British Born Muslim Family Stripped Of Citizenship And Deported!!!

Who the fuck cares? They can choose an islamic country of their choice and off they go.

about fucking time. Many more to come i hope. better yet a bullet in the back of the head.

Citizenship has never been a Right, it has always been a privilege.

A condition of Citizenship has always involved compliance with our Law, plus, historically, if anybody's Citizenship had been a doubt, they could be summoned to appear before a Justice of the Peace, to swear the Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy, on the Bible.

Any refusal to do so, was taken as confirmation of non-Citizenship.

It will be a piece of cake to remove these incompatibilities from our Society.

The longest journey begins with the first step.

That step has now been taken.

You are all missing something very crucial here. SOmething that affects all non-white Brits inthe UK. That is, that thing called citizenship, that they hold onto so dearly, is not worth the paper it's written on.

Can a white british person (i.e. white british mother and father) be deported even if they were the worst terrorist known to man? The answer is quite cearly NO. Where would that person be deported to? Australia? Again?

So now we know there are true citizens that can never be deported to anywhere no matter what, and second class citizens that can now be thrown out on whim.

Interesting times indeed!

Exactly the point I'm making. OUR law - implies you are not truely part of us.

How would you enforce non-Citizenship on a white Brit?


Many foreigners and their offsprings are so confused in the UK now, that they have actually stopped reffering to themselves as British, and now start to see themselves as English, Scottish, Welsh, Irish.

THere is a whole detailed history into been English, Scot etc. Not just coming in on a boat, filling in a form and you suddenly become English.

The mob are fickle...... Well played the 4th branch for luring in these clueless, uneducated, racist dumb wits. If we pointed this anger at the real problem within this planet, the gangsters running and controlling it then we would make progress.

About time, send them all to Mecca, theres room for them all in Soddy Barbaria, House Saud can pay for them all, its their people after all.

The crimes of the muslims are on your hands besides those that brought them in commie.

Hard to believe that GLP'ers don't see the slippery slope problem with this...

Who will they strip citizenship from and deport next? And for what?

Jews next

You mention Australia and it was deportation to Australia of white people, that proves the principle is correct, and applicable to all.

Criminals declare themselves to be non-citizens, by placing themselves outside the protections of the Law (the old descriptor 'Outlaw' was a better aid in comprehension). Reading a suspect their 'Rights' essentially returns a type of 'limbo citizenship' to them, and extends the protections of the Law to them, until a Court and Jury of their Peers can decide on guilt or innocence, deprive citizenship temporarily while jailed on a guilty verdict, or restore full citizenship with a not guilty verdict.

Imprisonment is a withdrawal of citizenship until the individual is considered fit to become a citizen again.

Frankly, Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy should be obligatory for a return to the protections of the Law and full citizenship, upon release.

The death penalty is only a permanent withdrawal of citizenship, to those who cannot be trusted to comply with the status of law abiding residents. Banishment for life was a far from uncommon alternative to the death penalty, all around the World, and served the same purpose.

You do not have to be a citizen to be a resident. But only citizens should have the privilege of voting (basically this is why prisoners were never allowed to vote, because they were by definition non-citizens), serving in Public Office, etc.

There has been a lot of deliberate and unnecessary confusion introduced into such areas of Law, when the principles are actually pretty straightforward and common sense.

Aside from the liberals there in Britain, there is only so far you can push the British people before they push back. This is a case in point and I wouldn't doubt laws are passed to create bans to prevent Muslims from ever entering Britain. It would be one thing if the Muslims wanted to enter Britain and embrace the society, while adding to the culture, but that isn't the way things happen with Muslims.

They segregate themselves, then ask, no scream for special treatment. They have zero desire to become part of the society, only goal is to change it to what their belief system is.

This leads to the question as to why the Muslims moved away in the first place. It certainly can't be because you wanted a better life. It's evident you saw an advantage due to liberal policies and went full out to take advantage of that.

I'd say the welcome is well worn out with the British people and they are pushing back. This will lead to a no welcome policy spreading through all of Europe when it comes to Muslims.

That is the way it should be and has to be to have any semblance of a civilized society.

Precisely. A white Brit can only ever be imprisoned and not deported.

A non-white Brit (whether by birth or naturalisation) can be imprisoned or deported.

The book "Hitler's Willing Executioners", by Daniel Goldhagen, is an execellent read. All the Jews went about saying, "Ich bin Deutsch". In their confusion, they clearly and truely believed that they too were Germans. But the true Germans hard other ideas.

