Billboard Goes Up In The Heart Of Reno - Chemtrails | |
Genghis_Khan User ID: 49407050 United States 03/14/2015 11:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | True I said that, but it appears you are at least admitting they exist. That is progress. Anyway, since you admitted that they exist, I would like to know how you tell the difference. "These are facts that you can't deny." I edited the post for clarification. No, I don't admit chemtrails exist. I'm still waiting for evidence. You're entitled to change your mind. I sign any red karma I give, because if it's important enough to give, then it's important enough to know who gave it to you. :Skullspud: |
Will the Shill User ID: 65392140 United States 03/14/2015 11:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | True I said that, but it appears you are at least admitting they exist. That is progress. Anyway, since you admitted that they exist, I would like to know how you tell the difference. "These are facts that you can't deny." I edited the post for clarification. No, I don't admit chemtrails exist. I'm still waiting for evidence. You're entitled to change your mind. I haven't. |
go reno peeps! User ID: 60796532 United States 03/14/2015 11:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Its obvious that the planes are either spraying something or additives have been added to the fuel... any person can observe this. Planes=clouds No clouds=no planes. It is not normal It is not contrails It is happening. RIGHT BEFORE YOUR VERY EYES!!! Yet here were are f n debating it ad nauseum. Out of all the conspiracies this is the ONE any mo fo can observe directly, all the time and still psychos are claiming its nothing out of the ordinary. How can people be so dumb? Planes show up and leave massive cloud formations in short order. What the fuck is there to debate? Why and what, maybe how is it. There is no arguement as to if it is happening. No we only need to concern ourselves with "why are they spraying?!" "What are they spraying?" Why do schills be schilling so hard? |
Genghis_Khan User ID: 49407050 United States 03/14/2015 11:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Genghis_Khan True I said that, but it appears you are at least admitting they exist. That is progress. Anyway, since you admitted that they exist, I would like to know how you tell the difference. "These are facts that you can't deny." I edited the post for clarification. No, I don't admit chemtrails exist. I'm still waiting for evidence. You're entitled to change your mind. I haven't. So you still believe it's hard to distinguish between chemtrails and contrails? I sign any red karma I give, because if it's important enough to give, then it's important enough to know who gave it to you. :Skullspud: |
Will the Shill User ID: 65392140 United States 03/14/2015 11:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Will the Shill I edited the post for clarification. No, I don't admit chemtrails exist. I'm still waiting for evidence. You're entitled to change your mind. I haven't. So you still believe it's hard to distinguish between chemtrails and contrails? I never made such a claim. I have pointed out that some chemmies claim that they don't believe that all long lasting trails are chemtrails and then fail to explain what characteristics determine which trails are contrails and which are chemtrails. Is it how long they last, color, altitude, length, geographic location? I have no idea. For me, it's easy. I think all trails are contrails because I haven't seen evidence to the contrary. Regardless of any physical property. Yes, I understand that there are weather modification/geoengineering research programs but no one has linked the trails in the sky with any such program without making assumptions. I can't do that. |
calin User ID: 4293899 United States 03/14/2015 11:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I asked a reasonable question above. .............................. When you judge another, you do not define them, you define yourself. .................................. THE SECOND AGREEMENT: "Don't take anything personally. When you are immune to the opinions and actions of others, you won't be the victim of needless suffering." ~ Don Miguel Ruiz, The Four Agreements |
