literally means "interpret". Like, look up the words in a damn book and apply logic. Like you might "interpret" a foreign language. There is no creative, progressive factor there. It is not afforded them. Otherwise, they are dicatators.

Also, "shill":
1 a :  one who acts as a decoy (as for a pitchman or gambler)b :  one who makes a sales pitch or serves as a promoter 

Doesn't say anything about payment being required, Mr. Promoter.
Getz

User ID: 61930547
United States
10/04/2014 02:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: Klayman files for deportation of Barack Obama
...


When have the courts ever defined what a "Natural Born Citizen" who is eligible to serve as president really is? I'll save you some time: they haven't. Maybe they should, but they never have.

The Democratic party determined that Obama was eligible, the Republican candidates in both 2008 and 2012 refused to claim he was not. No federal court has ruled that Obama is not a natural born citizen. Not ever.

The courts aren't going to touch it. In six years of these Birther lawsuits, the courts have dismissed them as fast as they can and they'll dismiss this one too. Even if the court in this case doesn't, they can't have Obama removed from office.

That's all I'm saying. This is all meaningless.
 Quoting: Getz


I see where you're coming from now. I think you are an accidental government shill. Meaning, you're intending to do good and be right regarding this subject, but you accept too many of the government and media's lies and false reasoning as truth. I've been there bro. So...sorry if what I say next hurts.

First off, federal judicial procedures and roles have been perverted and corrupted. I mean seriously...case law was introduced and accepted. Their reasoning is of no importance to anyone anymore. They pull a turd out of their butts and call it a diamond and we are then compelled to agree? Nah, bro.

Second, where in the Constitution does it say that it is not only the foundation of all laws and legal authority in the US, but it is also a dictionary? I believe it says that it was by, for and of the people. When they wrote it, they wrote it with the intent of everyone being able to understand it. Meaning, it is interpretable by the people as well. The people didn't need the Constitution to be a dictionary, because the words and terms used were well known, and if they were not well known, they could just look it up. The term "natural born citizen" was coined once and ever since then it has kept the same definition - all from "the Law of Nations" by Vattel.

But, if you do require the Constitution to be a dictionary or give a definition for each word it uses, then tell me from the Constitution what "Arms" are, or what "Privacy" is. Betcha can't find a definition in the Constituion. Does that mean that those words are meaningless and thus unenforcebale - having no legal weight?

Give me a break.

It's "WE THE PEOPLE" whose interpretation matters - as long as it is correct and not misguided by disinfo from propagandists. The interpretation that matters is not "ASSHAT PERVERTS IN ROBES, BETRAYING THEIR OATHS AND THEIR NATION BY PULLING INTERPRETATIONS OUT OF THEIR ASSES FOR THE BENEFIT OF A FEW".
 Quoting: Galfeslaf


How can I be an "accidental shill"? Either you think I'm paid to advance the government's interests or I'm not.

Let's go point by point on what you said, besides that...

First: "federal judicial procedures and roles have been perverted and corrupted."

Okay, then why do Birthers think that the federal judiciary is going to do a damn thing to get rid of Obama?

Second: "where in the Constitution does it say that it is not only the foundation of all laws and legal authority in the US, but it is also a dictionary?"

It doesn't say it's a dictionary. The judiciary has to determine what the Founder's intent was when there is doubt about interpreting the Constitution (see Article 3)--when they choose to hear a case, that is. In the case of Obama's citizenship, the federal judiciary has refused to hear the evidence and affirmatively say that Barack Obama isn't eligible to be president. They never will and so he is.

Then there's this quote: "ASSHAT PERVERTS IN ROBES, BETRAYING THEIR OATHS AND THEIR NATION BY PULLING INTERPRETATIONS OUT OF THEIR ASSES FOR THE BENEFIT OF A FEW".

Again: Why would you expect the courts to resolve what only Congress can under the Constitution if this is what you think of them?
 Quoting: Getz


I don't expect them to. Just because judges say something doesn't mean I am going to accept their judgement as fact or law. He is not the President. Put 1 million judges in from of me to tell me he is the President, and I'll tell those million judges how wrong they are. "Interpreting" the Constitution does not mean "Interpreting" in a creative way. It quite literally means "interpret". Like, look up the words in a damn book and apply logic. Like you might "interpret" a foreign language. There is no creative, progressive factor there. It is not afforded them. Otherwise, they are dicatators.

