Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,703 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,001,746
Pageviews Today: 1,188,912Threads Today: 213Posts Today: 3,086
08:37 AM

Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing

Whitley Strieber: "...the great Amazonian rain forest has perhaps a year to live." (The End of Man?)

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 58336
United States
07/25/2006 07:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Whitley Strieber: "...the great Amazonian rain forest has perhaps a year to live." (The End of Man?)
The End of Man?
Tuesday July 25th, 2006

As the summer of 2006 rages on, with heatwaves stretching from the American Pacific coast all the way across the North Atlantic to Europe and virtually around the world, we now discover that the great Amazonian rain forest has perhaps a year to live.

If there is no rain in the Amazon basin soon, and that forest is destroyed, mankind is likely to die with it. This is because the Amazonian forest is, in effect, the heart of the world's ecosystem. It is a vast, unimaginably important carbon dioxide sink and oxygen producer. Without it, the planet's climate will quickly become untenable for human life.

We are well on our way to another large-animal extinction, and we will be among the large animals who go.

Given the amazing magnitude of this catastrophe, I very much doubt that more than a remnant of mankind would still exist in 25 years. If it happens, most of us will be dead within 5 years, and those remaining at that time will curse God for not having taken them, also.

Unfortunately, it is not all that unlikely that this crucial ecosystem will die. It probably will, in fact. More terrifying, it is likely to die in the context of vast forest fires, that will come alight due to dry lightning and people used to relatively damp and non-combustible foliage accidentally setting fires.

So, what can we do about it? The short answer is nothing. It's too late. Overpopulation and political inaction will have done us in.

The next question, then, is how do we face it? My first thought is a simple enough one: we need to pray our hearts out for rain to fall in the Amazon between this coming December and next May. Because if it does not come, scientists from Woods Hole are warning that the forest ecosystem will completely collapse.

Climatological studies show conclusively that this will lead to profound drought across the whole of the northern hemisphere. Our world, as we know it now, will be in ruins by 2010, and something close to hell by 2012.

I know that it's almost impossible to imagine that it could be that bad, but, in fact, it's true. The life of the world depends on that rainy season working.

This gets to the reason that it has been so dry there for the past two years. It is because the Caribbean has overheated, and the hot water does not produce enough free vapor to form the moisture laden clouds that usually sweep across Brazil and push up against the Andes during that season.

Why has this happened? In great part, because the growth of human population has happened too fast for the environment to cope, and it's rebalancing itself by relieving itself of the burden that is us. In part, it's because we have not directed our intelligence or our scientific and engineering skills to solving the problem of global warming.

This has not been a matter for debate for twenty-five years, and yet lying politicans and greedy companies have kept the false debate going anyway. The United States, the one country with the power and the expertise to make changes has, instead, ended up with an exceptionally poor leadership that has promoted the shibboleth of denial until it is, in all probability, too late.

The largest question is, how do we engage in this process of dieback? How will it strike us first?

The first problem is one we already face: heat. There will come times soon, possibly in Europe in the next few weeks, in fact, where heat becomes untenable and thousands die. But that's only the beginning. There will be heatwaves, if the Amazon dies, that will kill millions.

The next problem will be water. We'll run out. The desert cities that have emerged in the US will experience catastrophic water emergencies and forced migrations that it will not be possible for the rest of the society to absorb.

Then will come the food problem. Already this year, excessive heat has disrupted production of food crops worldwide. The disruptions are not disastrous yet, and the world still grows a food surplus, but the day will come when that will not be true, and if the Amazon does indeed collapse next year, the first great food shortages will appear in 2010.

After that, social collapse will spread rapidly. The rest, you can imagine. There's no point in describing it.

In my 1985 book Nature's End, I predicted essentially the scenario that is unfolding now, and warned that the Amazonian rain forest might become too dry and burn.

The fires have not started yet, but they are not far off, I fear.

I understood very clearly in 1985 what runaway global warming would do to the planet--what it is doing now. I also saw that this catastrophe would not be recoverable for us.

Now, we are facing a stark reality indeed: the end of the Amazonian rain forest and the subsequent end of man. It is worth remembering that more than nine out of ten species that have ever existed on the earth are extinct at any given moment in geologic history.

Will we go entirely extinct? There is no way to be certain of that, but we will experience a massive dieback, that is certain...if the forest fails.

And for those of you who will scoff at this and say 'what does the Amazon have to do with us,' I suggest you look at the climate models. The peril is quite clear.

What will it be like to live in a dying world? We do now, actually, but nobody really admits it. However, when temperatures are still in the triple digits in Kansas in November, as they will be if we lose the Amazon, people will begin to face the reality that we waited too long to act, and have run out of time.

Who will they blame? What difference does it make?

And what of the visitors? Will they help? Actually, there's a possiblity of that. They are certainly around and they probably have the resources to give us assistance of some sort. Will they? That is a question I cannot answer.

I have been working since about 1980 to avoid ever having to write an article like this. Unfortunately, neither my little effort nor the much greater efforts of far more influential people, have helped change the situation.

The Kyoto Treaty turned out to be a lot of talk built around a dubious premise. The United States has not shown any leadership at all in this area, at a time when the survival, if not of the species, then certainly of civilization, depended on bold and innovative action by the world's most powerful country.

So now we stand just this side of dying. We who live on this day may know the end of the world. There will be no rapture of the congenitally selfish, and the Moslems will not meet their sky virgins. What will happen will be hard, terrifying beyond words, and fatal in a million different ways, but always fatal.

How do we do a thing like this well, if it comes down to the dying? It's hard to imagine. But I will say this, that the peace that abides in my own heart will not be shaken even by this suffering.

I watched a little boy today, come down the street with his backpack on and his eyes twinkling with the joy of his boyhood. He walked on past me and I thought that we cannot count how much we owe our children.

If I could, I would lift them all into a better earth, but I have not the strength in my shoulders.

Now it's dark, the house is hot (we don't have air conditioning) and the hour is late and weary. Somewhere nearby, that little boy sleeps, and dreams perhaps of the peaks he will ascend in the future to which he feels entitled.

Now, the little baby who lives across the way cries and fusses a bit. Mother comes, I hear her voice, tired in the late hour, nevertheless cooing with the gentlest love.

Love. I don't see the world as a place of hate. I can hardly hear words spoken in hate. It's as if they're being shouted up from a deep well. I see the world as a land of love, because that's what it really is.

Subtract the politicians and the guns and the media, and think of your own life. You live in love. You love your children, your parents, your spouses--and you are multiplied by billions.

For uncountable eons, life on earth was governed by the brutalities of nature. Animals fought and slaughtered and died in abject terror here, for ages upon ages.

Then, just a short time ago, a man and a woman gazed into each other's eyes and spoke words of love, and the world changed. Now, in all this intricate vastness of billions, there is love. In fact, mankind is an ocean of love riding a little rock in the great dark of the sky.

An ocean of love. That's our reality. The guns and the wars and the hate, the betrayals and the cruelty--those are mere dimmings of the huge light of love that shines here.

A late hour, weary hour, and I am tired, too. I know well that this is the first place where this warning has actually been voiced. Hopefully, it will be proved wrong by circumstances, but I very much doubt that. Who is going to cool the Caribbean? The answer is, it's too late.

Even if the rains come this year and next year, there will soon be a series of years when they do not come.

On the plus side, the Amazon rain forest has been around for around two million years, and throughout that time has experienced significant climate fluctuations. Scientists consider it an extremely resistant ecosystem.

Earth, in other words, has a strong heart.

Have we broken it?


[link to www.unknowncountry.com]
Just walking by...
User ID: 99597
07/25/2006 08:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Whitley Strieber: "...the great Amazonian rain forest has perhaps a year to live." (The End of Man?)
Alltough his books about aliens were probably a hoax, he sure has a point her...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 16156
United States
07/25/2006 08:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Whitley Strieber: "...the great Amazonian rain forest has perhaps a year to live." (The End of Man?)
Dramatic, for sure, and Whitley never saw a popular trend he wasn't willing to embrace, but this time, it's an accurate warning I think.

They don't call the Amazon Basin the "Lungs of the World" for nothing.
Ojos de Brujo
User ID: 122452
07/26/2006 08:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Whitley Strieber: "...the great Amazonian rain forest has perhaps a year to live." (The End of Man?)
The breathing forest.... [link to www.royalsoc.org]
breathing forest

Forests are generally assumed to be a good thing for the climate, absorbing the carbon dioxide that we continue to throw out into the atmosphere. However, under certain conditions forests start to release more carbon dioxide than they absorb. There are vast stores of carbon held globally in trees and soils, if these stores start to become net sources of carbon dioxide as the climate changes then we will enter a frightening positive feedback situation', says Phil Ineson of the University of York.

Phil and colleagues in Edinburgh and Sheffield are carrying out research into what happens to the carbon cycle in forests when atmospheric carbon dioxide increases. Trees convert carbon dioxide into living solid matter', says Phil. As levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide increase so rates of growth increase'. Increasing growth rates in forests have been observed worldwide and are estimated to take out 10% of our global carbon dioxide emissions, shielding us from global warming. Unfortunately, research indicates that forests will not continue to make this contribution as carbon dioxide levels increase.

A variety of techniques are used to measure carbon dioxide levels in samples of air. The very reason why carbon dioxide is a problem is actually the basic principle behind each of the technologies we use,' says Phil. Carbon dioxide in the air absorbs heat leading to global warming, so we measure how much heat is absorbed in an air sample to tell us the concentration of carbon dioxide'. The analysers used can respond in fractions of a second and are automated with robotic devices left out in the field to take measurements.

The carbon taken up by the tree is transferred to the soil via the tree's roots and taken up by microorganisms. The microorganisms' metabolisms speed up and increased levels of carbon dioxide are emitted into the atmosphere. If this were to happen on a global scale then the consequences would be severe', says Phil.

Research to refine climate change models incorporating the carbon cycle of forests continues but it is clear we cannot rely on trees to solve global warming
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 161250
11/22/2006 07:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Whitley Strieber: "...the great Amazonian rain forest has perhaps a year to live." (The End of Man?)
Whitley SStrieber likes to tell people on his message board to kill themselves and then he bans them.