Will the Shill User ID: 65392140 United States 03/14/2015 11:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Its obvious that the planes are either spraying something or additives have been added to the fuel... any person can observe this. Quoting: go reno peeps! 60796532 Planes=clouds No clouds=no planes. It is not normal It is not contrails It is happening. RIGHT BEFORE YOUR VERY EYES!!! Yet here were are f n debating it ad nauseum. Out of all the conspiracies this is the ONE any mo fo can observe directly, all the time and still psychos are claiming its nothing out of the ordinary. How can people be so dumb? Planes show up and leave massive cloud formations in short order. What the fuck is there to debate? Why and what, maybe how is it. There is no arguement as to if it is happening. No we only need to concern ourselves with "why are they spraying?!" "What are they spraying?" Why do schills be schilling so hard? There is argument. You're just not interested. Science explains your claims above and you're not interested in that either. That doesn't make me "dumb" for understanding what you don't care to learn. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68457282 United States 03/14/2015 11:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Lol, I came to this thread because of the headline, I stayed because it was swarmed by ridiculing, name calling shills and trolls from the word go, many of those AC's were you. I didn't go out in search of "Will the Shill", as you were various AC's at that point. Quoting: Ag47 Anyone can go back and read through the thread and discern which AC's you were, and can see all the inflammatory statements you made including wishing death on us: People come here to help chemtards and all they can do is make baseless accusations. You people are mean and deserve to be sprayed. I hope they ratchet up the programs a few notches. The sooner you scumbags are gone, the better. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 63879474 (Will the Shill) Your behavior in this thread alone speaks for itself. My posting history speaks for itself. I don't go around abusing everyone who disagrees with me or others who share my belief. I do stand up to bullies though. Obviously that post was a jab at the paranoid ignorance that people here display. It's like telling people that I hope the unicorns or the bogeyman gets them. And do you honestly believe you have perfect behavior? Hypocrite Oh, it's just all in good humor, OBVIOUSLY... Of course it is. My behavior in this thread has been in direct response to your antics and I make no apologies for exposing you for what you are. I find the ones that do not believe in chemtrails were born after 1980, so the gov indoctrination is working perfectly. Ask yourself, how much of your personalty is knee jerk mindless behavior and how much of your personalty is actually you. |
Will the Shill User ID: 65392140 United States 03/14/2015 11:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Ag47 User ID: 68572900 United States 03/14/2015 11:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Anybody check out CV News website for credibility regarding jet fuels? Quoting: calin I posted this question on the EPA thread and no takers. Anybody here? hmmm.. what am I asking that for.. you all are on both threads. Silly me. Still.... You have a link? I don't think my search results are showing what you refer to. Are you referring to a site that shall not be posted in these forums? |
calin User ID: 62710565 United States 03/14/2015 11:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Won't post... Regulating Greenhouse Gas Emissions Under the Clean Air Act will get you there .............................. When you judge another, you do not define them, you define yourself. .................................. THE SECOND AGREEMENT: "Don't take anything personally. When you are immune to the opinions and actions of others, you won't be the victim of needless suffering." ~ Don Miguel Ruiz, The Four Agreements |
Will the Shill User ID: 65392140 United States 03/14/2015 11:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Lol, I came to this thread because of the headline, I stayed because it was swarmed by ridiculing, name calling shills and trolls from the word go, many of those AC's were you. I didn't go out in search of "Will the Shill", as you were various AC's at that point. Quoting: Ag47 Anyone can go back and read through the thread and discern which AC's you were, and can see all the inflammatory statements you made including wishing death on us: ... Your behavior in this thread alone speaks for itself. My posting history speaks for itself. I don't go around abusing everyone who disagrees with me or others who share my belief. I do stand up to bullies though. Obviously that post was a jab at the paranoid ignorance that people here display. It's like telling people that I hope the unicorns or the bogeyman gets them. And do you honestly believe you have perfect behavior? Hypocrite Oh, it's just all in good humor, OBVIOUSLY... Of course it is. My behavior in this thread has been in direct response to your antics and I make no apologies for exposing you for what you are. I find the ones that do not believe in chemtrails were born after 1980, so the gov indoctrination is working perfectly. Ask yourself, how much of your personalty is knee jerk mindless behavior and how much of your personalty is actually you. I was born in 1965 and I have seen such trails for over 40 years. Maybe there have been more of them in the northeast for more years. Maybe where you grew up there wasn't much flyover traffic. |