Apologies for quoting myself, but perhaps some clarification is in order.

Please do not consider that I support what were the actions of a politicised and criminal Judiciary in their treatment of 'offenders' with deportation.

It is the principle that is correct, not the way it was abused.

By this time we had already suffered criminal changes to our Law and Constitution, carried out by enemies foreign and domestic.

The prime initial culprit in this, was the Jacobite William Murray, the 1st Earl of Mansfield, and the criminal damage he did while he was Attorney General and Lord Chief Justice.

He was named by President John Quincy Adams, as the man most responsible for the American War of Independence.

Rightly despised by the likes of William Pitt, this criminal tried to establish that Parliament had Divine Right, and that it and its occupants, were above the Law.

This exchange in Parliament should illustrate why America's Founding Fathers were far from amused, and obviously could see the writing on the wall:

"instead of the arbitrary power of a King, must we submit to the arbitrary power of the House of Commons? If this be true, what benefit do we derive from the exchange? Tyranny my Lords is detestable in every shape, but none so formidable as where it is assumed and exercised by a number of tyrants.

But my Lords this is not the fact, this is not the Constitution, we have a Law of Parliament. We have a Statute Book and the Bill of Rights." William Pitt attempting to counter William Murray

Do you envisage a situation, where the 'Australia Option', might again be exercised?

"We are innocent of all the allegations but our situation prevents us from answering the allegations,' the 51-year-old told the Sunday Times. "We are British through and through. The best of British values don't contradict Islamic values. We as a family have been abandoned by the British [government] and this is tearing our family apart."

Cry me a fuckin river.

Way to go Theresa May - should be Prime Minister instead of that chinless wonder Cameron.

Er, no thanks!

The thing is, all this started with the "terrorists attacks" of 911.

We all know what that means!

Or don't we?

How long before Cameron gets an email from Brussels. You know...'You can't do that.' Then after the election, they'll bring the family back and pay them a couple of mil compensation. Just wait.

Send them out and go after others with relentless pursuit.

FU

Intersting precident, but I'm not sure the liberal euroscum will allow this to continue. Already the euroscum are running scared because the UK has had enough of being pushed around and we're pushing back.

Next on the agenda, fill in the channel tunnel please.

Give any illegal immo a choice of being shot dead or going back to where they came from...

wow, well well well

well done that woman!

seriously, did somebody in our govt grow a set of balls??

must be the ukip effect

cheers ukip

first reference I've seen on GLP to "hiter's willing executioners" Well done. Not that the hitler worshippers will read it or anyone else for that matter.

And the hitler worshippers will give you a red karma as they always do me if having the audacity to point out mass murder.

but I guess you are an AC, so you are safe.

Curiously enough most of the nazi mass murder deniers/rationalizers seem to be Canadian.

I don't get that. Well, I kind of do,since Canadians are pretty much gubmint worshippers to begin with.

Last Edited by s. d. butler on 12/08/2014 05:52 AM

It is the beginning of big operation, I hope

I would expect they would be free to leave to a destination of their choice.

Banishment is banishment, where they go is then up to them.

By the way I don't know why you are failing to recognise that these citizenship issues are just as applicable to white people as they are to people of any colour.

This is a Law and citizenship issue, not a racial one, or even particularly a religious one.

Ban Mosques as the extremist political places they actually are, declare Islam to be not recognised as a religion (it really isn't), ban Halal meat, ban Muslims from participating in Public life, and allow them the status of residents.

We did this for centuries to prevent the Roman Catholic Church behaving in the same way, with great success (after Rome was promoting the assassination of our leaders, etc).

We only need to abide by our Bill of Rights (which we should be doing anyway - and yes that does mean no Roman Catholics allowed in Parliament, the changes to allow it were entirely illegal, and there is no way that members of Opus Dei should have been allowed to take positions in our Government).

If residents wish to serve the community they are part of, there are plenty of constructive and helpful ways they can participate as non-citizens, without trying to take our Country over.

My grandfather had a similar solution to the Irish problem, back in the day. Take them all to the west coast of UK, tell them to get swimming. Those that turned back would get the 10 cent solution. Might be a bit far to swim to sandland though, lol

Well fine, supposing they had land in Ireland to go back to - but the English stripped them of the land, burnt their homes and left them starving. and the Irish didn't invade England and take their homes and benefits - they built all the roads and railways.Slightly different case old chap - and I say this as an Englishwoman, now living in Ireland among people who are friendly, even though they've got cause not to be.

Good filthy cheeky bastards