BREAKING: Tactical NUKE YEMEN Sanaa

:nuke 22:


no nuke

no flash

no crazy heat with the flash

Correct, but for all we know this was a very very low yield nuke, and the lower the yield the shorter the flash.

Nuclear detonations all experience a characteristic "double flash." Early in the detonation the explosion consists of two concentric spheres. The outer one is created by a sudden flood of radiation being absorbed by the surrounding air and heating it to incandescence. The inner one is the fireball of the vaporized solid elements of the bomb itself. The ionized structure of the outer shell makes it opaque to light from the inner shell so all that can be seen is the light the outer shell gives off. A millisecond or so after the detonation, the inner shell expands far enough that it blows through the outer shell and the glowing surface of the now exposed inner fireball can be seen, hence the second flash.

whatever it was it gives me the shits and one day soon it will come to our shores

how long can we keep funding and instigating this all over the world and it not come back to bite us?

Not a nuke.

Alalala long

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Did you just make that up or guess it??


here's the real info i just researched.

"For the last half-century, the U.S. has maintained its 5,400-warhead arsenal by replacing degraded plastic and rubber parts. But the most important part of the warhead -- its explosive radioactive core -- naturally decays over time and has not been replaced.
The warheads will remain dependable for at least 82 more years, or until the year 2091, according to a 2006 report by JASON, an independent scientific advisory group for the U.S. government. At that point, the warheads' decayed cores could leave the U.S. with an impotent nuclear arsenal. "The concern is, can we keep the nuclear arsenal safe, reliable and effective for as long as we'll need nuclear forces?"
"
Over time, the core loses mass and energy by emitting tiny particles through a process known as radioactive decay, and impurities build up in the core. The conditions required to start the explosive chain reaction are so precise, "there is always concern that if the core changes slightly, the compression might not go in a predictable manner," says Mark Sakitt, a nuclear proliferation expert at Brookhaven National Laboratory on Long Island.
The degradation of this radioactive material could destabilize the cores to the point that the weapons detonate weakly or not at all, RRW proponents say.
"


Whos to say what decay the old pakistani or other warheads have gone through. Its possible that they no longer work properly.

TOTALLY agree OP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

so.. there are no 0.5 KT nukes? Ones to destroy underground sites?

Indeed. A La Chelyabinsk!

looks lovely there this time of the year

good people too.

This was weeks ago and no its not a Tactical NUKE

Not good. Not good at all.

^^^ this

New type of nuke?

I believe these are White Phosphorus bombs. There has been reports of it's use, and there are videos of the civilians affected by it.

I guess using chemical weapons to take out ammo deposits next to cities is logical?

It's not a nuke. The shit was burning before it blew up. -Former Weapons Tech, US .mil

Stop this madness.

Why the fuck would anyone use a nuke to take out an explosive stockpile stored in a cave when any of the much cheaper options using regular bombs/missiles would have detonated the explosives in the cave???

What is the abomination of desolation?


Jesus links it to armies

If you look at the verse where he refers to it in the new testament
In one gospel he refers to Daniel in the other the armies of Rome
Who worshipped the red dragon.




The Destruction of Jerusalem
20"But when you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies, then recognize that her desolation is near. 21"Then those who are in Judea must flee to the mountains, and those who are in the midst of the city must leave, and those who are in the country must not enter the city;…

[link to biblehub.com]


The Abomination of Desolation
15"Therefore when you see the ABOMINATION OF DESOLATION which was spoken of through Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place (let the reader understand), 16then those who are in Judea must flee to the mountains.…

[link to biblehub.com]


Thread: The false miracles of the antichrist beast - miracles of WAR


And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week,.... Sixty nine of the seventy weeks being accounted for, and the several events observed to be fulfilled in them; the angel proceeds to take notice of the remaining "one" week, or seven years, and what should be done within that space of time: a covenant should be confirmed with many; which is not to be understood of the Messiah's confirming the covenant of grace with many, or on account of all his people, by fulfilling the conditions of it, and by his blood and sacrifice, through which all the blessings of it come to them; for this is not for one week only, but for ever;

The new Covenant in Christs blood is eternal and so IS NOT for one week

but this is to be interpreted of the Roman people, spoken of in the latter part of the preceding verse; who, in order to accomplish their design to destroy the city and temple of Jerusalem, made peace with many nations, entered into covenant and alliance with them, particularly the Medes, Parthians, and Armenians, for the space of one week, or seven years; as it appears they did at the beginning of this week (l):

[link to biblehub.com]

"25 kill streak" IAR.... veteran air to ground badge awarded.