Also, "shill":
1 a :  one who acts as a decoy (as for a pitchman or gambler)b :  one who makes a sales pitch or serves as a promoter 

Doesn't say anything about payment being required, Mr. Promoter.
 Quoting: Galfeslaf



You don't believe he's really the president. Great. How do you remove him from the White House unless Congress acts?

The only thing you're telling me is that you more or less agree with me that the courts won't remove Obama from office. You think the courts are corrupt. Fine. I'm not arguing with that. One way or another, I'm saying that they aren't going to rule on Obama's legitimacy or remove him from office.

You don't seem to be disagreeing with me on this, except for the fact that you're mad that I'm explaining why they won't.

What are you arguing about then?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 39647545
United States
10/04/2014 02:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: Klayman files for deportation of Barack Obama
It's a useless distraction.
 Quoting: Getz


Just like everything else on this site.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 55674029


See ya! The Huffington Post wants more folks like you on their website anyway. Go home!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 59961878
United States
10/04/2014 02:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: Klayman files for deportation of Barack Obama
How the fuck does one sue the taliban and AQ??
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 62688429
United States
10/04/2014 02:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: Klayman files for deportation of Barack Obama
What an idiot.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17894339
United States
10/04/2014 02:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: Klayman files for deportation of Barack Obama
4 Simple Questions

1.Back in 1961 people of color were called 'Negroes.'So how can the Obama 'birth certificate' state he is "African-American" when the term wasn't even used at that time ?

2.The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama's birth as August 4, 1961 & Lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, Right ? At the time of Obama's birth, it also shows that his father is aged 25 years old, and that Obama's father was born in "Kenya , East Africa ".
This wouldn't seem like anything of concern, except the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama's birth, and 27 years after his father's birth. How could Obama's father have been born in a country that did not yet Exist? Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the "British East Africa Protectorate". (check it below)
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

3.On the Birth Certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is "Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital".
This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called "KauiKeolani Children's Hospital" and "Kapi'olani Maternity Home", Respectively.
The name did not change to Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged.
How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978 ?
(CHECK IT BELOW)
[link to http]
( [link to www.kapiolani.org]

4. Perhaps a clue comes from Obama's book on his father. He states how proud he is of his father fighting in WW II. I'm not a math genius, so I may need some help from you. Barack Obama's "birth certificate" says his father was 25 years old in 1961 when Obama was born. That should have put his father's date of birth approximately 1936-if my math holds (Honest! I did That without a calculator!!!) Now we need a non-revised history book-one that hasn't been altered to satisfy the author's goals-to verify that WW II was basically between 1939 and 1945. Just how many 3 year olds fight in Wars? Even in the latest stages of WW II his father wouldn't have been more than 9 years old. Does that mean that Mr. Obama is a liar, or simply chooses to alter the facts to satisfy his imagination or political purposes ?
Galfeslaf

User ID: 58974470
United States
10/04/2014 02:40 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: Klayman files for deportation of Barack Obama
...


I see where you're coming from now. I think you are an accidental government shill. Meaning, you're intending to do good and be right regarding this subject, but you accept too many of the government and media's lies and false reasoning as truth. I've been there bro. So...sorry if what I say next hurts.

First off, federal judicial procedures and roles have been perverted and corrupted. I mean seriously...case law was introduced and accepted. Their reasoning is of no importance to anyone anymore. They pull a turd out of their butts and call it a diamond and we are then compelled to agree? Nah, bro.

Second, where in the Constitution does it say that it is not only the foundation of all laws and legal authority in the US, but it is also a dictionary? I believe it says that it was by, for and of the people. When they wrote it, they wrote it with the intent of everyone being able to understand it. Meaning, it is interpretable by the people as well. The people didn't need the Constitution to be a dictionary, because the words and terms used were well known, and if they were not well known, they could just look it up. The term "natural born citizen" was coined once and ever since then it has kept the same definition - all from "the Law of Nations" by Vattel.

But, if you do require the Constitution to be a dictionary or give a definition for each word it uses, then tell me from the Constitution what "Arms" are, or what "Privacy" is. Betcha can't find a definition in the Constituion. Does that mean that those words are meaningless and thus unenforcebale - having no legal weight?

