MINI-NUKED | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 137650 United States 09/18/2006 09:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
LS User ID: 74965 United States 09/18/2006 09:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Patrick25 User ID: 143425 Canada 09/18/2006 09:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The WTC was pulverized by a deadly combo of Thermate and Mini-Nukes! Who has Mini-Nukes? Not any crazed Arabs hiding in Afghanistan or Saudi Arabia or anywhere else. Who could pull off this stunt? Only Mossad and Israel - with a lot of help from their Zionist friends in the WH, Pentagon, Congress, CIA, NSA, FBI, MIC, etc. The Mini-Nukes most likely came from the United States of Israel! (might have been bought from the Russians ;) Quoting: GodSend 119647Get the WHOLE TRUTH at: [link to www.novalight.org] Click on Mini-Nukes, among other, VERY 'interesting' links :O There would be radiation that even a $10 probe you can buy at radio shack would notice, dumbass. |
Red Hot Chilean Pepe (nli) User ID: 145180 Chile 09/18/2006 10:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Patrick25 User ID: 143425 Canada 09/18/2006 10:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Fusion reactions don't leave radiation signature. Fusion technology has been developped by defense contractors all over the world. Quoting: Red Hot Chilean Pepe (nli) 145180High level tritium is a tell tale of fusion. Google WTC tritium levels and educate yourselves. Regards. Yes they leave radiation WTF are you talking about???... but that's not the point here... cold fusion doesn't exist, sorry to burst your bubble. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 138546 United States 09/18/2006 10:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Fusion reactions don't leave radiation signature. Fusion technology has been developped by defense contractors all over the world. Quoting: Red Hot Chilean Pepe (nli) 145180High level tritium is a tell tale of fusion. Google WTC tritium levels and educate yourselves. Regards. Love how the car doors were fused to their chassis parked outside WTC1/2... Oh, and more recently, small (<1cm) bits of human bone, found on top of a building blocks away from the WTC... Then, there's the girders found lodged into buildings blocks away... I guess they hit a tank of compressed air on the way down, suitable to lift a 4-ton girder hundreds of feet into the air, and blow it into the side other another building? |
Ningishiddza User ID: 124957 United States 09/18/2006 10:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Fusion reactions don't leave radiation signature. Fusion technology has been developped by defense contractors all over the world. Quoting: Red Hot Chilean Pepe (nli) 145180High level tritium is a tell tale of fusion. Google WTC tritium levels and educate yourselves. Regards. Wrong. You way out of your league and haven't a clue what you are talking about. Americanii-s de vina futu-i in gura sa-i fut |
neesie User ID: 145186 United States 09/18/2006 10:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | dang, i thought this thread was discussing a new cereal. i was wondering what the little nuke bombs would look like. .A man can no more diminish God's glory by refusing to worship Him than a lunatic can put out the sun by scribbling the word, 'darkness' on the walls of his cell. C. S. Lewis |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 106180 United States 09/18/2006 10:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The WTC was pulverized by a deadly combo of Thermate and Mini-Nukes! Who has Mini-Nukes? Not any crazed Arabs hiding in Afghanistan or Saudi Arabia or anywhere else. Who could pull off this stunt? Only Mossad and Israel - with a lot of help from their Zionist friends in the WH, Pentagon, Congress, CIA, NSA, FBI, MIC, etc. The Mini-Nukes most likely came from the United States of Israel! (might have been bought from the Russians ;) Quoting: GodSend 119647Get the WHOLE TRUTH at: [link to www.novalight.org] Click on Mini-Nukes, among other, VERY 'interesting' links :O What a ridiculous webpage. |
DLoriot User ID: 101926 United States 09/18/2006 10:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search Mini-nuke is a term used for a low yield nuclear weapon which has much less explosive power than the most powerful nuclear weapons available. Because of the relatively small yield, a state can plan to use these weapons while hoping to avoid negative public reactions associated with nuclear war. Any potenial plan to produce mini-nukes by the United States has been blocked by the United States Congress, which prohibited the development of any nuclear weapons with a yield of less than five kilotons, roughly a third of the power of Little Boy, the Hiroshima bomb. Previously, tactical devices such as the Davy Crockett recoilless rifle offered yields as low as tens of tons, but all existing devices in the U.S. arsenal have much higher yields. Nuclear bunker busters are a separate development, and utilize higher yield warheads, in the tens or hundreds of kilotons, in order to produce sufficient shock through the ground to destroy their target. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 119755 United States 09/18/2006 10:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Rocker User ID: 142520 United States 09/18/2006 11:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
