NASA Busted: Apollo 17 Moon Hoax

No. I just call him Bob the NAZI. I suppose I find it humorous to point out that it is mainly jews or jew sympathizers defending the accomplishments of NAZI scientists. It's not so much an insult to anyone as it is a reference to the irony in that fact.

Or it could just be a typo type error where I wasn't really concentrating on worry about getting the grammar perfect in an informal internet discussion.

Not when you make the same mistake multiple times.

So Bob is defending the Moon landing, Bob must be a jew or jew sympathizer, and it was Nazis who accomplished the Moon landing, so it's ironic to call Bob a Nazi?

Reference another post where I said "damned" instead of "damn". Who GIVES A DAMN?

I don't. Do you really? Or is it desperation of an inferior intellect as is usually the case with spell checkers?

Bob the NAZI may or may not be a jew sympathizer, but jews and jew sympathizers defend him.

Which is kinda ironic.

Considering how IDW views the Nazi's (and the whole holocaust), I think that was a backhanded complement...in a sicko sort of way.

If you insist.

Thread: Did we really go to the Moon? Why haven't we been back since 72? (Page 170)

Thread: NASA Busted: Apollo 17 Moon Hoax (Page 32)

Thread: BreakingNews: Large police presence in NYC, 2 officers were SHOT IN THE HEAD...have died- PERP: BLACK hunting cops for Brown /Garner..LIVE STREAM (Page 5)

Thread: Sheriff Joe: inmates who defaced flags in cells get only bread and water (Page 4)

Thread: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED! (Page 314)

Appears to me as though you've been making that mistake for years...

Last Edited by 74444 on 03/31/2015 10:59 PM

OK.

Reply #48419337 by Anonymous Astrophysicist on 01/20/15 12:03 AM
... are an idiot... Does anyone give a damned what YOU say?




Reply #49472810 by IDW on 03/21/15 11:08 PM
... think any "sane" person is going to give a damned what you think, cretin? ...




Reply #48419675 by Anonymous Astrophysicist on 01/20/15 12:35 AM
... is exactly youare trying to impress? No one gives a damned what you say, you know ... is how it feels to not have anyone give a damned about my opinion , or me in general. I naturally pity ...

Heh. By a nose.

High Five, 74444!

My god, what the hell is going on here? Who the hell keeps track of every word someone says to this extent and why would they do it in the first place?






And youre congratulating him?

I don't have any difficulty understanding the irony of it. NASA's rocket scientists were primarily Nazis, and now NASA has people who are sympathetic of Jews or Jews themselves operating as defenders of these Nazis accomplishments who use a person's views about Jews as a method to discredit them and attack them. Yeah, it's ironic, about as ironic as anything can get. It doesn't matter how a person feels about NAZI's or Jews to see the irony in it. It also calls into question the perception that Jews have integrity when it comes to NAZI's ,it seems like they will defend them if there are shekels involved.

To be blunt, I wouldn't trust a Paperclip Nazi rocket scientist nor a shit slinging jew to tell me the truth about anything. It makes no difference how I feel about the Nationalist Socialism party and our nations responsibility in its failed efforts to eradicate Jewish Bolshevism, these NAZI scientists were obviously traitors to their own cause.

Yeah, a long hooked one

I didn't. Didn't even refer to the List for those goodies. And *IDW* issued the challenge.





I think it was more a congrats for same thing at same time, than anything remotely *meaningful.* But YMMV.

I do not grok. But I will assume ad hominem. Par for your particular course.

I must be a hell of a lot more important than I thought I was, it's hard to imagine anyone taking the time to dwell on every word a person says, like for instance when I said "damned". I suppose these jews see a person who is awake and aware as a dangerous element that needs to be monitored and continuously attacked.


The simple solution is to post anonymously , eliminating the problem completely. And I do this often.

But then why would they encourage me to go down this obvious path?

Well, I'll tell you why. Regardless of how they personify me or slander me, my views have a tendency to start out being "marginal" and then eventually are adopted by the majority. For instance, most people didn't think Zionist Jews and Neocons were involved in 911 in 2001, now most do. If you honestly evaluate how views have changed over time about a wide variety of things, there is no way you can deny what I think starts out being marginal and ends up being mainstream.

NASA only has a matter of time. A few years at most. Most of us see no sense in having a parasitic beauracracy paying people to lie to us and withholding useful information we have paid to obtain, while funneling our money to a select few.

What does NASA give back to the people? 74444, Jay Windley and Phil Plait? The censorship of data and information? Faked hoaxes? Moral degenerates influencing our children and filling their heads full of nonsense?

You have never made a post that wasn't an ad hominem personal attack.

And you have never shown your work, or proved what you say you can prove. Thus, I declare us even.

What I have proved is not up to you to decide. It is up to the individual. The smarter that individual is, the more likely he is to see what you are, and what I have proved.

While it is not up to me to say what i proved, it most certainly is not up to a psychotic stalker.

Yep!



Ummm... I'm going to have to go with "Nope!" on that one. In fact, in my experiences with you, there seems to be an almost inverse proportion. The *less* one knows, the more believable IDW sounds.



Yet, you do it all the time...



Had you proved what you *claim* to have proved, I couldn't very well point out how you *hadn't* proved it, could I? You could just *link to the proof.*

Strangely, you don't do this.

Ad hominem noted, by the by.

And yet you know *nothing* about the subject or science in general and have shown zero aptitude for understanding anything involved. The entire focus of your input is well poisoning, back patting and circle jerking other shills and stalkers, and ad hominem atacks. Which begs the question, WHO GIVES A RATS ASS WHAT YOU YOU THINK?

Nasa propagandists primary MO (mode of operation):

1)Obfuscation. Complicate the issue to the point a level of doubt is reached that readers believe no conclusion is possible. NASA claims can then be claimed as historical facts and not dealt with as scientific claims.

2)poison the well. Attack the messenger when you can't attack the message. Any derogatory comments are effective, but accusations of bigotry are a prime example.

3)Ad Hominem attacks. Irrelevant or fabricated criticism.Continually portray the debunker in a negative fashion

4) FABRICATE EVIDENCE as neccessary

5)Appeal to authority

6) Bandwagon fallacyy

7)censor the debunker

8)misquote the debunker (once you've eliminated his input, simply modify or edit the discussion)


9)Threaten the debunker, with death, injury or persecution

10) stalk the debunker. Gangstalking with 2 or more individuals or sockpuppets working together on a target is extremely effective in manipulating perception of readers.


11) back patting, circle jerking-see # 10 above


12) never acknowledge anything that has been proved. The most common method is to simply ignore proofs or evidence. This prevents the debunker from building a case

13) If all else fails, gain control of the venue the debunker is using and control it in a manner that prevents effective debunking of NASA frauds and hoaxes.

You do, obviously. Or you wouldn't respond. QED.

Or you'd go and post somewhere I'm not -- which is the whole internet other than GLP.

You *love* me because I give you what you want most: any attention whatsoever.

Though, I have to say of late, you've gotten much more dull.

Precisely.

It's an IDW thing. He uses the wrong word, i. e. "conscious" instead of "conscience" or "irradiate" instead of "eradicate", and then insists that his word use is correct.

Or he blames it on his editor.

His constant "give(s) a damned" just attracted our attention.

When he challenged us, it only took a moment to prove him wrong.

For my part, I just did a search for "give(s) a damned" and posted a few hits from IDW's posts.

Caricatures of jews employ long hooked noses.

This is correct.

IDW has often used sock puppets to pretend to be someone else who supports him.

I think he justifies this with the claim that a thread is locked so that no one but he and what he claims are menbers of a NASA hit squad can post on it.

He's been caught at this many times.

Jews are caricatures of humans, and if you find one without a hideous nose it's because they've had a few meters of it hacked off.

Jews invented rhinoplasty.

I wonder why

WRONG. If I post anonymously it is to fly below radar when my posts are being hacked and removed and I am being banned because I have a nasa fanboi on the ropes.

Egypt and India, asswipe.