Hungarian Words - a little dipni | |
redhouserebel (OP) User ID: 65304088 United Kingdom 11/19/2014 03:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | thank you so much for your post.. Quoting: MOM 65299303 I am amazed as to what you are saying. I see so much scripture in it and I feel I am living what you are speaking. Thank you. There is a reason you are posting and it is here for me to see. I learned hungarian as a child from my parents and am not good at Magyar language. I have relatives there still. they are not like me in a spiritual hunt that is. I have started studying Hebrew on my own because of the rich symbolism in the original pictures GOD gave the Hebrews to communicate. Due to that symbolism, I get the scriptures even more, but I never thought of any meanings in the Hungarian language. I have seen that Chinese has it's own symbolism in the ancient symbols that match things in scripture too. I see so much in what you are saying on this thread and it is new to me. But, I am excited to learn what you are teaching. I wish there was a book I can study. Is there one? I just know what you are saying. I've been through so much and thought I was going crazy. there is so much more to learn. thank you for posting. I seek to understand my heritage and have much to learn. I want to be a help and not a hinderance to people and I do feel a calling on my life but am like alone on what I am experiencing. My parents are not like me. No one else gets me or what I am going through. I can only explain scripture. It's in me naturally. And it's not for greed or power or anything like that. It's more of wisdom, living and learning, trials, helping and serving in a one on one level. commerce in the U.S. doesn't fit what you are speaking. I am searching and I found this. thanks I am glad to be of help and I am glad you have found some comprehension in what I am attempting to relay - I have written a lot on this - but it has not been published - although many people have read my work - either because my computers are persistently hacked or because i have attempted to post elsewhere before - and yes - it is all relevant to scripture. Unfortunately you have caught me in a Mr. Tinkles moment - which isn't the best of my moods. The work I have done on this so far - is the equivalent of about 8 PhDs in my own modest estimation - and so when I try to share this and get banned or blocked it is frustrating. If there is anyone out there associated with a university which would like to fund the continuation of my writing for the purpose of my work being released as books for people to read and study and learn from - please contact me - otherwise - you guys are going to have to write to the mods and ask them to stop banning me. I wrote a novel in the hope of being able to fund the completion of my works - as giving my work away seems to gain me nothing but ban-hammers - I haven't got the funding to get my novel off the ground yet. It is not like I am not trying. One of the problems may be the ramifications of the product of the truth in my work - there are many - not least being all the books currently in libraries which will have to be thrown off the shelves because they are nothing more than random guesswork - I don't know - maybe we could keep them in a warehouse somewhere - so people could see how well the ancient codes were kept hidden for so long and for how long so many people have been duped. I have been careful not to complicate these translations with the quantum mechanics encoded in ancient scripture so as not to confuse people further - the creation of an atom - a cell - molecular science and nuclear theory - all encoded - but people just say i am a lunatic and that what i am trying to reveal is not possible - but WHY NOT LET ME SAY IT THEN - AND THEN JUST LAUGH AWAY AT ME?????? SCARED????? Sorry - My inner Sheldon Cooper has come out to join my Mr Tinkles. :( Last Edited by redhouserebel on 11/19/2014 03:14 PM A MILF Mortgage - coming soon ;) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 37757297 Hungary 11/19/2014 03:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
redhouserebel (OP) User ID: 65304088 United Kingdom 11/19/2014 03:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And it's totally different from surrounding languages in the near areas or other countries, such as German and Dutch? Quoting: watchZEITGEISTnow Well, that's actually true, since it's not an Indo-European, but a Finno-Ugric language. What some scholars somewhere or other have said is that there is a proto language - a proto indo-european language - and some languages are excluded - I am saying - yes - there is a proto lingual code for all the languages - does that make sense? The roots may not seem comparable - but the meaning through the source code relates them all - that is what I am saying - no language can be excluded. A MILF Mortgage - coming soon ;) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42370202 Sweden 11/19/2014 03:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
