Physics Student Owns Cop In Math-- Results In Wrongful Arrest

Where was the arrest? Why cut it short? Why not show the alleged arrest for dui?

You obviously don't get it. He was way under the legal limit.

Why not arrest the dumb ass cop for being a douche.

He was under the legal limit.

0.016 < 0.08

Of course this is considering he is of drinking age which who knows?

Why not show the begining where he lied to the officer and said he had nothing to drink at all?

Then after registering on the breathalyzer he claims he only had two beers.

Why not show the whole video instead of selective editing?

Maybe we would learn what the kid was really arrested for like lying to an officer, obstructing an investigation, underage consumption, etc...

I believe you can ask for a lawyer at any point but you will be arrested and processed and I doubt they will be nice about it!

.08 x 2 = .16

.16 is over the legal limit of .08

what am i missing?

never mind...he blew a .018 obviously .01 is less than .08

cop is a dick

n/m

Last Edited by Raymantheheretic on 02/03/2015 04:07 PM

Did you catch where the cop said "that little 0 don't mean shit" lol

NO YOUR WRONG it's 0009.90 x 8900.098 = 4

This is a good plan in theory, but most states now have 'implied consent' laws, in which if you are operating a motor vehicle you are automatically implying your consent that if you get pulled over you will comply with DUI protocol.

In some states, this means if you refuse a breathalyzer they'll forcibly take your blood or cath you for urine.

And they will do so legally - indeed, if you resist you will be charged with additional crimes and may be shot and killed for your efforts - all within the legal parameters we've granted these fucks.

but the kid was a .018... probably less than taking cough syrup. if someone gets in an accident with a .018 it wasnt the alcohol that caused the accident.

.

#1: You're not required to speak to a police officer (policy enforcer) during a traffic stop. DON'T. You have nothing to gain and everything to lose.

#2 Under NO CIRCUMSTANCES give evidence against yourself. Don't engage in roadside sobriety tests and don't allow a Breathalyzer unless you are totally sober, and then do it only to prove innocence.You have nothing to gain, the suspension of your license occurs regardless of cooperation if you're really drunk.

If you are charged with DUI and you license suspended, demand a jury trial and read both fourth and fifth Amendments of the bill of rights, AND REST YOUR CASE.Since they have no evidence, there is no case against you. They CANNOT revoke your driver license without a legal cause and you have broken no law refusing. The requirement to provide evidence against yourself is based on the legal fallacy that driving is a privilege and not a right. Juries typically disagree. The instant they charge you with a criminal offense that fallacy evaporates, privileges cannot be dictated by law and there is no such thing as a privilege involving law, which applies to everyone with equal force whether you are privileged or not. Again, juries typically agree. . The judge will dismiss the charge and restore you license, not allowing the jury to decide the case and set a legal precedent proving that the conditional requirement to give evidence against yourself without a warrant specifically describing what that evidence is and probable cause is unconstitutional. Police NEVER have warrants for dui evidence because in general they do not need them because people are conditioned to believe refusing to give evidence is worst than a conviction. IT'S NOT, EVER.

Keep your mouth shut and do not cooperate in your own conviction.

#1: You're not required to speak to a police officer (policy enforcer) during a traffic stop. DON'T. You have nothing to gain and everything to lose.

#2 Under NO CIRCUMSTANCES give evidence against yourself. Don't engage in roadside sobriety tests and don't allow a Breathalyzer unless you are totally sober, and then do it only to prove innocence.You have nothing to gain, the suspension of your license occurs regardless of cooperation if you're really drunk.

If you are charged with DUI and you license suspended, demand a jury trial and read both fourth and fifth Amendments of the bill of rights, AND REST YOUR CASE.Since they have no evidence, there is no case against you. They CANNOT revoke your driver license without a legal cause and you have broken no law refusing. The requirement to provide evidence against yourself is based on the legal fallacy that driving is a privilege and not a right. Juries typically disagree. The instant they charge you with a criminal offense that fallacy evaporates, privileges cannot be dictated by law and there is no such thing as a privilege involving law, which applies to everyone with equal force whether you are privileged or not. Again, juries typically agree. . The judge will dismiss the charge and restore you license, not allowing the jury to decide the case and set a legal precedent proving that the conditional requirement to give evidence against yourself without a warrant specifically describing what that evidence is and probable cause is unconstitutional. Police NEVER have warrants for dui evidence because in general they do not need them because people are conditioned to believe refusing to give evidence is worst than a conviction. IT'S NOT, EVER.

Keep your mouth shut and do not cooperate in your own conviction.

i believe it is 'their' license, it says so on the back ..

There are all kinds of legal fallacies floating around and this is one of them. A license is conditional only upon your abiding in the law, and breaking the law or failing to meet the physical requirements that are required is the only way it can be taken from you (unless you allow it without a fight). The license is yours, it has your name on it, you applied for it, took the tests and paid for it to validate your competency to drive. This is the only reason we have licenses, not to prove we have the privilege to drive.

I think it's the same in all states .. Ct has an open container law .. Limit one drink per passenger

This is a bit pathetic, this is why we have a problem with law enforcement within our country. Yes maybe the kid was being a bit of a douche, I don't know. But cops should have the understanding of at least basic math. If I am going 46 in a 40 I would hate to be given a ticket for 16 over. But playing devils advocate here, you shouldn't be inebriated and driving anyways. My two cents, they are both a bit stupid

Your one of the lucky ones then.

moron

Your about as smart as the cop....The legal limit for alcohol is .08. The cop says the reading is .016 and claims the kid is over the limit. The kid counters and stands up for himself by pointing out to the cop that .016 is not over .08. The cop then realizing his mistake takes the "I'm a cop" mentality and continues to arrest even though he knows what he is doing is wrong....My two cents....the cop is a douche.

If you eat a ultra low carb diet you will fail a breathalyzer because of the keytones.

Under 21 is 0.02

How old was the 'student' in this video at the time?

Maybe you should reread what I wrote previously. No sense in me writing more when you didn't do such a good job on the first response.

then you need to tune your piano dumbass.