WTC7 footage found on old digital camera, must see! | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 48081938 United States 10/29/2014 06:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 64561909 Argentina 10/29/2014 06:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You can't bury this. All you can do is ban me, but others would follow :) Here's the deal... for those that didn't understand it. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 64561909 The guy that made that fake video and then the confession is a PAID SHILL. the objective was to make the people interested in the truth to look like retards while at the same time forcing everyone to dismiss the notion of a controlled demolition. And a controlled demolition is CLEARLY what happens with that building...in the original tape....that is WHY they needed to do something about the video...and people are so stupid that it seemed to work. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 64561909 Argentina 10/29/2014 06:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You can't bury this. All you can do is ban me, but others would follow :) Quoting: Anonymous Coward 64561909 Here's the deal... for those that didn't understand it. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 64561909 The guy that made that fake video and then the confession is a PAID SHILL. the objective was to make the people interested in the truth to look like retards while at the same time forcing everyone to dismiss the notion of a controlled demolition. And a controlled demolition is CLEARLY what happens with that building...in the original tape....that is WHY they needed to do something about the video...and people are so stupid that it seemed to work. And what they paid that retard to do is called Damage Control. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 37389491 United States 10/29/2014 06:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Aquagrass I guess silverstein saying "we decided to pull it" in an interview was a hoax also? [link to www.google.com (secure)] More truther BS. His exact words were 'and they made the decision to pullit'. No demolition team ever has used the term pull it to mean a controlled demolition. Please do 5 minutes of your own research. Oh I have. what do you think "pull it" means in the context in which he said it? 13 years and still parroting questions that have been answered over and over. Here is a picture for you [link to www.911myths.com] Open your eyes. Link is forbidden. just watched again the section of the pbs silverstein video. This is what he said "I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse." So what do you think he meant by that? |
ShillShank Reduction User ID: 58862710 United States 10/29/2014 06:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Uncle Paul User ID: 64648817 United Kingdom 10/29/2014 06:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Uncle Paul More truther BS. His exact words were 'and they made the decision to pullit'. No demolition team ever has used the term pull it to mean a controlled demolition. Please do 5 minutes of your own research. Oh I have. what do you think "pull it" means in the context in which he said it? 13 years and still parroting questions that have been answered over and over. Here is a picture for you [link to www.911myths.com] Open your eyes. Link is forbidden. just watched again the section of the pbs silverstein video. This is what he said "I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse." So what do you think he meant by that? Still cant do your own research then? Here is another qoute from the day for you; Worker #1: Oh, we’re getting ready to pull building six. Luis Mendes: We have to be very careful how we demolish building six. We were worried about the building six coming down and demolishing the slurry wall, so we wanted that particular building to fall within a certain area. Worker #1: We’ve got the cables attached in four different locations... <”going up”? hard to hear>... Now they’re pulling [gestures to vehicles] pulling the building to the north. It’s not every day you try to pull down a eight storey building with cables” |
djdandew1 User ID: 63258028 United Kingdom 10/29/2014 06:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | PLEASE STOP POSTING THIS HOAX VIDEO MADE BY THAT ASSHOLE SHILL!! Quoting: ShillShank Reduction Obviously, WT7 was a controlled demolition, but this video is fake. He reversed the image and added effects. That's why its so zoomed in. Fuck that guy and fuck this video. “This is a memo that describes how we’re going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran.” General Wesley Clark |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 62073245 United States 10/29/2014 06:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Aquagrass I guess silverstein saying "we decided to pull it" in an interview was a hoax also? [link to www.google.com (secure)] More truther BS. His exact words were 'and they made the decision to pullit'. No demolition team ever has used the term pull it to mean a controlled demolition. Please do 5 minutes of your own research. Is that how much time you spent researching it, 5 minutes? You are the one who is a bullshitter! I watched the building fall the day it happened shill and knew immediately it was a controlled demolition. Of course you did because you have a Phd in super ultra mega demolitions of the New York area and are the worlds leading authority on the subject. Obvious shill is obvious. I don't need some overeducated idiot telling me what I saw. You have to be one dumb mother fucker if you do. That's your problem Uncle Paul, you are like some kind of idiot out of a Monty Python skit. Do you really believe anything a person says just because they have a Phd? If you do I feel sorry for you. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 37389491 United States 10/29/2014 06:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Aquagrass Oh I have. what do you think "pull it" means in the context in which he said it? 13 years and still parroting questions that have been answered over and over. Here is a picture for you [link to www.911myths.com] Open your eyes. Link is forbidden. just watched again the section of the pbs silverstein video. This is what he said "I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse." So what do you think he meant by that? Still cant do your own research then? Here is another qoute from the day for you; Worker #1: Oh, we’re getting ready to pull building six. Luis Mendes: We have to be very careful how we demolish building six. We were worried about the building six coming down and demolishing the slurry wall, so we wanted that particular building to fall within a certain area. Worker #1: We’ve got the cables attached in four different locations... <”going up”? hard to hear>... Now they’re pulling [gestures to vehicles] pulling the building to the north. It’s not every day you try to pull down a eight storey building with cables” I can do my own research, thank you. I've asked you a simple question twice and you haven't answered it. Why not? |
Let Freedom Ring 365 User ID: 64641066 United States 10/29/2014 06:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Never saw before - thx! You are the creator of your own master plan... Make it a good one. Wake the fuk up and be ready... This is absolutely no time to be stupid! “If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.” - Nikola Tesla |
Uncle Paul User ID: 64648817 United Kingdom 10/29/2014 06:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Uncle Paul 13 years and still parroting questions that have been answered over and over. Here is a picture for you [link to www.911myths.com] Open your eyes. Link is forbidden. just watched again the section of the pbs silverstein video. This is what he said "I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse." So what do you think he meant by that? Still cant do your own research then? Here is another qoute from the day for you; Worker #1: Oh, we’re getting ready to pull building six. Luis Mendes: We have to be very careful how we demolish building six. We were worried about the building six coming down and demolishing the slurry wall, so we wanted that particular building to fall within a certain area. Worker #1: We’ve got the cables attached in four different locations... <”going up”? hard to hear>... Now they’re pulling [gestures to vehicles] pulling the building to the north. It’s not every day you try to pull down a eight storey building with cables” I can do my own research, thank you. I've asked you a simple question twice and you haven't answered it. Why not? I have answered it, twice. I even gave you a picture so simple even you would understand but you claim you can access the link. How about you tell me what 'pull it'means and back it up with pictures. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 64561909 Argentina 10/29/2014 06:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You can't bury this. All you can do is ban me, but others would follow :) Quoting: Anonymous Coward 64561909 Here's the deal... for those that didn't understand it. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 64561909 The guy that made that fake video and then the confession is a PAID SHILL. the objective was to make the people interested in the truth to look like retards while at the same time forcing everyone to dismiss the notion of a controlled demolition. And a controlled demolition is CLEARLY what happens with that building...in the original tape....that is WHY they needed to do something about the video...and people are so stupid that it seemed to work. PLEASE STOP POSTING THIS HOAX VIDEO MADE BY THAT ASSHOLE SHILL!! Quoting: ShillShank Reduction Obviously, WT7 was a controlled demolition, but this video is fake. He reversed the image and added effects. That's why its so zoomed in. Fuck that guy and fuck this video. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 64561909 Argentina 10/29/2014 06:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Beetlejuice User ID: 50063679 Netherlands 10/29/2014 07:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Revo/elation User ID: 57369630 United States 10/29/2014 07:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Reflection off the glass that is popping out because the building is twisting out of shape as it collapses are explosions? Quoting: G. House You people couldn't analyze your way out of a paper bag! I've NEVER seen a film of the collapse with sound where you can hear any explosions. I've watched just about every video that is available of controlled demolitions of buildings. The ones that have sound? The reports of the explosions are VERY loud and unmistakable. Did they use silent explosives for controlled demolition of the WTC towers and building 7? Or are you people just friggen idiots? Reflections huh. Those are definitely explosions. All on the same level of the building huh. Do you get paid to say this on forum? Pretty full on green karma huh? |
