MOON LANDING WAS FAKED! TODAY'S NEWS! | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 129802 United Kingdom 09/14/2006 03:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
nomuse (NLI) User ID: 143630 United States 09/14/2006 05:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I understand that some of the HB's are getting annoyed at that sobriquet. I am urged to comment by the last few posts in this thread. I don't think "hoax believer" is an accurate characterization at all. I don't think they believe anything at all. Or otherwise stir themselves to take an interest in much of the world around them. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 129802 United Kingdom 09/14/2006 06:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Barls Knarkley User ID: 31297 Australia 09/15/2006 02:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Otherwise let's drive another stake through this thing's heart. At least until, in best Hammer Films style, it once more rises unbidden and shambles forth to frighten a new generation... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 129802 United Kingdom 09/15/2006 07:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | One last bump for IDW's benefit. Radiative cooling! Black body temperature! Quoting: Barls Knarkley 31297Otherwise let's drive another stake through this thing's heart. At least until, in best Hammer Films style, it once more rises unbidden and shambles forth to frighten a new generation... The horse, she is dead. Please to stop beating her... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 322651 United Kingdom 11/06/2007 03:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | One last bump for IDW's benefit. Radiative cooling! Black body temperature! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 129802Otherwise let's drive another stake through this thing's heart. At least until, in best Hammer Films style, it once more rises unbidden and shambles forth to frighten a new generation... The horse, she is dead. Please to stop beating her... And yet Apollos' leading proponent is afraid to debate IDW on the subject of the Apollo hoax on a one on one basis, without the circus sideshow illustrated so effectively by the regular NASA shills operating on the last few pages of this thread. Jay demands the use of an organized attack , one against many. Thats the only way he is willing to debate! Where is you evidence, again? I don't see where you actually responded to any of the real science with honesty and relevance. |
IDW User ID: 68654876 United States 03/21/2015 01:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
IDW User ID: 68654876 United States 03/21/2015 02:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | so how did they simply cool the ship, tell us asshole... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11033The craft was a bit more reflective than your black car, for a start. IT was also in a vacuum, which cuts both ways in terms of radiative transfer - it could only radiate heat, but it wasn't being warmed by the hot air in your Texas field, either. If you want a more detailed response that that, it will have to wait until I get home. I note you have chosen to ignore my challenge to explain the functioning of a porous plate sublimator. Would you care to retract your "you can't air condition in a vacuum" claim, then? I call you an asshole only because I have already proven to you what I claimed and you refuse to admit it. Would you in any circumstance? It's hard to admit you're a lying piece, so I'll do it for you. getting paid to lie is a sorry way to make a living. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11033That is hardly sufficient reason to get foul mouthed. Resorting to abuse in the first few exchanges of a renewed debate does nothing to help you. Nobody else in this thread has such a propensity for swearing, even when they could also claim that you have displayed the same intransigence you accuse others of. What makes your situation so unique in justifying such a scatological response? I think it is pretty clear that you engage in this sort of behaviour as a vent for your frustrations, and that the abuse is actually part of the rationale, rather than a response to an intolerable affront. If the surface of something is hotter than the air surrounding it, the air cools it. A car sitting in the SUn is much hotter than the air surrounding it. In a vacuum heat can only be removed by radiant processes. If the spacecraft is covered in materials which reflect heat or insulate it, the effect would be made worst by the fact the radiant process was seriously impeded. When you realized I was right, NASA added sublimation systems to the spacecraft themselves in an attempt to explain how they cooled them. The fact is using passive cooling the spacecraft would reach thermal equilibrium around 130-160F, within the operating range of electronics but fatal to humans. |
IDW User ID: 68654876 United States 03/21/2015 02:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | One last bump for IDW's benefit. Radiative cooling! Black body temperature! Quoting: Barls Knarkley 31297Otherwise let's drive another stake through this thing's heart. At least until, in best Hammer Films style, it once more rises unbidden and shambles forth to frighten a new generation... The horse, she is dead. Please to stop beating her... Ten years later and who has made ground and who is losing it? |
74444 User ID: 74444 United States 03/23/2015 11:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | One last bump for IDW's benefit. Radiative cooling! Black body temperature! Quoting: Barls Knarkley 31297Otherwise let's drive another stake through this thing's heart. At least until, in best Hammer Films style, it once more rises unbidden and shambles forth to frighten a new generation... The horse, she is dead. Please to stop beating her... Ten years later and who has made ground and who is losing it? Still hysterically funny. Thread: MOON LANDING WAS FAKED! TODAY'S NEWS! And you were so sure photos from the LRO would reveal nothing at the Apollo sites, yet when it did, you changed your objection to say they must be faked. Ah, constants. |