escaping set | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 26131443 United States 12/25/2014 09:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I had hoped there'd be more interest in this. I guess I'm the only one alone on Christmas. Usually for the Mandelbrot set you use: Re(c) = x Im(c) = y z = c for i = 1 to number_of_iterations z = z² + c next if z -> infinity, it's part of the escaping set, else it's not where z & c are complex Anyway, it's used to define the geometry of certain fractals. But if you use this instead: z = (z ^ 4) + c You'll get a triangle fractal. Using z = (z ^ 5) + c, you'll get a 4-pointed star, etc. When you see the pattern, you can backtrack and realize the Mandelbrot set is like a star with a single point, and it's not dot. There's also a 2-pointed star with an unusual shape. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 26131443 United States 12/25/2014 09:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 26131443 United States 12/25/2014 09:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 26131443 United States 12/25/2014 10:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5148714 United States 12/25/2014 11:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Names mean nothing User ID: 61533440 United States 12/26/2014 12:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's already widely accepted that Mandelbrots are the natural way to geometrically transcribe our world. Being applicable to a black hole would be purely theoretical. Without a hands on investigation to test the theory, it would just be anothing chip in the lunch box... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 66384914 United States 12/26/2014 12:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 66384914 United States 12/26/2014 12:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Most individuals who view this site have an intellect comparable to that of a monkey. Without the ability to visual the fractal sets described by the equations it is hard to blame them for not paying attention. Maybe some pictures or videos would help explain things. Quoting: Names mean nothing 61533440 It's already widely accepted that Mandelbrots are the natural way to geometrically transcribe our world. Being applicable to a black hole would be purely theoretical. Without a hands on investigation to test the theory, it would just be anothing chip in the lunch box... ^^^^^^^^^^This^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 66384914 United States 12/26/2014 12:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I had hoped there'd be more interest in this. I guess I'm the only one alone on Christmas. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26131443 Usually for the Mandelbrot set you use: Re(c) = x Im(c) = y z = c for i = 1 to number_of_iterations z = z² + c next if z -> infinity, it's part of the escaping set, else it's not where z & c are complex Anyway, it's used to define the geometry of certain fractals. But if you use this instead: z = (z ^ 4) + c You'll get a triangle fractal. Using z = (z ^ 5) + c, you'll get a 4-pointed star, etc. When you see the pattern, you can backtrack and realize the Mandelbrot set is like a star with a single point, and it's not dot. There's also a 2-pointed star with an unusual shape. Get out much? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 44493293 United States 12/26/2014 12:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Most individuals who view this site have an intellect comparable to that of a monkey. Without the ability to visual the fractal sets described by the equations it is hard to blame them for not paying attention. Maybe some pictures or videos would help explain things. Quoting: Names mean nothing 61533440 It's already widely accepted that Mandelbrots are the natural way to geometrically transcribe our world. Being applicable to a black hole would be purely theoretical. Without a hands on investigation to test the theory, it would just be anothing chip in the lunch box... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 53480914 United States 12/26/2014 03:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I had hoped there'd be more interest in this. I guess I'm the only one alone on Christmas. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26131443 Usually for the Mandelbrot set you use: Re(c) = x Im(c) = y z = c for i = 1 to number_of_iterations z = z² + c next if z -> infinity, it's part of the escaping set, else it's not where z & c are complex Anyway, it's used to define the geometry of certain fractals. But if you use this instead: z = (z ^ 4) + c You'll get a triangle fractal. Using z = (z ^ 5) + c, you'll get a 4-pointed star, etc. When you see the pattern, you can backtrack and realize the Mandelbrot set is like a star with a single point, and it's not dot. There's also a 2-pointed star with an unusual shape. Get out much? How dare you attempt to ridicule someone because they know something you don't. Shame on you for being suck a fuckhead. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 66364584 Australia 12/26/2014 03:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 53480914 United States 12/26/2014 04:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 66385025 United States 12/26/2014 04:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 66385025 United States 12/26/2014 04:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 44493293 United States 12/26/2014 04:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 44493293 United States 12/26/2014 04:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 53480914 United States 12/26/2014 04:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |