Posting Down (admin edit)

Thankyou for posting this.

great ! we get 30 minutes more of death and destruction
the wtc cannot be destroyed often enough

what is that weird white color near the base of the tower the first few times she tapes the firetrucks?

If you watch it around the 5:35min mark you can see another fire starting up many floors above the main one. Also, why would smoke be coming out of the top windows?

Watch from the 12th minute. she will say, O my good, it was a military plane!

Who was that ?

After the 2nd plane hit (12 mins in) she says "Oh my God, it was a military plane!"

Wierd how eyewitnesses sometimes get identifying planes wrong.

More info. can be found here: [link to www.geocities.com]

Excellent find op

Yeah, that happened alot on 911. hrm…

I agree and have passed it onto 911blogger.com

Do you work for Bush/Cheney?

I think he was being sarcastic. But he can correct me if I`m wrong.

I can see four lines of smoke (12:00min) above the impact site. Why?

I was refering to the rock solid eyewitness testimony at the pentagram ...

Now wait a second people! At 11:45 there's another explosion high up and then she says that it was a military plan!

Were there 2 planes hitting the firts tower? Also watch to the righ (from 11:45) for the shiny object (could be a plane or ufo) to the right.

What's the hell is going on here with 2 planes at WTC 1
!?

At 17:18 a small fast moving jet can be seen. Any idea what that could be?

Was she not talking about the attack on the second Tower? But yeah, she`s not the first to say military plane.

Ooops, I'm wrong; I didn't see the second tower since it's behind the first; it looked like if the first one was hit but of course it was the second hit...with a military plane?

The one with no windows, like a military cargo plane that one reporter commented on.

Oh brother...

Well the myth debunking "experts" (popular mechanics editor) claim that when the jet hit, fuel from it traveled down the elevator shafts and columns and ignited in the basement. Despite this, I still subscribe to the controlled demolition theory.

You and me both. The final moments remind me of a volcanic eruption with ejecta.

[link to volcano.und.nodak.edu]

Afraid it will show the truth AC?

I found myself crying again with the woman whose voice I hear in the video. I can't watch it without crying for all those people who were lost.

And, now there are many people suffering with respiratory diseases.

I believe google lowers the quality of the video when it’s uploaded so download the torrent file if you need quality. It has lots of seeds so it should be a fast download..

9/11 NO planes vs. thousands of eyewitnesses & millions watching TV:* praticability *
[link to www.goldismoney.info]

Oookay -

This video is absolute gold dust. Pity that they stopped videoing when they did... would have done a great job getting that second plane on tape.

Anyway, it's very clear that there wasn't a raging inferno in that first tower like we are led to believe brought it down. You can see the ruly masssive fissure that the plane made... and what struck me for the first time seeing THIS video as opposed to all the rest is that the ANGLE that it hit at creates a massive seam rising many, many stories high.

Now we all know that heat rises.

So if there was that massive 1200 degree inferno in there hot enought to melt the steel then pure physics says that most of the hot air would have been pouring out the top of that gash and colder air pouring in at the bottom. I.e. This video would have shown very, very clear termal activity of an absolutely raging torrent.

This ties in with the audio from the firefirghter who got to those floors and said that the fire was nearly under control and could be put out.

This video is absolute proof of that.

Before now I was willing to believe that "squishy steel" story. Now that I have seen this, I know it to be complete rubbish. an absolute farce.

I am willing to accept that there could have been local areas of heat, maybe even enough for one corner to collapse. But then you would expect a lopsided collapse which didn't happen. The top should have slid off the tower and fallen down below onto the street.

However, one thing that I cannot see clearly enough is what happens below before the tower's collapse. Was there an explosion? Is doesn't look like it but then if you go over those few seconds of footage, there DOES seem to be smoke there... only they weere panning around too much before then to see if this was normal at the time or indicative of some explosion. There sure was a LOT of smoke at the bottom shortly before they jerk the camera skywards.

So this footage MAY debunk the "explosions in the basement" theory of demolition. But no way with that massive semi-veritcal gash would the heat be accumulating like we are led to believe. That theory, the official line, is now smashed to pieces by this video. There isn't event a smoke pall rising from the top of the gash. Impossible if temps had reached the levels that the official line says.

And again... another witness saying it was a military plane.

At the end you can see through the smoke part of the central suuport column.

It stays for just a bit as the building falls, and it does fall quick. The you see that column fall straight down, Doesn't lead a bit. Like the bottome was whacked out in swoop and it just came down straight as an arrow.

Explain how that happens 'by accident".

There were two of them in the room saying oh my god, it is a military plane. Are they saying a military plane hit the second tower? Or do they just see a military plane flying around. I thought the military planes came after it was all over.