Missing link in Evolution- Neanderthals still amongst us they are the Sasquatch. | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65965026 United States 03/27/2015 01:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 66426623 Germany 03/27/2015 01:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 66046261 Argentina 03/27/2015 01:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Darwin was right! Quoting: Darwon 40416559 They are called big-foot but are not that much taller then humans because their feet aren't that much longer length-wise then ours, just a little wider due to a more sturdier evolutionary stage to weather the natural elements. These archaeological footprint collection dug-out by research teams confirms that just like some humans so do some Neanderthal-Sasquatch have flat feet where they run slower and tire easily and why some have been photographed. [link to sasquatchresearch.net] This Photo taken of a Neanderthal-Sasquatch by research teams confirms. [link to media.bonnint.net] That the above figure accurately match depictions by anthropologists of Neanderthal (Homo neanderthalensis) below minus the fur clothing usually worn probably from their prey.. [link to donsmaps.com] |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 40416559 Canada 03/27/2015 01:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I hear what you`re saying, and I myself wish that some day we will have one in captivity, as well as Great White sharks at Seaworld or Marineland, but for the time being the information gathered by Bigfoot researchers is impressive. I can only add that perhaps Neanderthals-Sasquatch share a human-like resemblance in thinking and why they are far from human reach. Almost as though they can relate to what the human capacity is. Only some Neanderthals-Sasquatch who ventured too deep away from their safe-zone have been photographed and by humans who themselves ventured very deep into the woods of mountainous forests. |
The Undeceived... User ID: 66790302 United States 03/27/2015 01:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Darwin was right! Quoting: Darwon 40416559 They are called big-foot but are not that much taller then humans because their feet aren't that much longer length-wise then ours, just a little wider due to a more sturdier evolutionary stage to weather the natural elements. These archaeological footprint collection dug-out by research teams confirms that just like some humans so do some Neanderthal-Sasquatch have flat feet where they run slower and tire easily and why some have been photographed. [link to sasquatchresearch.net] This Photo taken of a Neanderthal-Sasquatch by research teams confirms. [link to media.bonnint.net] That the above figure accurately match depictions by anthropologists of Neanderthal (Homo neanderthalensis) below minus the fur clothing usually worn probably from their prey.. [link to donsmaps.com] "Neanderthals" are 100% human. There are specific historical and scientific reasons for their slightly different skeletal structures. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68651547 United States 03/27/2015 01:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | LOL! Do you really think 1 species a Sasquatch proves evolution? If macro evolution was real there would be thousands of transitional species running around, there would be evidence of new species being developed everywhere but alas there is none. Darwin himself gave a few criteria that would "debunk" the theory of evolution and by his own accord if was alive today he would conclude the theory is false. The evidence is simply not there to back it up. |
ScrumpTheTexan Forum Administrator User ID: 3515193 United States 03/27/2015 01:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I am a Christian. Christian does not equal doormat or pushover "I Have Sworn upon the Altar of God... Eternal Hostility against every form of Tyranny over the mind of man." -Thomas Jefferson, Sep. 23, 1800 The Election of Donald John Trump: [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] For previous Newsletters, click 'Scrump's News Letters' @ [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 40416559 Canada 03/27/2015 01:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | LOL! Do you really think 1 species a Sasquatch proves evolution? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68651547 If macro evolution was real there would be thousands of transitional species running around, there would be evidence of new species being developed everywhere but alas there is none. Darwin himself gave a few criteria that would "debunk" the theory of evolution and by his own accord if was alive today he would conclude the theory is false. The evidence is simply not there to back it up. I am very sorry that I will have to disagree with your statement based on human logic and common sense. There are species of wild-life in existence today that are on the verge of extinction and not running around in full bloom. The scientific community needs to act if these incredible creatures will survive the coming Global changes by sponsoring some sort of government funded program to look more in-depth on what is needed to be done. |
CASEY JONES 3741 User ID: 54229920 United States 03/27/2015 01:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65965026 United States 03/27/2015 01:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | LOL! Do you really think 1 species a Sasquatch proves evolution? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68651547 If macro evolution was real there would be thousands of transitional species running around, there would be evidence of new species being developed everywhere but alas there is none. Darwin himself gave a few criteria that would "debunk" the theory of evolution and by his own accord if was alive today he would conclude the theory is false. The evidence is simply not there to back it up. Thread: Defending Darwin |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 50345519 United Kingdom 03/27/2015 01:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21846469 United States 03/27/2015 02:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Darwin was right! Quoting: Darwon 40416559 They are called big-foot but are not that much taller then humans because their feet aren't that much longer length-wise then ours, just a little wider due to a more sturdier evolutionary stage to weather the natural elements. These archaeological footprint collection dug-out by research teams confirms that just like some humans so do some Neanderthal-Sasquatch have flat feet where they run slower and tire easily and why some have been photographed. [link to sasquatchresearch.net] This Photo taken of a Neanderthal-Sasquatch by research teams confirms. [link to media.bonnint.net] That the above figure accurately match depictions by anthropologists of Neanderthal (Homo neanderthalensis) below minus the fur clothing usually worn probably from their prey.. [link to donsmaps.com] "Neanderthals" are 100% human. There are specific historical and scientific reasons for their slightly different skeletal structures. they can detect neanderthal dna in humans right? I remember seeing a show on cable about an englishman who had neanderthal dna. they did a match from a neanderthal skeleton in britain, and then tested the popluace, and this guy was related! ..to the skeleton. does this mean that some humans mated with bigfoots in the far distant past? i mean if neanderthal and bogfoots are the same. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 40416559 Canada 03/27/2015 02:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "Neanderthals" are 100% human. There are specific historical and scientific reasons for their slightly different skeletal structures. they can detect neanderthal dna in humans right? I remember seeing a show on cable about an englishman who had neanderthal dna. they did a match from a neanderthal skeleton in britain, and then tested the popluace, and this guy was related! ..to the skeleton. does this mean that some humans mated with bigfoots in the far distant past? i mean if neanderthal and bogfoots are the same. What you say could be possible based on Donkey + Horse = Mule genetic manipulation could also be transmitted via Human + Sasquatch = that Englishman. It could be, I remember reading long ago a fictional story of a society of Neanderthals invading small towns in remote parts of earth interbreeding with humans giving birth to Apelike human capable of speech with technological abilities. Then about a year later the Hollywood movie Planets of the Apes with the spin-off into a another dimension of accidental future time travel hits the screen. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65016907 United States 03/27/2015 02:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Darwin was right! Quoting: Darwon 40416559 They are called big-foot but are not that much taller then humans because their feet aren't that much longer length-wise then ours, just a little wider due to a more sturdier evolutionary stage to weather the natural elements. These archaeological footprint collection dug-out by research teams confirms that just like some humans so do some Neanderthal-Sasquatch have flat feet where they run slower and tire easily and why some have been photographed. [link to sasquatchresearch.net] This Photo taken of a Neanderthal-Sasquatch by research teams confirms. [link to media.bonnint.net] That the above figure accurately match depictions by anthropologists of Neanderthal (Homo neanderthalensis) below minus the fur clothing usually worn probably from their prey.. [link to donsmaps.com] They are also known as atheists? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 58686169 United States 03/27/2015 02:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 40416559 Canada 03/27/2015 02:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Space program had a chimp make a flight into outer-space with the hopes that if one day a planet like earth was discovered a creature similar to humans with natural survival-instincts would populate that planet as a Genesis Program study. You will note for those interested in Big-foot that sightings became popular in the 1970`s after the lunar landings knowing that the technology to implant humanoids on a surface other then earth was possible and was preparing mankind for a possible Neanderthal Genesis Program when and if the right conditions were discovered on other planets in our solar system. Unfortunately no Planet discovery came forth at that time containing a positive percentage for survival to any of earth creatures and the Genesis Program was abandoned along with any restricted reservation area for the Neanderthals-Sasquatch species wild-life. Survival of the fittest means if you can be used in the human society or find a place within its use you are fit to survive. So I still believe with great hope that there is a place for these marvelous creatures that came up along side with humans in our universe and would promote a `Save the Sasquatch Foundation` funded by the United Nations to help with their preservation until a planet suitable could be accommodated because if the Sasquatch do go extinct it is the end of that food-chain forever. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 66046261 Argentina 03/27/2015 03:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68697487 United States 03/27/2015 03:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Close but not true. Neanderthals bone structure is a prototype of our own, but the fossils of bipedal apes that scientists claim we came from are more proportionate to gorilla like primates such as Bigfoot. In comparison to other animals, the ape to human evolution was a overnight process that would be naturaly impossible unless outside forces interfered with the process. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18847154 United States 03/27/2015 03:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Is there only one "missing link"? You mean evolution jumped from apes to man in one step? I thought Darwin's theory is that it is slow and gradual. Shouldn't there be hundreds if not thousands of missing links to go from ape to man? Where are all the remains and evidence of these gradually changing ape like men? |
Em18966 User ID: 55782402 United States 03/27/2015 03:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | To demand proof of sasquatch is silly. It's pretty obvious they're there and we're not supposed to know about them. If you disbelieve that the could exist along side us virtually unnoticed, you need to travel a bit to appreciate the vastness of their ranges and the fact that these areas are largely uninhabited by people. And the people who DO inhabit them have plenty of stories to tell. Of course YOU don't believe it because YOU didn't see it. A human cognitive trait that makes us easy to keep in the dark. What percentage of fish or deer or ants do you believe have actually SEEN a human being? The fact that many have never observed that that we're around nor even know of our existence doesn't mean we're not here. Last Edited by Don@ld Trump on 03/27/2015 03:59 PM |
