Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,282 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 131,015
Pageviews Today: 203,806Threads Today: 82Posts Today: 1,168
02:13 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Greys behind the NWO?

 
Metamorphadite
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 151482
United States
10/06/2006 02:32 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Greys behind the NWO?
Maybe there's more to it than just corruption in high places. Could there be any truth to the abduction accounts of witnesses seeing "greys and nazis collaborating in these dipicable acts?
Whitley Strieber seems to be developing a strong opinion on the issue of where we're being led, in this country, and the world.
Whether he is vocalising his dissent, or acting on cue I don't know, but it deserves a read.
Here is an excerpt from the series.
The new book by Bob Woodward, State of Denial, contains the devastating information that Condolezza Rice, while National Security Advisor, was told by CIA Director George Tenet and Defense Department counterterrorism chief J. Cofer Black that an al Qaeda attack on the United States was imminent--a month before it happened.
None of the three parties testified to this effect before the 911 Commission, and Rice specifically stated that there was no warning.

Add to this the fact that the administration classified 11 warnings transmitted to the National Security Council by the FAA prior to 911 that US aircraft were liable to be attacked, AND that Dr. Rice never mentioned these warnings during her testimony either, and a very dark picture emerges.

Either Condoleeza Rice is spectacularly incompetent, or the warnings were being intentionally ignored. There is no third possibility. No national security advisor would fail to transmit warnings such as that delivered by Tenet and Black to the whole council for discussion, at the very least. It would normally have been transmitted to the president, also.

The FAA warnings are at a lower level, but they should have only added to a sense of alarm that simply was not there.

I have just finished reading Jim Marrs's new book, The Terror Conspiracy, which does an expert job of making the case that the administration not only ignored warnings, but actively participated in the orchestration of the attack.

Could such a thing be possible? Well, before I had my close encounters of the third kind, I would have said no, of course not, it's just conspiracy theory.

Now that I have seen up close and personal just how good the United States is at keeping secrets, and the deep, profoundly evil consequences of some of those secrets, I no longer think of it as a healthy institution or even a good institution gone wrong.

It has a dark heart, and that heart is devoted to one thing: the eradication of human freedom through the destruction of the American Republic. Increasingly, at the highest levels of government, we find people who are unable or unwilling to resist whatever it is hiding within.

I am not a conspiracy theorist. I do not know what is there, but I do know this: something is. It acted first with the assassination of JFK. The fact that it got away with this enabled it to embed itself in our government, where it has been acting with more or less freedom ever since.

At present, it has more freedom than it has ever had before, and when, over the summer of 2001, the president's approval ratings were plummeting, I think a decision was made to simply sit back and wait, and let the terrorists do their thing.

It worked: by October, the president was at an all time high in popularity, and the United States Congress was so frightened that it was willing to throw away our freedoms by passing a largely unread Patriot Act.

In addition, it has acted to insure its place by striking directly at the place that counts the most: the ballot box. Princeton University researchers have shown that Diebold electronic voting machines have been designed so that votes cast on them can easily be changed without leaving a trace. Whether this is incompetence or intention is unknown, but the fact remains that 10% of the voting machines in the United States are now suspect. And it must not be forgotten that the president of Diebold is a strong supporter of George W. Bush. He calls himself a Republican, but I do not think of people who support the president as Republicans at all. My guess is that 10% of voting machines will turn election after election to the president's supporter, wherever the races are close enough to make that possible, or the machines prevalent enough.

In November, again and again, we'll see surprises: actual votes differing from exit poll results, and Bush supporters winning by a hair.

Republicans stand for freedom and free enterprise, not for curtailing our freedoms and crushing the life out of small business and enterpreneurship. Those goals are as far as you can get from the Republican tradition almost as is possible. In fact, the last place you can find them is in the policies of National Socialism.

Almost the first thing that Adolf Hitler did upon his appointment as chancellor was to draw up legislation essentially ending freedom in Germany. Parts of it even read a good bit like the Patriot Act. And his system concentrated power in the hands of large corporations at the expense of small business. By 1938, the small manufacturing enterprise had been virtually eliminated in Germany, mostly via forced sales of companies to Nazi sympathizers, who then merged them into the larger corporations that had financed the sales in the first place.

