Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,185 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,037,690
Pageviews Today: 1,437,850Threads Today: 393Posts Today: 6,858
11:55 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Why There Were No Helicopter Rescues on 911

 
WHY NOT
User ID: 67205106
Switzerland
03/02/2015 04:46 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Why There Were No Helicopter Rescues on 911
Have any of you wondered why on 9-11 no helicopter rescue attempts were made to get people out of the twin towers? I know I did. It was one of the first thoughts that entered my mind while watching the buildings burn on television that morning. Why don’t they start getting people off from the rooftops? What were they expecting, that firefighters after climbing up 100 stories — gear and all — would be able to carry those down who were too injured to walk on their own?

Of course not. The brutal truth is, those people ‘needed to die’. Everyone in the upper floors would have witnessed that there were no planes. And they would have seen all sorts of other ‘oddities’ (explosives going off, etc.). Their exit paths were purposely cut off. The doors to the roof area were locked and in all likelihood disabled with brass pin lock inserts. Their downward escape routes were deliberately smoke flooded. The planners of 9-11 needed to make sure no one would live to tell what they really saw.

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 854647
United States
03/02/2015 04:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why There Were No Helicopter Rescues on 911
Have any of you wondered why on 9-11 no helicopter rescue attempts were made to get people out of the twin towers? I know I did. It was one of the first thoughts that entered my mind while watching the buildings burn on television that morning. Why don’t they start getting people off from the rooftops? What were they expecting, that firefighters after climbing up 100 stories — gear and all — would be able to carry those down who were too injured to walk on their own?

Of course not. The brutal truth is, those people ‘needed to die’. Everyone in the upper floors would have witnessed that there were no planes. And they would have seen all sorts of other ‘oddities’ (explosives going off, etc.). Their exit paths were purposely cut off. The doors to the roof area were locked and in all likelihood disabled with brass pin lock inserts. Their downward escape routes were deliberately smoke flooded. The planners of 9-11 needed to make sure no one would live to tell what they really saw.


 Quoting: WHY NOT 67205106


I remember reading about that, yes. Good observation about why. I would give you 5*s, but I've used up my allotment for today. I'll getcha tomorrow.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 62684562
United States
03/02/2015 04:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why There Were No Helicopter Rescues on 911
Have any of you wondered why on 9-11 no helicopter rescue attempts were made to get people out of the twin towers? I know I did. It was one of the first thoughts that entered my mind while watching the buildings burn on television that morning. Why don’t they start getting people off from the rooftops? What were they expecting, that firefighters after climbing up 100 stories — gear and all — would be able to carry those down who were too injured to walk on their own?

Of course not. The brutal truth is, those people ‘needed to die’. Everyone in the upper floors would have witnessed that there were no planes. And they would have seen all sorts of other ‘oddities’ (explosives going off, etc.). Their exit paths were purposely cut off. The doors to the roof area were locked and in all likelihood disabled with brass pin lock inserts. Their downward escape routes were deliberately smoke flooded. The planners of 9-11 needed to make sure no one would live to tell what they really saw.


 Quoting: WHY NOT 67205106


Yeah, um, a helicopter would have been incinerated from the heat...but keep trying...
JB
User ID: 68439648
New Zealand
03/02/2015 04:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why There Were No Helicopter Rescues on 911
If you work in a high rise building, learn to jump, buy a parachute.

Live and learn.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 68445246
Australia
03/02/2015 04:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why There Were No Helicopter Rescues on 911
There were planes, but they were not commercial airliners.

Remote controlled military planes.
JB
User ID: 68439648
New Zealand
03/02/2015 05:05 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why There Were No Helicopter Rescues on 911
Why is it, just before the Twin Pillars event, on TV in Queensland Australia, I learned about the Taliban soccer fields/Killing field.

It was interrupted by the event...

coincident...

I think not
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25381964
United States
03/02/2015 05:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why There Were No Helicopter Rescues on 911
Yea there were 8 helicopters at the scene hovering. One hovered right over the building for a minute. There were police choppers and a couple news ones.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 68450927
Canada
03/02/2015 06:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why There Were No Helicopter Rescues on 911
I don't think there were people on the roof, first of all.

Second, there is the issue of smoke and heat. Smoke could blind the crew.

Then you have heat. Heat reduces the ability of an airfoil (wing or rotor-blade) to produce lift.

Then you have, let's just say the police helicopters. Bigger than the news choppers, but not big like a CH-47 Chinook. In each of these, you have 2 pilots and at least 1 or 2 crew in the rear. The ability to rescue many people under these circumstances would be very limited, due to weight issues and heat.

