Child Porn Viewers to get medical help instead of jail...Every perversion is being legitimized. | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24413414 United States 12/05/2014 11:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 61006052 United States 12/05/2014 11:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 51512719 United Kingdom 12/05/2014 11:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 62627759 United States 12/05/2014 11:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Good that's how it should be! Less people will be incarcerated for BS... It's like people who have drug problems. They should receive medical care instead of jail time. Since when has incarceration ever stopped a problem? It just prolongs the issue when the person gets out. This opinion is only in regards to those "viewing" it. Yes, if you partake in the actual act, then you probably should receive a sentence along with your medical treatment. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65731174 United States 12/05/2014 12:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | pedophiles can never be cured from all i've read about it. but at least jail may put the fear in them. not that they keep them for very long. do more time for possession of weed than child molesting. heinous |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 45225682 United Kingdom 12/05/2014 12:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65411965 United States 12/05/2014 12:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There has been a long and torrid history of pedophilia within the elite and people in positions of power. Quoting: DeadbeatDad There has been a long and torrid history of pedophilia within the general population. You make it seem as if only people in power are into such things when there's millions of regular people around the world who get off to children. Well now, TPTB in the UK have decided NOT to seek jail for those viewing child pornography but instead grant them "medical treatment". Quoting: DeadbeatDad I think TPTB should ban all porn and seek jail for those viewing it, all porn viewers obviously have a mental disorder & need treatment and/or castration. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 45225682 United Kingdom 12/05/2014 12:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No they don't have a mental disorder. They are taking pleasure in others pain. Because it makes them feel better.... You know like those dog fighters, who put dogs in a ring and like to watch the tear each other apart just for the fun of it. That's no different and its a crime not a mental illness. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 63426209 United States 12/05/2014 12:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 63426209 United States 12/05/2014 12:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 37200755 United States 12/05/2014 12:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why don't they also give medical help to the homosexuals? They also have a mental illness. Oh wait, they made the choice, no wait, they were born with a mental illness just like pedophiles, no wait, pedophiles made the choice! Read it on GLP over and over and over again that LGBT, homosexual marriage and allowing them "equality" is the foot in the door to legitimizing a lot of things like this, next to necrophilia and beastiality. All in the name of love! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65784545 United Kingdom 12/05/2014 01:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just last month in the middle of a BBC article about why they would not be prosecuting all online viewers of child rape ..... came this statement "A suspect who has viewed indecent images (child porn) online, but to date, done nothing abusive in the 'real world' may offend at a later date" The new teachings...a viewer of child rape has done nothing abusive in the 'real world.....nor offended. Of course they've offended and abused those children because it's their sexual lust that sees those children raped on film. This is how they sway entire entire generations into 'new beliefs'. Hear something enough, they know man comes to believe it. Child porn is made for those who want to watch it. No viewers = no child rape for film purposes.. You want to watch it? Then you are responsible for the rape of those children. But to divorce us from responsibility and accountability to those children, they start this garbage. Please, be on the lookout. It's following the exact same steps as homosexual acceptance. Homosexuality has gone hand in hand with pederasty throughout history - and they lie that it does not. Oh, and on the same day they reported that households who allow a particular weed to grow on their property may face £2500 and an anti-social order. Go figure. We are truly done for if people continue on this path. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65784545 United Kingdom 12/05/2014 01:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Knock it down from a crime to a 'medical' condition. That one step removes the legal charge of child abuse. It rejects any notion that a man or woman watching child RAPE has any culpability for the child's rape. It's like stating that the one who hires a hit man has no responsibility in the murder of the victim. Of course they do! Without them, no murder would have taken place. Once its knocked down to a 'medical condition', then the homosexual and pederastic psychiatrists will remove it from the list of medical conditions. Same steps as homosexual. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65232126 United States 12/05/2014 01:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Mental Health Group Looks to Remove Stigma From Pedophilia A group of psychiatrists and other mental health professionals say it's time to change the way society views individuals who have physical attractions to children. [link to www.foxnews.com] This has been in the works for awhile...sickening! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 20241035 United States 12/05/2014 01:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Good that's how it should be! Less people will be incarcerated for BS... It's like people who have drug problems. They should receive medical care instead of jail time. Since when has incarceration ever stopped a problem? It just prolongs the issue when the person gets out. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 62627759 This opinion is only in regards to those "viewing" it. Yes, if you partake in the actual act, then you probably should receive a sentence along with your medical treatment. Saw what you did there.... You are saying pedophilia is just "BS"...and by lumping these people in with those with "drug problems" you are trying to equate the two on the SAME level. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3770846 United Kingdom 12/05/2014 01:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Mental Health Group Looks to Remove Stigma From Pedophilia Quoting: Ouiser A group of psychiatrists and other mental health professionals say it's time to change the way society views individuals who have physical attractions to children. [link to www.foxnews.com] This has been in the works for awhile...sickening! I would bet money that 90% of this "group" are Communistic Bolshies of the Tribester persuasion! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 45225682 United Kingdom 12/05/2014 01:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Knock it down from a crime to a 'medical' condition. That one step removes the legal charge of child abuse. It rejects any notion that a man or woman watching child RAPE has any culpability for the child's rape. It's like stating that the one who hires a hit man has no responsibility in the murder of the victim. Of course they do! Without them, no murder would have taken place. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 65784545 Once its knocked down to a 'medical condition', then the homosexual and pederastic psychiatrists will remove it from the list of medical conditions. Same steps as homosexual. Good point or those who like to be abused by others for pleasure. Med for them too! Bottom line is if they cross the line there is no return.. there shouldn't be. They do what they do INTENTIONALLY CRUELLY. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 20241035 United States 12/05/2014 01:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just last month in the middle of a BBC article about why they would not be prosecuting all online viewers of child rape ..... came this statement Quoting: Anonymous Coward 65784545 "A suspect who has viewed indecent images (child porn) online, but to date, done nothing abusive in the 'real world' may offend at a later date" The new teachings...a viewer of child rape has done nothing abusive in the 'real world.....nor offended. Of course they've offended and abused those children because it's their sexual lust that sees those children raped on film. This is how they sway entire entire generations into 'new beliefs'. Hear something enough, they know man comes to believe it. Child porn is made for those who want to watch it. No viewers = no child rape for film purposes.. You want to watch it? Then you are responsible for the rape of those children. But to divorce us from responsibility and accountability to those children, they start this garbage. Please, be on the lookout. It's following the exact same steps as homosexual acceptance. Homosexuality has gone hand in hand with pederasty throughout history - and they lie that it does not. Oh, and on the same day they reported that households who allow a particular weed to grow on their property may face £2500 and an anti-social order. Go figure. We are truly done for if people continue on this path. EXACTLY. Words are used to DECEIVE and to trick the MIND: "A suspect who has viewed indecent images (child porn) online, but to date, done nothing abusive in the 'real world' may offend at a later date" This statement is saying, in a backhanded way, that a person who has viewed child porn online "has done nothing abusive in the real world nor offended". Well, shoot...did they "view" the child porn in outerspace? In the land of Oz? Is "online" not in the real world? They freaking viewed it IN THE REAL WORLD. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 45225682 United Kingdom 12/05/2014 01:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
lee14714 User ID: 23350068 United Kingdom 12/05/2014 01:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | perhaps drs see their jobs going if they don,t have a future supply of broken ones. i propose lobotomy s treatment of choice. Arachnid.T. i want a cup of Tea now |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 20241035 United States 12/05/2014 01:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just last month in the middle of a BBC article about why they would not be prosecuting all online viewers of child rape ..... came this statement Quoting: Anonymous Coward 65784545 "A suspect who has viewed indecent images (child porn) online, but to date, done nothing abusive in the 'real world' may offend at a later date" The new teachings...a viewer of child rape has done nothing abusive in the 'real world.....nor offended. Of course they've offended and abused those children because it's their sexual lust that sees those children raped on film. This is how they sway entire entire generations into 'new beliefs'. Hear something enough, they know man comes to believe it. Child porn is made for those who want to watch it. No viewers = no child rape for film purposes.. You want to watch it? Then you are responsible for the rape of those children. But to divorce us from responsibility and accountability to those children, they start this garbage. Please, be on the lookout. It's following the exact same steps as homosexual acceptance. Homosexuality has gone hand in hand with pederasty throughout history - and they lie that it does not. Oh, and on the same day they reported that households who allow a particular weed to grow on their property may face £2500 and an anti-social order. Go figure. We are truly done for if people continue on this path. EXACTLY. Words are used to DECEIVE and to trick the MIND: "A suspect who has viewed indecent images (child porn) online, but to date, done nothing abusive in the 'real world' may offend at a later date" This statement is saying, in a backhanded way, that a person who has viewed child porn online "has done nothing abusive in the real world nor offended". Well, shoot...did they "view" the child porn in outerspace? In the land of Oz? Is "online" not in the real world? They freaking viewed it IN THE REAL WORLD. And to add. That sentence is saying "viewing child porn online" is NOT abusive nor offensive. The serpent is crafty with his/her words. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65784545 United Kingdom 12/05/2014 01:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just last month in the middle of a BBC article about why they would not be prosecuting all online viewers of child rape ..... came this statement Quoting: Anonymous Coward 65784545 "A suspect who has viewed indecent images (child porn) online, but to date, done nothing abusive in the 'real world' may offend at a later date" The new teachings...a viewer of child rape has done nothing abusive in the 'real world.....nor offended. Of course they've offended and abused those children because it's their sexual lust that sees those children raped on film. This is how they sway entire entire generations into 'new beliefs'. Hear something enough, they know man comes to believe it. Child porn is made for those who want to watch it. No viewers = no child rape for film purposes.. You want to watch it? Then you are responsible for the rape of those children. But to divorce us from responsibility and accountability to those children, they start this garbage. Please, be on the lookout. It's following the exact same steps as homosexual acceptance. Homosexuality has gone hand in hand with pederasty throughout history - and they lie that it does not. Oh, and on the same day they reported that households who allow a particular weed to grow on their property may face £2500 and an anti-social order. Go figure. We are truly done for if people continue on this path. EXACTLY. Words are used to DECEIVE and to trick the MIND: "A suspect who has viewed indecent images (child porn) online, but to date, done nothing abusive in the 'real world' may offend at a later date" This statement is saying, in a backhanded way, that a person who has viewed child porn online "has done nothing abusive in the real world nor offended". Well, shoot...did they "view" the child porn in outerspace? In the land of Oz? Is "online" not in the real world? They freaking viewed it IN THE REAL WORLD. And to add. That sentence is saying "viewing child porn online" is NOT abusive nor offensive. The serpent is crafty with his/her words. Yes, right in the middle of an article they slipped their new teaching in. That sentence is read, absorbed in the mind, then added to each and every time that we encounter it. It then morphs into the beliefs of the future generation.. This is how one generation can be so separated in beliefs from the generations before it. And yet, this disparity in beliefs is not a sign of modern times or enlightenment as so many claim, but rather proof of the propaganda and indoctrination that has come upon a society. One generation from now the young adults will view child rape as just another form of sexuality to be expressed. Of course, they won't call it by its name of child rape, they will call it tolerance, love and enlightenment - never ever understanding who and what has overcome them - others who want it legalised, accepted and tolerated. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65755373 United States 12/05/2014 01:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think for awhile now in several states the law was basically that you could view it but not download it. So this doesn't surprise me really. They have been setting up for it. I think the reasoning in the article was something like the majority of what ppl were looking at was teenagers who put this stuff out there on their own. So "victimless" crime. Of course that opens the door for the younger and rougher stuff everyone is worried about. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65786971 United States 12/05/2014 02:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 61464139 United States 12/05/2014 08:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 51323524 United States 12/05/2014 08:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65754194 United States 12/05/2014 09:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Recently in the U.S. DSM paedophilia was listed as a sexual orientation rather than an illness. Previous commenter was right- this has been in the works for a while. Just look at all the "fashion" advertising out there. The "women" all look like pre-pubescent little girls. No longer do we idolize the curves of a woman as beauty. It's all about "teens" that look even younger than that. "Men" are smooth faced and feminine, like little boys are. We're in big trouble. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24413414 United States 12/05/2014 09:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65312806 Canada 12/05/2014 09:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Matrix User ID: 65533875 Australia 12/05/2014 09:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |