Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,877 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 705,786
Pageviews Today: 933,039Threads Today: 255Posts Today: 3,746
08:07 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

3 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HAVE BEEN RULING ON CASES INVOLVING COMPANIES WHOSE STOCK THEY OWN

 
Munsoned

User ID: 51111974
United States
07/07/2015 05:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 3 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HAVE BEEN RULING ON CASES INVOLVING COMPANIES WHOSE STOCK THEY OWN
All judicial tyrants!
Freedom requires breathing room, the Constitution presupposes that there will be some crazies among us so that the rest of us can enjoy freedom. - Judge Andrew Napolitano

A huge shit cloud is coming!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 53158832
United States
07/07/2015 05:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 3 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HAVE BEEN RULING ON CASES INVOLVING COMPANIES WHOSE STOCK THEY OWN
Look at it this way, America is not a failed state, it is the perfect opportunity to create 50 new independent republics using the former as an example of what not to let happen.

chuckle

.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 43199023
United States
07/07/2015 05:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 3 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HAVE BEEN RULING ON CASES INVOLVING COMPANIES WHOSE STOCK THEY OWN
John Roberts needs to go
BodilessModerator
Forum Administrator

User ID: 22251333
United States
07/07/2015 05:32 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 3 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HAVE BEEN RULING ON CASES INVOLVING COMPANIES WHOSE STOCK THEY OWN
Corruption is system wide.
 Quoting: -GLP-Christian-


Happy to agree with you. Now how do we fix it? How about we start with jury nullification. Start local, build large. Get rid of illegal laws.

thumbsup
“We have assembled the most extensive and inclusive Voter Fraud Organization in the history of America”—Joe “SippyCup” Biden

Joe Biden will never be the man Michelle Obama is

The worst thing about dying is that you become a democratic voter for eternity
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 7426888
United States
07/07/2015 05:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 3 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HAVE BEEN RULING ON CASES INVOLVING COMPANIES WHOSE STOCK THEY OWN
The whole court should be impeached (after the election), and replaced with honest judges. The problem is not with one judge, it is systemic. It's not just a bad apple, they are all crooks. Every one of them is bent on filling their own pockets at our expense. I guess the judges decided that it has worked so well for congress, they might as well get some the action too.
 Quoting: Epic Beard Guy


The whole court should be impeached (after the election), and replaced with honest judges. The problem is not with one judge, it is systemic. It's not just a bad apple, they are all crooks. Every one of them is bent on filling their own pockets at our expense. I guess the judges decided that it has worked so well for congress, they might as well get some the action too.
 Quoting: Epic Beard Guy


Honest judges isn't that an oxymoron
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 69698911
United States
07/07/2015 05:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 3 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HAVE BEEN RULING ON CASES INVOLVING COMPANIES WHOSE STOCK THEY OWN
What does the Constitution say to do with a corrupt court?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69558478


clappa
 Quoting: Bodhi Sita


The Constitution does not exist. The Supreme Court said so.

The US Supreme Court just admitted that the US Contitution is gone. Watch and listen for yourself. You will be amazed if you did not already know that the Constitution has been gone since 1933. Chief Justice Roberts actually said it when the gay marriage ruling came out.

Pay particular attention at the 2:35 mark to the 2:58 mark

"Do not celebrate the Constitution. It had nothing to do with it"

Supreme Court Rules Same-Sex Marriage Legal Nationwide

 Quoting: Understand the Times 11478368
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 69700607
United States
07/07/2015 05:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 3 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HAVE BEEN RULING ON CASES INVOLVING COMPANIES WHOSE STOCK THEY OWN
The whole court should be impeached (after the election), and replaced with honest judges. The problem is not with one judge, it is systemic. It's not just a bad apple, they are all crooks. Every one of them is bent on filling their own pockets at our expense. I guess the judges decided that it has worked so well for congress, they might as well get some the action too.
 Quoting: Epic Beard Guy


The whole court should be impeached (after the election), and replaced with honest judges. The problem is not with one judge, it is systemic. It's not just a bad apple, they are all crooks. Every one of them is bent on filling their own pockets at our expense. I guess the judges decided that it has worked so well for congress, they might as well get some the action too.
 Quoting: Epic Beard Guy