No, what we have in Washington now is not Republicanism. It is a slightly more user friendly version of National Socialism, and at its dark heart is an irrevocable belief that the insiders know better how to run the country than the people.

Oddly enough, the reason republics work so well, fight so little and last so long is that the opposite is, historically, the truth: the people are very good at governing themselves, wise about hiring and firing leaders, intelligent about where they want policy to go.

Ideology can never be complex enough to respond correctly in all situations, and the more rigid the ideology, the less competent to govern it is. This is why Nazism and communism failed, and why European socialism works poorly. Socialism survives only because it is somewhat more flexible than communism, which attempts to impose its noble ideals on that most ignoble of creatures, us, the ordinary folk, who know what actually matters--home, family and a decent, peaceful life--far more than the deluded dreamers who concoct ideologies.

The president operates according to a rigid ideology, and so do his primary advisors, Rice, Rumsfeld and Cheney. And, I guess I must now add, that sinister old fool Henry Kissinger, who guided America to defeat 30 years ago and is apparently back again, doing the same thing.

Kennedy was going to get us out of Vietnam because he knew that central forces cannot win wars against guerillas. He knew this because he knew his American history. George Washington's Continental Army was a guerilla organization. The Minutemen were our Viet Cong...and our Madhi Army, for that matter.

Henry Kissinger brings to the table a profoundly European worldview. It was the inability of the European imperial organzations to cope with guerilla movements that lost them their empires. Try as it might, the British Army could not defeat the Mau Mau any more than we will defeat the Iraqi insurgents or the Taliban. Fighting such battles with organized military structures is impossible. Defeat is always certain.

The moment that I heard that Kissinger was in the background, advising the administration, I knew that we were doomed not just to some sort of stalemate in Iraq and Afghanistan, but to absolute defeat on both fronts.

Armies cannot fight ideas. It's that simple. NATO forces in Afghanistan brag that they have 'rooted out' hundreds of Taliban fighters every week or so. But the numbers never diminish, any more than the numbers of Viet Cong did. This is because this is not a battle between military forces. The other side doesn't exist as a military force. The other side is concealed in the minds of people hoping for a better life, longing for purity of spirit and excellence in their days, and willing to give their lives for a dream.

This is not something an army can defeat. How ironic that Henry Kissinger is so oddly indicted by the philosopher George Santayana's warning that those who would ignore history are condemned to repeat it. Kissinger has condemned us all to repeat history that he himself created, by ignoring it.

But, then, what can defeat the Taliban, what can defeat al Qaeda, what can defeat the Iraqi insurgency?

Or is that even the question? One of the deepest of all Republican traditions has been unfairly called 'isolationism,' which conjures up notions of moronic hicks hiding their heads in the sand in order to avoid the Hitlers of the world.

The desire to look to one's own national condition first is a much more accurate way to describe the policies of such Republicans as Robert Taft, and it is a policy that our present gang of ideological adventurers would do well to consider.

It is argued by the administration that terror is bred in 'failed states' like Afghanistan, Sudan and Iraq. But Afghanistan was not a failed state at all, it was simply an extremely unpleasant one. It did not harbor al Qaeda, it wanted to get rid of al Qaeda. The Taliban knew perfectly well that an al Qaeda attack on the United States would be a death sentence for them. They were not psychotics at all, but politicians with a silly, nasty ideology that, frankly, is none of our business. We are not the keepers of the Afghans any more than we are the 'liberators' of the Iraqis.

We need people in office who can rationally and objectively rethink the way our nation addresses itself to the rest of the world. All we have managed to do over the past seven terrible years is create a pool of potential terrorists who were not there before we started, run up a national debt that will make our children curse the day the were born, and reveal for all to see the fact that our army is not an effective weapon in the modern world, because it is not the right weapon.

So this is what that dark entity, that has been trying to run this country unfettered since it murdered Kennedy, has finally accomplished: the same thing that the Nazis accomplished, and for exactly the same reason: ideology cannot be imposed on reality. It is always too simple to succeed in the subtle and complex arena of human affairs.

In 1895, Tsar Nicholas II ridiculed Bolshevik notions of reform as "senseless dreams." He might well have been talking to all of the dreamers of the next hundred years, the Bolsheviks, the Nazis, the American religious and economic ideologues of both the left and the right, all of them.

Nearly half a billion lives were lost over the attempts by the communists and the Nazis to impose their senseless dreams on others. Now, it's our turn. So far, we have lost only a few thousand in terms of human lives. There has as yet been no mass slaughter, no epochal disaster. But the foolish adventurism of the administration has made it more possible than ever that a really gigantic terrorist attack will be mounted.

If so, the result could easily be the ruin of our republic, and if, God forbid, it involves the sudden destruction of Washington, a turning point in American history so catastrophic that it is almost impossible to imagine.

This is where these corporate adventurers, religious extremists and their political cronies have taken us. Senseless dreams, for sure.
"oh you can call me Ray, and you can call me Jay, but ya doesn't has ta call me Johnson". (Raymond J. Johnson)
AA

User ID: 151300
United States
10/06/2006 02:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Greys behind the NWO?
I have considered this being there is a lot more than just a few people in the US Government in on this. China, N Korea, Russia, and mire are all playing their roles.
"Pray, v:. To ask that the laws of the universe be annulled in behalf of a single petitioner confessedly unworthy." - Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914)
Irish Jim, nli
User ID: 120402
United States
10/06/2006 02:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Greys behind the NWO?
I don't know if it's grays specifically. But I think some sort(s) of non-human are involved in the plans and activities of the PTB, at least at the highest levels. This is the core secret that they will kill for. It also spawns the factional infighting amongst the human element within TPTB.
AA

User ID: 151300
United States
10/06/2006 02:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Greys behind the NWO?
I don't know if it's grays specifically. But I think some sort(s) of non-human are involved in the plans and activities of the PTB, at least at the highest levels. This is the core secret that they will kill for. It also spawns the factional infighting amongst the human element within TPTB.
 Quoting: Irish Jim, nli 120402



Definitely who ever is control have suppressed technology and knowledge vital to human enlightenment and advancement both spiritually and technologically.

They have consolodated power and wealth into selfish and evil men which allows for the first thing I mentioned.

They are leading the human race toward emanate destruction... hence our dependence on fossil fuels leading to global warming and the globalization of a military state.

I can not figure out how fuckin greedy and power hungry you have to be to hold the entire human race back or you must have some exterior motive such as an alien race would.
"Pray, v:. To ask that the laws of the universe be annulled in behalf of a single petitioner confessedly unworthy." - Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 91543
Australia
10/06/2006 03:03 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Greys behind the NWO?
I can not figure out how fuckin greedy and power hungry you have to be to hold the entire human race back or you must have some exterior motive such as an alien race would.
 Quoting: AA


I wish more people would realise this or CONNECT THE DOTS- the ruling elite/aliens are content to let people believe its just greed, money and power and they don't even really mind if a lot of people believe in some sort of human conspiracy but what they will kill for etc. to keep secret from the human mass consciousness is the ALIEN AGENDA. And it involves alien races at war here on Earth.
Metamorphadite  (OP)

User ID: 151482
United States
10/06/2006 03:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Greys behind the NWO?
If reptillian entities were involved as theorised, and influencing global events, I could see where the population explosion and technologically induced global warming could be used to ultimatly create a more "comfortable" environment for those of the "colder blood" type of beings.
"oh you can call me Ray, and you can call me Jay, but ya doesn't has ta call me Johnson". (Raymond J. Johnson)
AA

User ID: 151300
United States
10/06/2006 03:10 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Greys behind the NWO?
If reptillian entities were involved as theorised, and influencing global events, I could see where the population explosion and technologically induced global warming could be used to ultimatly create a more "comfortable" environment for those of the "colder blood" type of beings.
 Quoting: Metamorphadite



No the dependence on oil is for several reasons other than warming the atmosphere for reptiles. (there are plenty of warm spots for them to hang out)

