Women in Ranger School Fail to Finish Grueling C6ourse

[link to www.usatoday.com]

The women were admitted to the two-month class as part of a broader effort by the Pentagon to lift the ban on female soldiers serving in "ground combat" jobs, such as the infantry.

The Army said Friday that five of the women will leave the course, but three will be given another chance to start the class from the beginning.

The Army said it is not unusual to allow some students to start over at the beginning. "This is normal course procedures and is used when students struggle with one aspect of the course and excel at others," the statement said.

These brave ladies deserve that second chance, don't you think?

No, they shouldn't. We have a mortgage, 2 cars and 3 kids and only one working member of our household. As it should be. If you can't afford the kids, don't have them.

Do you realize how many women have been in combat throughout human history??????

Let me ask you something, if a bullet is fired by a woman hits you will it hurt??????

Duh......

and by the way, some of us don't want to bring a child into this shitty world and condemn their progeny to a hellish future!

No, they shouldn't. We have a mortgage, 2 cars and 3 kids and only one working member of our household. As it should be. If you can't afford the kids, don't have them.

I can afford my kids. My wife doesnt want to sit at home all day Thats her choice, helps with keeping them out of public schools so why not have 2 parents workin . My kids arent fucked up.

Honestly I don't think women should serve in the military.

Correct. Wars in the eighteen century are won the way described.

However, modern day warfare are fought with a completely new array of weaponry - EMP equipments and other high tech stuff, drones operated from thousands of miles away from theatre of operation.

Modern warfare requires more brain than brawn.

Traditionally, liberal / progressives have used the military as testing ground for their dim-witted social experiments, because, as of yet, those are the only American lives they have the desired control over. Just as in public schools and civil sector jobs, standards will be lowered until they can achieve the desired result. In actuality, it will only dilute the quality of the finished product and discriminate against qualified applicants, just like all liberal / progressive programs do.

I can afford my kids. My wife doesnt want to sit at home all day Thats her choice, helps with keeping them out of public schools so why not have 2 parents workin . My kids arent fucked up.

Get it?

Too bad your wife doesn't embrace her role

No. If you don't make the cut, you don't make the cut.

Stop lowering the bar, America. That's a lot of what's wrong with modern America. Keep the bar where it is, and demand it be met.

That doesn't sound like Rangers then.

But they're gender norming STEM too, it's called affirmative action.

I was an engineer. I have never seen a clever female engineer. But I have seen a lot of female engineers get promoted very quickly.

[link to www.usatoday.com]

The women were admitted to the two-month class as part of a broader effort by the Pentagon to lift the ban on female soldiers serving in "ground combat" jobs, such as the infantry.

The Army said Friday that five of the women will leave the course, but three will be given another chance to start the class from the beginning.

The Army said it is not unusual to allow some students to start over at the beginning. "This is normal course procedures and is used when students struggle with one aspect of the course and excel at others," the statement said.

These brave ladies deserve that second chance, don't you think?

if you cant/don't pass ~ that's it ~ you don't lower the standards - TRY SOMETHING ELSE~ this is not for you.

whats next ~ telling the enemy before the battle ~ "look fellas, we have ladies with us, so if you could only shoot them with airsoft guns, that would be great.

if You don't pass ~ you doesn't mean woman. IT MEANS A human. Guys that don't pass are out just the same.

that is equality ~ that is justice.

lowering the standards is not equality

Talking of losers, I'd like to see any of the men go through childbirth with a smile on their faces.

In war,no second chances. And men dont have periods. I dont want to be in a fox hole with a bleeding female next to me. They should be nurses,doctors,office workers. And barefoot and preganent breast feeding their babies,they are NOT combat troops.

No said anything about childbirth weirdo.

I was in the Army during the Gulf War. That's back when they were just starting to become a 'kinder' more 'gentle' killing force.

I was a 19 Delta Recon. A Scout. We trained Rangers in forward reconnaissance and worked with them regularly in shit hot zones. Fortunately there were no women in Combat platoons back then.

We did have a few women in my Battalion though. And they were total freak prostitutes. There's something very special about military women. At the time I believed they were specially chosen to relieve the sexual frustrations of entire battalions, because one or two chicks would regularly service hundreds of guys. Sometimes in the same night. Nearly my entire quad fucked one chick in one night. They were lined up down the hall. She was dating a soldier I knew and they got in a fight so she let about 80 dudes run a train on her. Everyone got busted of course and had to get an AIDS test every month for a whole year. A blood test. LOL. One of the dudes grabbed a bottle of Pert Plus and used it as lube to fuck the girl in the asshole.

This was totally normal behavior for women in the military. Out of the 50 or so chicks I knew of they were all raging hookers. I'm talking zero ethical thought process. There is something wrong first of all with a woman who WANTS to immerse herself into a massive group of trained murderer rough neck men. There is an underlying subconscious desire to be raped to death. There can be no other explanation. They were all the same. And all of them were the ugliest girls you ever witnessed.

Women in the military cause NOTHING BUT PROBLEMS. There's no way around it. They distract the men. They want and seek out queen bee status and manipulate everyone until there is the eventual conflict.

I never banged one of the enlisted girls but I did bang a young West Point lieutenant who had no business in the Army. But she was too hot and seemingly too refined to pass up. Plus we were the same age. I nearly got court martialed though since I was enlisted.

I also banged another enlisted guy's wife after they both approached me about it. The guy wanted to watch while I fucked his wife. I was 19 and had no clue about that world. But I did it. And it caused problems. She started contacting me outside the agreement saying she loved me. The dude got jealous and reported me. I just denied it and my CO told me to keep it off garrison. Get a GF on the economy, not on base.

Anyway, when the shit starts popping off, no matter how bad ass a chick tries to act, they have no clue what to do. They instantly regress to the man must protect me evolutionary status. Women can make descent spies, but are biologically and inherently worthless in battle.

Just my observations.

I respect Tillman but he fucked up joining the Army. He should have joined Navy or Air Force special forces.

well that's confusing.. growing up we were taught to protect the women and children

Women actually mentally, and emotionally perform better than men in combat situations - women are able to think thru, multi-task, and process trauma much better than their male counter parts.
Physically, over an extended periods women do better.
Not talking about carrying gear, or physical demands of combat.. talking about what extended periods of intense stress and max demands physically have on your body.
Women do better than men.

Should women be in combat, hell no.. the biggest reason is that most men, by their nature will feel a higher responsibly to keep a woman safe, where as with a male counter part, the man will trust his male partner to be as physically capable as he is to maintain his own safety.