Ag47 User ID: 68572900 United States 03/14/2015 11:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68457282 I find the ones that do not believe in chemtrails were born after 1980, so the gov indoctrination is working perfectly. Ask yourself, how much of your personalty is knee jerk mindless behavior and how much of your personalty is actually you. Maybe just differences in individuals, but I find many more people who believe what the tv tells them to have been born before 1980, not after. Seems like those generations were conditioned to believe the tv, newspapers, etc, and there was no free flow of information like there is now with the internet. It was all a one way flow and herd mentality. I was born prior to 1980, fwiw. |
calin User ID: 62710565 United States 03/14/2015 11:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68457282 I find the ones that do not believe in chemtrails were born after 1980, so the gov indoctrination is working perfectly. Ask yourself, how much of your personalty is knee jerk mindless behavior and how much of your personalty is actually you. Maybe just differences in individuals, but I find many more people who believe what the tv tells them to have been born before 1980, not after. Seems like those generations were conditioned to believe the tv, newspapers, etc, and there was no free flow of information like there is now with the internet. It was all a one way flow and herd mentality. I was born prior to 1980, fwiw. FWIW... way before! .............................. When you judge another, you do not define them, you define yourself. .................................. THE SECOND AGREEMENT: "Don't take anything personally. When you are immune to the opinions and actions of others, you won't be the victim of needless suffering." ~ Don Miguel Ruiz, The Four Agreements |
SnakeAirlines User ID: 68578607 United States 03/14/2015 11:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68457282 I find the ones that do not believe in chemtrails were born after 1980, so the gov indoctrination is working perfectly. Ask yourself, how much of your personalty is knee jerk mindless behavior and how much of your personalty is actually you. Maybe just differences in individuals, but I find many more people who believe what the tv tells them to have been born before 1980, not after. Seems like those generations were conditioned to believe the tv, newspapers, etc, and there was no free flow of information like there is now with the internet. It was all a one way flow and herd mentality. I was born prior to 1980, fwiw. What does the TeeVee have to do with deluded people believing in chemtrails? "Hold my cat while I bring in my tomato plant. That chemtrail looks like an earthquake chemtrail" deanoZXT-07/20/2014 07:48 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68457282 United States 03/14/2015 11:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Will the Shill Obviously that post was a jab at the paranoid ignorance that people here display. It's like telling people that I hope the unicorns or the bogeyman gets them. And do you honestly believe you have perfect behavior? Hypocrite Oh, it's just all in good humor, OBVIOUSLY... Of course it is. My behavior in this thread has been in direct response to your antics and I make no apologies for exposing you for what you are. I find the ones that do not believe in chemtrails were born after 1980, so the gov indoctrination is working perfectly. Ask yourself, how much of your personalty is knee jerk mindless behavior and how much of your personalty is actually you. I was born in 1965 and I have seen such trails for over 40 years. Maybe there have been more of them in the northeast for more years. Maybe where you grew up there wasn't much flyover traffic. was born in 58, i remember dark blue skies, and vapor trails that burned off after 30 to 40 secs behind the jets when playing outside as a kid. Never did see a contrail\chemtrail till the late 70s. IMO, the chemtrail project is an act of desperation, either to mitigate extreme weather changes or repairing ozone layers, damaged by an industrial age or military atmospheric experiments ( or both).. My nose runs\eyes burn, when they run their chemtrail operation. But i am tending to lean towards ozone repair\or band-aid effect. UV rays have been on the rise the last 40 years. Either due to thinning of the atmosphere or changes in sun\space weather events. Its the gov way of keeping commerce flowing...for the good of keeping profits coming in to the very end. |
Ag47 User ID: 68572900 United States 03/14/2015 12:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Won't post... Quoting: calin Regulating Greenhouse Gas Emissions Under the Clean Air Act will get you there I found that that returned EPA and Wikipedia, but may be my search engine. This will get people to the right page for sure: Earthjustice sues EPA over Flight Pollution Yeah, I wish that site could be linked to, I have found quite a few things there I would have liked to have shared in the past. Here is the accompanying video for anyone who cannot find the page: |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68457282 United States 03/14/2015 12:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68457282 I find the ones that do not believe in chemtrails were born after 1980, so the gov indoctrination is working perfectly. Ask yourself, how much of your personalty is knee jerk mindless behavior and how much of your personalty is actually you. Maybe just differences in individuals, but I find many more people who believe what the tv tells them to have been born before 1980, not after. Seems like those generations were conditioned to believe the tv, newspapers, etc, and there was no free flow of information like there is now with the internet. It was all a one way flow and herd mentality. I was born prior to 1980, fwiw. What does the TeeVee have to do with deluded people believing in chemtrails? they don't call t television programing for nothing. |
Genghis_Khan User ID: 49407050 United States 03/14/2015 12:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So you still believe it's hard to distinguish between chemtrails and contrails? I never made such a claim. I have pointed out that some chemmies claim that they don't believe that all long lasting trails are chemtrails and then fail to explain what characteristics determine which trails are contrails and which are chemtrails. Is it how long they last, color, altitude, length, geographic location? I have no idea. For me, it's easy. I think all trails are contrails because I haven't seen evidence to the contrary. Regardless of any physical property. Yes, I understand that there are weather modification/geoengineering research programs but no one has linked the trails in the sky with any such program without making assumptions. I can't do that. I don't really believe that you are that naive, unless you are too young to remember what the skies looked like. I remember, so unless I get Alzheimer's you'll never change my mind. You could start your own "Chemtrails are bullshit" thread. [link to www.google.com (secure)] US patent #5003186 Publication number US5003186 A Publication type Grant Application number US 07/513,145 Publication date Mar 26, 1991 Filing date Apr 23, 1990 Priority date Apr 23, 1990 Fee status Paid Inventors David B. Chang, I-Fu Shih Original Assignee Hughes Aircraft Company Export Citation BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan Patent Citations (2), Referenced by (10), Classifications (7), Legal Events (7) External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION A method is disclosed for reducing atmospheric warming due to the greenhouse effect resulting from a greenhouse gases layer. The method comprises the step of seeding the greenhouse gas layer with a quantity of tiny particles of materials characterized by wavelength-dependent emissivity or reflectivity, in that said materials have high emissivities in the visible and far infrared wavelength regions and low emissivity in the near infrared wavelength region. Such materials can include the class of materials known as Welsbach materials. The oxides of metal, e.g., aluminum oxide, are also suitable for the purpose. The greenhouse gases layer typically extends between about seven and thirteen kilometers above the earth's surface. The seeding of the stratosphere occurs within this layer. The particles suspended in the stratosphere as a result of the seeding provide a mechanism for converting the blackbody radiation emitted by the earth at near infrared wavelengths into radiation in the visible and far infrared wavelength so that this heat energy may be reradiated out into space, thereby reducing the global warming due to the greenhouse effect. I sign any red karma I give, because if it's important enough to give, then it's important enough to know who gave it to you. :Skullspud: |
Ag47 User ID: 68572900 United States 03/14/2015 12:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68457282 I find the ones that do not believe in chemtrails were born after 1980, so the gov indoctrination is working perfectly. Ask yourself, how much of your personalty is knee jerk mindless behavior and how much of your personalty is actually you. Maybe just differences in individuals, but I find many more people who believe what the tv tells them to have been born before 1980, not after. Seems like those generations were conditioned to believe the tv, newspapers, etc, and there was no free flow of information like there is now with the internet. It was all a one way flow and herd mentality. I was born prior to 1980, fwiw. What does the TeeVee have to do with deluded people believing in chemtrails? It has to do with government indoctrination. Your reading comprehension skills are lacking, the "TeeVee" generation I referred to are the ones I stated are less likely to believe in the existence of chemtrails. |
Will the Shill User ID: 65392140 United States 03/14/2015 12:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Ag47 Oh, it's just all in good humor, OBVIOUSLY... Of course it is. My behavior in this thread has been in direct response to your antics and I make no apologies for exposing you for what you are. I find the ones that do not believe in chemtrails were born after 1980, so the gov indoctrination is working perfectly. Ask yourself, how much of your personalty is knee jerk mindless behavior and how much of your personalty is actually you. I was born in 1965 and I have seen such trails for over 40 years. Maybe there have been more of them in the northeast for more years. Maybe where you grew up there wasn't much flyover traffic. was born in 58, i remember dark blue skies, and vapor trails that burned off after 30 to 40 secs behind the jets when playing outside as a kid. Never did see a contrail\chemtrail till the late 70s. IMO, the chemtrail project is an act of desperation, either to mitigate extreme weather changes or repairing ozone layers, damaged by an industrial age or military atmospheric experiments ( or both).. My nose runs\eyes burn, when they run their chemtrail operation. But i am tending to lean towards ozone repair\or band-aid effect. UV rays have been on the rise the last 40 years. Either due to thinning of the atmosphere or changes in sun\space weather events. Its the gov way of keeping commerce flowing...for the good of keeping profits coming in to the very end. I also remember dark blue sky, which I still see often, and short lived contrails. I still see short lived trails because it's just an indication that the air isn't saturated enough to support persistent trails. I'm not going to speculate about that other stuff. I appreciate that you prefaced it with "IMO". Many more should learn from your example instead of making statements of fact. |
calin User ID: 62710565 United States 03/14/2015 12:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I was susceptible to believing certain conspiracies because they felt right .. or for whatever reason. Over the years of being on GLP, I have tuned my discernment and reticular activating system after getting disappointed and realizing the conspiracy was more for attention and website hits/donations or just plain "loonies" with agendas on the internet that sucked people in with believable bias. Trust... but fact check. The problem is the fact checking sometimes. Top secret and needing special clearance to get the facts is the problem. I know for a fact now that the jet trails are harmful... for the excessive vapors and "clouds" they are producing as well as the jet fuel additives and mix. So, the trails can be called chemtrails IMO as the chemicals that are emitted is causing the EPA to realize the harm and make some changes in standards and regulations. Please explain how my perception is wrong if anyone disagrees. I am always open to getting more facts. And... do it in layman's terminology please. .............................. When you judge another, you do not define them, you define yourself. .................................. THE SECOND AGREEMENT: "Don't take anything personally. When you are immune to the opinions and actions of others, you won't be the victim of needless suffering." ~ Don Miguel Ruiz, The Four Agreements |
SnakeAirlines User ID: 68578607 United States 03/14/2015 12:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | was born in 58, i remember dark blue skies, and vapor trails that burned off after 30 to 40 secs behind the jets when playing outside as a kid. Never did see a contrail\chemtrail till the late 70s. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68457282 I know no one gives a fuck about the reality of the situation, but... Today there are over 18 times the air miles flown by passenger planes alone... [link to www.rita.dot.gov] This does not even take into account the exponential explosion of air freight since the 70's... Couple that with higher efficiency engines, and planes flying at higher altitudes to conserve fuel, and you have the recipe for more (and more persistent) contrails... "Hold my cat while I bring in my tomato plant. That chemtrail looks like an earthquake chemtrail" deanoZXT-07/20/2014 07:48 PM |
Will the Shill User ID: 65392140 United States 03/14/2015 12:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Theory of HF Induced Turbulence in the Ionosphere: Status and Challenges' Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68457282 D. F. DuBois2 Los Alamos National Laboratory, MS B213 Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA Abstract [link to www.osti.gov] In the past five years the combination of new theoretical concepts and computer simulations along with dramatically improved observational diagnostics appear to have led to a detailed, quantitative, understanding of the properties of the Langmuir turbtdence induced in the unpreconditioned ionosphere at Arecibo during the first tens of milliseconds following the turn-on of the HF heater. This is the only observational regime in which the initial ionospheric conditions are known to a high level of confidence. The so called strong Langmuir turbulence (SLT) theory predicts observed features in this early time heating which are completely at odds with the prediction of the traditional weak turbulence approximation. The understanding of the observed signatures for times greater than say 30-50 ms following the onset of heating at Arecibo is still incomplete. The same is apparently true for the observations at Troms~w here the unique predictions of SLT theory are not so clearly observed. Density irregularities, induced by heating at Arecibo and perhaps present in the ambient ionosphere at Troms~a,p pear to control the properties of the turbulence. The proper description of the coexistence of Langmuir turbulence with various density irregularities and accounting for the turbulent modification of the electron velocity distribution are challenges for the theory. In this paper I will review, starting from the Vlasov-Poisson equations, the fundamental basis of the reduced models used to describe SLT and suggest improvements to the standard model including a new local quasi linear theory for the treatment of hot electron acceleration and transit time damping or burnout of collapsing Langmuir cavitons. The increased ponderomotive and thermal pressures of the horizontal, Airy layered, turbulence observed by Djuth et.al. are predicted to be large enough to induce density depletions of a few percent which in turn can alter the standing wave profile of the heater. These turbulence-induced pressures, which are strong functions of the local heater intensity, are expected to lead to an enhanced filamentation instability of the heater field near reflection density which can evolve into intermediate scale field aligned density irregularities. New SLT simulation diagnostics reveal that the Langmuir waves and ion acoustic waves participating in the decay-cascade processes, near or below matching density, are confined to field aligned density depletion channels or filaments. This leads to the speculation that these may be the seeds for short scale striations which are observed to be correlated with the Langmuir turbulence. ' In your own words, what does this mean!? Last Edited by Michael. on 03/14/2015 12:25 PM |
Will the Shill User ID: 65392140 United States 03/14/2015 12:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Macroscopic Time and Altitude Distribution of Plasma Turbulence Induced in Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68457282 Ionospheric Modification Experiments Harvey Rose*, Donald Dubois, David Russell (Lodestar Research Corporation), and Alfred Hanssen (University of Tromsg, Norway) Abstract This is the final report of a three-year, Laboratory-Directed Research and Development (LDRD) project at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). This research concentrated on the time dependence of the heater, inducedturbulence, and electron-density profiles excited in the ionosphere by a powerful radio-frequency heater wave. The macroscopic density is driven by the ponderomotive pressure and the density self-consistently determines the heater propagation. For typical parameters of the current Arecibo heater, a dramatic quasi-periodic behavior was found. For about 50 ms after turn-on of the heater wave, the turbulence is concentrated at the first standing-wave maximum of the heater near reflection altitude. From 50-100 ms the standingwave pattern drops by about 1-2 km in altitude and the quasi-periodicity reappears at the higher altitudes with a period of roughly 50 ms. This behavior is due to the half-wavelength density depletion grating that is set up by the ponderomotive pressure at the maxima of the heater standing-wave pattern. Once the grating is established the heater can no longer propagate to higher altitudes. The grating is then unsupported by the heater at these altitudes and decays, allowing the heater to propagate again and initiate another cycle. For stronger heater powers, corresponding to the Arecibo upgrade and the HAARP heater now under construction, the effects are much more dramatic. 1. Background and Research Objectives The objective of this research is to develop theoretical predictions for the macroscopic spatial and temporal distribution of turbulence induced in the ionosphere by p0werfi.d highfrequency (hf) radio waves. In the past few years there has been a dramatic improvement in the quality of experiments measuring the plasma turbulence induced near the reflection layer *principal investigator, e-mail: [email protected] 1 I'm sorry, but posting stuff like this is not very productive. Can you link this information to the trails in the sky logically. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68457282 United States 03/14/2015 12:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | was born in 58, i remember dark blue skies, and vapor trails that burned off after 30 to 40 secs behind the jets when playing outside as a kid. Never did see a contrail\chemtrail till the late 70s. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68457282 I know no one gives a fuck about the reality of the situation, but... Today there are over 18 times the air miles flown by passenger planes alone... [link to www.rita.dot.gov] This does not even take into account the exponential explosion of air freight since the 70's... Couple that with higher efficiency engines, and planes flying at higher altitudes to conserve fuel, and you have the recipe for more (and more persistent) contrails... Couple that with higher efficiency engines, and planes flying at higher altitudes to conserve fuel, and you have the recipe for more (and more persistent) contrails... Higher efficiency engines would have less by product. A well made motor would use less fuel and burn more completely..leaving less residue. |
CaptiveR User ID: 64715204 United Kingdom 03/14/2015 12:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Do you really want to go back down this path again today, after taking your ball and going home in a tissy yesterday? Quoting: Ag47 Again, if I am such a bother to you that you felt victimized and needed to place me on the ignore list, why are you insistent on engaging me? It never ends well for you, you know. Yeah, shilly willy folds easily, he gets all bent up out of shape because he lives off his wives Jewish savings. |
SnakeAirlines User ID: 68578607 United States 03/14/2015 12:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Higher efficiency engines would have less by product. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68457282 A well made motor would use less fuel and burn more completely..leaving less residue. FFS, Jethro... Contrails are ice crystals, not 'byproduct'... "Hold my cat while I bring in my tomato plant. That chemtrail looks like an earthquake chemtrail" deanoZXT-07/20/2014 07:48 PM |
Ag47 User ID: 68572900 United States 03/14/2015 12:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Do you really want to go back down this path again today, after taking your ball and going home in a tissy yesterday? Quoting: Ag47 Again, if I am such a bother to you that you felt victimized and needed to place me on the ignore list, why are you insistent on engaging me? It never ends well for you, you know. Yeah, shilly willy folds easily, he gets all bent up out of shape because he lives off his wives Jewish savings. |
Genghis_Khan User ID: 49407050 United States 03/14/2015 12:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Macroscopic Time and Altitude Distribution of Plasma Turbulence Induced in Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68457282 Ionospheric Modification Experiments Harvey Rose*, Donald Dubois, David Russell (Lodestar Research Corporation), and Alfred Hanssen (University of Tromsg, Norway) Abstract [link to www.osti.gov] This is the final report of a three-year, Laboratory-Directed Research and Development (LDRD) project at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). This research concentrated on the time dependence of the heater, inducedturbulence, and electron-density profiles excited in the ionosphere by a powerful radio-frequency heater wave. The macroscopic density is driven by the ponderomotive pressure and the density self-consistently determines the heater propagation. For typical parameters of the current Arecibo heater, a dramatic quasi-periodic behavior was found. For about 50 ms after turn-on of the heater wave, the turbulence is concentrated at the first standing-wave maximum of the heater near reflection altitude. From 50-100 ms the standingwave pattern drops by about 1-2 km in altitude and the quasi-periodicity reappears at the higher altitudes with a period of roughly 50 ms. This behavior is due to the half-wavelength density depletion grating that is set up by the ponderomotive pressure at the maxima of the heater standing-wave pattern. Once the grating is established the heater can no longer propagate to higher altitudes. The grating is then unsupported by the heater at these altitudes and decays, allowing the heater to propagate again and initiate another cycle. For stronger heater powers, corresponding to the Arecibo upgrade and the HAARP heater now under construction, the effects are much more dramatic. 1. Background and Research Objectives The objective of this research is to develop theoretical predictions for the macroscopic spatial and temporal distribution of turbulence induced in the ionosphere by p0werfi.d highfrequency (hf) radio waves. In the past few years there has been a dramatic improvement in the quality of experiments measuring the plasma turbulence induced near the reflection layer *principal investigator, e-mail: [email protected] 1 Well stated, you must be scientifical. Last Edited by Michael. on 03/14/2015 12:36 PM I sign any red karma I give, because if it's important enough to give, then it's important enough to know who gave it to you. :Skullspud: |