redhouserebel (OP) User ID: 65304088 United Kingdom 11/19/2014 04:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 8 ál- “false” Quoting: redhouserebel ŠL 358/3, 4; Gost. 604; Kiss 18 Sum. alam, alan Hebr. ál “not, just not” 9 állni “to stand”, állítani “to put”, állat “animal” ŠL 80; MSL III 176; Gost. 332, 874; Kiss 18, 44 Sum. gal, al Hebr. alah, alah 10 álom “sleep; dream” ŠL 358/3, 4; Gost. 472, 604; Kiss 32 Sum. a-a-lum, alam, alan Hebr. chálom I would like to point out that: á a with the accent possibly denotes - a raising of the people in a zone called a; that is those chosen to be raised from a the accents can become confusing if you do not have the base code and a fuller vocabulary to decrypt from - because as the phases change the accents indicating a particular direction in one phase - can have the direction altered in another phase. xx I haven't explained enough about why ál means "false". One of the duties of those raised up - was to measure - as they had been measured. So - for example - they had not been allowed to cross over or rise up because they had been fighting for a scrap of food - and they learnt that if they did not do this then they would have more chance of promotion and so stopped doing it (amongst other things of course) - then when they had crossed - if someone scrabbled for their ration then they could mark this behaviour - in this sense - they had to mark those who were "falsely" there. So - a "false" - an ál was someone raised up to measure others; this was their designation - and from this came the later meaning - of something (originally someone) who was not true. xx OK - this is not the banned post - but an extrapolation of the one quoted above: If we can take a step back again from the above decryption of the Hungarian word for false: ál Before it was someone rising who had been measured - someone who would then measure, it was an instruction: it was an instruction to someone high up - to go to area a and to raise up those who had been measured to one side - go down to area a - and measure - when this was done - those who passed the test were raised up to measure. The reason they would measure was no doubt in a part - repeat behaviour they were doing what they had learned - and this also works with the word "false": the duty - f - to go to area a - a - and measure - l - those who through authority - s - are free - e the place being gone to - to do this - is not a place where the "true" exist - but when one there finds the truth - they are raised - so you can see how the origin of the word false has come into being - as it is also in the Hungarian. Am I allowed to keep posting? Do I miss out the banned word? A MILF Mortgage - coming soon ;) |
redhouserebel (OP) User ID: 65304088 United Kingdom 11/19/2014 04:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 61629439 United States 11/19/2014 04:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | For your interest, a wikipedia article about the languages of Eurasia. [link to en.wikipedia.org] |
VagyokAkiVagyok User ID: 64242048 Hungary 11/20/2014 05:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And it's totally different from surrounding languages in the near areas or other countries, such as German and Dutch? Quoting: watchZEITGEISTnow Well, that's actually true, since it's not an Indo-European, but a Finno-Ugric language. it's NOT finno-ugric :) that's part of the hoax |
VagyokAkiVagyok User ID: 64242048 Hungary 11/20/2014 05:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm confused. Quoting: watchZEITGEISTnow So basically Hungarian comes from Sumeria which is Sanskrit and that's the oldest known 'language'? And it's totally different from surrounding languages in the near areas or other countries, such as German and Dutch? Yep. Actually we have A LOT of common words with Bulgarian, Turkish, Azeri aso. Also I always use two basic words for my language comparison that will tell you a few things :) The logic behind it is that when you are born, you first see your parents. It would be insane to think that these 2 words would be "borrowed" from another language, so I think it's safe to say that these words have the same root. So let's compare them to other languages (I used Wiktionary and Google search and am only listing the similar ones). I am writing the words as spoken since special characters are not recognized here. Words for mother / father Hungarian: anya / atya (old word, also used in the Bible - new word apa) Azeri (Azerbaidjan): ana / ata Albanian: eme / ate Basque (Spain - Basque land): ama / aitak Turkish: anne / ata Greenlandic: anaana / ataata Navajo (yes, the American indians): amá / azhé Estonian: ema / isa Chuvash (Chuvashia, Russia): anne / atte Nepali: aama / buwa Erzyan (Mordovia, Russia): ava / atja Hausa (West Africa): inna / uba Tatar: ana / ata Sindhi (Pakistan): ama / babo Sinhala (Sri Lanka): amma / tatta Tagalog (Phillipinnes): ina / ama Abhkazian (Republic of Georgia): an / ab Amharic (Ethiopia): anat / abbaa Udmurt (Udmurtia, Russia): anaj / ataj Uyghur (China): ana / ata Uzbek (Uzbekistan): ona / ota |
VagyokAkiVagyok User ID: 64242048 Hungary 11/20/2014 05:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | As you see, we have basically THE SAME words for mother and father all over the world and mainly used by indigenous people, who in most places have been suppressed and assimilated. In my researches I have come to the conclusion that in Europe, the only people who still "carry" the remnants of this great ancient civilization (hidden from us actually) AND who have an own country are the Hungarians. All other people who carry this code, like OP is calling it, are living in small groups and are not being allowed to form their own countries and rule themselves. There is a reason for this also.... |
redhouserebel (OP) User ID: 65326050 United Kingdom 11/20/2014 06:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I tried to post another word .. explanation/breakdown - and got another ban - not sure what to do. I feel like someone is running a book on the outcome of something and i am not allowed to post until the bets are in or something. The posts which show you are hearing me mean so much like you have no idea. xxxxx Big Love. xxxx A MILF Mortgage - coming soon ;) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 37757297 Hungary 11/20/2014 02:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And it's totally different from surrounding languages in the near areas or other countries, such as German and Dutch? Quoting: watchZEITGEISTnow Well, that's actually true, since it's not an Indo-European, but a Finno-Ugric language. it's NOT finno-ugric :) that's part of the hoax I'm sure you're an expert on the subject. But what makes you so sure about that? |
redhouserebel (OP) User ID: 65328830 United Kingdom 11/20/2014 02:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And it's totally different from surrounding languages in the near areas or other countries, such as German and Dutch? Quoting: watchZEITGEISTnow Well, that's actually true, since it's not an Indo-European, but a Finno-Ugric language. it's NOT finno-ugric :) that's part of the hoax I'm sure you're an expert on the subject. But what makes you so sure about that? I don't know how VagyokAkiVagyok would go about answering that - but I feel that the thing to do here - is try to remember that these terms of.. terminology,, being used to classify certain languages in to particular groups are names which have been made up by people who have looked at words between the languages and looked for things which they give names to - like "taxons" - or similarities... so what you might deduce from this is that those people found some similarities between some languages which they then categorised as - finno-ugric - and other similarities between other languages which they then were allowed to categorise as indo-european - because there was no one viable around to debate with them or argue with them sufficiently about the relationships between the various languages. I wonder if instead of comparing words - if they had compared meanings if they would have been any the wiser. Having thought about this for a few seconds - I am inclined to say my question was irrelevant. So what we are left with here is the prospect of trying to have a discussion about the true origins of these languages with a whole load of terminology thrown in which is going to do nothing more than muddying the waters. For example - how can those who believe in the indo-european language set - exclude Basque? Where on earth do they think that came from then - and how do they think it got THERE? Explanations, while needing to be logical - also need to be practical. How for example do they explain the distinction between these groups of languages - are they saying there were two roots? One giving rise to the indo-european and one to the finno-ugric? Really - who cares - don't even boggle your mind with that question - it only muddies the waters. There was one code - and one day - it will be like a ... I don't know what you call those kind of diagrams - like an ancestry tree - but the languages on the tree do not evolve - THEY ARE GIVEN - and yes of course there is some evolution involved as they grow and change - but this is not done by accident either - or else how has SO MUCH meaning been kept? The hoax the dude there might be referring to - is how has this knowledge been lost or hidden - well - for one - it isn't and hasn't - you can read all about it in the Bible which is ENCODED with lots and lots and lots of secrets - like you would not believe - and 2 - supposing at some stage - some people usurped the power of the highest - but they didn't know the code - so things started getting messed up. This concept would have led on very nicely from the post I kept trying to make which kept getting banned - which was a decryption of the word for WOMAN. xx Last Edited by redhouserebel on 11/20/2014 02:51 PM A MILF Mortgage - coming soon ;) |
redhouserebel (OP) User ID: 65328830 United Kingdom 11/20/2014 03:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 37757297 Well, that's actually true, since it's not an Indo-European, but a Finno-Ugric language. it's NOT finno-ugric :) that's part of the hoax I'm sure you're an expert on the subject. But what makes you so sure about that? I don't know how VagyokAkiVagyok would go about answering that - but I feel that the thing to do here - is try to remember that these terms of.. terminology,, being used to classify certain languages in to particular groups are names which have been made up by people who have looked at words between the languages and looked for things which they give names to - like "taxons" - or similarities... so what you might deduce from this is that those people found some similarities between some languages which they then categorised as - finno-ugric - and other similarities between other languages which they then were allowed to categorise as indo-european - because there was no one viable around to debate with them or argue with them sufficiently about the relationships between the various languages. I wonder if instead of comparing words - if they had compared meanings if they would have been any the wiser. Having thought about this for a few seconds - I am inclined to say my question was irrelevant. So what we are left with here is the prospect of trying to have a discussion about the true origins of these languages with a whole load of terminology thrown in which is going to do nothing more than muddying the waters. For example - how can those who believe in the indo-european language set - exclude Basque? Where on earth do they think that came from then - and how do they think it got THERE? Explanations, while needing to be logical - also need to be practical. How for example do they explain the distinction between these groups of languages - are they saying there were two roots? One giving rise to the indo-european and one to the finno-ugric? Really - who cares - don't even boggle your mind with that question - it only muddies the waters. There was