Iranian Prez not on a "watchlist"?

"Will you walk into my parlour?"
Said the spider to the fly;
"'Tis the prettiest little parlour
That ever you did spy.
The way into my parlour
Is up a winding stair;
And I have many curious things
To show you when you're there."
"Oh, no, no," said the little fly;
"To ask me is in vain;
For who goes up your winding stair
Can ne'er come down again."


What do you suspect?

my idea is that you are a fucking moron. Because the decider declares someone an "axis of evil" does that make it so?

What...do you think he's going to be carrying bombs? He's the head of a country of 80 million people that graduates more scientists and engineers than the US does.

This is the kind of nitwit attitude that spawned songs like "american idiot" which you are.

I think you did not carefully read his post. He suspects the US has an alterior motive in allowing the Iranian President into the US.

HE IS ON A SHIT LIST LMAO ITALY JUST LAST WEEK ALSO CALLED FOR IMMEDIATE SANCTIONS...THE CHINESE AN RUSSIAN COMMUNIST YOU SO MUCH LOVE CAN VETO ALL THEY WANT.IRAN IS TOAST.AN SO IS THE MIDGET MONKEY FACE LEADER.LMAO

politics in not about logic or truth

it didn't come off that way to me at all.

The US can't assassinate world leaders that come to the US....covertly or otherwise. The political consequences of that are unacceptable. The UN happens to be in NY. They have to let him in. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.

It sure seems funny that this Iranian President who is accused of raining terror with his nooklar program and the one man Cheney and Bush and the Neocons want War with so bad, is just going to fly right in to the U.S. without any resistance from Bushco.

Homeland security will probably be too busy searching your 70 year old grandma at the airport anyway.

I agree with you. The cost of denying his entrance to speak at the UN far outweighs any percieved gain in doing this.

TEAM

The US, Does not have to let him in. I don't know where you get this "enlightenment".
The Iranian President will be coming to our county after just taking part in a conference with other countries which have only one goal in mind, which is to distroy the US.
Due his past history, begining with taking part in the Iranian hostage situation in the last 70s, to his other than reasonable coments since becoming leader of his country, He is up to no good and I am confused as to why our country would even consider to allow his entrance to this country.
You obviously, misunderstood the phrase previously "no use for this guy", as meaning a advocation of assasination.
I have evaluated your past posts and find you are a avid copy and paste artist of the highest order on this site and have NO original thoughts of your own, and understand that when you choose not to do the above mentioned you made the fatal attempt to verbalize your own incoherent thought, thus the name calling when something is not understood.
All you need to do is read, contemplate what is given to you, and read it again if necessary; if you are confused. it is very easy and this may help develope your communications skills.

"The US, Does not have to let him in"


technically that is not true. United nations building does not belong to USA. As the name suggests it is infact the UNITED NATIONS and belongs to all countries in the world who are a member. The fact that it is located in USA gives no right what so ever to USA. Yes they are responsible for security and may ban certain factions who may try to harm the building or any of its members. By law USA can not refuse any leader or deligation entery unless United nations (not USA) decided to ban some one for security reasons.
Just think if USA tried to do this to a few leaders before long United nations will be moved to another country on the protest of members, then how would it be if USA leaders were banned from that country based on their activities and lies about Afganistan and Iraq.

Wow, i don't know where to start. False information plenty in this quote.
He was not involved in hostage crisis. this turned out to be a false propeganda by USA.
His comments have been perfectly logical for those through out the world as regards to Israel. And before you start going on about "wiped off the map" do a bit of re-search and you will find this too was indeed a propeganda by USA.
perhaps it will do you well to listen to your own words before replying. If you do not remember, here it is.

"All you need to do is read, contemplate what is given to you, and read it again if necessary; if you are confused. it is very easy and this may help develope your communications skills."

They can be , not allowed into the US.
But with the Sec. General request to through official channels for the request, they will be let in,with a note of protest Form the US gov.
But once all is said and done, the US does not HAVE to, But will if "called by", or "requested" buy a particual counsel of the UN. Correct. Thanks for the definition.