Breaking: Sandy Hook victims "bled out while SWAT had control of school"

Of course nobody died at Sandy Hook. The question becomes: why is this info coming out now?

One could say it was to perpetuate the lie years later, but that is superficial.

Did anyone else find it odd that this coincides with all of the anti-police rhetoric going on lately? Yes, some cops are bully assholes, but this goes to further the agenda that all cops are bad.

An AR-15 is not a high-power rifle.

Yes, the effects of a .223/5.56 round can be damaging at close range, but 'high-powered' is generally reserved for cartridges using much heavier projectiles and greater powder charges regardless of caliber.

It is incredibly tiresome how the MSM continuously reports an AR-15 as a 'high-powered assault rifle' when neither term is correct.

It is not a high powered rifle.

It is not an assault rifle. Assault rifles are select-fire and are military weapons.

SWAT did a great job by letting most of the victims bleed out?

What planet are you from?

This says in plain English the cops let those kids die!!

FFS why hasn't the national media jumped on this?

the police called the scene 'clear' just a few minutes (less than 5) after entering the building.

listen to the radio recordings, the officers had no way of knowing there was one shooter, nor did they have time to check the entire building. There is no possible way they could have check that number of wounded while simultaneously clearing the building.

The problem with this story is it's pure speculation.

Deputy Fire Chief Heinz may be of the opinion that kids bled out at Sandy Hook while the scene was under a SWAT teams control, but he can't prove it. He can't prove it any more than we can.

Nobody bled at Sandy Hook.

No one who was shot at Sandy Hook lived. Correct? That is the story.

It doesn't work like that. the major criticism is the 5.56 or 223 enters and exits clean too often not producing an incapacitating wound. the military has complained fighting an enemy that is undernourished - Somalia, afghanis, the bullets pass straight through.

so up to 85 percent of rounds that hit do not start to fragment until nearly 5 in of penetration. Against small statured or thin combatants, little chance of yawing before passing through cleanly and leaving a wound cavity no bigger than the bullet itself. Often these wounds are not fatal, nor do they stop the threat

Anyone who says to this "they were all headshots, so penetration depth isn't required"

anyone remember the Amish School shooting in 2006? Horrible - but one thing stands out big time

10 girls were shot - all headshots

5 lived

... Troopers and local police officers assisted the surviving children, administering first aid. Troopers and local officers continued to tend to the girls, helping the emergency medical technicians provide first aid on the school playground until the helicopters got there....





[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

they are part of it.

Lol. So in the history of emergency responders nobody thought to NOT block a road when there is an emergency? I mean come on. Also with all the wars and violence only now we think about bleeding out? This article is written for morons who will just believe the crap without logical thinking.

Duhr....This Sandy Hook drill taught us valuable lessons.,.... Duhh, like don't block the road during an emergency. Duhh and we should stop somebody from bleeding to death. Duhr..... Frickin retards.

the police called the scene 'clear' just a few minutes (less than 5) after entering the building.

listen to the radio recordings, the officers had no way of knowing there was one shooter, nor did they have time to check the entire building. There is no possible way they could have check that number of wounded while simultaneously clearing the building.

only a few officers ever entered the building, nothing adds up with the official lie, not one thing.

anyone who has any tactical experience could not look at the sandy hook lie and not rip it apart from a LE standpoint, nor and EMS standpoint.

the entire non-incident complete and utter TRIPE. reports like these are made up lies to support the original lie. i would bet bots wrote the entire report.

Did I just wake up in the fucking twilight zone?

Why is anyone entertaining the idea that anyone was actually shot at Sandy Hook?

1 star and move on.

The problem with this story is it's pure speculation.

Deputy Fire Chief Heinz may be of the opinion that kids bled out at Sandy Hook while the scene was under a SWAT teams control, but he can't prove it. He can't prove it any more than we can.

Unless he's come into some evidence the rest of us aren't privy to, in which case he'd have to present that evidence.