Then imagine a panicked rush by dozens of people for a landing helicopter, which cannot possibly take off with all of them.

Just a few thoughts from a guy with a bunch of helicopter experience.
Still not believing
User ID: 9896570
United States
03/02/2015 06:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why There Were No Helicopter Rescues on 911
This is a well placed shill. There were no planes that hit either tower.

This is the same dis information spread by shills on the street who immediately said when asked," Who was responsible?"

They replied without hesitation," Osama bin Laden!"
I had no idea who this was until I looked him up on Wiki.

The cover up goes very deep onto the rabbit hole, my friends, as deep as it gets.Idol1
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 68450927
Canada
03/02/2015 06:45 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why There Were No Helicopter Rescues on 911
I don't think there were people on the roof, first of all.

Second, there is the issue of smoke and heat. Smoke could blind the crew.

Then you have heat. Heat reduces the ability of an airfoil (wing or rotor-blade) to produce lift. See link.

Then you have, let's just say the police helicopters. Bigger than the news choppers, but not big like a CH-47 Chinook. In each of these, you have 2 pilots and at least 1 or 2 crew in the rear. The ability to rescue many people under these circumstances would be very limited, due to weight issues and heat.

Then imagine a panicked rush by dozens of people for a landing helicopter, which cannot possibly take off with all of them.

Just a few thoughts from a guy with a bunch of helicopter experience.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68450927


Density altitude and Pressure altitude.


[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Density altitude is the altitude relative to the standard atmosphere conditions (ISA) at which the air density would be equal to the indicated air density at the place of observation. In other words, density altitude is air density given as a height above mean sea level. "Density altitude" can also be considered to be the pressure altitude adjusted for non-standard temperature.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 68450927
Canada
03/02/2015 06:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why There Were No Helicopter Rescues on 911
This is the same dis information spread by shills on the street who immediately said when asked," Who was responsible?"

They replied without hesitation," Osama bin Laden!"

 Quoting: Still not believing 9896570


Link for people on the street saying that during the event that day?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 66040444
United States
03/02/2015 06:59 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why There Were No Helicopter Rescues on 911
The helicopters were too busy dropping the explosive charges that brought 'em down (clearly visible in the unedited "Loose Change" video). You could clearly see the bright flash as the payload was "fired" and the nearly immediate collapse of each tower !!!!!!!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 9636232
United States
03/02/2015 07:20 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why There Were No Helicopter Rescues on 911
You get a nice view from the WTC outside observation deck towards the end of the video.

Plenty of room to land a rescue helicopter.

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 66575894
Malta
03/02/2015 07:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why There Were No Helicopter Rescues on 911
OP you are a moron. There is plenty of footage from NYPD air units that day; and they got as close as they could - and there were people waiting on the roof. Apart from the billowing smoke the terrible truth is that the heat was so great that the people who made it to the roofs were being cooked alive. Heat rises. If a helicopter had of tried a landing they would have overheated and crashed.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 68408600
United States
03/02/2015 07:46 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why There Were No Helicopter Rescues on 911
Air travel was shut down, you dumbasses
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 63655070
United States
03/02/2015 07:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why There Were No Helicopter Rescues on 911
There were no planes that hit either tower.

Idol1
 Quoting: Still not believing 9896570


Dumbest 9/11 conspiracy theory of them all. I take it you believe it was either a hologram or a space weapon. Both are utter bull shit.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 68450399
Croatia
03/02/2015 07:59 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why There Were No Helicopter Rescues on 911
No Helicopter Rescues

well, that would be possible

but only in Hollywood grinning
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 9636232
United States
03/02/2015 08:03 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why There Were No Helicopter Rescues on 911
Air travel was shut down, you dumbasses
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68408600


Police and Coast Guard rescue helicopters included?

Really?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 9636232
United States
03/02/2015 08:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why There Were No Helicopter Rescues on 911
OP you are a moron. There is plenty of footage from NYPD air units that day; and they got as close as they could - and there were people waiting on the roof. Apart from the billowing smoke the terrible truth is that the heat was so great that the people who made it to the roofs were being cooked alive. Heat rises. If a helicopter had of tried a landing they would have overheated and crashed.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 66575894


Why wasn't Edna Cintron cooked alive?

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 65730928
United States
03/02/2015 08:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why There Were No Helicopter Rescues on 911
Or..
maybe, it was Occam's Razor.

People were unable to reach the roof due to fire.
Helicopters could not get close enough to the side of the towers due to excessive winds, debris falling, and helicopter blades.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 62090878
Canada
03/02/2015 08:10 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why There Were No Helicopter Rescues on 911
We have finally hit the point where there are more shills in a 911 thread than anyone else.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 854647
United States
03/02/2015 08:11 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why There Were No Helicopter Rescues on 911
I don't think there were people on the roof, first of all.

Second, there is the issue of smoke and heat. Smoke could blind the crew.

Then you have heat. Heat reduces the ability of an airfoil (wing or rotor-blade) to produce lift.

Then you have, let's just say the police helicopters. Bigger than the news choppers, but not big like a CH-47 Chinook. In each of these, you have 2 pilots and at least 1 or 2 crew in the rear. The ability to rescue many people under these circumstances would be very limited, due to weight issues and heat.

Then imagine a panicked rush by dozens of people for a landing helicopter, which cannot possibly take off with all of them.

Just a few thoughts from a guy with a bunch of helicopter experience.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68450927


Doors to the roof were locked, I recall reading (and as OP stated).

As for the smoke, there was quite a breeze blowing that morning; to the east/southeast, if I remember correctly. Thus, a helicopter could've landed on the roof. But as stated, it appears that no one was able to get to the roof, for one. And two, no one thought the Towers would experience total collapse (demolition).
vortecmax

User ID: 64728382
United States
03/02/2015 08:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why There Were No Helicopter Rescues on 911
We have finally hit the point where there are more shills in a 911 thread than anyone else.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 62090878


hesright
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3230238
Yemen
03/02/2015 09:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why There Were No Helicopter Rescues on 911
I used to wonder about people with the
No planes theory,

But then it all made sense to me.

We are entering the age of illusion and magic
--the age of the anti-Christ

9/11 was an initiation into greater illusions and
magic to come.

That, and the fact that I saw the second tower literally
disappear with no smoke or dust. One second I'm looking
At it with smoke coming out of a dozen floors or so and I
turn around to talk to a friend for 5 seconds and boom
gone!

No smoke no dust just erased from the scene.
national socialist, eh

User ID: 68442056
Canada
03/02/2015 09:03 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why There Were No Helicopter Rescues on 911
OP you are a moron. There is plenty of footage from NYPD air units that day; and they got as close as they could - and there were people waiting on the roof. Apart from the billowing smoke the terrible truth is that the heat was so great that the people who made it to the roofs were being cooked alive. Heat rises. If a helicopter had of tried a landing they would have overheated and crashed.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 66575894


the fires were out.

firemen have been caught on recordings saying the fires were smoldering, hence the black smoke.


that theory can go back into your ass.
a veracious one.
gott mit uns.
Wookiee666

User ID: 62421844
United States
03/02/2015 09:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why There Were No Helicopter Rescues on 911
Yeah, um, a helicopter would have been incinerated from the heat...but keep trying...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 62684562


hesright

and turbulence - choppers are very fragile.

Last Edited by JustSomeGuy_42 on 03/02/2015 09:05 AM
Warning: JustSomeGuy_42 is a publicly confessed unvaxxed neophiliac .

If the number 666 is considered evil.
then technically, 25.8069758 is the root
of all evil.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 68408600
United States
03/02/2015 09:05 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why There Were No Helicopter Rescues on 911
Yeah, um, a helicopter would have been incinerated from the heat...but keep trying...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 62684562


hesright
 Quoting: Wookiee666


Dumb fuck, air flight was shut down,
Wookiee666

User ID: 62421844
United States
03/02/2015 09:07 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why There Were No Helicopter Rescues on 911
I used to wonder about people with the
No planes theory,

But then it all made sense to me.

We are entering the age of illusion and magic
--the age of the anti-Christ

9/11 was an initiation into greater illusions and
magic to come.

...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3230238


DOrolleyes
Warning: JustSomeGuy_42 is a publicly confessed unvaxxed neophiliac .

If the number 666 is considered evil.
then technically, 25.8069758 is the root
of all evil.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 68452247
United States
03/02/2015 09:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why There Were No Helicopter Rescues on 911
Because 911 was a planned operation carried out by rogue cia, mossad and arabian operatives?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 68452247
United States
03/02/2015 09:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why There Were No Helicopter Rescues on 911
And many well-paid colluders? Like that piece of shit gulliani?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 63655070
United States
03/02/2015 09:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why There Were No Helicopter Rescues on 911
Yeah, um, a helicopter would have been incinerated from the heat...but keep trying...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 62684562


hesright
 Quoting: Wookiee666


Dumb fuck, air flight was shut down,
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68408600


Not to all traffic as this video shows. 3 helicopters can be seen. [link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

But the doors to the roofs were locked and there was no one there to save.
Related Threads





GLP