marriage is outdated

This^

Less pressure from big gov. but the bond is there between you.

And wrong again. The house gets to go to whoever is caring for the children. So either 1. You would stay in the house while "he" paid for it all even after he is gone. or 2. The house is sold and the money is split depending on how the courts decide. Time to wake up fro fairy tale land.

Let me see if I got this right. He invited her over into his home. He provided everything. He cooked, cleaned, and most likely provided entertainment. And for his trouble he had his appliances stolen. And yet he is the douchebag ... just wow. Typical woman.

It is just not his house since if she is taking care of it and the children. It would be the same if she were working outside the home and he was the taking care of the home and children. The house belongs to both of them no matter who is bringing in the money. Many women these days are paying alimony and child support to their ex's. So the tide is turning as more women are the bread winners and the husbands choose to stay at home.

It is just not his house since if she is taking care of it and the children. It would be the same if she were working outside the home and he was the taking care of the home and children. The house belongs to both of them no matter who is bringing in the money. Many women these days are paying alimony and child support to their ex's. So the tide is turning as more women are the bread winners and the husbands choose to stay at home.

Tell that to the many many men still paying the bills while she moves in her thug boyfriend. Plus she is telling their children what a horrible person he is and uses the heavy handed court system to remove any and all visitation rights. So at the end of the day they are nothing more than money hungry child abusing skanks. I wouldn't take one minute out of my day to piss on a woman if she was on fire. They brought this on themselves.

Believe it or not, it is not always a battle to separate when children are involved. The husband and wives CAN agree to how they feel the best way to proceed is, and there are many instances when child support is not even involved. Some people are actually mature enough to know that the children's best interests are most important, and they don't care about the rest. I would never try to get child support from him, because he would help provide for his children happily, because he loves them. The main problem with divorce is that people become angry and bitter and want to destroy the other persons life as much as possible. It's sad.

it is simply a bad financial decision.

not to mention the fact that most people are fucking psychos one way or another (myself included).

what is the difference between just saying youre "married" and living together, than going to the courthouse to sign papers?

having recently broken off an engagement i can honestly say it was the best fucking decision i have made for a while.

we weren't even married and she tried to clean me out. took the stove, refrigerator, and the fucking washer. now i have to go to someones house or the laundromat to wash clothes. AND SHE ALREADY HAD A FUCKING WASHER SHE JUST SOLD IT TO A FRIEND. /rant

well thats just like, your opinion, man.

Yeah, there is simply no chance in hell that I'll get married again.

Fool me once, shame on me...

If she really loves you, she'd agree to a 'pre-nup'.

in all seriousness, why not just live together and make a commitment to each other? its much less of a mistake than legally binding half your shit to another person.

It may be true that in our society marriage has lost it's meaning, but that doesn't mean it has no meaning in every human culture.

The question we have to ask is what will our society be like if we toss out all the laws that provide benefits to couples that decide to unite in matrimony.

Roll that forward ten or twenty years.

What will the picture be then?

As a female I would not have taken myself off the market in my prime to commit to one man who had no financial stake in the game in the event his ass decided to leave me, especially once I was past my prime. State sanctioned marriage at least gives women some protection. I sure as hell would not have had children with him without him having a financial stake in the game when it came to not only our children but also me.

We both agree that putting children in daycare is the equivalent of putting kids on orphanages. There are tons of studies out there showing just how damaging daycare is to children under the age of 4 (after 4 it's not nearly as damaging) but it's suppressed since this would destroy the commie agenda in this county to destroy the traditional family unit which helps to get babies away from their mothers as soon as possible and into day orphanages. Anyway, we both knew we wanted kids and we agreed that I should stay home and raise them, all the way though their teen years, and that going back to work after they are in college would be fine if I wanted to. I made a decent living before I married buy my husband is a 1% earner.

He put his money where is mouth is and had a prenup drawn up that heavily favors me. There are consequences if I cheat on him but I still would not be left with nothing. His attitude is that if you treat your woman right no other men will have a chance. He's right. Too many men ignore their women at the least and treat them like shit at the most and then wonder why they get cheated on (same applies to women when it comes to their men by the way.) Anyway, he is free to leave and trade me in for a younger model but he will be paying out the ass in monthly payments to support me well after the child support would stop until he dies and I still have a claim to an X% of his total estate at the time of his divorce regardless of how long we would have been divorced by that point and regardless if he is remarried or not. This was his choice to have the prenup written this way but honestly I would not have married a man and taken myself off the market in my prime had he not been okay with an arrangement like this.

Too many men are pussified these days and they don't want to be the head of the household and man up. Had I not met a man the caliber of my husband I would have just stayed single.

We have been married for over 10 years now and have two children .

in all seriousness, why not just live together and make a commitment to each other? its much less of a mistake than legally binding half your shit to another person.

What do you mean by that? Be specific, what you think manning up is as you put it.. Give me every gorey detail you think the man should be doing, then right beneath it, give me the role of the women in specific detail..

I already know your answers but I wanna see what you have to say.. And I want you to tell me exactly what you husband does that makes him the man for you.. Plz be specific so the rest of us pussy beta's can know and learn from.