one code - and one day - it will be like a ... I don't know what you call those kind of diagrams - like an ancestry tree - but the languages on the tree do not evolve - THEY ARE GIVEN - and yes of course there is some evolution involved as they grow and change - but this is not done by accident either - or else how has SO MUCH meaning been kept? The hoax the dude there might be referring to - is how has this knowledge been lost or hidden - well - for one - it isn't and hasn't - you can read all about it in the Bible which is ENCODED with lots and lots and lots of secrets - like you would not believe - and 2 - supposing at some stage - some people usurped the power of the highest - but they didn't know the code - so things started getting messed up. This concept would have led on very nicely from the post I kept trying to make which kept getting banned - which was a decryption of the word for WOMAN. xx The great thing about this proposition - to forget your programming - to forget what you know or what you think you know - some of it anyway - is that most people have not ever heard of terms like indo-european or finno-ugric etc or whatever they are so they could start with a clean slate - and hopefully the ones who have become gamiliar with these terms are also brainy enough not too suffer too greatly from any cognitive dissonance. :D A MILF Mortgage - coming soon ;) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 37757297 Hungary 11/20/2014 03:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 37757297 Well, that's actually true, since it's not an Indo-European, but a Finno-Ugric language. it's NOT finno-ugric :) that's part of the hoax I'm sure you're an expert on the subject. But what makes you so sure about that? I don't know how VagyokAkiVagyok would go about answering that - but I feel that the thing to do here - is try to remember that these terms of.. terminology,, being used to classify certain languages in to particular groups are names which have been made up by people who have looked at words between the languages and looked for things which they give names to - like "taxons" - or similarities... so what you might deduce from this is that those people found some similarities between some languages which they then categorised as - finno-ugric - and other similarities between other languages which they then were allowed to categorise as indo-european - because there was no one viable around to debate with them or argue with them sufficiently about the relationships between the various languages. I wonder if instead of comparing words - if they had compared meanings if they would have been any the wiser. Having thought about this for a few seconds - I am inclined to say my question was irrelevant. So what we are left with here is the prospect of trying to have a discussion about the true origins of these languages with a whole load of terminology thrown in which is going to do nothing more than muddying the waters. For example - how can those who believe in the indo-european language set - exclude Basque? Where on earth do they think that came from then - and how do they think it got THERE? Explanations, while needing to be logical - also need to be practical. How for example do they explain the distinction between these groups of languages - are they saying there were two roots? One giving rise to the indo-european and one to the finno-ugric? Really - who cares - don't even boggle your mind with that question - it only muddies the waters. There was one code - and one day - it will be like a ... I don't know what you call those kind of diagrams - like an ancestry tree - but the languages on the tree do not evolve - THEY ARE GIVEN - and yes of course there is some evolution involved as they grow and change - but this is not done by accident either - or else how has SO MUCH meaning been kept? The hoax the dude there might be referring to - is how has this knowledge been lost or hidden - well - for one - it isn't and hasn't - you can read all about it in the Bible which is ENCODED with lots and lots and lots of secrets - like you would not believe - and 2 - supposing at some stage - some people usurped the power of the highest - but they didn't know the code - so things started getting messed up. This concept would have led on very nicely from the post I kept trying to make which kept getting banned - which was a decryption of the word for WOMAN. xx Linguistic groupings, language families are not created simply by just comparing words. Linguists look at certain patterns languages evolve through and look for certain shared grammatical traits. |
redhouserebel (OP) User ID: 65328830 United Kingdom 11/20/2014 05:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm sure you're an expert on the subject. But what makes you so sure about that? I don't know how VagyokAkiVagyok would go about answering that - but I feel that the thing to do here - is try to remember that these terms of.. terminology,, being used to classify certain languages in to particular groups are names which have been made up by people who have looked at words between the languages and looked for things which they give names to - like "taxons" - or similarities... so what you might deduce from this is that those people found some similarities between some languages which they then categorised as - finno-ugric - and other similarities between other languages which they then were allowed to categorise as indo-european - because there was no one viable around to debate with them or argue with them sufficiently about the relationships between the various languages. I wonder if instead of comparing words - if they had compared meanings if they would have been any the wiser. Having