Revo/elation User ID: 57369630 United States 10/29/2014 07:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You can't bury this. All you can do is ban me, but others would follow :) Quoting: Anonymous Coward 64561909 Here's the deal... for those that didn't understand it. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 64561909 The guy that made that fake video and then the confession is a PAID SHILL. the objective was to make the people interested in the truth to look like retards while at the same time forcing everyone to dismiss the notion of a controlled demolition. And a controlled demolition is CLEARLY what happens with that building...in the original tape....that is WHY they needed to do something about the video...and people are so stupid that it seemed to work. I believe this is most likely the truth in this twisted sick tale we live in. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 56184625 United States 10/29/2014 07:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 64645173 United States 10/29/2014 07:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I guess silverstein saying "we decided to pull it" in an interview was a hoax also? [link to www.google.com (secure)] More truther BS. His exact words were 'and they made the decision to pull'. No demolition team ever has used the term pull it to mean a controlled demolition. Please do 5 minutes of your own research. Thousands of Engineers and Architects are my reason for saying the official story stinks: [link to www2.ae911truth.org] Why do people like GET SO UPSET when people demand simple answers to the Bullshit investigation that was biased and incomplete? Why is an independent investigation too much to ask? Why wouldn't any Physicist step forward to defend the official story? Even for money? Why were several Physics teachers being suspended and/or punished for going against and doubting the official story? Why do people who QUESTION AUTHORITY get a beat down in a supposedly free country? Not a Single Top Physicist is Willing to Defend the Official Story [link to www.ae911truth.org] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 64645173 United States 10/29/2014 07:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 46619613 United States 10/29/2014 07:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
redhouserebel User ID: 64647449 United Kingdom 10/29/2014 07:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33290320 United States 10/29/2014 07:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Uncle Paul User ID: 64648817 United Kingdom 10/29/2014 07:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I guess silverstein saying "we decided to pull it" in an interview was a hoax also? [link to www.google.com (secure)] More truther BS. His exact words were 'and they made the decision to pull'. No demolition team ever has used the term pull it to mean a controlled demolition. Please do 5 minutes of your own research. Thousands of Engineers and Architects are my reason for saying the official story stinks: [link to www2.ae911truth.org] Why do people like GET SO UPSET when people demand simple answers to the Bullshit investigation that was biased and incomplete? Why is an independent investigation too much to ask? Why wouldn't any Physicist step forward to defend the official story? Even for money? Why were several Physics teachers being suspended and/or punished for going against and doubting the official story? Why do people who QUESTION AUTHORITY get a beat down in a supposedly free country? Not a Single Top Physicist is Willing to Defend the Official Story [link to www.ae911truth.org] As soon as you take out the unregistered and unlicensed architects as well as the non relevent engineers you will the number drop from thousands to less than 10. All they were asked was if there should be another investigation, nothing about controlled demolitions etc.. AE911 is a cashcow for Richard Gage who pays himself $80,000 a year from the not-for-profit donations and uses another $80,000 for his own expenses. Your last link shows the stupidity of them, David Griscom did not meet the criteria he laid down so no-one was going to waste their time with him. It is well noted that the entry e-mail supplied by ae911 '[email protected]' didnt actually work and the $1000 that was donated for the prize money disappeared. AE911 are a scam who are currently trying to fleece the Nation of Islam for any cent they can get. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 62073245 United States 10/29/2014 07:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I guess silverstein saying "we decided to pull it" in an interview was a hoax also? [link to www.google.com (secure)] More truther BS. His exact words were 'and they made the decision to pull'. No demolition team ever has used the term pull it to mean a controlled demolition. Please do 5 minutes of your own research. Thousands of Engineers and Architects are my reason for saying the official story stinks: [link to www2.ae911truth.org] Why do people like GET SO UPSET when people demand simple answers to the Bullshit investigation that was biased and incomplete? Why is an independent investigation too much to ask? Why wouldn't any Physicist step forward to defend the official story? Even for money? Why were several Physics teachers being suspended and/or punished for going against and doubting the official story? Why do people who QUESTION AUTHORITY get a beat down in a supposedly free country? Not a Single Top Physicist is Willing to Defend the Official Story [link to www.ae911truth.org] Uncle Paul. Where did you go? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 64645173 United States 10/29/2014 07:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Aquagrass I guess silverstein saying "we decided to pull it" in an interview was a hoax also? [link to www.google.com (secure)] More truther BS. His exact words were 'and they made the decision to pull'. No demolition team ever has used the term pull it to mean a controlled demolition. Please do 5 minutes of your own research. Thousands of Engineers and Architects are my reason for saying the official story stinks: [link to www2.ae911truth.org] Why do people like GET SO UPSET when people demand simple answers to the Bullshit investigation that was biased and incomplete? Why is an independent investigation too much to ask? Why wouldn't any Physicist step forward to defend the official story? Even for money? Why were several Physics teachers being suspended and/or punished for going against and doubting the official story? Why do people who QUESTION AUTHORITY get a