Why has ISIS endured fewer airstrikes than Saddam Hussein? Because Obama is the head of the snake! | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68246264 United States 07/07/2015 08:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Why has ISIS endured fewer airstrikes than Saddam Hussein? Because Obama is the head of the snake! the pentagon knows where all the isis vehicles are Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69658668 Thread: All those 'captured' American tanks and humvees ISIL got in Iraq all have GPS tracking chips in them Are we all forgetting Senator John McCain and his trip to syria? Wake up You wake up! McCain is a dumb ass cheerleader, nothing more. It's Obama who calls the shots!! |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 59866150 United States 07/07/2015 09:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Why has ISIS endured fewer airstrikes than Saddam Hussein? Because Obama is the head of the snake! [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] On June 21, 2006 Rick Santorum claimed that "we have found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, chemical weapons", citing a declassified June 6 letter to Pete Hoekstra saying that since the 2003 invasion, a total of "approximately 500 weapons munitions which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent" had been found scattered throughout the country.[102][103] On June 21, 2006 the U.S. House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence released key points from a classified report from the National Ground Intelligence Center on the recovery of a small number of degraded chemical munitions in Iraq. The report stated that "Coalition forces have recovered approximately 500 weapons munitions which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent." All are thought to be pre-Gulf War munitions.[104] These munitions meet the technical definition of weapons of mass destruction, according to the commander of the National Ground Intelligence Center. "These are chemical weapons as defined under the Chemical Weapons Convention, and yes ... they do constitute weapons of mass destruction," Army Col. John Chu told the House Armed Services Committee. The munitions addressed in the report were produced in the 1980s, according to Army Lt. Gen. Michael D. Maples. Badly corroded, they could not currently be used as originally intended, though agent remaining in the weapons would be very valuable to terrorists and insurgents, Maples said.[105] |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 59866150 United States 07/07/2015 09:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Why has ISIS endured fewer airstrikes than Saddam Hussein? Because Obama is the head of the snake! the pentagon knows where all the isis vehicles are Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69658668 Thread: All those 'captured' American tanks and humvees ISIL got in Iraq all have GPS tracking chips in them Are we all forgetting Senator John McCain and his trip to syria? Wake up You wake up! McCain is a dumb ass cheerleader, nothing more. It's Obama who calls the shots!! That is true! Obama is the one who is doing the damage...he is the one in control. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 59866150 United States 07/07/2015 09:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Why has ISIS endured fewer airstrikes than Saddam Hussein? Because Obama is the head of the snake! [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] Quoting: Cassie MW On June 21, 2006 Rick Santorum claimed that "we have found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, chemical weapons", citing a declassified June 6 letter to Pete Hoekstra saying that since the 2003 invasion, a total of "approximately 500 weapons munitions which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent" had been found scattered throughout the country.[102][103] On June 21, 2006 the U.S. House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence released key points from a classified report from the National Ground Intelligence Center on the recovery of a small number of degraded chemical munitions in Iraq. The report stated that "Coalition forces have recovered approximately 500 weapons munitions which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent." All are thought to be pre-Gulf War munitions.[104] These munitions meet the technical definition of weapons of mass destruction, according to the commander of the National Ground Intelligence Center. "These are chemical weapons as defined under the Chemical Weapons Convention, and yes ... they do constitute weapons of mass destruction," Army Col. John Chu told the House Armed Services Committee. The munitions addressed in the report were produced in the 1980s, according to Army Lt. Gen. Michael D. Maples. Badly corroded, they could not currently be used as originally intended, though agent remaining in the weapons would be very valuable to terrorists and insurgents, Maples said.[105] |