Maybe it's Magi[k]c

Honestly I see the tendency to psychoanalyze tactics as more a manifestation of "going to length" to connect ideas that are not inherently connected. I don't log on to win favor from friends or respect from enemies. My purpose here is quite casual.

Correct, I am not overly focused on one particular topic. As I've said before, this is my thread and I don't see the need to be a subject nazi. I don't see the need to make evaluative judgements about the sentiments expressed here beyond merely commenting upon them on the analytic surface.

What is your purpose? Intent?

What bearing do my or someone else's personal faults actually have upon the topic at hand? Who suddenly cares about the strength of our respective characters? You? Do you care about ranking GLP members based on their ethical merit? Have at it, that sounds absurd to me.

Seldom is putting in as much work, time and effort as you do, can be considered casual.

Purpose is to provide one with as an accurate perception as possible of how they are perceived.

intent to is have fun while doing so.

tactics are defensives in nature. as early training I was rather proficient at tactics. if it appears that my line of inquiry is a tactic, it is something that is second nature and not my primary focus.

does your defensiveness not ALWAYS engage in asking a question instead of answering one. LOL.

What does that say about you?

if someone wishes to be taken seriously, their personal opinions must be open to examination.

Perhaps my idea of something done "for fun" is merely more in depth than other hobbies.

I just find it a little obtuse, when people go out of their way to criticize another's persona while rendering their own immune to comment. That strikes me as cowardly. Also it makes me wonder, why have you decided to single me out? Because I am a regular user? Because some peculiar quality of my work stands out to you?

Early training for what, if I might ask?

I am suspicious because your modus operandi is particular and I see it as manipulative . You present yourself as a fair voice presenting reasonable thoughts but you always orient yourself from a certain vantage point of perspective and you are more persistent then I would expect an uninvolved anonymous commenter to be.

Of course being on GLP fosters a baseline level of 'defensiveness'. Mind games go on here. And I know the way they are played. It is one risk of attaching a handle and a blue name to a personality, that ones "identity" can be used to manipulate them in a community like this one.

So of course your intention is a question to me, and I may not see an honest and nutrient dense answer my ideal form of response . To put it shortly, your intention strikes me as suspicious

An exchange should be just that...an exchange, give and take. Now granted this is kind of a vague thing, but mostly I would feel suspicious in exchanges where lots of information is sought but little to none is given. There's also a particular way of going about seeking that from people without being too noticeable.

your statement about being singled out is not even evident.
as to the harshness of the "criticism" you take offense too, you cry louder than seer! lol. Please go back and place into perspective just what it is that you find so harsh. examine if your sensitivity is not all in your own head.

says the wolf. it is indicative of one's own frame of mind.
lol

perhaps you should answer more questions and ask less in reply. lol

You are misinterpreting my thoughts. What I am saying is not that the criticism is harsh, merely that it is pointed in one direction to the exclusion of others. Also that it is coming from a personality constellation that is identifiable as 'you' and that constellation behaves in a predictable manner.

However, you do not have an 'identity' nor a consistent personality with which your deeds and opinions may be attributed to your 'character'. so the things you say lack true relevance. It is so easy to preach. And that's all you do. thus, humoring you is a personal choice - I am consciously engaging you, whereas it would be just as easy and less draining to ignore you, because you are not a constructive presence, you are deconstructive, not unlike a tick.

what a persecution complex you have. lol

on the contrary, I feel less persecuted by you then I feel irate, vaguely. I do not feel 'persecuted' by anybody.

Hello.
Now for some colourful commentary.

AC58 takes a swing, Cark step back ducks and weaves then launches the full scale hail Mary.

The tick frick goes down hard on the canvas...

Heya there. How've you been? We should coin the term astral field. but whenever I think of astral I think of asstrolls

most have seen the lengths you go to in denying facts that are plainly evident.

Okay, name three of them

There IS a huge war going on, but imo it is not as it appears to either side.

The war is about having chosen paths stolen from each other. If we're all headed to the same place in the end why deny another person from arriving there via a different path?

support her she need it! lol

How can a path be stolen? What sides are currently involved? How do the sides know each other? I mean most people are not 'playing' for whatever that's worth. They are just trying to get by. This world of fantasy and gratification and lights and impulses and consumption - I look around me and that is the world most people are happily occupied within.

Now when I take a subsection of the population like GLP...you get people who are awakened to the salience of something more, something higher...at least some semblance of a spiritual gratification, whether that comes in the form of a political awareness or a literal spiritual crusade or even just a criticism of the social state of the present era...most people are not highly conscious unfortunately...

I have been good. The field, it is filled with trawls. About coining the term, you just have to mention it and people will catch it.

you denied that you didn't plagiarize
you denied that you didn't say you were the anti-Christ
you denied that you deny

there are probably many more that i'm unaware of, but its definiately with you. lol

lol

Sorry, I denied that I did not plagiarize?
Why would I deny not doing something?
Do you mean I denied doing it?

I always know when people are unsure. Even if Cark did need it, support that is, I hardly think she would accept any support from a internet stranger.

I honestly think you are just trying to get something from her, that is why you crossed threads to get her attention is it not?

the only thing people have ever caught from you required a phone call and an apology. lol

you most certainly did, you also denied it quite vigorously to no avail. lol

that is a trait that is deemed not trustworthy.

That's what would be, in a court of law, admissible as hearsay, not objective fact

hear·say
noun
information received from other people that one cannot adequately substantiate; rumor.
"according to hearsay, Bob had managed to break his arm"
synonyms: rumor, gossip, tittle-tattle, idle talk; More
LAW
the report of another person's words by a witness, usually disallowed as evidence in a court of law.
"everything they had told him would have been ruled out as hearsay"

nice try though

foolish that you could even think that you can discern my intention.

anybody that could read could discern what you wrote without giving proper credit.