Give me a break.

It's "WE THE PEOPLE" whose interpretation matters - as long as it is correct and not misguided by disinfo from propagandists. The interpretation that matters is not "ASSHAT PERVERTS IN ROBES, BETRAYING THEIR OATHS AND THEIR NATION BY PULLING INTERPRETATIONS OUT OF THEIR ASSES FOR THE BENEFIT OF A FEW".
 Quoting: Galfeslaf


How can I be an "accidental shill"? Either you think I'm paid to advance the government's interests or I'm not.

Let's go point by point on what you said, besides that...

First: "federal judicial procedures and roles have been perverted and corrupted."

Okay, then why do Birthers think that the federal judiciary is going to do a damn thing to get rid of Obama?

Second: "where in the Constitution does it say that it is not only the foundation of all laws and legal authority in the US, but it is also a dictionary?"

It doesn't say it's a dictionary. The judiciary has to determine what the Founder's intent was when there is doubt about interpreting the Constitution (see Article 3)--when they choose to hear a case, that is. In the case of Obama's citizenship, the federal judiciary has refused to hear the evidence and affirmatively say that Barack Obama isn't eligible to be president. They never will and so he is.

Then there's this quote: "ASSHAT PERVERTS IN ROBES, BETRAYING THEIR OATHS AND THEIR NATION BY PULLING INTERPRETATIONS OUT OF THEIR ASSES FOR THE BENEFIT OF A FEW".

Again: Why would you expect the courts to resolve what only Congress can under the Constitution if this is what you think of them?
 Quoting: Getz


I don't expect them to. Just because judges say something doesn't mean I am going to accept their judgement as fact or law. He is not the President. Put 1 million judges in from of me to tell me he is the President, and I'll tell those million judges how wrong they are. "Interpreting" the Constitution does not mean "Interpreting" in a creative way. It quite literally means "interpret". Like, look up the words in a damn book and apply logic. Like you might "interpret" a foreign language. There is no creative, progressive factor there. It is not afforded them. Otherwise, they are dicatators.

Also, "shill":
1 a :  one who acts as a decoy (as for a pitchman or gambler)b :  one who makes a sales pitch or serves as a promoter 

Doesn't say anything about payment being required, Mr. Promoter.
 Quoting: Galfeslaf



You don't believe he's really the president. Great. How do you remove him from the White House unless Congress acts?

The only thing you're telling me is that you more or less agree with me that the courts won't remove Obama from office. You think the courts are corrupt. Fine. I'm not arguing with that. One way or another, I'm saying that they aren't going to rule on Obama's legitimacy or remove him from office.

You don't seem to be disagreeing with me on this, except for the fact that you're mad that I'm explaining why they won't.

What are you arguing about then?
 Quoting: Getz


I think we had a problem in communication. I assumed that when you said Obama IS President, because of xyz, courts blah blah, that you were saying he was President de jure, when in fact you were really saying he was just President, de facto. I just have a hard time calling him President if he isn't legally so. He may act as President, but he is prohibited to be President according to the highest law in the land....that's just why I thought we were talking about the de jure side of things, sonce that's what matters legally.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 6179162
United States
10/04/2014 02:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: Klayman files for deportation of Barack Obama
It's a useless distraction.
 Quoting: Getz


Just like everything else on this site.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 55674029


Bullshit!

Deport this Muslim pig now!

Him and his tranny wife, Michael Robinson, football jock with a big cock.....right up Obama's ass every night
Getz

User ID: 61930547
United States
10/04/2014 02:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: Klayman files for deportation of Barack Obama
4 Simple Questions

1.Back in 1961 people of color were called 'Negroes.'So how can the Obama 'birth certificate' state he is "African-American" when the term wasn't even used at that time ?

