*** Urgent warning of impending earthquake *** | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69385906 United States 06/01/2015 05:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Stay safe Eat! This time I'm inclined to believe you unfortunately. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69359965 I would ask that you would say a prayer for me tonight. Possibly the Lord may grant me more specifics, or reveal to me that I am in error. -EAT Interceding for you, dear one. |
WhiteAngel also known at WA User ID: 47921376 United States 06/01/2015 05:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Holy Cow!_33 Just been on another thread where someone mentioned that. Their words; No Doom. I disagree. An underwater volcano erupting. No Doom. Facepalm. Here is one for you to use. Isaiah 5:20 KJV Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! Thread: Being Prepared - Updated Basic Food List On Page One |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65628652 United States 06/01/2015 05:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Full moon every 29 days. New moon falls in the half of 29 days so it would be on every 14.5th day. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 65628652 3 days plus or minus each is 6 days. So 6 days at the full moon and 6 days at the new moon. Thats 12 days total. Almost 50% of the average month. Do you get it? Has no one thought of this? You make it sound rare when you say +/-3 days from full or new moon. 29 days between between each full moon. A new moon happens the opposite of a full moon, so in the middle of the 29+days. Its almost like saying youre more likely to have a car wreck when youre in a car. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 49145280 United States 06/01/2015 05:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 36229104 Denmark 06/01/2015 05:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 36229104 Denmark 06/01/2015 05:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
The Endless Watchers User ID: 69393109 United States 06/01/2015 05:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28032624 United States 06/01/2015 05:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17497967 United States 06/01/2015 05:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69342611 Norway 06/01/2015 05:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I agree, except I don't see any evidence that planetary aligment have anything to do with Earth's orbit. We've got scientist Milutin Milankovich who proves that orbit changes in cycles, and this is not the case now. However, if Earth's magnetic field is weakening, than there is a speculation that more radiation income causes heating downthere, in the core. And reverse, more heating provides weaker magnets. that's maybe the case. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69392703 The change of orbit (if that is the case) is not related to the Milankovich cycles, but is a smaller adjustment that was set off by the March alignment, and we don't know that yet, could have been corrected or amplified by the May 28 alignment. We only need to see small adjustments on the orbit for it to impact the solar irradiation that is between 1.36 - 1.48 kW/sq meter/h depending on latitude and season, and which brings us up from 0 K to whatever surface temperature we have at the moment. |
EAT (OP) User ID: 68936393 Canada 06/01/2015 05:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 4 now? il check it out. for the person who asked which is worse, shaker or roller? shakers are because they usually come with a jolt and that's what does more damage than a rolling quake. hope that helps Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8165470 Thank you - it was me. Actually there have been 5 5.9 Off the coast of Oregon 2015-06-01 20:11:31 UTC 10.0 km 4.4 Off the coast of Oregon 2015-06-01 14:46:34 UTC 10.0 km 5.5 Off the coast of Oregon 2015-06-01 10:46:27 UTC 10.0 km 4.3 Off the coast of Oregon 2015-06-01 07:01:20 UTC 10.0 km 5.8 Off the coast of Oregon 2015-06-01 06:52:41 UTC 10.0 km [link to earthquake.usgs.gov] The average magnitude of these 5 earthquakes is 5.2.... If you lived on the San Andreas fault.... would you not be a little afraid if 5 earthquakes 5.2 magnitude each started popping up right around the same spot on the fault line? Do you think this indicates a destabilized fault that has just begun to be torn? |
Silly Marin User ID: 69375240 Israel 06/01/2015 05:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Fear the volcano Britain faces tidal wave threat Britain may be threatened by a monster wave that is predicted to devastate the coasts of Florida and Brazil following a volcanic eruption in the Canary Islands, scientists said today. The mega-tsunami generated by part of a mountain twice the size of the Isle of Man falling into the sea would be the biggest ever recorded in history. Today scientists warned that the UK would probably not escape the disaster unscathed. A weaker, but still hugely destructive, wave was likely to hit Britain's Atlantic coastline. Travelling at speeds of up to 500mph, the tsunami would be an unstoppable force. Its first target was expected to be the West Saharan coast of Morocco, where the wave would measure an awesome 330ft from crest to trough. But the built up coastal areas of Florida, Brazil and the Caribbean were expected to suffer the greatest destruction, according to a new forecast by Dr Simon Day, of the Benfield Greig Hazard Research Centre at University College London. Here, the wave would reach heights of 130ft to 164ft - higher than Nelson's column - and travel four or five miles inland, flattening everything in its path. Read more: [link to www.dailymail.co.uk] Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook Last Edited by Account Deleted by User on 06/01/2015 06:42 PM |
Silly Marin User ID: 69375240 Israel 06/01/2015 05:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
WhiteAngel also known at WA User ID: 47921376 United States 06/01/2015 05:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is why you should look at this link [link to www.emsc-csem.org] It shows many reporting agencies. The recent Japan quake USGS downgraded to 7.8 yet several other agencies including JAPAN stated it was an 8.5. There was even a report from Japan that they upgraded it further to a 9.1 Isaiah 5:20 KJV Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! Thread: Being Prepared - Updated Basic Food List On Page One |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69035201 United States 06/01/2015 05:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 4 now? il check it out. for the person who asked which is worse, shaker or roller? shakers are because they usually come with a jolt and that's what does more damage than a rolling quake. hope that helps Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8165470 Thank you - it was me. Actually there have been 5 5.9 Off the coast of Oregon 2015-06-01 20:11:31 UTC 10.0 km 4.4 Off the coast of Oregon 2015-06-01 14:46:34 UTC 10.0 km 5.5 Off the coast of Oregon 2015-06-01 10:46:27 UTC 10.0 km 4.3 Off the coast of Oregon 2015-06-01 07:01:20 UTC 10.0 km 5.8 Off the coast of Oregon 2015-06-01 06:52:41 UTC 10.0 km [link to earthquake.usgs.gov] The last being the strongest. |
kitkat31 User ID: 69382748 United States 06/01/2015 05:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 4 now? il check it out. for the person who asked which is worse, shaker or roller? shakers are because they usually come with a jolt and that's what does more damage than a rolling quake. hope that helps Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8165470 Thank you - it was me. Actually there have been 5 5.9 Off the coast of Oregon 2015-06-01 20:11:31 UTC 10.0 km 4.4 Off the coast of Oregon 2015-06-01 14:46:34 UTC 10.0 km 5.5 Off the coast of Oregon 2015-06-01 10:46:27 UTC 10.0 km 4.3 Off the coast of Oregon 2015-06-01 07:01:20 UTC 10.0 km 5.8 Off the coast of Oregon 2015-06-01 06:52:41 UTC 10.0 km [link to earthquake.usgs.gov] The average magnitude of these 5 earthquakes is 5.2.... If you lived on the San Andreas fault.... would you not be a little afraid if 5 earthquakes 5.2 magnitude each started popping up right around the same spot on the fault line? Do you think this indicates a destabilized fault that has just begun to be torn? God Bless you EAT.......just noticed you are in Canada. Not too many people would care or take the time to help and advised others of what may be coming. Bless your whole family. Sue...... Mesa, Arizona Just Waiting |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 58391971 United States 06/01/2015 05:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69392703 Serbia 06/01/2015 05:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I agree, except I don't see any evidence that planetary aligment have anything to do with Earth's orbit. We've got scientist Milutin Milankovich who proves that orbit changes in cycles, and this is not the case now. However, if Earth's magnetic field is weakening, than there is a speculation that more radiation income causes heating downthere, in the core. And reverse, more heating provides weaker magnets. that's maybe the case. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69392703 The change of orbit (if that is the case) is not related to the Milankovich cycles, but is a smaller adjustment that was set off by the March alignment, and we don't know that yet, could have been corrected or amplified by the May 28 alignment. We only need to see small adjustments on the orbit for it to impact the solar irradiation that is between 1.36 - 1.48 kW/sq meter/h depending on latitude and season, and which brings us up from 0 K to whatever surface temperature we have at the moment. I realy hope there's no effect of that. Otherwise, I've played a little with Solarsystemscope and found july 2020. when almost all of the planets will be at the same side of the Solar system. What a stretch could it be! I've played more (moved Neptun, for faster moving( and found last time that happened in 3104. BC, sometime in the beggining of faraon era in Egypt. Still, it's a little more than 5120 years cycle in the Mayan calendar |
WhiteAngel also known at WA User ID: 47921376 United States 06/01/2015 05:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 4 now? il check it out. for the person who asked which is worse, shaker or roller? shakers are because they usually come with a jolt and that's what does more damage than a rolling quake. hope that helps Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8165470 Thank you - it was me. Actually there have been 5 5.9 Off the coast of Oregon 2015-06-01 20:11:31 UTC 10.0 km 4.4 Off the coast of Oregon 2015-06-01 14:46:34 UTC 10.0 km 5.5 Off the coast of Oregon 2015-06-01 10:46:27 UTC 10.0 km 4.3 Off the coast of Oregon 2015-06-01 07:01:20 UTC 10.0 km 5.8 Off the coast of Oregon 2015-06-01 06:52:41 UTC 10.0 km [link to earthquake.usgs.gov] The last being the strongest. Yes which usually means they are foreshocks UNLESS this is volcanic. Then who knows what will happen. Isaiah 5:20 KJV Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! Thread: Being Prepared - Updated Basic Food List On Page One |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 53455543 United States 06/01/2015 05:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 49145280 United States 06/01/2015 05:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68831420 Norway 06/01/2015 05:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
BamaGirl73 User ID: 67749646 United States 06/01/2015 05:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I have 3 friends that live on the West Coast and even though they may think I'm nuts, I just sent them a message. Last Edited by BamaGirl73 on 06/01/2015 05:45 PM I believe in God, guns and Old Glory. If that offends you, I won't say I'm sorry. "My home's in Alabama...Southern born and Southern bred." If you put a candy wrapper on poison and give it to the sheep, they will eat it with a smile on their faces. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2402379 United States 06/01/2015 05:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
The Endless Watchers User ID: 69393109 United States 06/01/2015 05:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 4 now? il check it out. for the person who asked which is worse, shaker or roller? shakers are because they usually come with a jolt and that's what does more damage than a rolling quake. hope that helps Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8165470 Thank you - it was me. Actually there have been 5 5.9 Off the coast of Oregon 2015-06-01 20:11:31 UTC 10.0 km 4.4 Off the coast of Oregon 2015-06-01 14:46:34 UTC 10.0 km 5.5 Off the coast of Oregon 2015-06-01 10:46:27 UTC 10.0 km 4.3 Off the coast of Oregon 2015-06-01 07:01:20 UTC 10.0 km 5.8 Off the coast of Oregon 2015-06-01 06:52:41 UTC 10.0 km [link to earthquake.usgs.gov] The last being the strongest. Yes which usually means they are foreshocks UNLESS this is volcanic. Then who knows what will happen. The volcanic activity on the western coast of the US is caused from plate movement which is why we have volcanoes that explode instead of ooze out magma. Subbduction zones are the most volatile areas on the planet with regards to destruction on a widespread scale in a small amount of time. I think more earthquakes will occur of the coast of Oregon through out the day, getting larger and larger. Last Edited by PNWGeoMan on 06/01/2015 05:47 PM PNWGeoMan-Geology/Rocktard. "Geologists have their faults." |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18263388 United States 06/01/2015 05:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | three Big quakes now showing but it's probably all the same. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 36229104 [link to quakes.globalincidentmap.com] still at 6 and shallow depth. I don't know about these things, BUT, in trying to figure it out, looking at globalincident data - and being a fairly intelligent, logical person :) I would say it's the same quake, being reported by three different reporting sources. |
WhiteAngel also known at WA User ID: 47921376 United States 06/01/2015 05:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: WhiteAngel Thank you - it was me. Actually there have been 5 5.9 Off the coast of Oregon 2015-06-01 20:11:31 UTC 10.0 km 4.4 Off the coast of Oregon 2015-06-01 14:46:34 UTC 10.0 km 5.5 Off the coast of Oregon 2015-06-01 10:46:27 UTC 10.0 km 4.3 Off the coast of Oregon 2015-06-01 07:01:20 UTC 10.0 km 5.8 Off the coast of Oregon 2015-06-01 06:52:41 UTC 10.0 km [link to earthquake.usgs.gov] The last being the strongest. Yes which usually means they are foreshocks UNLESS this is volcanic. Then who knows what will happen. The volcanic activity on the western coast of the US is caused from plate movement which is why we have volcanoes that explode instead of ooze out magma. Subbduction zones are the most volatile areas on the planet with regards to destruction on a widespread scale in a small amount of time. I think more earthquakes will occur of the coast of Oregon through out the day, getting larger and larger. Yes, exactly. Isaiah 5:20 KJV Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! Thread: Being Prepared - Updated Basic Food List On Page One |
WhiteAngel also known at WA User ID: 47921376 United States 06/01/2015 05:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | three Big quakes now showing but it's probably all the same. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 36229104 [link to quakes.globalincidentmap.com] still at 6 and shallow depth. I don't know about these things, BUT, in trying to figure it out, looking at globalincident data - and being a fairly intelligent, logical person :) I would say it's the same quake, being reported by three different reporting sources. Exactly. When using GI, one needs to look at the times reported. This helps in telling new quakes from old ones. Isaiah 5:20 KJV Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! Thread: Being Prepared - Updated Basic Food List On Page One |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69394107 United Kingdom 06/01/2015 05:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 68936393 Canada 06/01/2015 05:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 4 now? il check it out. for the person who asked which is worse, shaker or roller? shakers are because they usually come with a jolt and that's what does more damage than a rolling quake. hope that helps Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8165470 Thank you - it was me. Actually there have been 5 5.9 Off the coast of Oregon 2015-06-01 20:11:31 UTC 10.0 km 4.4 Off the coast of Oregon 2015-06-01 14:46:34 UTC 10.0 km 5.5 Off the coast of Oregon 2015-06-01 10:46:27 UTC 10.0 km 4.3 Off the coast of Oregon 2015-06-01 07:01:20 UTC 10.0 km 5.8 Off the coast of Oregon 2015-06-01 06:52:41 UTC 10.0 km [link to earthquake.usgs.gov] The average magnitude of these 5 earthquakes is 5.2.... If you lived on the San Andreas fault.... would you not be a little afraid if 5 earthquakes 5.2 magnitude each started popping up right around the same spot on the fault line? Do you think this indicates a destabilized fault that has just begun to be torn? God Bless you EAT.......just noticed you are in Canada. Not too many people would care or take the time to help and advised others of what may be coming. Bless your whole family. Sue...... Mesa, Arizona Thanks Sue. |