thought about this for a few seconds - I am inclined to say my question was irrelevant. So what we are left with here is the prospect of trying to have a discussion about the true origins of these languages with a whole load of terminology thrown in which is going to do nothing more than muddying the waters. For example - how can those who believe in the indo-european language set - exclude Basque? Where on earth do they think that came from then - and how do they think it got THERE? Explanations, while needing to be logical - also need to be practical. How for example do they explain the distinction between these groups of languages - are they saying there were two roots? One giving rise to the indo-european and one to the finno-ugric? Really - who cares - don't even boggle your mind with that question - it only muddies the waters. There was one code - and one day - it will be like a ... I don't know what you call those kind of diagrams - like an ancestry tree - but the languages on the tree do not evolve - THEY ARE GIVEN - and yes of course there is some evolution involved as they grow and change - but this is not done by accident either - or else how has SO MUCH meaning been kept? The hoax the dude there might be referring to - is how has this knowledge been lost or hidden - well - for one - it isn't and hasn't - you can read all about it in the Bible which is ENCODED with lots and lots and lots of secrets - like you would not believe - and 2 - supposing at some stage - some people usurped the power of the highest - but they didn't know the code - so things started getting messed up. This concept would have led on very nicely from the post I kept trying to make which kept getting banned - which was a decryption of the word for WOMAN. xx Linguistic groupings, language families are not created simply by just comparing words. Linguists look at certain patterns languages evolve through and look for certain shared grammatical traits. OK - you said that bit better than me - but my point is that this is not the whole picture - it does not give a full or whole picture - which is why some languages are excluded from .... connection - when they should not be. There are clearly other forms of "grammatical trait" which have not been considered as being connective. xx A MILF Mortgage - coming soon ;) |
VagyokAkiVagyok User ID: 64242048 Hungary 11/21/2014 02:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And it's totally different from surrounding languages in the near areas or other countries, such as German and Dutch? Quoting: watchZEITGEISTnow Well, that's actually true, since it's not an Indo-European, but a Finno-Ugric language. it's NOT finno-ugric :) that's part of the hoax I'm sure you're an expert on the subject. But what makes you so sure about that? Well first of all check my posts above. Secondly, Finnish an Hungarian are VERY different, I've met Finns who said they cannot hear any similarities AT ALL. Third, I've pointed out the fact that the most basic words in Hungarian, which a person learns FOR THE VERY FIRST TIME are "anya" and "atya" (mother and father) Hungarian is a CONSONANT based language (check my post above) Anya is THE SINGLE one-consonant word which uses NY Atya is also the single one-consonant word which uses TY In ALL Turkic languages, the word for ANYA is ANA, or ANNE, while the word for ATYA is ATA or ATE In Finnish you cannot find this similarity: Anya=Aiti, Atya=Isa (Isza) Considering that these words are the very first words a baby learns, don't you find it interesting that the word is basically THE SAME as in Hungarian in all Turkish languages, While in the language which supposedly is part of the same family, these words are different?!? Why in the world would any group of people need to borrow or alter the words they use for the people who conceived them and gave them life on this Earth?! Can't you see that this Finno-Ugric thing is absolute nonsense?! You can say "yeah, but these languages evolved and that's why the words changed". Then I ask you: WHY haven't the words changed in ALL other languages, except in Finnish?! And why are the words THE SAME in all Turkic languages, INCLUDING Hungarian?! The thing is that some people didn't want Hungarian to be in any way related to Turkic and that's why they made-up the Finn-Ugric theory (which is 300 years "young" btw) because that would mean that we have in Europe a country which is actually full of descendants of the Sumerians and which still carries the code OP is talking about. THE SINGLE country in Europe! All other countries are either in Asia or these people haven't got a country AT ALL. In my opinion the other descendants of the Sumerians are ie the Basques, Azeri, the people from Central Asia (can't remember their name now) and also the people scattered all over the Urals, which are all now part of Russia. |
VagyokAkiVagyok User ID: 64242048 Hungary 11/21/2014 02:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Please explain why languages where the most basic words like mother and father are the same haven't been included in the same group. If you are a tribe of people and you wander around the world, you use your own words, then go and settle somewhere, then why in the world would you need to borrow or change these two words from the other group of people living in the area?! Why are ALL other languages except Hungarian, who use "ana" and "ata" to define the people who brought you in this world grouped as Turkic, while Hungarian is grouped as "finno-ugric"?! Or do you think Hungarians were so unevolved that they didn't have their own words for mother and father and had to borrow it from Turkish? :) |
VagyokAkiVagyok User ID: 64242048 Hungary 11/21/2014 04:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | OP, have you considered the possibility that there are actually two groups of people with two different "codes"? That would explain why we have ie Basque, which is totally different from the surrounding languages, just like Hungarian. Also, in Italy there wears the Etruscan language, which was also "isolated" Isn't it possible that people which held the so-called Indo-European language code have assimilated people who held the Sumerian code (which is btw also defined as "isolated") This would/could bring us back to Atlantis and Lemuria... |
VagyokAkiVagyok User ID: 64242048 Hungary 11/21/2014 05:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Don't know if you have this already, but here is the old Hungarian runic script: [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] Here are some tablets they found in Transylvania, dating 5000 BC. Interestingly enough, you can clearly recognize more runes from the Hungarian script above: [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] Here is the Sumerian script: [link to www.omniglot.com] |
redhouserebel (OP) User ID: 65357472 United Kingdom 11/21/2014 08:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | *when you need a brew and you're out of teabags* A MILF Mortgage - coming soon ;) |
redhouserebel (OP) User ID: 65357472 United Kingdom 11/21/2014 09:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | OK I found an old unfinished cup of tea from last night and stuck it in the microwave and gave it a top up - so glad i didn't have to go and drag water from a well and i had a squint at this link you gave me [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] I can see lots of things. I think somewhere on this thread I mentioned noticed - with the vowels and how they are working - that there is a similarity to a pigpen code such as used in the orchestration of the celtic - and yes i see some ogham-comparisons now - both in what i see on this link and also in what i saw last night in the sumerian stuff. They are all about where you are crossing from and to - and who is doing it and under whose instruction - but the similarities do not connect the languages - except to an earlier source - which gives it; what I mean is - if i send one group tot he east and say go conquer and one to the west and say go conquer - and they both use the same concept to conquer - and then later there are similarities in their codes or alphabets - it doesn't mean these peoples or civilisations ever met - except at their source. I heard what you are saying about ny and ty - also there is ly - the y is unfortunate - compare it with the j and the k - it can be both a instruction and in the vowel sense - a placement - but the placement can be final - as in an actual death - this only happens during a certain phase - after that phase the y no longer retains that meaning and just assimilates itself with the words in the language - its meaning hidden forever after. I have to go hunting and gathering now for teabags. quickly - sz - authority to send up and down - also cz -- someone who has crossed and also gained authority to send up and down - but at a lower level - I know in some languages we have csar for a high official - there are reasons for that - just as their are .. associate this with words like king or lord - where they can mean both the leader - but also the people - back in the day. A MILF Mortgage - coming soon ;) |
redhouserebel (OP) User ID: 65357472 United Kingdom 11/21/2014 09:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | OK I found an old unfinished cup of tea from last night and stuck it in the microwave and gave it a top up - so glad i didn't have to go and drag water from a well and i had a squint at this link you gave me Quoting: redhouserebel [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] I can see lots of things. I think somewhere on this thread I mentioned noticed - with the vowels and how they are working - that there is a similarity to a pigpen code such as used in the orchestration of the celtic - and yes i see some ogham-comparisons now - both in what i see on this link and also in what i saw last night in the sumerian stuff. They are all about where you are crossing from and to - and who is doing it and under whose instruction - but the similarities do not connect the languages - except to an earlier source - which gives it; what I mean is - if i send one group tot he east and say go conquer and one to the west and say go conquer - and they both use the same concept to conquer - and then later there are similarities in their codes or alphabets - it doesn't mean these peoples or civilisations ever met - except at their source. I heard what you are saying about ny and ty - also there is ly - the y is unfortunate - compare it with the j and the k - it can be both a instruction and in the vowel sense - a placement - but the placement can be final - as in an actual death - this only happens during a certain phase - after that phase the y no longer retains that meaning and just assimilates itself with the words in the language - its meaning hidden forever after. I have to go hunting and gathering now for teabags. quickly - sz - authority to send up and down - also cz -- someone who has crossed and also gained authority to send up and down - but at a lower level - I know in some languages we have csar for a high official - there are reasons for that - just as their are .. associate this with words like king or lord - where they can mean both the leader - but also the people - back in the day. I have sneakily put some hints and clues about the WOMAN word which I kept getting banned over before A MILF Mortgage - coming soon ;) |