2.The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama's birth as August 4, 1961 & Lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, Right ? At the time of Obama's birth, it also shows that his father is aged 25 years old, and that Obama's father was born in "Kenya , East Africa ".
This wouldn't seem like anything of concern, except the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama's birth, and 27 years after his father's birth. How could Obama's father have been born in a country that did not yet Exist? Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the "British East Africa Protectorate". (check it below)
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

3.On the Birth Certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is "Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital".
This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called "KauiKeolani Children's Hospital" and "Kapi'olani Maternity Home", Respectively.
The name did not change to Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged.
How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978 ?
(CHECK IT BELOW)
[link to http]
( [link to www.kapiolani.org]

4. Perhaps a clue comes from Obama's book on his father. He states how proud he is of his father fighting in WW II. I'm not a math genius, so I may need some help from you. Barack Obama's "birth certificate" says his father was 25 years old in 1961 when Obama was born. That should have put his father's date of birth approximately 1936-if my math holds (Honest! I did That without a calculator!!!) Now we need a non-revised history book-one that hasn't been altered to satisfy the author's goals-to verify that WW II was basically between 1939 and 1945. Just how many 3 year olds fight in Wars? Even in the latest stages of WW II his father wouldn't have been more than 9 years old. Does that mean that Mr. Obama is a liar, or simply chooses to alter the facts to satisfy his imagination or political purposes ?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17894339


These were all debunked before Obama was even elected.

1. Obama's provided birth certificate does NOT say "African American" anywhere on it. Look for yourself: [link to www.bing.com]

2. Kenya was the name of the British colony in 1961. It was called "Kenya". In fact, Kenya participated in the 1956 and 1960 Olympics as "Kenya".

3. The hospital was really called the "Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital" in 1961. I have never found any proof that it wasn't.

4. Obama is an idiot who plays loose with facts and often says dumb shit despite his reputation as a great speech-giver. His mother's father fought in WW2, not his father. Obama also once wrongly claimed that his uncle was one of the soldiers who liberated Auschwitz (it was Buchenwald). Neither of those goofs mean he wasn't born in Hawaii to an American citizen mother.
Getz

User ID: 61930547
United States
10/04/2014 02:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: Klayman files for deportation of Barack Obama
...


How can I be an "accidental shill"? Either you think I'm paid to advance the government's interests or I'm not.

Let's go point by point on what you said, besides that...

First: "federal judicial procedures and roles have been perverted and corrupted."

Okay, then why do Birthers think that the federal judiciary is going to do a damn thing to get rid of Obama?

Second: "where in the Constitution does it say that it is not only the foundation of all laws and legal authority in the US, but it is also a dictionary?"

It doesn't say it's a dictionary. The judiciary has to determine what the Founder's intent was when there is doubt about interpreting the Constitution (see Article 3)--when they choose to hear a case, that is. In the case of Obama's citizenship, the federal judiciary has refused to hear the evidence and affirmatively say that Barack Obama isn't eligible to be president. They never will and so he is.

Then there's this quote: "ASSHAT PERVERTS IN ROBES, BETRAYING THEIR OATHS AND THEIR NATION BY PULLING INTERPRETATIONS OUT OF THEIR ASSES FOR THE BENEFIT OF A FEW".

Again: Why would you expect the courts to resolve what only Congress can under the Constitution if this is what you think of them?
 Quoting: Getz


I don't expect them to. Just because judges say something doesn't mean I am going to accept their judgement as fact or law. He is not the President. Put 1 million judges in from of me to tell me he is the President, and I'll tell those million judges how wrong they are. "Interpreting" the Constitution does not mean "Interpreting" in a creative way. It quite literally means "interpret". Like, look up the words in a damn book and apply logic. Like you might "interpret" a foreign language. There is no creative, progressive factor there. It is not afforded them. Otherwise, they are dicatators.

Also, "shill":
1 a :  one who acts as a decoy (as for a pitchman or gambler)b :  one who makes a sales pitch or serves as a promoter 

Doesn't say anything about payment being required, Mr. Promoter.
 Quoting: Galfeslaf



You don't believe he's really the president. Great. How do you remove him from the White House unless Congress acts?

The only thing you're telling me is that you more or less agree with me that the courts won't remove Obama from office. You think the courts are corrupt. Fine. I'm not arguing with that. One way or another, I'm saying that they aren't going to rule on Obama's legitimacy or remove him from office.

You don't seem to be disagreeing with me on this, except for the fact that you're mad that I'm explaining why they won't.

What are you arguing about then?
 Quoting: Getz


I think we had a problem in communication. I assumed that when you said Obama IS President, because of xyz, courts blah blah, that you were saying he was President de jure, when in fact you were really saying he was just President, de facto. I just have a hard time calling him President if he isn't legally so. He may act as President, but he is prohibited to be President according to the highest law in the land....that's just why I thought we were talking about the de jure side of things, sonce that's what matters legally.
 Quoting: Galfeslaf


I'm saying he's President because of the Constitution and that he can only legally be removed from office by Constitutional means.

But sure, we can say "de facto". That's reasonable.

Blame McCain and Romney for not suing him on Article II grounds.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 55628693
Netherlands
10/04/2014 02:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: Klayman files for deportation of Barack Obama
Im still trying to figure out why this scumbag was voted in anyway.

Citizen are the ones that voted for him...its there own fault. And since I voted for Romney.

We live...we learn..oh well. whatever

NEXT UP: Nuclear Holocaust ::sarcasm::
 Quoting: Obtrice1985


He most likely was never voted in.

Under oath was admitted that voting machines are rigged.

During bush

You americans are being had every time you think you are serving democracy

WAKE UP
Galfeslaf

User ID: 58974470
United States
10/04/2014 03:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: Klayman files for deportation of Barack Obama
...


I don't expect them to. Just because judges say something doesn't mean I am going to accept their judgement as fact or law. He is not the President. Put 1 million judges in from of me to tell me he is the President, and I'll tell those million judges how wrong they are. "Interpreting" the Constitution does not mean "Interpreting" in a creative way. It quite literally means "interpret". Like, look up the words in a damn book and apply logic. Like you might "interpret" a foreign language. There is no creative, progressive factor there. It is not afforded them. Otherwise, they are dicatators.

Also, "shill":
1 a :  one who acts as a decoy (as for a pitchman or gambler)b :  one who makes a sales pitch or serves as a promoter 

Doesn't say anything about payment being required, Mr. Promoter.
 Quoting: Galfeslaf



You don't believe he's really the president. Great. How do you remove him from the White House unless Congress acts?

The only thing you're telling me is that you more or less agree with me that the courts won't remove Obama from office. You think the courts are corrupt. Fine. I'm not arguing with that. One way or another, I'm saying that they aren't going to rule on Obama's legitimacy or remove him from office.

You don't seem to be disagreeing with me on this, except for the fact that you're mad that I'm explaining why they won't.

What are you arguing about then?
 Quoting: Getz


I think we had a problem in communication. I assumed that when you said Obama IS President, because of xyz, courts blah blah, that you were saying he was President de jure, when in fact you were really saying he was just President, de facto. I just have a hard time calling him President if he isn't legally so. He may act as President, but he is prohibited to be President according to the highest law in the land....that's just why I thought we were talking about the de jure side of things, sonce that's what matters legally.
 Quoting: Galfeslaf


I'm saying he's President because of the Constitution and that he can only legally be removed from office by Constitutional means.

But sure, we can say "de facto". That's reasonable.

Blame McCain and Romney for not suing him on Article II grounds.
 Quoting: Getz


As has already been proven, McCain amnd Romney are also imelogoble to become President, ever. Neither of them are natural born citizens. Why would they go after him if they had the same problem?
s. d. butler

User ID: 974819
United States
10/04/2014 03:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: Klayman files for deportation of Barack Obama
Barack Obama's mother was a US citizen. Even if you could prove he were born in Kenya, it wouldn't mean a damn thing.

Most important thing is for the Republicans to get a Senate majority and then find something to impeach him for or, failing that, wait until his term ends.

Enough of this Birther stuff. It's a useless distraction.
 Quoting: Getz


A young woman giving birth in a foreign country to a child whose father was not an American citizen (and was himself deported) did not have the legal capacity to pass along American citizenship to such child, a report for the Western Journalism Center confirmed.

“When enacted in 1952, section 301 (of federal immigration laws at the time) required a U.S. citizen married to an alien to have been physically present in the United States for 10 years, including five after reaching the age of fourteen, to transmit citizenship to foreign-born children. The 10-year transmission requirement remained in effect from 12:01 a.m. EDT December 24, 1952, through midnight November 13, 1986, and still is applicable to persons born during that period,” the Western Journalism Center’s report explained.

Ann Dunham was only 18 years old upon Barack Hussian Obama’s birth on August 4, 1961. Her own date of birth in Wichita, Kansas, was November 29, 1942. She turned 14 on November 29, 1956. Therefore in contrast to the law’s requirement, she had lived only 4 1/2 years from her 14th birthday up until Barack Hussein Obama’s birth on August 4, 1961 – and apparently not all of those years actually within the United States.

Thus because of the requirement to reside in the United States continuously for five years after becoming 14 and a total of 10 years in the United States overall, Barack Hussein Obama could not acquire U.S. citizenship through his mother Ann Dunham. At the very least, he would have had to apply at some point for naturalization.

Read more at [link to www.wnd.com]
 Quoting: Present and Aware


He is a sitting US President who has twice won the electoral college and taken the oath of office. Only Congress can remove him through the process of impeachment. That is the ONLY Constitutional remedy. These court hearings are total nonsense.

Birthers are wasting time.
 Quoting: Getz


Maybe. That would be a matter of opinion. The evidence shows that Larry Klayman is right.
s. d. butler

User ID: 974819
United States
10/04/2014 03:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: Klayman files for deportation of Barack Obama
...



You don't believe he's really the president. Great. How do you remove him from the White House unless Congress acts?

The only thing you're telling me is that you more or less agree with me that the courts won't remove Obama from office. You think the courts are corrupt. Fine. I'm not arguing with that. One way or another, I'm saying that they aren't going to rule on Obama's legitimacy or remove him from office.

You don't seem to be disagreeing with me on this, except for the fact that you're mad that I'm explaining why they won't.

What are you arguing about then?
 Quoting: Getz


I think we had a problem in communication. I assumed that when you said Obama IS President, because of xyz, courts blah blah, that you were saying he was President de jure, when in fact you were really saying he was just President, de facto. I just have a hard time calling him President if he isn't legally so. He may act as President, but he is prohibited to be President according to the highest law in the land....that's just why I thought we were talking about the de jure side of things, sonce that's what matters legally.
 Quoting: Galfeslaf


I'm saying he's President because of the Constitution and that he can only legally be removed from office by Constitutional means.

But sure, we can say "de facto". That's reasonable.

Blame McCain and Romney for not suing him on Article II grounds.
 Quoting: Getz


As has already been proven, McCain amnd Romney are also imelogoble to become President, ever. Neither of them are natural born citizens. Why would they go after him if they had the same problem?
 Quoting: Galfeslaf


both of them are scum but nice attempt at distraction and misdirection to the issue at hand.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 63493424
United States
10/04/2014 03:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: Klayman files for deportation of Barack Obama
I don't like the precedent this would set for Ted Cruz's possible Prez candidacy
Getz

User ID: 61930547
United States
10/04/2014 03:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: Klayman files for deportation of Barack Obama
...



You don't believe he's really the president. Great. How do you remove him from the White House unless Congress acts?

The only thing you're telling me is that you more or less agree with me that the courts won't remove Obama from office. You think the courts are corrupt. Fine. I'm not arguing with that. One way or another, I'm saying that they aren't going to rule on Obama's legitimacy or remove him from office.

You don't seem to be disagreeing with me on this, except for the fact that you're mad that I'm explaining why they won't.

What are you arguing about then?
 Quoting: Getz


I think we had a problem in communication. I assumed that when you said Obama IS President, because of xyz, courts blah blah, that you were saying he was President de jure, when in fact you were really saying he was just President, de facto. I just have a hard time calling him President if he isn't legally so. He may act as President, but he is prohibited to be President according to the highest law in the land....that's just why I thought we were talking about the de jure side of things, sonce that's what matters legally.
 Quoting: Galfeslaf


I'm saying he's President because of the Constitution and that he can only legally be removed from office by Constitutional means.

But sure, we can say "de facto". That's reasonable.

Blame McCain and Romney for not suing him on Article II grounds.
 Quoting: Getz


As has already been proven, McCain amnd Romney are also imelogoble to become President, ever. Neither of them are natural born citizens. Why would they go after him if they had the same problem?
 Quoting: Galfeslaf


McCain isn't ineligible under Article II. Both of his parents are US citizens and even the US Senate passed a resolution affirming that he was a "natural born US citizen in 2008. No matter where he was born, it seems pretty ridiculous to try to render a man ineligible to be President because his father was serving in the military overseas with his wife in a hospital(in a US military controlled area) at the time he was born.