DLoriot User ID: 101926 United States 09/18/2006 11:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "technical analysis shows that low-yield weapons would not be effective for these tasks. Low-yield earth-penetrating weapons cannot burrow deep enough and do not have a large enough yield to destroy deep underground targets; moreover, the explosion would not be contained for even low-yield earth-penetrating weapons, and would necessarily result in large amounts of radioactive fallout." [link to www.ucsusa.org] |
GodSend (OP) User ID: 119647 United States 09/18/2006 11:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 145184 United States 09/18/2006 11:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 145187 New Zealand 09/18/2006 11:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Old-fashioned Catholic User ID: 135493 United States 09/19/2006 12:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes they leave radiation WTF are you talking about???... but that's not the point here... cold fusion doesn't exist, sorry to burst your bubble. Quoting: Patrick25First, you have the wrong 'fusion'. The OP is talking about a hydrogen bomb, which is based on the energy released by the fusion of hydrogen atoms to form helium atoms (just as occurs in the sun). Second, there would be no geiger-counter-style radiation from a (hypothetical) 'pure' hydrogen bomb--i.e., one that does not rely on uranium or plutonium fission for ignition. We do not know whether the American government has ever actually developed a 'pure' hydrogen bomb, and anyone on this board who claims to know, for certain, that we have not is a liar. In other words, a 'pure' hydrogen mini-nuke is not impossible but highly speculative. Needless to say, we also do not know whether the American government has developed some other technology 'in between' conventional and nuclear weapons. Again, anyone who claims to be *certain* that we have not is a liar. |
Red Hot Chilean Pepe User ID: 145229 Chile 09/19/2006 12:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well, you can allways call me ignorant and idiot, and you're wellcome because no ofense is taken by me. But, I am not talking about conventional weapons, nor conventional fusion technologies. Sandia labs has been testing the Z machine for a long time by now. And that is a form of fusion that releases 4 more times energy than is required for producing it (search for the paper from Haynes). That is what they let us know. Guess what they really have. There is a group of highly trained scientists that have worked in fields of science that very few people know about, and all of them under secrecy oath for the USA defense department, since the 50's. Can you spell anti matter? The technology for egg sized, city devastating antimatter bombs is said to be in posession of the US since the 60's. You can think is all sci fi. But Be sure that a molten steel pool lasting for months required an amount of heat that can only be explained by menas of something like a thermonuclear reaction (fision, fusion, or antimatter). Regards. All great truths begin as Blasphemies. G.B.S. GLP is like a diamond mine of information, in the sense that you have to shovel mountains of crap to find the diamonds, but it's still worth the pain. |
Patrick25 User ID: 143425 Canada 09/19/2006 01:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes they leave radiation WTF are you talking about???... but that's not the point here... cold fusion doesn't exist, sorry to burst your bubble. Quoting: Old-fashioned CatholicFirst, you have the wrong 'fusion'. The OP is talking about a hydrogen bomb, which is based on the energy released by the fusion of hydrogen atoms to form helium atoms (just as occurs in the sun). Second, there would be no geiger-counter-style radiation from a (hypothetical) 'pure' hydrogen bomb--i.e., one that does not rely on uranium or plutonium fission for ignition. We do not know whether the American government has ever actually developed a 'pure' hydrogen bomb, and anyone on this board who claims to know, for certain, that we have not is a liar. In other words, a 'pure' hydrogen mini-nuke is not impossible but highly speculative. Needless to say, we also do not know whether the American government has developed some other technology 'in between' conventional and nuclear weapons. Again, anyone who claims to be *certain* that we have not is a liar. That technology does not exist, not even close. - This is where we are getting into the woo woo stuff. - The US didn't spend hundreds of billions in the 80's to equip conventional bombs on it's subs and missile silos for nothing. 'pure' hudrogen mini-nuke is not possible with today's technology....period. And a regular mini-nuke (ala soviet suitcase bomb style) would have detectable radiation with a simple geiger-counter even with the smallest explosion. Alpha particles get scattered and registered when CERN for example collides even just ONE ATOM. This whole story is just ridiculous. |
bombologist User ID: 71498 United States 09/19/2006 01:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 109815 United States 09/19/2006 01:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
-Freak- User ID: 143415 Norway 09/19/2006 01:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
GodSend (OP) User ID: 119647 United States 09/19/2006 02:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
know_one User ID: 143976 United States 09/19/2006 02:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 112496 United States 09/19/2006 02:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 144549 New Zealand 09/19/2006 03:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |