Two shadows of first 'moon' step, One is on wrong side of Neil, the other, behind the lem, doesn't match his motion. Opsss

No. AGAIN since you ignored it before, look up heiligenschein
[link to www.google.com (secure)]
That is why the Sun sometimes appears to light up a few yards, although you lie about it being "blackness", it is only slightly darker.

Heiligenschein means a halo around a shadow, unrelated to the 'sun' not iluminating hundreds of miles of 'lunar' surface .Either can stage lights.

Unrelated? Then you only prove you didn't bother to look at the link provided.

I can see the sun illuminating the moon from earth, it doesn't only light up a 50' radius leaving the rest in blackness. Check it yourself tonight, you don't even need 3d theater glasses.

Last Edited by DGN on 03/15/2015 06:42 PM

AGAIN you lie about the rest being in blackness and AGAIN you prove you didn't actually look at the links. The lunar soil exhibits retroreflective properties, it tends to reflect in the direction of the light source. This is why The full moon is 11 times brighter than a half moon instead of twice as bright. The retroreflective properties cause heiligenschein in many photos as explained the link provided. Stop trolling.

The reason I can see full, half, quarter moons is because the light is reflecting in all directions as intended;
" And God went on to say: “Let luminaries come to be in the expanse of the heavens to make a division between the day and the night; and they must serve as signs and for seasons and for days and years. 15 And they must serve as luminaries in the expanse of the heavens to shine upon the earth.” And it came to be so. 16 And God proceeded to make the two great luminaries, the greater luminary for dominating the day and the lesser luminary for dominating the night, and also the stars. 17 Thus God put them in the expanse of the heavens to shine upon the earth, 18 and to dominate by day and by night and to make a division between the light and the darkness. Then God saw that [it was] good. 19 And there came to be evening and there came to be morning, a fourth day." Ge1;14
It's a Genesis thingy ya know?

Last Edited by DGN on 03/15/2015 07:43 PM

Read what I wrote. I said TENDS to reflect in the direction of the light source. If it did not do that then the full Moon would only be twice as bright as a half Moon and the brightness of the full Moon would not appear uniform. It was provided as an example of how the soil exhibits retroreflective properties and it is true and has nothing to do with the irrelevant post you made.

Maybe NASA could use the Heiligenscheim to erase the shadow of the guy standing by for the flag shot (behind the lem at .14-.28)?


Last Edited by DGN on 03/15/2015 08:06 PM

AGAIN, there is no shadow of any other guy (only one astronaut in the shot at that time) and there is no flag in the shot. What you see on the left hand side of the frame is a cable or the lanyard swinging. It is far closer to the camera than anything else. You were shown this before. That you are bringing it up again can only be because you are deliberately trolling.

That you think heiligenschein could "erase a shadow" shows you either still don't understand what it is, haven't tried to understand, or are deliberately trolling.

Based on your actions in this and many other threads, it is deliberately trolling.

So being the light was shinning from left to right behind the lem, (as you correctly cited) how could the MESA cable (swinging in the moon breeze) be casting a shadow from the darkness where it's filming from?

Last Edited by DGN on 03/15/2015 08:43 PM

There is no shadow. That is the cable itself. The astronaut reaches for it at the end of the clip. How can you not see that?

Is the 'sun' behind the astronaut and the MESA causing the cable to cast a 'flag on pole' shadow, or shinning from 90 degrees to the left, which is why he's in the dark when he comes back under the lem?

There is no shadow, no 'flag on pole' shadow or otherwise. There is just the cable, it appears to have some kind of tag on it but there is no shadow. The Sun is on the left but it is not "shinning" (sic) on the cable.

So why is the broken 'cable and tag' drifting about? Why did NASA need to tag a simple cable? How did you determine that's a cable blowing about in the refreshing moon breeze? I'm not trying to be difficult, just curious.

Who says it is broken? Why do you assume it is simple? It APPEARS to be a tag. I never said it was one. I NEVER said it was blowing about. Stop trying to put words in my mouth. It also appears to be a simple pendulum motion. You ARE trying to be difficult. Stop lying. If you were really curious you would throw away the third-party footage, and go to the original source and cross-reference it with the transcript. No, instead you continue to claim there are extra shadows after being told there weren't and continue to claim things are blowing when they clearly aren't. You aren't curious, you have an obvious agenda.

good post OP, your right the shadows are totally wrong and Some NASA shills.

'Moon walk'...good stuff, good fun, no?

Right because the 'cable', swinging merrily about, is in the shade. The 'sun' is shining behind someone holding a flag and his shadow is seen behind the lem at.14-.28 No worries, who's gonna notice?

First of all, the flag was on the other side of the LM. Second, it is NOT visible in that footage. Third, there is some kind of cable moving in a pendulum motion at that time which you see the astronaut reach for at the end. Fourth, you'be been told this multiple times. You are either blind or a troll. Your claim of being curious is a lie, because if you were you would check out the original footage that would be longer and accompany it with the transcript that likely explains everything. Instead you prefer to troll.

there is no shadow from the flag. Are you really this dense or just deliberately trolling?

OP, not to worry. The real reason the NASA (National Academy of Space Actors) shill on threads is because they want you to keep from discovering the real secret.

The secret of the moon is that it really cannot exist.
And this is according to their own masonic 'scientist' and 'physicist', sir Isaac Newton:
>
Thread: MOON HOAX! The Moon CANNOT exist !

There is no doubt that what they aired on tv was fake. The first clue was in the radio two way talk. When they started talking when orbiting the moon answers made to command were less than the time needed to travel from the moon to the earth. A hacker was transmitting the live and dark comms and sending them out over off channel uhf. I heard command tell them to go dark, secure. On the the secure transmit command told them to count to four before answering. The astrouys had some fun with this and made taps before answering, ha. They settled down and did pretty good after that. So not by the moon. They messed up on the scenes and reused props in the wrong places. Some back drops were used over again in later shoots, fake. Later with the astroguys skippy around and hopping is not something highly trained military men would do. That goofing around not real. Than you have the mass of objects in motion. Even though gravity is low when something moves it's mass is moving. If you got between a one ton space obect that was moving and a wall you would be smashed. If you were shot by a bullet on the moon the effects would be the same as here on earth, the bullet would drop by the moons gravity and no air effects. Point is, if an astroguy with body mass, suit, camera, backpack and etc. made a big hop and hit the suface at 20 miles an hour his leg bones would snap like twigs, period.

Notice how they never demonstrated low moon gravity by jumping five feet high or throwing things back and forth displaying the extended hang time, not even once? The only thing displayed is the 'moon' dust kicked up by the Rover, no hang time, it falls back down immediately.

They found it difficult to jump high because the stiffness of the suit made it hard to fully bend the knees. There IS however some jumps up the ladder of that height or greater. Most of the time they avoided it because the suit was top heavy and they tended to tip over backwards. Not a good idea to fall on the piece of equipment keeping you alive.

They did throw objects from time to time and also dropped a hammer and feather at the same time to demonstrate the vacuum. That you don't know about this shows you either haven't bothered to look or are deliberately lying.

Y E A h ....i see the high jumps up the ladder and the hammer and feather and ....... opssss..... no ...no actually I don't, was it all just my imagination? Ohhh shucks!

Thank you for admitting you never bothered to look and do any actual research.