Snnnnaaaccckkkkbar breaker!

While the Muz is making idiot luh luh luh sounds you can see a fire right before detonation.

OK so it was a Jesus bomb, not a nuke. Doom off

I have knowledge of nuclear warfare from my days as an Army Officer.

This may have been a low yield tactical nuke however, I see no massive fires along with the blast wave and no Electo Magnetic Pulse (EMP) which would terminate the video.

More probably a massive HE Explosion.



Last Edited by Casey_ Jones on 05/19/2015 02:15 PM

Except for the part in the end of the video where the filmer was right next to ground zero of the explosion, so bs. No nuke.

Any sufficently large explosion makes a mushroom cloud.

Tactical nukes - more alpha/beta and less gamma released with new techno-nukes. Just look at the demolition of the twin towers for an example.

Don't know what type of bomb this was, but it was not a nuke. It burned way to long.

Wish they would all stop throwing bombs at each other :(

Jesus man...What are we doing to each other?

This is correct, and they would in no way compensate for the type of flash produced by a nuclear device, even a small one.


The luminosity of a nuclear explosion is the same intensity regardless of the total yield or size of the device.


If that was a nuke that guys mini cam or phone would have gone completely white even behind a wall as the back-lighting tried and failed to compensate.


Additionally the column of "smoke" that forms the mushroom and stem of the cloud is not round puff balls.

A Fissile device will create and continuous coloumn of non-diffuse ground material excavated from the blast. It will often be in jagged ridges kinda of like a star shape when looking at the coloumn rather than nice round puffy blobs.


Finaly the blast happens so fast in a fissile device that you will not see the explosion rise from the ground up.

Watch the two videos, the first one you see a blast, a rising ball of heat that then folds under itself into a semi mushroom like cap and debris falls to the ground.

In the second video you see a flash, and by the time it clears you see the column of debris RISE from the ground and continue to push the ball of upwards in a continued reaction.

The Yemen explosion is over and done, the energy has been expended almost instantly where as the nuclear blast continues to be driven by expanding heat and is apparent in the behavior of the fissile material debris.

The main explosion you see in this vid was not the actual bomb it was the tons of explosive ammo the bomb detonated...

Forgot to login


Also to clarify:

Finaly the blast happens so fast in a fissile device that you will not see the explosion rise from the ground up.

Watch the two videos, the first one you see a blast, a rising ball of heat that then folds under itself into a semi mushroom like cap and debris falls to the ground.

In the second video you see a flash, and by the time it clears you see the column of debris RISE from the ground and continue to push the ball of upwards in a continued reaction.


What I mean by this since it sounds kinda contradicting is that, due to the flash you will not see the initial blast/excavation/smoke plume rise from ground up. You will generally see the column already there, and material will RISE from the ground up as the force of the blast is continuing to be released.

In a normal explosion, you will see a flare, a blast, the debris rise, then begin to fall, not a continued rise of debris as the explosion evolves.

(unless of course you are seeing multiple explosions, but then the sound and light will make that apparent.


This is an image of an atomic blast 0.025 seconds in, that is 2 hundredths of a second... you can see the blast is already full developed, this did not happen in the video and is a tell tale sign of a fission device no matter the yield.


[link to en.wikipedia.org]


For those wondering, I used to work for a company called 'Signature Science' their primary role is analyze explosions to determine their size and chemical make up for military and law enforcement. So I do have some real world and professional experience in analyzing explosives.

[link to www.signaturescience.com]

Last Edited by vind21 on 05/19/2015 02:38 PM