Should a black owned bakery be forced to bake a cake for the KKK?

:rere23:

I would think a black owned bakery would be overjoyed for the opportunity to poison the KKK.

The KKK has a religious aspect. So it would be discrimination to refuse.

The real question is, what kind of idiot would want a cake produced under duress? I'd be afraid of what bodily fluids would be included. Perhaps, urinal cakes aren't just for restrooms.

Last Edited by samanthasunflower on 03/31/2015 02:24 PM

This is all just retarded. You should be able to refuse service to anyone. The laws that were put in place were put there to protect minorities long before we had this amount of business. You now can go to a gay bakery, black bakery, muslim bakery, jewish bakery. Meaning that today you have plenty of choices, quit buing a douche and go somewhere else. And as stated, who wants a cake from someone who doesnt like them?

Should a black owned bakery be forced to bake a cake for the KKK?

Not if it's a privately owned bakery owned by a black person.This whole issue goes both ways,the owner has the right to deny service to anyone for any reason they see fit.This is the definition of a free society.Everybody loves this idea when it doesn't directly affect them but the second they get singled out it's wrong,that's utter bullshit.

Exactly!!

I remember a couple of days ago there was a thread about some jagoff getting kicked off a flight for refusing to conceal vulgarities on his T shirt.

An owner should be able to choose who he does business with.

And really, unless a gay guy comes in there prancing around in a dress how is he to even know the dude is gay and have an issue?

^^^ In bold...."that's why it don't work that way in the US"

"Hey, your mouth is bleeding."
"Yours too!"

I think a Muslim owned print shop should be forced to print anti-Mohammad cartoons.

On the radio today I heard the host posit an interesting question:

What would happen if a gay couple asked a Muslim bakery to produce the cake for their wedding?

Would they force the Muslims to go against their religion, or allow the Muslims to refuse service to gays?

Personally I'd guess they'd uphold the Muslim's right to not be forced to engaged in something against their religion. After all, gays seldom go around blowing up straights while Muslims commonly blow up 'infidels'.

Either way, though, I'd LOVE to see what would happen. It would provoke very, very interesting discussion about religious freedom vs gays' rights to patronize a business that does not want them there.

Last Edited by KonspiracyKitty on 03/31/2015 02:58 PM

Liberal heads would explode