BREAKING!! Oct 7th!! First hint of 'life after death' found in biggest ever scientific study!!!!

There's a word for that, it's called reincarnation.

my grandfather was seen ten hours after he died,so no one really knows.

Was he still dead?

Sorry but I don't buy that the body just instantly stops, it takes hours for you to truly be "dead". These claims they make about what they know is stupid. There is no way to measure what brain activity could still be going on beyond what they use to "prove" as such.

It's about money; they declare people dead way to quickly. If I just "die" out of nowhere with a perfectly healthy body I want to be left untouched for 72 hours before I be called done. That 72 hours costs money they don't want to spend. They are far more likely to try to save someone injured than someone who comes in whole. Then you are a more of a risk to be "dead".

Never sign donor cards, ever. You may as well sign your own death certificate.

The Strawman factor is involved to because the instant you are legally dead, they are cashing you out. It's all eugenics based; anything to check you out.

There my be something after this dimension, but this isn't what proves it.

They probably still have brain activity. The brain can still be going when a heart stops.

Yeah. This exact same scenario has been described over the course of ten thousand years all across every single culture around the whole planet. Recorded in detail. Yet fools choose to believe in a corrupt media and school system.

Who is the dummy?

As always theres a big sounding title but all this is about is clinical death on people the were revived and does wernt really really dead yet. This study doenst prove anything about an eternal afterlife. Just that theres more to 'life' than a <3beat and brainactivity.. Still cool tho.

A collection of anecdotes based on people's perceptions is not scientific evidence by any stretch of the imagination.

By the same burden of proof, we have 'scientific' evidence that leprechauns are real.


Here's the thing; We have no idea what the process of dying does to one's perception of reality, and time. For example the last second of brain life, as consciousness begins to fade, could be experienced by the person as a much longer timescale than it actually is. Sounds, speech, movement in the room may still be subtly perceived on a subconscious level.

Ever play the knockout game? Ever see someone get choked out and then wake up? The initial seconds when the blood rushes back into your brain often involves delusion and confusion.

It is quite possible that the entire 'life after death' experience happens as the brain is dying, but most likely happens as the brain is coming back to life.

If you were to experience something after your brain dies, you would not be remotely aware of it when you came back to life, because your brain
A) cannot encode memories while it is dead.
B) if there was enough residual electricity flowing to maintain the memory encoding mechanisms, it makes the whole thing moot because then there is also enough residual electricity present to fabricate the experience, aka imagine or dream it happened.
C) if your physical body did not experience this 'life after death, aka your physical eyes weren't looking at it, and your physical ears weren't hearing it, how in the world would your physical brain record memories of it?

Don't get me wrong. There is nothing wrong with believing in some form of life after death.

But if you think people's 'remembering' of life after death is evidence of it, well that is simply because you are a moron who knows jack shit about how anything works.

Read up on DMT since its a drug thats also in our brain and people that use it all seem to have the same experience aswell. Wich is totally weird compared to minder altering drugs. People on DMT always see the 'machine elves' even if they never heard of them before..

And the insane part about DMT is that it lasts a couple of minutes but always feels like hours have passed.

Yeah. Done it like 8 times. Shrooms are better.

Great thread, OP! Have always been interested in this
since I had an arrest as a child (and an NDE) while
having an operation for a tonsillectomy.

Something that your older readers might find very
interesting...during the early 1950's thru 1960's
(and even into 70's in some foreign countries) prior
to sodium pentothol...the use of a really UNSTABLE
anesthesia gas for operations was something
called "ether"...AND it was routine...(get that? ROUTINE)
for the medical staff to have a full "crash-cart" standing
by for various kinds of "arrests" during the operation.
Ether was a very difficult gas to control, especially
with children, and there are estimates that up to
80% of children who had tonsillectomies during those
years had some kind of near-death-experience due to
being near death from the gas OR A COMBINATION of a
physical allergy to ether and an over-dose.

My own private doctor admitted to me and my husband
in the 1970's that I was one of the lucky 80% to have "clinically died for several minutes" and brought back
using the "paddles" (crash-cart.) I had a severe reaction
to the ether, itself, as well has having been O.D.'d for
the amount of gas--so mine was especially horrific. I
was only 6 years old. (NO 6-year-old should have that
kind of experience!)

So, if you have memories of "strange dreams" or even
suspect that you had a NDE in the 50-60-70's while having
a tonsillectomy as a child--maybe they were NOT dreams
at all, but an actual full-blown out-of-body experience!

O'sCookie

:heartattak:

Last Edited by TheOracle'sCookie on 10/09/2015 08:33 PM

Not the first hint, and obvious.

Except that many of these people describe seeing things that they could not have seen from their vantage point while unconscious.

Yes and some go into the fire.

It would make sense that an out of body "episode" can happen when the body is at rest.

People who claim to experience out of body projections while alive only do it with the practice of meditation.

So maybe death is the key.

Ur brain capacity would not allow you to go to med school.

Awareness could be a representation of quantum locality vs non-locality. In quantum, there exists potential, out of that potential arises localized existence. And this "quantum" principle, in my opinion, is simply one potential expression of a much deeper reality of the "will" to exist.

The driver for consciousness is still yet unknown, but there are brilliant people investigating such things.



[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Anthropocentric view points are unlikely to be the end all, be all of reality.

Anyway..

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Definitely worth a watch for those into this subject - truly excellent evidence!

Exactly. The brain is only hardware. The power that animates it is compeltely separate and wholly independent.

The material brain is simply the receiver of consciousness, not the source.

Like a TV.

This has been know for many, many years throughout the world.

Interesting that "modern" science is just now catching up to this.

We are souls having a physical experience. Not bodies with a soul.

That's a very logical argument, except it doesn't allow for a known phenomenon:

No brain activity

Time passes

Brain activity restarted

Patient could detail specific events that happened around him while there was no brain activity

I don't see how your post explains that phenomenon to "morons" line myself.

Some are aware of the invisible life and some are not.

It exists whether you want to cope with it or not.

Denial is eventual disaster.

atheists are fuckin douchebags

this

this

Yea, about that.