beeches User ID: 28167778 United States 03/27/2015 04:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 61184324 Netherlands 03/27/2015 04:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 40416559 Canada 03/27/2015 04:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Is there only one "missing link"? You mean evolution jumped from apes to man in one step? I thought Darwin's theory is that it is slow and gradual. Shouldn't there be hundreds if not thousands of missing links to go from ape to man? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18847154 Where are all the remains and evidence of these gradually changing ape like men? Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. If you consider cross-breeding like donkey+horse=mule then a specie could literally be born over-night. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 40092258 United States 03/27/2015 04:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "Neanderthals" are 100% human. There are specific historical and scientific reasons for their slightly different skeletal structures. they can detect neanderthal dna in humans right? I remember seeing a show on cable about an englishman who had neanderthal dna. they did a match from a neanderthal skeleton in britain, and then tested the popluace, and this guy was related! ..to the skeleton. does this mean that some humans mated with bigfoots in the far distant past? i mean if neanderthal and bogfoots are the same. What you say could be possible based on Donkey + Horse = Mule genetic manipulation could also be transmitted via Human + Sasquatch = that Englishman. It could be, I remember reading long ago a fictional story of a society of Neanderthals invading small towns in remote parts of earth interbreeding with humans giving birth to Apelike human capable of speech with technological abilities. Then about a year later the Hollywood movie Planets of the Apes with the spin-off into a another dimension of accidental future time travel hits the screen. it is a scientific fact: [link to genographic.nationalgeographic.com (secure)] A team of scientists comparing the full genomes of the two species concluded that most Europeans and Asians have between 1 to 4 percent Neanderthal DNA.. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 40092258 United States 03/27/2015 04:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | why aren't we supposed to know about them? spiritual element involved perhaps? my opinion is that they exist in a mildly different dimension, so that what we see, is exactly what we are supposed to see, and no more than this. so that they (god, spirits, etc) provide a mystical part to our existense, this is our quota. just my opinion, which does not count for much. |
Anus the Heinous User ID: 1447197 United States 03/27/2015 04:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "Evolution" is nothing but Cartoon Science. The only supporting evidence for the "Darwinian" paradigm, are the Cartoons of animal transitions from one type to another. There is Zero scientific evidence to support these "Cartoon-Transitions". Period. Heinous Anus... Where Blather Meets Godzilla! Throbbing with semi-liquid contents... And Ready to Spew... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 55022092 United States 03/27/2015 04:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | LOL! Do you really think 1 species a Sasquatch proves evolution? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68651547 If macro evolution was real there would be thousands of transitional species running around, there would be evidence of new species being developed everywhere but alas there is none. Darwin himself gave a few criteria that would "debunk" the theory of evolution and by his own accord if was alive today he would conclude the theory is false. The evidence is simply not there to back it up. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Dude's got jokes. |
Darwon (OP) User ID: 40330618 Canada 03/27/2015 04:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "Evolution" is nothing but Cartoon Science. Quoting: Anus the Heinous The only supporting evidence for the "Darwinian" paradigm, are the Cartoons of animal transitions from one type to another. There is Zero scientific evidence to support these "Cartoon-Transitions". Period. I can understand your frustration but one has to consider that there were no photographers at that time for a more proper presentation so most of the work gets done from a forensic point-of-view like recreating a face from a bone skull. And besides, science still today use atomic depictions of medicines and other chemicals with animation serving for a better understanding of that particular chemistry and no-one will dismiss that these medicines or chemicals are not actual to their chart. The chart serve as a bases a sort of scientific language in order to better communicate the evolution of chemistry. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68651547 United States 03/27/2015 04:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | LOL! Do you really think 1 species a Sasquatch proves evolution? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68651547 If macro evolution was real there would be thousands of transitional species running around, there would be evidence of new species being developed everywhere but alas there is none. Darwin himself gave a few criteria that would "debunk" the theory of evolution and by his own accord if was alive today he would conclude the theory is false. The evidence is simply not there to back it up. I am very sorry that I will have to disagree with your statement based on human logic and common sense. There are species of wild-life in existence today that are on the verge of extinction and not running around in full bloom. The scientific community needs to act if these incredible creatures will survive the coming Global changes by sponsoring some sort of government funded program to look more in-depth on what is needed to be done. Yes this is true which is evidence of the opposite of evolution. In the history of the planet Scientists have cataloged evidence of 4 Million species, there are currently 4 thousand species living which is the opposite of what you would see if evolution were real(Start with 1 end with Millions). The Earth started with Millions of species and as time goes on the species are dieing out to extinction. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 59737592 United States 03/27/2015 04:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |