the FLAT EARTH video to challenge all ROUND EARTH believers | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70283953 United States 09/10/2015 04:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Challenge Accepted: None NASA footage using a transit, level, the mountain should not be lower than cross hairs. Let me know when you debunk this. [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] |
J Dove (OP) User ID: 69524843 United States 09/10/2015 04:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Challenge Accepted: None NASA footage using a transit, level, the mountain should not be lower than cross hairs. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70283953 Let me know when you debunk this. [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Looks like people in the comment section of your video already debunked it... Plus this thread is about the video in the OP. |
all Sing User ID: 70294672 United Kingdom 09/10/2015 04:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69413338 United States 09/10/2015 04:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
J Dove (OP) User ID: 69524843 United States 09/10/2015 04:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Challenge Accepted: None NASA footage using a transit, level, the mountain should not be lower than cross hairs. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70283953 Let me know when you debunk this. [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] From the video comment section: "Zetetic astronomy explains this .It was often thought that this was proof of spherical earth however it is a falsehood you have simply magnified the horizon closer to your viewer so it drops below the cross hairs this effect is always more apparent the greater the distance so in fact it proves that earth is actually a plane." -Weigh Land u Tarni Building Flatter Worlds |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70283953 United States 09/10/2015 04:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70283953 United States 09/10/2015 04:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | As far as the video its irrelevant. I provided you a non nasa video that provides evidence. In one video you say the buildings are there and should have dropped below horizon, then in the next your saying that as things get smaller they drop, thus going below the horizon anyhow? So are things dropping or not? You decide on that fact first, then we can go from there. |
Humanity Blows User ID: 70187925 United States 09/10/2015 04:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The U.N. Has used the flat earth model for it's flag since 1945 Here's an interesting video : Remember the U.S.S. Liberty, NEVER FORGIVE, NEVER FORGET! “I spent thirty-three years and four months in active military service as a member of this country's most agile military force, the Marine Corps. I served in all commissioned ranks from Second Lieutenant to Major-General. And during that period, I spent most of my time being a high class muscle-man for Big Business, for Wall Street and for the Bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism.” Smedley D. Butler |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70283953 United States 09/10/2015 04:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
J Dove (OP) User ID: 69524843 United States 09/10/2015 04:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | As far as the video its irrelevant. I provided you a non nasa video that provides evidence. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70283953 In one video you say the buildings are there and should have dropped below horizon, then in the next your saying that as things get smaller they drop, thus going below the horizon anyhow? So are things dropping or not? You decide on that fact first, then we can go from there. Things are not dropping. It's all in the limits of visibility. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65695781 United States 09/10/2015 04:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | As far as the video its irrelevant. I provided you a non nasa video that provides evidence. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70283953 In one video you say the buildings are there and should have dropped below horizon, then in the next your saying that as things get smaller they drop, thus going below the horizon anyhow? So are things dropping or not? You decide on that fact first, then we can go from there. Things are not dropping. It's all in the limits of visibility. Wrong. I've seen with my own eyes and verified with binoculars that once something has gone over the horizon it is over the horizon. If you really think the Earth is flat (contrary to all evidence from the last 2,000+ years) then explain this. You could also explain why lines of longitude get closer together south of the equator instead of farther apart as they should if the Earth was flat. |
J Dove (OP) User ID: 69524843 United States 09/10/2015 04:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
artMan User ID: 70292635 Sweden 09/10/2015 04:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
J Dove (OP) User ID: 69524843 United States 09/10/2015 04:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | As far as the video its irrelevant. I provided you a non nasa video that provides evidence. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70283953 In one video you say the buildings are there and should have dropped below horizon, then in the next your saying that as things get smaller they drop, thus going below the horizon anyhow? So are things dropping or not? You decide on that fact first, then we can go from there. Things are not dropping. It's all in the limits of visibility. Wrong. I've seen with my own eyes and verified with binoculars that once something has gone over the horizon it is over the horizon. If you really think the Earth is flat (contrary to all evidence from the last 2,000+ years) then explain this. You could also explain why lines of longitude get closer together south of the equator instead of farther apart as they should if the Earth was flat. Sir, you are neglecting the video in the OP entirely and I will not be addressing further videos. If you had watched the video in the OP you would know we see things come back into focus over the horizon with zoom. |
artMan User ID: 70292635 Sweden 09/10/2015 04:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69840473 United States 09/10/2015 04:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
artMan User ID: 70292635 Sweden 09/10/2015 04:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65695781 United States 09/10/2015 04:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | As far as the video its irrelevant. I provided you a non nasa video that provides evidence. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70283953 In one video you say the buildings are there and should have dropped below horizon, then in the next your saying that as things get smaller they drop, thus going below the horizon anyhow? So are things dropping or not? You decide on that fact first, then we can go from there. Things are not dropping. It's all in the limits of visibility. Wrong. I've seen with my own eyes and verified with binoculars that once something has gone over the horizon it is over the horizon. If you really think the Earth is flat (contrary to all evidence from the last 2,000+ years) then explain this. You could also explain why lines of longitude get closer together south of the equator instead of farther apart as they should if the Earth was flat. Sir, you are neglecting the video in the OP entirely and I will not be addressing further videos. If you had watched the video in the OP you would know we see things come back into focus over the horizon with zoom. the video in the OP is wrong. Is it full of ignorance. and it DOES show the bottoms of the buildings do NOT come back with magnification. You won't address further videos because you can't. Flat Earth was proven wrong over 2,000 years ago by the Greeks. No amount of ignorance spread on the Internet will change that fact. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69413338 United States 09/10/2015 04:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | As far as the video its irrelevant. I provided you a non nasa video that provides evidence. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70283953 In one video you say the buildings are there and should have dropped below horizon, then in the next your saying that as things get smaller they drop, thus going below the horizon anyhow? So are things dropping or not? You decide on that fact first, then we can go from there. Things are not dropping. It's all in the limits of visibility. Wrong. I've seen with my own eyes and verified with binoculars that once something has gone over the horizon it is over the horizon. If you really think the Earth is flat (contrary to all evidence from the last 2,000+ years) then explain this. You could also explain why lines of longitude get closer together south of the equator instead of farther apart as they should if the Earth was flat. Sir, you are neglecting the video in the OP entirely and I will not be addressing further videos. If you had watched the video in the OP you would know we see things come back into focus over the horizon with zoom. they are paid shills to disprove flat earth. they dont care. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69840473 United States 09/10/2015 04:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nope, flat earthers will tell you that the sun is a 26 mile disc. Even this does not help them. No matter how small the sun is, if the world is flat, then you have a binary situation. Either the sun is above the plane or not. Oh its above, but it functions as a spot light, and travels around in the sky. Is like shining a light on a flat piece of paper. Just being devils advocate.... Don't think i'm dumb... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69413338 United States 09/10/2015 04:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | OP, if the world is flat, why does the sun not set at the same time in the whole world? Quoting: artMan Why, if you Skype someone on the other side of the globe, you can actually see the sun, even though it is night locally? perspective you dumb fuck.... the sun doesnt just disappear it moves out of view from what you can see and thus it takes the light with it. |
J Dove (OP) User ID: 69524843 United States 09/10/2015 04:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | OP, if the world is flat, why does the sun not set at the same time in the whole world? Quoting: artMan Why, if you Skype someone on the other side of the globe, you can actually see the sun, even though it is night locally? There will be a million questions rise up once you start to accept the earth isn't a sphere. This is one of the easiest to address. Here is a video that does: |
artMan User ID: 70292635 Sweden 09/10/2015 04:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | OP, if the world is flat, why does the sun not set at the same time in the whole world? Quoting: artMan Why, if you Skype someone on the other side of the globe, you can actually see the sun, even though it is night locally? perspective you dumb fuck.... the sun doesnt just disappear it moves out of view from what you can see and thus it takes the light with it. If it moved like that, it would be like an airplane flying over head. First it looks like its moving slow, then when it's overhead it moves fast, then slow again, when it heads towards the horizon. I hope I don't have to say more about this, because that is not how the sun moves. |
artMan User ID: 70292635 Sweden 09/10/2015 04:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | OP, if the world is flat, why does the sun not set at the same time in the whole world? Quoting: artMan Why, if you Skype someone on the other side of the globe, you can actually see the sun, even though it is night locally? There will be a million questions rise up once you start to accept the earth isn't a sphere. This is one of the easiest to address. Here is a video that does: You forgot to answer even one of the questions. We all know why. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69413338 United States 09/10/2015 04:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | OP, if the world is flat, why does the sun not set at the same time in the whole world? Quoting: artMan Why, if you Skype someone on the other side of the globe, you can actually see the sun, even though it is night locally? perspective you dumb fuck.... the sun doesnt just disappear it moves out of view from what you can see and thus it takes the light with it. If it moved like that, it would be like an airplane flying over head. First it looks like its moving slow, then when it's overhead it moves fast, then slow again, when it heads towards the horizon. I hope I don't have to say more about this, because that is not how the sun moves. okay mr.scientist. believe what you want to believe but get the fuck out of this thread spreading false info |
artMan User ID: 70292635 Sweden 09/10/2015 04:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | OP, if the world is flat, why does the sun not set at the same time in the whole world? Quoting: artMan Why, if you Skype someone on the other side of the globe, you can actually see the sun, even though it is night locally? perspective you dumb fuck.... the sun doesnt just disappear it moves out of view from what you can see and thus it takes the light with it. If it moved like that, it would be like an airplane flying over head. First it looks like its moving slow, then when it's overhead it moves fast, then slow again, when it heads towards the horizon. I hope I don't have to say more about this, because that is not how the sun moves. okay mr.scientist. believe what you want to believe but get the fuck out of this thread spreading false info You seem to have problems with trigonometry. It's ok. Good luck. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69413338 United States 09/10/2015 04:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69413338 United States 09/10/2015 04:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69413338 perspective you dumb fuck.... the sun doesnt just disappear it moves out of view from what you can see and thus it takes the light with it. If it moved like that, it would be like an airplane flying over head. First it looks like its moving slow, then when it's overhead it moves fast, then slow again, when it heads towards the horizon. I hope I don't have to say more about this, because that is not how the sun moves. okay mr.scientist. believe what you want to believe but get the fuck out of this thread spreading false info You seem to have problems with trigonometry. It's ok. Good luck. but yet the best argument u could come up with was "HOW COME I CAN SEE THE SUN WHEN IM ON SKYPE WITH SOMEONE ACROSS THE WORLD" do u realize how stupid you sound? |
artMan User ID: 70292635 Sweden 09/10/2015 04:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: artMan If it moved like that, it would be like an airplane flying over head. First it looks like its moving slow, then when it's overhead it moves fast, then slow again, when it heads towards the horizon. I hope I don't have to say more about this, because that is not how the sun moves. okay mr.scientist. believe what you want to believe but get the fuck out of this thread spreading false info You seem to have problems with trigonometry. It's ok. Good luck. but yet the best argument u could come up with was "HOW COME I CAN SEE THE SUN WHEN IM ON SKYPE WITH SOMEONE ACROSS THE WORLD" do u realize how stupid you sound? Well, anser the question! If the world is flat, then everyone can see the sun, as long as you are above the treeline, and the sun is above the plane. Or do you have problems with math? |
J Dove (OP) User ID: 69524843 United States 09/10/2015 05:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |