EMP novel "One Second After" has a sequel coming out soon | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 46975203 United States 09/01/2015 10:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
tiger1 User ID: 68665462 United States 09/01/2015 10:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
mkarenh13 User ID: 70137220 United States 09/01/2015 10:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70225179 United States 09/01/2015 10:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Did you know our fear of EMP vis a vie automobiles is WAY overblown? The EMP Commission actually TESTED vehicles and most passed with no effects. [link to empcommission.org] Page 115- We tested a sample of 37 cars in an EMP simulation laboratory, with automobile vintages ranging from 1986 through 2002. Automobiles of these vintages include extensive electronics and represent a significant fraction of automobiles on the road today. The testing was conducted by exposing running and nonrunning automobiles to sequentially increasing EMP field intensities. If anomalous response (either temporary or permanent) was observed, the testing of that particular automobile was stopped. If no anomalous response was observed, the testing was continued up to the field intensity limits of the simulation capability (approximately 50 kV/m). Automobiles were subjected to EMP environments under both engine turned off and engine turned on conditions. No effects were subsequently observed in those automobiles that were not turned on during EMP exposure. The most serious effect observed on running automobiles was that the motors in three cars stopped at field strengths of approximately 30 kV/m or above. In an actual EMP exposure, these vehicles would glide to a stop and require the driver to restart them. Electronics in the dashboard of one automobile were damaged and required repair. Other effects were relatively minor. Twenty-five automobiles exhibited malfunctions that could be considered only a nuisance (e.g., blinking dashboard lights) and did not require driver intervention to correct. Eight of the 37 cars tested did not exhibit any anomalous response. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65062930 United States 09/01/2015 11:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Thisx1000This User ID: 70111785 United States 09/02/2015 02:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Did you know our fear of EMP vis a vie automobiles Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70225179 is WAY overblown? The EMP Commission actually TESTED vehicles and most passed with no effects. [link to empcommission.org] Page 115- We tested a sample of 37 cars in an EMP simulation laboratory, with automobile vintages ranging from 1986 through 2002. Automobiles of these vintages include extensive electronics and represent a significant fraction of automobiles on the road today. The testing was conducted by exposing running and nonrunning automobiles to sequentially increasing EMP field intensities. If anomalous response (either temporary or permanent) was observed, the testing of that particular automobile was stopped. If no anomalous response was observed, the testing was continued up to the field intensity limits of the simulation capability (approximately 50 kV/m). Automobiles were subjected to EMP environments under both engine turned off and engine turned on conditions. No effects were subsequently observed in those automobiles that were not turned on during EMP exposure. The most serious effect observed on running automobiles was that the motors in three cars stopped at field strengths of approximately 30 kV/m or above. In an actual EMP exposure, these vehicles would glide to a stop and require the driver to restart them. Electronics in the dashboard of one automobile were damaged and required repair. Other effects were relatively minor. Twenty-five automobiles exhibited malfunctions that could be considered only a nuisance (e.g., blinking dashboard lights) and did not require driver intervention to correct. Eight of the 37 cars tested did not exhibit any anomalous response. Shut it shill. They only tested to a certain level, nothing close to a nuclear bomb's fallout. |
Thisx1000This User ID: 70111785 United States 09/02/2015 02:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 40163360 United States 09/02/2015 02:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 40163360 United States 09/02/2015 02:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Morr2Life User ID: 68143565 United States 09/02/2015 03:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Thisx1000This User ID: 70111785 United States 09/02/2015 05:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Also shill those years were cars that were more metal than pleiglass. Did you look into modern ones that are boxes of glass and not metal? Quoting: Thisx1000This 70111785 Who the fuck would he be shilling for? GLPs favorite response to facts!!! Said the shill that mislead with "facts" |
Thisx1000This User ID: 70111785 United States 09/02/2015 05:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 67789990 United States 09/02/2015 05:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 09/02/2015 05:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Did you know our fear of EMP vis a vie automobiles Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70225179 is WAY overblown? The EMP Commission actually TESTED vehicles and most passed with no effects. [link to empcommission.org] Page 115- We tested a sample of 37 cars in an EMP simulation laboratory, with automobile vintages ranging from 1986 through 2002. Automobiles of these vintages include extensive electronics and represent a significant fraction of automobiles on the road today. The testing was conducted by exposing running and nonrunning automobiles to sequentially increasing EMP field intensities. If anomalous response (either temporary or permanent) was observed, the testing of that particular automobile was stopped. If no anomalous response was observed, the testing was continued up to the field intensity limits of the simulation capability (approximately 50 kV/m). Automobiles were subjected to EMP environments under both engine turned off and engine turned on conditions. No effects were subsequently observed in those automobiles that were not turned on during EMP exposure. The most serious effect observed on running automobiles was that the motors in three cars stopped at field strengths of approximately 30 kV/m or above. In an actual EMP exposure, these vehicles would glide to a stop and require the driver to restart them. Electronics in the dashboard of one automobile were damaged and required repair. Other effects were relatively minor. Twenty-five automobiles exhibited malfunctions that could be considered only a nuisance (e.g., blinking dashboard lights) and did not require driver intervention to correct. Eight of the 37 cars tested did not exhibit any anomalous response. Shut it shill. They only tested to a certain level, nothing close to a nuclear bomb's fallout. The level they tested to is consistent with a nuclear high altitude EMP burst. [link to fas.org] SGEMP refers to system generated EMP and only applies to the EMP received by satellites. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70231555 Australia 09/02/2015 05:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 55240075 United States 09/02/2015 06:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68818442 Australia 09/02/2015 07:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They should have tested the new cars. So much electronics in the new ones, some can't even be opened with a key. I'm all for technology but every car should have a manual solution if the battery goes flat or the computer chip dies. Have seen a woman trapped in her car, couldn't wind down the window or unlock the door. Had to be rescued. |