Mitt Romney was born in Detroit to two US citizen parents. I have no idea what standard you think he isn't a natural born citizen. Even WND agrees with me here: [link to www.wnd.com]
Galfeslaf

User ID: 58974470
United States
10/04/2014 03:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: Klayman files for deportation of Barack Obama
...


I think we had a problem in communication. I assumed that when you said Obama IS President, because of xyz, courts blah blah, that you were saying he was President de jure, when in fact you were really saying he was just President, de facto. I just have a hard time calling him President if he isn't legally so. He may act as President, but he is prohibited to be President according to the highest law in the land....that's just why I thought we were talking about the de jure side of things, sonce that's what matters legally.
 Quoting: Galfeslaf


I'm saying he's President because of the Constitution and that he can only legally be removed from office by Constitutional means.

But sure, we can say "de facto". That's reasonable.

Blame McCain and Romney for not suing him on Article II grounds.
 Quoting: Getz


As has already been proven, McCain amnd Romney are also imelogoble to become President, ever. Neither of them are natural born citizens. Why would they go after him if they had the same problem?
 Quoting: Galfeslaf


both of them are scum but nice attempt at distraction and misdirection to the issue at hand.
 Quoting: s. d. butler


Huh? How was I distracting? They aren't natural born citizens. That should be added as evidence to the fact that BHO ain't either.
s. d. butler

User ID: 974819
United States
10/04/2014 03:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: Klayman files for deportation of Barack Obama
...


I'm saying he's President because of the Constitution and that he can only legally be removed from office by Constitutional means.

But sure, we can say "de facto". That's reasonable.

Blame McCain and Romney for not suing him on Article II grounds.
 Quoting: Getz


As has already been proven, McCain amnd Romney are also imelogoble to become President, ever. Neither of them are natural born citizens. Why would they go after him if they had the same problem?
 Quoting: Galfeslaf


both of them are scum but nice attempt at distraction and misdirection to the issue at hand.
 Quoting: s. d. butler


Huh? How was I distracting? They aren't natural born citizens. That should be added as evidence to the fact that BHO ain't either.
 Quoting: Galfeslaf


Your previous statement argues against your statement now. What you have done is the classic red herring.

He is a sitting US President who has twice won the electoral college and taken the oath of office. Only Congress can remove him through the process of impeachment. That is the ONLY Constitutional remedy. These court hearings are total nonsense.

Birthers are wasting time.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 16213727
United States
10/04/2014 03:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: Klayman files for deportation of Barack Obama
Barack Obama's mother was a US citizen. Even if you could prove he were born in Kenya, it wouldn't mean a damn thing.

Most important thing is for the Republicans to get a Senate majority and then find something to impeach him for or, failing that, wait until his term ends.

Enough of this Birther stuff. It's a useless distraction.
 Quoting: Getz




I realize impeachment is now too late- he will finish his term while the proceedings happen....

America CAN NOT WAIT FOR HIM TO FINISH HIS TERM!

HE NEEDS TO BE ARRESTED NOW!!! RIGHT ALONG WITH THE MINIONS THAT LICK HIS ASS ON A DAILY BASIS.

That gives him 2 more years to finish America off.

I have never hated someone as much as I hate that F-er for what he has done to the country in 6 years...I shudder to think what more he can do in his remaining time.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 58391971
United States
10/04/2014 03:30 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: Klayman files for deportation of Barack Obama
Barack Obama's mother was a US citizen. Even if you could prove he were born in Kenya, it wouldn't mean a damn thing.

Most important thing is for the Republicans to get a Senate majority and then find something to impeach him for or, failing that, wait until his term ends.

Enough of this Birther stuff. I'M a useless distraction.
 Quoting: Getz


Fixed
Getz

User ID: 61930547
United States
10/04/2014 03:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: Klayman files for deportation of Barack Obama
Barack Obama's mother was a US citizen. Even if you could prove he were born in Kenya, it wouldn't mean a damn thing.

Most important thing is for the Republicans to get a Senate majority and then find something to impeach him for or, failing that, wait until his term ends.

Enough of this Birther stuff. I'M a useless distraction.
 Quoting: Getz


I think my right to rape small animals should be in the Constitution.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58391971


And I fixed your comment for you. This is fun!





GLP