Honest judges isn't that an oxymoron
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7426888


that's oxymoran
BodilessModerator
Forum Administrator

User ID: 22251333
United States
07/07/2015 05:38 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 3 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HAVE BEEN RULING ON CASES INVOLVING COMPANIES WHOSE STOCK THEY OWN
fivestars
redpin
“We have assembled the most extensive and inclusive Voter Fraud Organization in the history of America”—Joe “SippyCup” Biden

Joe Biden will never be the man Michelle Obama is

The worst thing about dying is that you become a democratic voter for eternity
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 69322115
United States
07/07/2015 05:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 3 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HAVE BEEN RULING ON CASES INVOLVING COMPANIES WHOSE STOCK THEY OWN
Wow.
This entire planet is so out of sync and balance that we're actually in need of a direct asteroid strike!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29150242


Agree! Or a nice large comet or don't we have a huge planet headed this way? A super X flare would work too.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 69684423
United States
07/07/2015 05:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 3 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HAVE BEEN RULING ON CASES INVOLVING COMPANIES WHOSE STOCK THEY OWN
this is Satan's system; what did you expect?
~sIcKaNdTwIsTeD~

User ID: 65969492
United States
07/07/2015 05:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 3 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HAVE BEEN RULING ON CASES INVOLVING COMPANIES WHOSE STOCK THEY OWN
The whole court should be impeached (after the election), and replaced with honest judges. The problem is not with one judge, it is systemic. It's not just a bad apple, they are all crooks. Every one of them is bent on filling their own pockets at our expense. I guess the judges decided that it has worked so well for congress, they might as well get some the action too.
 Quoting: Epic Beard Guy


hesright
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 69673225
United States
07/07/2015 06:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 3 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HAVE BEEN RULING ON CASES INVOLVING COMPANIES WHOSE STOCK THEY OWN
What does the Constitution say to do with a corrupt court?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69558478


Constitution????

WHAT???

1rof11rof11rof1
Citizenperth

User ID: 66515138
Australia
07/07/2015 06:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 3 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HAVE BEEN RULING ON CASES INVOLVING COMPANIES WHOSE STOCK THEY OWN
i hope they ruled in favor of further advances...

chuckle

derp
It's life as we know it, but only just.
[link to citizenperth.wordpress.com]
sic ut vos es vos should exsisto , denego alius vicis facio vos change , exsisto youself , proprie
Perfectly Paleo

User ID: 69278931
United States
07/07/2015 06:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 3 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HAVE BEEN RULING ON CASES INVOLVING COMPANIES WHOSE STOCK THEY OWN
4. FEDERAL JUDGES DO NOT HOLD LIFETIME APPOINTMENTS

A. The Constitution says that judges hold their office only during “good behavior” (Art. III, Sec. 1).
B. Federal judges may be removed by Congress for misbehavior, which, historically, did not include only criminal behavior but also other misbehavior.
C. Historically, federal judges have been removed from the bench by Congress for contradicting an order of Congress, for profanity, for rude treatment of witness in a courtroom, for drunkenness, for judicial high-handedness and a variety of other reasons.24
D. The Constitution provides six clauses on impeachment – the most often-mentioned subject in the Constitution.25
E. The Founding Fathers and early legal authorities were clear about the ground for impeachment:
1. James Wilson, signer of the Constitution, original Justice on the U. S. Supreme Court: “mpeachments are confined to political characters, to political crimes and misdemeanors, and to political punishments.26
2. Justice Joseph Story, a “Father of American Jurisprudence” appointed to the Supreme Court by President James Madison: “The offenses to which the power of impeachment has been and is ordinarily applied as a remedy. . . . are aptly termed political offences, growing out of personal misconduct, or gross neglect, or usurpation, or habitual disregard of the public interests.27
3. John Marshall, Chief Justice of the U. S. Supreme Court: “[T]he present doctrine seems to be that a Judge giving a legal opinion contrary to the opinion of the legislature is liable to impeachment.28
4. George Mason, the “Father of the Bill of Rights”: “attempts to subvert the Constitution.29
5. Alexander Hamilton: “the abuse or violation of some public trust. . . . [or for] injuries done immediately to the society itself.30
6. George Mason, “Father of the Bill of Rights,” and Elbridge, signer of the Declaration and Framer of the Bill of Rights: “mal-administration.31
7. William Rawle, legal authority and author of early constitutional commentary: “the inordinate extension of power, the influence of party and of prejudice32 as well as attempts to “infringe the rights of the people.33
8. Justice Joseph Story, a “Father of American Jurisprudence” appointed to the Supreme Court by President James Madison: “unconstitutional opinions” and “attempts to subvert the fundamental laws and introduce arbitrary power.34
F. Federalist #65: “[T]he practice of impeachments [is] a bridle in the hands of the Legislative body.35
G. Justice James Iredell, a ratifier of the Constitution, placed on the Supreme Court by President Washington: “Every government requires it [impeachment]. Every man ought to be amenable for his conduct. . . . It will be not only the means of punishing misconduct but it will prevent misconduct. A man in public office who knows that there is no tribunal to punish him may be ready to deviate from his duty; but if he knows there is a tribunal for that purpose although he may be a man of no principle, the very terror of punishment will perhaps deter him."
[link to www.wallbuilders.com]
hi
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 68546039
United States
07/07/2015 06:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 3 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HAVE BEEN RULING ON CASES INVOLVING COMPANIES WHOSE STOCK THEY OWN
that seems pretty blatant I mean a nurse in the hospital isn't supposed to help somebody they know get well for ethical reasons
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 67637065


Not particularly good at drawing parallels, are you?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 64326072
United States
07/07/2015 06:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 3 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HAVE BEEN RULING ON CASES INVOLVING COMPANIES WHOSE STOCK THEY OWN
Absolute corruption!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 66628755
United States
07/07/2015 06:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 3 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HAVE BEEN RULING ON CASES INVOLVING COMPANIES WHOSE STOCK THEY OWN
That's grounds for disbarment.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15292827


bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1626233
United States
07/07/2015 06:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 3 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HAVE BEEN RULING ON CASES INVOLVING COMPANIES WHOSE STOCK THEY OWN
This is not good.
Sad state of affairs.
DeadManWalkin'

User ID: 26565484
United States
07/07/2015 06:47 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 3 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HAVE BEEN RULING ON CASES INVOLVING COMPANIES WHOSE STOCK THEY OWN
snippet:

"The organization Fix the Court says in a report (pdf) that Chief Justice John Roberts and Associate Justices Stephen Breyer and Samuel Alito have created potential conflicts of interest by participating in decisions that potentially affected their stock portfolio.

Fix the Court reviewed cases heard by the court between 2009 and 2013, and focused on 19 cases in which the three justices owned stock in companies that filed “friend of the court” or amicus curiae briefs. The report says that, in those cases, 68% of the time Roberts, Breyer and Alito sided with the companies in which they owned stock.

The other six justices were omitted from the study because they don’t own a significant amount of common stock in individual companies.

The 19 conflict-of-interest cases involved such matters as mandatory arbitration, affirmative action, and corporate immunity for international law violations."

Read more [link to www.blacklistednews.com]
 Quoting: ImpartialOne 69226408


The whole government should be locked up and the key thrown away
 Quoting: the white rose


Wow.
This entire planet is so out of sync and balance that we're actually in need of a direct asteroid strike!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29150242


The other six justices were omitted from the study because they don't own a significant amount of common stock in individual companies.

Read more [link to www.blacklistednews.com]
 Quoting: ImpartialOne 69226408


What utter bullshit.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69546414


is there any legal precedent to remove supreme court justices like impeachment?
 Quoting: Grove Street
Yes! and these are impeachable offenses, but it is unlikely that an equally corrupt congress would impeach them.
 Quoting: Northman


The whole court should be impeached (after the election), and replaced with honest judges. The problem is not with one judge, it is systemic. It's not just a bad apple, they are all crooks. Every one of them is bent on filling their own pockets at our expense. I guess the judges decided that it has worked so well for congress, they might as well get some the action too.
 Quoting: Epic Beard Guy


The supreme court is nothing but a joke. Just another political group that does the bidding of it's masters.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 64469937


Might be important news if we lived in a nation of laws.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68966920


Recuse yourself maybe? No, my stock portfolio might lose earnings!!
 Quoting: FlashBuzzkill


What does the Constitution say to do with a corrupt court?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69558478


Try the first couple lines of the declaration of independence, to whit:

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 53158832


Corruption is system wide.
 Quoting: -GLP-Christian-


Tore up from the floor up, yup.
 Quoting: Kira mai Kadwalladyr


Get a rope.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 46495393


Get a rope.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 46495393


Seriously. It's getting to the point were we may have to start doing something.
 Quoting: Nerve03


The whole government should be locked up and the key thrown away
 Quoting: the white rose


The irony here is 'lies are truth'; 'victims are terrorists'.

And furthermore, 'give away military weapons to the rebels'; 'let no crime go to waste'.

It's about time to add a line to the top of every ballot;
'Should we lock up the current elected politicos and try them for treason'

Perhaps the oath of office should be enforced?

bump
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 54586102


snippet:

"The organization Fix the Court says in a report (pdf) that Chief Justice John Roberts and Associate Justices Stephen Breyer and Samuel Alito have created potential conflicts of interest by participating in decisions that potentially affected their stock portfolio.

Fix the Court reviewed cases heard by the court between 2009 and 2013, and focused on 19 cases in which the three justices owned stock in companies that filed “friend of the court” or amicus curiae briefs. The report says that, in those cases, 68% of the time Roberts, Breyer and Alito sided with the companies in which they owned stock.

The other six justices were omitted from the study because they don’t own a significant amount of common stock in individual companies.

The 19 conflict-of-interest cases involved such matters as mandatory arbitration, affirmative action, and corporate immunity for international law violations."

Read more [link to www.blacklistednews.com]
 Quoting: ImpartialOne 69226408


Will anything happen? No! All agencies, all positions are corrupt.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 67594723


that seems pretty blatant I mean a nurse in the hospital isn't supposed to help somebody they know get well for ethical reasons
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 67637065


All judicial tyrants!
 Quoting: Munsoned


Look at it this way, America is not a failed state, it is the perfect opportunity to create 50 new independent republics using the former as an example of what not to let happen.

chuckle

.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 53158832


John Roberts needs to go
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 43199023


Corruption is system wide.
 Quoting: -GLP-Christian-


Happy to agree with you. Now how do we fix it? How about we start with jury nullification. Start local, build large. Get rid of illegal laws.

thumbsup
 Quoting: Bodiless


What does the Constitution say to do with a corrupt court?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69558478


Constitution????

WHAT???

1rof11rof11rof1
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69673225


4. FEDERAL JUDGES DO NOT HOLD LIFETIME APPOINTMENTS

A. The Constitution says that judges hold their office only during “good behavior” (Art. III, Sec. 1).
B. Federal judges may be removed by Congress for misbehavior, which, historically, did not include only criminal behavior but also other misbehavior.
C. Historically, federal judges have been removed from the bench by Congress for contradicting an order of Congress, for profanity, for rude treatment of witness in a courtroom, for drunkenness, for judicial high-handedness and a variety of other reasons.24
D. The Constitution provides six clauses on impeachment – the most often-mentioned subject in the Constitution.25
E. The Founding Fathers and early legal authorities were clear about the ground for impeachment:
1. James Wilson, signer of the Constitution, original Justice on the U. S. Supreme Court: “mpeachments are confined to political characters, to political crimes and misdemeanors, and to political punishments.26
2. Justice Joseph Story, a “Father of American Jurisprudence” appointed to the Supreme Court by President James Madison: “The offenses to which the power of impeachment has been and is ordinarily applied as a remedy. . . . are aptly termed political offences, growing out of personal misconduct, or gross neglect, or usurpation, or habitual disregard of the public interests.27
3. John Marshall, Chief Justice of the U. S. Supreme Court: “[T]he present doctrine seems to be that a Judge giving a legal opinion contrary to the opinion of the legislature is liable to impeachment.28
4. George Mason, the “Father of the Bill of Rights”: “attempts to subvert the Constitution.29
5. Alexander Hamilton: “the abuse or violation of some public trust. . . . [or for] injuries done immediately to the society itself.30
6. George Mason, “Father of the Bill of Rights,” and Elbridge, signer of the Declaration and Framer of the Bill of Rights: “mal-administration.31
7. William Rawle, legal authority and author of early constitutional commentary: “the inordinate extension of power, the influence of party and of prejudice32 as well as attempts to “infringe the rights of the people.33
8. Justice Joseph Story, a “Father of American Jurisprudence” appointed to the Supreme Court by President James Madison: “unconstitutional opinions” and “attempts to subvert the fundamental laws and introduce arbitrary power.34
F. Federalist #65: “[T]he practice of impeachments [is] a bridle in the hands of the Legislative body.35
G. Justice James Iredell, a ratifier of the Constitution, placed on the Supreme Court by President Washington: “Every government requires it [impeachment]. Every man ought to be amenable for his conduct. . . . It will be not only the means of punishing misconduct but it will prevent misconduct. A man in public office who knows that there is no tribunal to punish him may be ready to deviate from his duty; but if he knows there is a tribunal for that purpose although he may be a man of no principle, the very terror of punishment will perhaps deter him."
[link to www.wallbuilders.com]
 Quoting: Perfectly Paleo


Absolute corruption!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 64326072


There is hope for our country, yet!
Man
, I love you guys!!
See ya on the other side. If not, you can all share my preps.
wink
clappa
-.. . .- -.. / -- .- -. / .-- .- .-.. -.- .. -. --.