beat down in a supposedly free country? Not a Single Top Physicist is Willing to Defend the Official Story [link to www.ae911truth.org] As soon as you take out the unregistered and unlicensed architects as well as the non relevent engineers you will the number drop from thousands to less than 10. All they were asked was if there should be another investigation, nothing about controlled demolitions etc.. AE911 is a cashcow for Richard Gage who pays himself $80,000 a year from the not-for-profit donations and uses another $80,000 for his own expenses. Your last link shows the stupidity of them, David Griscom did not meet the criteria he laid down so no-one was going to waste their time with him. It is well noted that the entry e-mail supplied by ae911 '[email protected]' didnt actually work and the $1000 that was donated for the prize money disappeared. AE911 are a scam who are currently trying to fleece the Nation of Islam for any cent they can get. Oh what a load of bullshit! They delayed the debate FOR MONTHS because no physicist would come forth and defend NIST! Still no one came forth, not even for a cash prize.... Show a link for your claim- lets see how real it is! People who are greedy don't start a "non profit" to steal money- that is the most retarded thing I've heard. You are seriously grasping for straws here. Answer my question about WHY it upsets you that people are demanding answers and another non biased investigation? What rubs you the wrong way? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 64645173 United States 10/29/2014 07:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to davidgriscom.com] David L. Griscom, PhD – Research physicist, retired in 2001 from Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) in Washington, DC, after 33 years service. Fellow of the American Physical Society. Fulbright-García Robles Fellow at Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México in Mexico City (1997). Visiting professorships of research at the Universities of Paris and Saint-Etienne, France, and Tokyo Institute of Technology (2000 - 2003). Adjunct Professor of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Arizona (2004 - 2005). Winner of the 1993 N. F. Mott Award sponsored by the Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, the 1995 Otto Schott Award offered by the Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung (Germany), a 1996 Outstanding Graduate School Alumnus Award at Brown University, and the 1997 Sigma Xi Pure Science Award at NRL. Principal author of 109 of his 185 published works, a body of work which is highly cited by his peers. Officially credited with largest number of papers (5) by any author on list of 100 most cited articles authored at NRL between 1973 and 1988. |
Stoned Goddess User ID: 48235929 Canada 10/29/2014 07:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I personally did not fall for that particular video. But I do wonder how that arrogant moran would explain this: And this: And how does he propose WTC7 fell? Last Edited by Stoned Goddess on 10/29/2014 07:46 PM :smokin1: |
Uncle Paul User ID: 64648817 United Kingdom 10/29/2014 07:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Uncle Paul More truther BS. His exact words were 'and they made the decision to pull'. No demolition team ever has used the term pull it to mean a controlled demolition. Please do 5 minutes of your own research. Thousands of Engineers and Architects are my reason for saying the official story stinks: [link to www2.ae911truth.org] Why do people like GET SO UPSET when people demand simple answers to the Bullshit investigation that was biased and incomplete? Why is an independent investigation too much to ask? Why wouldn't any Physicist step forward to defend the official story? Even for money? Why were several Physics teachers being suspended and/or punished for going against and doubting the official story? Why do people who QUESTION AUTHORITY get a beat down in a supposedly free country? Not a Single Top Physicist is Willing to Defend the Official Story [link to www.ae911truth.org] As soon as you take out the unregistered and unlicensed architects as well as the non relevent engineers you will the number drop from thousands to less than 10. All they were asked was if there should be another investigation, nothing about controlled demolitions etc.. AE911 is a cashcow for Richard Gage who pays himself $80,000 a year from the not-for-profit donations and uses another $80,000 for his own expenses. Your last link shows the stupidity of them, David Griscom did not meet the criteria he laid down so no-one was going to waste their time with him. It is well noted that the entry e-mail supplied by ae911 '[email protected]' didnt actually work and the $1000 that was donated for the prize money disappeared. AE911 are a scam who are currently trying to fleece the Nation of Islam for any cent they can get. Oh what a load of bullshit! They delayed the debate FOR MONTHS because no physicist would come forth and defend NIST! Still no one came forth, not even for a cash prize.... Show a link for your claim- lets see how real it is! People who are greedy don't start a "non profit" to steal money- that is the most retarded thing I've heard. You are seriously grasping for straws here. Answer my question about WHY it upsets you that people are demanding answers and another non biased investigation? What rubs you the wrong way? Thread: Richard Gage Gives Himself A Near 7% Payrise Thread: Registered Sex Offender with fake medals made the new posterboy for AE911 [link to healthwyze.org] or you could just go ahead and email the debate email address, go ahead and nominate me. |
Beetlejuice User ID: 50063679 Netherlands 10/29/2014 07:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Sungaze_At_Dawn User ID: 62256035 Canada 10/29/2014 07:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |