Global Warming Receives Another Nail In It's Coffin

Yes, that's what accelerated warming does, it "screws up the jet stream."

Yes

The people that want to tax me for taking a breath and farting or turning up my heater during winters

oh god not this again....LOw IQ people thinking they know better than the scientists and when called they cry conspiracy its a scam for the carbon tax...

Bunch of fuking dickheads literally....

I say it again for the millionth time..global warming is a seperate issue from the carbon tax scam scheme or whatever u wanna call it. In other words Global warming is happening regardless of what u think of the tax....if you get rid of the tax tomorrow you still have global warming its not going to go away just coz u pricks think the 2 are linked together...

Michael Crichton knew that so-called "global warming" was bullshit, he was speaking out about it, and TPTB murdered him.

Well said.

It's really amazing how the crowd on this website will gulp any goddamn conspiracy theory that some psychotic dumbass can dream up, but when they're faced with the plutocrat carbon conspiracy, which is real as daylight, they just can't grasp it.

Don't confuse the global warming shills with real posters. The legitimate posters know that global warming is nothing but a scam.

Oh look, another person that's willing to gulp some ludicrous conspiracy about Chrichton, but is unwilling to see the 5 star plutocrat carbon conspiracy that's ruining the fucking climate.

Anthropogenic global warming is absolute and total bullshit.

As opposed to the climate change models pushed by the companies that will lose billions of dollars of revenue if action is taken against climate change? You really trust those? I want some of what you are smoking!!

The level of heat absorption of carbon is one of the linchpins of the AGW theory as a computer model.

If that's wrong then the whole damn mathematical model is faulty because it's central to the equations. Even if it's only half wrong that's still a big problem.

Garbage in, garbage out.

Last Edited by TexasPaleo on 03/21/2015 10:27 PM

People who make this kind of post are under the employ of Big Oil, who has hoards of minions out trying to sway public opinion back towards burning as much oil as possible, because that's their revenue you are threatening to take away.

Duh.

The planet heats and the planet freezes. Eventually, the sun will kill the solar system. It is inevitable, so suck it up, and stop trying to tax me and lie to me with bullshit "carbon credits."

Remove the proposed taxes and carbon credits, and then I might give a shit.

The sun is a thermodynamic system. It beats the same as your heart. Between peak and minimum is about 300 years. Why would man have migrated from warmer climates to colder if they could not grow crops? Just maybe, they moved north when it was warm and they tried running for the sun when the ice came.

Last Edited by No Dhimmi on 03/22/2015 07:48 AM

Carbon dioxide levels have indeed changed for various reasons, human and otherwise, just as they have throughout geologic time. Since the beginning of the industrial revolution, the CO2 content of the atmosphere has increased. The RATE of growth during this period has also increased from about 0.2% per year to the present rate of about 0.4% per year,which growth rate has now been constant for the past 25 years. However, there is no proof that CO2 is the main driver of global warming. As measured in ice cores dated over many thousands of years, CO2 levels move up and down AFTER the temperature has done so, and thus are the RESULT OF, NOT THE CAUSE of warming. Geological field work in recent sediments confirms this causal relationship. There is solid evidence that, as temperatures move up and down naturally and cyclically through solar radiation, orbital and galactic influences, the warming surface layers of the earth's oceans expel more CO2 as a result.

A paper published by "Nature Geoscience" finds a persistent link between solar activity and Greenland climate during the last ice age from a high-resolution record of radionuclides representing temperature and solar activity. The ice cores were collected from central Greenland and the record spans from 22,500 to 10,000 years ago. The website "The Hockey Schtick" describes the solar forcing mechanism as proposed by the authors with an extensive excerpt and graphs from the paper. The correlation R2 between the temperature proxy and the solar proxy is 0.3 at 99% confidence.

[link to hockeyschtick.blogspot.ca]

A 3000 year "fully adjustment-free physical reconstruction" of sunspot number was published in the journal Astronomy and Astrophysics. This allowed the authors to study modes of solar activity. They conclude that the recent solar maximum (1950 to 2009) was "a rare or even unique event, in both magnitude and duration, in the past three millennia."

[link to www.co2science.org]

This article presents empirical evidence for a direct relationship between total solar irradiance (TSI) and the Equator-to-Pole (Arctic) surface temperature gradient. The evidence suggests that a net increase in the TSI has caused an increase in both oceanic and atmospheric heat transport to the Arctic in the warm period since the 1970s, resulting in a reduced temperature gradient between the Equator and the Arctic.

Also to be considered are the thousands of active underwater volcanoes - another inconvenient truth to the Global Change movement who for some illogical reason believes carbon taxes are the solution to their fairy tales.

[link to people.duke.edu]

The HadCRUT3 surface temperature index, produced by the Hadley Centre of the UK Met Office and the Climate Research Unit of the University of East Anglia, shows warming to 1878, cooling to 1911, warming to 1941, cooling to 1964, warming to 1998 and cooling through 2011. The warming rate from 1964 to 1998 was the same as the previous warming from 1911 to 1941. Satellites, weather balloons and ground stations all show cooling since 2001. The mild warming of 0.6 to 0.8 C over the 20th century is well within the natural variations recorded in the last millennium. The ground station network suffers from an uneven distribution across the globe; the stations are preferentially located in growing urban and industrial areas ("heat islands"), which show substantially higher readings than adjacent rural areas ("land use effects"). Two science teams have shown that correcting the surface temperature record for the effects of urban development would reduce the reported warming trend over land from 1980 by half.

There has been no catastrophic warming recorded.

Oh boy another oil company shill troll....
[link to www.skepticalscience.com (secure)]

go on pick any arguement and see what the science says

Significant changes in climate have continually occurred throughout geologic time. For instance, the Medieval Warm Period, from around 1000 to1200 AD (when the Vikings farmed on Greenland) was followed by a period known as the Little Ice Age. Since the end of the 17th Century the "average global temperature" has been rising at the low steady rate mentioned above; although from 1940 – 1970 temperatures actually dropped, leading to a Global Cooling scare.

The "hockey stick", a poster boy of both the UN's IPCC and Canada's Environment Department, ignores historical recorded climatic swings, and has now also been proven to be flawed and statistically unreliable as well. It is a computer construct and a faulty one at that.

Settled science indeed! LOL

Oh Boy, another Al Gore and UN shill troll . . .

Carbon tax your own ass shill

For the past thirty years we’ve been told that we have less than ten years to save the planet..."

The young fall for this crap. Grownups have seen this "dance" before.

hey mister oil paid low iq person. when people say about saving the planet it is because they are not speaking just about co2 emissions they are a lot of other things humans are doing to this planet making the biosphere of this planet weak or unstable.

Put it in another way the planeet earth and the human body works in very similiar ways the only difference other than the obvious is that the time scale is obviously different from each other. Both need machines and lifeforms to help keep the body healthy and regulated. When something starts growing as in a human body that changes the chemistry which makes the lifeforms living within to not function properly, keeps on growing for the sake of growth and kills destroys the human machinery and we call that a cancer. This is what we humans are to the planet because we are doing the exact same thing as a cancer would do to the human body. As i said the time scale is different it would take a long time before the planet responds to what we have done and when it does how do u turn back the clock?

Insight from Martin Armstrong

I attended the dinner in Washington that was a political bash. I went with my friend Dick Fox who was Chairman of Temple University at that time. The person in charge of seating put the two of us at the table with the environmental group heads. They assumed we were with a university and spoke freely. The conversation was frank and it was all about how to use the environmental movement to reduce population. They fought for wetlands to stop construction. We listened to this revelation and Dick egged them on pretending to be on their side. They even want harsh prison terms for minorities to stop them from have children. Dick finally asked them – Whose grandchild are you trying to prevent from being born? Your’s or mine? The farce was then up.

There is a difference from wanting a clean environment and using this as a tool for a hidden agenda. It is no different from taxing the rich that ends up as always the middle class while they borrow from the poor and do not even pay them interest with their annual tax refund.

[link to armstrongeconomics.com]

Winston Churchill said that “History is written by the victors.” That is so true even among Establishment Academics. Anyone who thinks that Global Warming is really caused by man is naive to say the least. They have taken the equivalent of 5 trading days and pronounced that the stock market is in a perpetual bull cycle. Taking the introduction of automobiles since 1920 and claiming this has altered the entire weather system of millions of years with no investigation into cyclical weather cycles over millions of years (Ice Ages), is just bogus analysis with a political agenda.


Global Warming is all about money and raising taxes for politicians to pay for their pensions and support all the illegitimate children. Among academics, this is a religion, but they are also just corrupt socialists. Money pours into academia to create bogus studies to support the theory of Global Warming for taxing power as well as other agendas. So, Establishment Academics line up like those in the inner city on welfare check day to get their welfare checks to put out studies on all sorts of things with a predetermined conclusion. There is no “think tank” in Washington that really thinks. They all have a biased agenda if it is weather, archaeology, religion, history, all the way to economics and politics.

The Establishment Academics are becoming just fascist Marxists hell-bent on manipulating society for personal gain and power. Establishment Academics are notoriously against free speech for they always threaten and black-list anyone who disagrees with them. The famous Swedish climatologist Lennart Bengtsson joined a group that is skeptical about Global Warming. He was intimidated until he was forced to resign.

Global Warming is another hidden agenda. The politicians are eager to climb on board not to save the world, but to raise taxes. The academics are driven by the money so they can sit in their rooms collect welfare checks for totally worthless nonsense.

[link to armstrongeconomics.com]

Interesting an educated opposite view gets a vulgar and emotional response. Sad shill much?

The earth was warming (more than present) prior to the the industrial age. Oh my - such inconvenient truth!!