Omnes vulnerant, ultima necat
Ms. Superduper

User ID: 69702722
United States
07/07/2015 06:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 3 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HAVE BEEN RULING ON CASES INVOLVING COMPANIES WHOSE STOCK THEY OWN
dick Was watching the black caucus on CSPAN a few years back and learned that this guy's company was being used for work in the war over yonder. They were talking about it.
Greater is He who is in me than he who is in the world.

Whatever feels good to your soul, do that.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 69593062
United States
07/07/2015 06:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 3 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HAVE BEEN RULING ON CASES INVOLVING COMPANIES WHOSE STOCK THEY OWN
So what?

The two freak'n dykes on the court have rules on cases in which they publicly took a position (fudge packer marriage licenses) before a case in which they should have recused themselves.

Good enough for dyke justices.... good enough for everybody else.

Fuck 'em.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 65224427


/thread
BlondieEastwood

User ID: 69602341
United States
07/07/2015 06:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 3 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HAVE BEEN RULING ON CASES INVOLVING COMPANIES WHOSE STOCK THEY OWN
And you're surprised how??
ManWithNoName
BlondieEastwood

User ID: 69602341
United States
07/07/2015 06:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 3 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HAVE BEEN RULING ON CASES INVOLVING COMPANIES WHOSE STOCK THEY OWN
The most corrupt and evil empire in the history of the world.
ManWithNoName
Perfectly Paleo

User ID: 69278931
United States
07/07/2015 06:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 3 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HAVE BEEN RULING ON CASES INVOLVING COMPANIES WHOSE STOCK THEY OWN
4. FEDERAL JUDGES DO NOT HOLD LIFETIME APPOINTMENTS

A. The Constitution says that judges hold their office only during “good behavior” (Art. III, Sec. 1).
B. Federal judges may be removed by Congress for misbehavior, which, historically, did not include only criminal behavior but also other misbehavior.
C. Historically, federal judges have been removed from the bench by Congress for contradicting an order of Congress, for profanity, for rude treatment of witness in a courtroom, for drunkenness, for judicial high-handedness and a variety of other reasons.24
D. The Constitution provides six clauses on impeachment – the most often-mentioned subject in the Constitution.25
E. The Founding Fathers and early legal authorities were clear about the ground for impeachment:
1. James Wilson, signer of the Constitution, original Justice on the U. S. Supreme Court: “mpeachments are confined to political characters, to political crimes and misdemeanors, and to political punishments.26
2. Justice Joseph Story, a “Father of American Jurisprudence” appointed to the Supreme Court by President James Madison: “The offenses to which the power of impeachment has been and is ordinarily applied as a remedy. . . . are aptly termed political offences, growing out of personal misconduct, or gross neglect, or usurpation, or habitual disregard of the public interests.27
3. John Marshall, Chief Justice of the U. S. Supreme Court: “[T]he present doctrine seems to be that a Judge giving a legal opinion contrary to the opinion of the legislature is liable to impeachment.28
4. George Mason, the “Father of the Bill of Rights”: “attempts to subvert the Constitution.29
5. Alexander Hamilton: “the abuse or violation of some public trust. . . . [or for] injuries done immediately to the society itself.30
6. George Mason, “Father of the Bill of Rights,” and Elbridge, signer of the Declaration and Framer of the Bill of Rights: “mal-administration.31
7. William Rawle, legal authority and author of early constitutional commentary: “the inordinate extension of power, the influence of party and of prejudice32 as well as attempts to “infringe the rights of the people.33
8. Justice Joseph Story, a “Father of American Jurisprudence” appointed to the Supreme Court by President James Madison: “unconstitutional opinions” and “attempts to subvert the fundamental laws and introduce arbitrary power.34
F. Federalist #65: “[T]he practice of impeachments [is] a bridle in the hands of the Legislative body.35
G. Justice James Iredell, a ratifier of the Constitution, placed on the Supreme Court by President Washington: “Every government requires it [impeachment]. Every man ought to be amenable for his conduct. . . . It will be not only the means of punishing misconduct but it will prevent misconduct. A man in public office who knows that there is no tribunal to punish him may be ready to deviate from his duty; but if he knows there is a tribunal for that purpose although he may be a man of no principle, the very terror of punishment will perhaps deter him."
[link to www.wallbuilders.com]
 Quoting: Perfectly Paleo


Absolute corruption!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 64326072


There is hope for our country, yet!
Man
, I love you guys!!
See ya on the other side. If not, you can all share my preps.
wink
clappa


To add...
"uarter.2
C. Congress determines the operation of the Judiciary, not vice versa (Congress sets the number of judges and courts; what issues may come before the courts; judges’ salary and compensation; how often the courts meet and the length of their sessions; and just as Congress can establish and set the number of lowers courts, so, too, can Congress also abolish them; etc.)"

hi
Copperhead

User ID: 69580332
United States
07/07/2015 06:57 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 3 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HAVE BEEN RULING ON CASES INVOLVING COMPANIES WHOSE STOCK THEY OWN
I bet Roberts had stock in medical and insurance companies. That would explain his twisting of Obamacare to make it law.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 69698911
United States
07/07/2015 06:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 3 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HAVE BEEN RULING ON CASES INVOLVING COMPANIES WHOSE STOCK THEY OWN
That's grounds for disbarment.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15292827


bump
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 66628755


You guys do realize that the BAR is in England, right?

THE LAWYER'S SECRET OATH
[link to www.apfn.org]

“BAR” stands for “British Accreditation Research”

also see [link to nesara.insights2.org]



America is still a British colony too.

The founding fathers LOST the "War of Independence".

The United States is Still a British Colony
[link to www.theforbiddenknowledge.com]

Also see here [link to www.natural-person.ca] Specifically look near the bottom of the page for The Destruction of America and see Great Britain Owns USA

This is a 4 hour video containing all parts. It's long, but it is worth watching.

Ralph Epperson - America's Secret Destiny
DeadManWalkin'

User ID: 35680072
United States
07/07/2015 07:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 3 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HAVE BEEN RULING ON CASES INVOLVING COMPANIES WHOSE STOCK THEY OWN
4. FEDERAL JUDGES DO NOT HOLD LIFETIME APPOINTMENTS

A. The Constitution says that judges hold their office only during “good behavior” (Art. III, Sec. 1).
B. Federal judges may be removed by Congress for misbehavior, which, historically, did not include only criminal behavior but also other misbehavior.
C. Historically, federal judges have been removed from the bench by Congress for contradicting an order of Congress, for profanity, for rude treatment of witness in a courtroom, for drunkenness, for judicial high-handedness and a variety of other reasons.24
D. The Constitution provides six clauses on impeachment – the most often-mentioned subject in the Constitution.25
E. The Founding Fathers and early legal authorities were clear about the ground for impeachment:
1. James Wilson, signer of the Constitution, original Justice on the U. S. Supreme Court: “mpeachments are confined to political characters, to political crimes and misdemeanors, and to political punishments.26
2. Justice Joseph Story, a “Father of American Jurisprudence” appointed to the Supreme Court by President James Madison: “The offenses to which the power of impeachment has been and is ordinarily applied as a remedy. . . . are aptly termed political offences, growing out of personal misconduct, or gross neglect, or usurpation, or habitual disregard of the public interests.27
3. John Marshall, Chief Justice of the U. S. Supreme Court: “[T]he present doctrine seems to be that a Judge giving a legal opinion contrary to the opinion of the legislature is liable to impeachment.28
4. George Mason, the “Father of the Bill of Rights”: “attempts to subvert the Constitution.29
5. Alexander Hamilton: “the abuse or violation of some public trust. . . . [or for] injuries done immediately to the society itself.30
6. George Mason, “Father of the Bill of Rights,” and Elbridge, signer of the Declaration and Framer of the Bill of Rights: “mal-administration.31
7. William Rawle, legal authority and author of early constitutional commentary: “the inordinate extension of power, the influence of party and of prejudice32 as well as attempts to “infringe the rights of the people.33
8. Justice Joseph Story, a “Father of American Jurisprudence” appointed to the Supreme Court by President James Madison: “unconstitutional opinions” and “attempts to subvert the fundamental laws and introduce arbitrary power.34
F. Federalist #65: “[T]he practice of impeachments [is] a bridle in the hands of the Legislative body.35
G. Justice James Iredell, a ratifier of the Constitution, placed on the Supreme Court by President Washington: “Every government requires it [impeachment]. Every man ought to be amenable for his conduct. . . . It will be not only the means of punishing misconduct but it will prevent misconduct. A man in public office who knows that there is no tribunal to punish him may be ready to deviate from his duty; but if he knows there is a tribunal for that purpose although he may be a man of no principle, the very terror of punishment will perhaps deter him."
[link to www.wallbuilders.com]
 Quoting: Perfectly Paleo


