French archaeologists find 560,000 year-old human tooth! (UPDATED!)

It wouldn't be a modern human. At that age and location, it'll be a proto-Neanderthal, like Homo heidelbergensis or Denisova hominins.

I don't get it... Soon they will discover that humans lived in "Jurassic" times???

Last Edited by NOFAKE on 07/28/2015 05:37 AM

Thanks for pine!

Yeah like Land of the Lost!!!!

they know it's human but not it's sex, yeah that makes sense lol.

That was quick shill boy...have a wee look at ANY of Michael Cremo's work, there are many examples of modern human existence dating back over a million years, and many examples of people like you suppressing it. Nice try but no cigar.

Without testing it how would they? You really shouldn't participate in threads above your pay grade.

So that's where I lost that...

in the same part of france i have a house there and a few years ago they found the bigger caves ever found with prehistoric painting in my village, scientific coming with helicopters all around the world for analysis. They keep it secret and the entrance is fully gard by military, by the way resident of the village were guess to a presentation to show a small part of the paint, something is wrong because is stil guard by army and sure they must hide something...
[link to www.culture.gouv.fr]
this part of france hiding a lot of secret about human history ....

[link to translate.google.com (secure)]

Will you invite me at you house?

Last Edited by NOFAKE on 07/28/2015 06:11 AM

The first line of your post you have completely just MADE UP.

It doesn't even SAY that in the article. The fossil was probably Homo heidelbergensis, as was a previous tooth found in the cave.

The article says that there are VERY FEW (i.e. NOT that this is the only one) human fossils from this period in Europe. This means not only are there others, but there are others in other places around the world as well, from this period and much MUCH MUCH earlier (Like by millions of years frikking earlier). And just for the fuckwads who would like to misinterpret what I'm saying, I'm referring to Homo habilis etc. as the millions of years ago fossils, not some other random bullshit)

(taking this in the interpretation of the Homo genus as defined as 'human'. It is not, however, clear what the definition of human IS in this article. What it is NOT, though, is human as defined as Homo sapiens. This is NOT inferred to be a Homo sapiens tooth)

beat me to it.

repeat post

First line is from this source >>>
[link to m.thelocal.fr]

Fixed

Guarded by the military...what a cock tease

Imagine being a caveman or woman 500,000 years ago, and waking up at 3AM with a really bad toothache

BS!
CARBON 14 tottaly fail!

how exactly is it dated? details please or else you get the flag.

something tells me that teeth were not supposed to decay at the rate we are used to and I doubt there would be much dentists around at the time to do the constant repairs we now need.

How can so much dumb be contained in one person?

I bet you think Jesus rode a dinosaur and that the film '10 million years BC,' is a documentary.

carbon dating ? might as well been 13 billion years old.

Damn, you smart

prolly soon they will discover that Earth was colonized a loooong time ago but a different species.

The transition to Homo Sapiens ended around 800,000 years ago,with the establishment of the 2nd race.

Obama's great great great great great grandfather

I'm sure they're weren't tooth decays as bad as these days.
soft drinks; smoothies and candy weren't available at the Pebblemart and Rocks cave mart.