Of course, when Halbig engages in baseless but logical speculation like this, he's tarred and feathered from every angle.

For those who keep saying this event was a hoax, that no kids died, we need to be more precise in how we put that.

We have been presented no evidence other than people's testimony that children died. However, not having evidence of a thing doesn't mean that thing didn't happen. There could be evidence which exists that proves people died, but which we're not being provided. There could be many reasons for that.

There is evidence which would be consistent with this being a "hoax" planned over many years, but there are other possible explanations for that evidence.

That's why I believe that although it may be reasonable to suspect that no children died at Sandy Hook based on the lack of evidence, the only thing we can say with certainty is that there is no reason to believe that the narrative told by the authorities is true.

The authorities could provide details of who handled the cleanup and decontamination of the site, and if those people were to release evidence of what they did, that would help bolster the authorities case.

Since the authorities continue to refuse to release any real evidence based on the false claim that it would violate the privacy rights of the victims families, none of that is likely, however.

aHEMagain

they are part of it.

No one who was shot at Sandy Hook lived. Correct? That is the story.

It doesn't work like that. the major criticism is the 5.56 or 223 enters and exits clean too often not producing an incapacitating wound. the military has complained fighting an enemy that is undernourished - Somalia, afghanis, the bullets pass straight through.

so up to 85 percent of rounds that hit do not start to fragment until nearly 5 in of penetration. Against small statured or thin combatants, little chance of yawing before passing through cleanly and leaving a wound cavity no bigger than the bullet itself. Often these wounds are not fatal, nor do they stop the threat

Anyone who says to this "they were all headshots, so penetration depth isn't required"

anyone remember the Amish School shooting in 2006? Horrible - but one thing stands out big time

10 girls were shot - all headshots

5 lived

... Troopers and local police officers assisted the surviving children, administering first aid. Troopers and local officers continued to tend to the girls, helping the emergency medical technicians provide first aid on the school playground until the helicopters got there....





[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

^^ THIS ^^

Stop right there bro - this isn't the opinion of Deputy Fire Chief Heinz but the opinion of a special study group from the American College of Surgeons, the best of the best.
It is their opinion that most of the victims did not necessarily have to die from bleeding out.

No death certificates
no registered plots for the graves
no autopsy reports via foia requests
No insurance claims for Sandy hook
No postings or news bulletins since 2004 from the school.
The gag orders for the demolition company for workers
Botched

The trauma caused by a high power rifle is extensive.
The wound my not imediately kill the victem but death is almost certain even if shot on an operating table.

There would be missing parts of all organs where the bullet passed through.
The smaller the body the more extensive.

It would not have mattered.

that's the point ~

10 shot. 5 dead. I'd guess some of those 5 were beyond any doubt too late. but that's not what the police do - they don't relay information like the military (7 kia, 15 wounded to get a tailored response based on the best understanding of the situation)

"a mass casualty on White Oak Road, Bart Township, with multiple children shot", and "at 11:11 a.m., police radioed dispatchers again, estimating 10 to 12 patients with head injuries"


they haven't searched the entire building - they haven't thoroughly examined every victim. they didn't decide who was alive or dead. relay facts only based on their observations

-and those shot ~ they called them patients. Multiple Helicopters were dispatched - not one at sandy hook - unless I missed it. not 1.

20~30 casualties, roll all available - there should have been helicopters there from as far away as Boston, NYC, and even Albany

THIS

No one would survive such close range shooting. You can only wish no one was conscious and suffered for an extended period, especially after police had control.

You know the drill..

PICS OR IT DIDNT HAPPEN!

According to the Myles Marhis website pics don't even mean shit

The trauma caused by a high power rifle is extensive.
The wound my not imediately kill the victem but death is almost certain even if shot on an operating table.

There would be missing parts of all organs where the bullet passed through.
The smaller the body the more extensive.

It would not have mattered.

BS.

Most children had survivable wounds