Absolute corruption!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 64326072


There is hope for our country, yet!
Man
, I love you guys!!
See ya on the other side. If not, you can all share my preps.
wink
clappa
 Quoting: Perfectly Paleo


To add...
"uarter.2
C. Congress determines the operation of the Judiciary, not vice versa (Congress sets the number of judges and courts; what issues may come before the courts; judges’ salary and compensation; how often the courts meet and the length of their sessions; and just as Congress can establish and set the number of lowers courts, so, too, can Congress also abolish them; etc.)
"



moar
-.. . .- -.. / -- .- -. / .-- .- .-.. -.- .. -. --.


Omnes vulnerant, ultima necat
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 69698911
United States
07/07/2015 07:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 3 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HAVE BEEN RULING ON CASES INVOLVING COMPANIES WHOSE STOCK THEY OWN
4. FEDERAL JUDGES DO NOT HOLD LIFETIME APPOINTMENTS

A. The Constitution says that judges hold their office only during “good behavior” (Art. III, Sec. 1).
B. Federal judges may be removed by Congress for misbehavior, which, historically, did not include only criminal behavior but also other misbehavior.
C. Historically, federal judges have been removed from the bench by Congress for contradicting an order of Congress, for profanity, for rude treatment of witness in a courtroom, for drunkenness, for judicial high-handedness and a variety of other reasons.24
D. The Constitution provides six clauses on impeachment – the most often-mentioned subject in the Constitution.25
E. The Founding Fathers and early legal authorities were clear about the ground for impeachment:
1. James Wilson, signer of the Constitution, original Justice on the U. S. Supreme Court: “mpeachments are confined to political characters, to political crimes and misdemeanors, and to political punishments.26
2. Justice Joseph Story, a “Father of American Jurisprudence” appointed to the Supreme Court by President James Madison: “The offenses to which the power of impeachment has been and is ordinarily applied as a remedy. . . . are aptly termed political offences, growing out of personal misconduct, or gross neglect, or usurpation, or habitual disregard of the public interests.27
3. John Marshall, Chief Justice of the U. S. Supreme Court: “[T]he present doctrine seems to be that a Judge giving a legal opinion contrary to the opinion of the legislature is liable to impeachment.28
4. George Mason, the “Father of the Bill of Rights”: “attempts to subvert the Constitution.29
5. Alexander Hamilton: “the abuse or violation of some public trust. . . . [or for] injuries done immediately to the society itself.30
6. George Mason, “Father of the Bill of Rights,” and Elbridge, signer of the Declaration and Framer of the Bill of Rights: “mal-administration.31
7. William Rawle, legal authority and author of early constitutional commentary: “the inordinate extension of power, the influence of party and of prejudice32 as well as attempts to “infringe the rights of the people.33
8. Justice Joseph Story, a “Father of American Jurisprudence” appointed to the Supreme Court by President James Madison: “unconstitutional opinions” and “attempts to subvert the fundamental laws and introduce arbitrary power.34
F. Federalist #65: “[T]he practice of impeachments [is] a bridle in the hands of the Legislative body.35
G. Justice James Iredell, a ratifier of the Constitution, placed on the Supreme Court by President Washington: “Every government requires it [impeachment]. Every man ought to be amenable for his conduct. . . . It will be not only the means of punishing misconduct but it will prevent misconduct. A man in public office who knows that there is no tribunal to punish him may be ready to deviate from his duty; but if he knows there is a tribunal for that purpose although he may be a man of no principle, the very terror of punishment will perhaps deter him."
[link to www.wallbuilders.com]
 Quoting: Perfectly Paleo


Absolute corruption!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 64326072


There is hope for our country, yet!
Man
, I love you guys!!
See ya on the other side. If not, you can all share my preps.
wink
clappa
 Quoting: Perfectly Paleo


To add...
"uarter.2
C. Congress determines the operation of the Judiciary, not vice versa (Congress sets the number of judges and courts; what issues may come before the courts; judges’ salary and compensation; how often the courts meet and the length of their sessions; and just as Congress can establish and set the number of lowers courts, so, too, can Congress also abolish them; etc.)
"

 Quoting: DeadManWalkin'


:moar:


You guys might as well be speaking Klingon.

The Constitution is DEAD.

Humpty Dumpty took a great fall too.

He was not all that he was cracked up to be and neither is the DEAD Constitution.

Long live the Klingons.
davvi

User ID: 3677166
United States
07/07/2015 07:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 3 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HAVE BEEN RULING ON CASES INVOLVING COMPANIES WHOSE STOCK THEY OWN
Is John Roberts the absolute worst Chief Justice ever?

Every bit of crap which comes from that court comes from him...

6-25 What?
BlondieEastwood

User ID: 69602341
United States
07/07/2015 07:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 3 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HAVE BEEN RULING ON CASES INVOLVING COMPANIES WHOSE STOCK THEY OWN
4. FEDERAL JUDGES DO NOT HOLD LIFETIME APPOINTMENTS

A. The Constitution says that judges hold their office only during “good behavior” (Art. III, Sec. 1).
B. Federal judges may be removed by Congress for misbehavior, which, historically, did not include only criminal behavior but also other misbehavior.
C. Historically, federal judges have been removed from the bench by Congress for contradicting an order of Congress, for profanity, for rude treatment of witness in a courtroom, for drunkenness, for judicial high-handedness and a variety of other reasons.24
D. The Constitution provides six clauses on impeachment – the most often-mentioned subject in the Constitution.25
E. The Founding Fathers and early legal authorities were clear about the ground for impeachment:
1. James Wilson, signer of the Constitution, original Justice on the U. S. Supreme Court: “mpeachments are confined to political characters, to political crimes and misdemeanors, and to political punishments.26
2. Justice Joseph Story, a “Father of American Jurisprudence” appointed to the Supreme Court by President James Madison: “The offenses to which the power of impeachment has been and is ordinarily applied as a remedy. . . . are aptly termed political offences, growing out of personal misconduct, or gross neglect, or usurpation, or habitual disregard of the public interests.27
3. John Marshall, Chief Justice of the U. S. Supreme Court: “[T]he present doctrine seems to be that a Judge giving a legal opinion contrary to the opinion of the legislature is liable to impeachment.28
4. George Mason, the “Father of the Bill of Rights”: “attempts to subvert the Constitution.29
5. Alexander Hamilton: “the abuse or violation of some public trust. . . . [or for] injuries done immediately to the society itself.30
6. George Mason, “Father of the Bill of Rights,” and Elbridge, signer of the Declaration and Framer of the Bill of Rights: “mal-administration.31
7. William Rawle, legal authority and author of early constitutional commentary: “the inordinate extension of power, the influence of party and of prejudice32 as well as attempts to “infringe the rights of the people.33
8. Justice Joseph Story, a “Father of American Jurisprudence” appointed to the Supreme Court by President James Madison: “unconstitutional opinions” and “attempts to subvert the fundamental laws and introduce arbitrary power.34
F. Federalist #65: “[T]he practice of impeachments [is] a bridle in the hands of the Legislative body.35
G. Justice James Iredell, a ratifier of the Constitution, placed on the Supreme Court by President Washington: “Every government requires it [impeachment]. Every man ought to be amenable for his conduct. . . . It will be not only the means of punishing misconduct but it will prevent misconduct. A man in public office who knows that there is no tribunal to punish him may be ready to deviate from his duty; but if he knows there is a tribunal for that purpose although he may be a man of no principle, the very terror of punishment will perhaps deter him."
[link to www.wallbuilders.com]
 Quoting: Perfectly Paleo


Absolute corruption!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 64326072


There is hope for our country, yet!
Man
, I love you guys!!
See ya on the other side. If not, you can all share my preps.
wink
clappa
 Quoting: Perfectly Paleo


To add...
"uarter.2
C. Congress determines the operation of the Judiciary, not vice versa (Congress sets the number of judges and courts; what issues may come before the courts; judges’ salary and compensation; how often the courts meet and the length of their sessions; and just as Congress can establish and set the number of lowers courts, so, too, can Congress also abolish them; etc.)
"

 Quoting: DeadManWalkin'


moar


You see hope? LMFAO....it's just about all wrapped up
ManWithNoName





GLP