It is control of technology, but more important it is ultimately control of the geopolitical structure. USA and Western Europe account for 10 percent of the world's population. Give the other 90 percent the technology to have free energy from ZPE and you immediately tip the balance of power and the other 90 percent's life and economic influence will come on par with the the western world.
"Pray, v:. To ask that the laws of the universe be annulled in behalf of a single petitioner confessedly unworthy." - Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914)
Ij, nli
User ID: 120402
United States
10/06/2006 06:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Greys behind the NWO?
Maybe [link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 744
United Kingdom
10/06/2006 06:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Greys behind the NWO?
No it is The Crown / City of £ondon / Illuminati they may have the Greys and the Annunaki on side helping out.
Dil
User ID: 51202
Austria
10/06/2006 07:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Greys behind the NWO?
There should be no doubt dark entities are able to hide themselves from our view by technology, be it greys, reptoids and other even scarier looking beings.
That's why many call them demons but actually these are just ETs and they aid everyone who plays for their agendas.

NWO is actually a deliberate misnomer so that mankind should be scared of the new and good paradigma, it's rather the OWO (old WO), they rule this earth for milennia and want to keep that forever.
IGASOP

User ID: 136177
United States
10/06/2006 07:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Greys behind the NWO?
If you only knew...

I can't make "moves" on the chessboard as it's not my turn to.

After the holidays pass this year and we celebrate the year 2-0-0-7 then I can dump some "fiction" on the net.

Delta-India-Niner-Niner-Echo-Romeo

"Dinner is served"
Twockin
User ID: 729142
Czechia
07/18/2009 10:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Greys behind the NWO?
Help me find a track
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 724435
Canada
07/19/2009 06:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Greys behind the NWO?
From all the conspiracy stuff I've seen, if aliens actually are behind the NWO, then the nightmare to come is unimaginable. They'll harvest us like cattle, open our brains, and take our glands. They'll use our adrenal glands to get high. If thats the case I hope the aliens at least snort it up with a 100 dollar bill of space money and off the asses of some hot alien bitches.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 725915
Australia
07/19/2009 07:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Greys behind the NWO?
What a croc of crap!

























Maybe there's more to it than just corruption in high places. Could there be any truth to the abduction accounts of witnesses seeing "greys and nazis collaborating in these dipicable acts?
Whitley Strieber seems to be developing a strong opinion on the issue of where we're being led, in this country, and the world.
Whether he is vocalising his dissent, or acting on cue I don't know, but it deserves a read.
Here is an excerpt from the series.
The new book by Bob Woodward, State of Denial, contains the devastating information that Condolezza Rice, while National Security Advisor, was told by CIA Director George Tenet and Defense Department counterterrorism chief J. Cofer Black that an al Qaeda attack on the United States was imminent--a month before it happened.
None of the three parties testified to this effect before the 911 Commission, and Rice specifically stated that there was no warning.

Add to this the fact that the administration classified 11 warnings transmitted to the National Security Council by the FAA prior to 911 that US aircraft were liable to be attacked, AND that Dr. Rice never mentioned these warnings during her testimony either, and a very dark picture emerges.

Either Condoleeza Rice is spectacularly incompetent, or the warnings were being intentionally ignored. There is no third possibility. No national security advisor would fail to transmit warnings such as that delivered by Tenet and Black to the whole council for discussion, at the very least. It would normally have been transmitted to the president, also.

The FAA warnings are at a lower level, but they should have only added to a sense of alarm that simply was not there.

I have just finished reading Jim Marrs's new book, The Terror Conspiracy, which does an expert job of making the case that the administration not only ignored warnings, but actively participated in the orchestration of the attack.

Could such a thing be possible? Well, before I had my close encounters of the third kind, I would have said no, of course not, it's just conspiracy theory.

Now that I have seen up close and personal just how good the United States is at keeping secrets, and the deep, profoundly evil consequences of some of those secrets, I no longer think of it as a healthy institution or even a good institution gone wrong.

It has a dark heart, and that heart is devoted to one thing: the eradication of human freedom through the destruction of the American Republic. Increasingly, at the highest levels of government, we find people who are unable or unwilling to resist whatever it is hiding within.

I am not a conspiracy theorist. I do not know what is there, but I do know this: something is. It acted first with the assassination of JFK. The fact that it got away with this enabled it to embed itself in our government, where it has been acting with more or less freedom ever since.

At present, it has more freedom than it has ever had before, and when, over the summer of 2001, the president's approval ratings were plummeting, I think a decision was made to simply sit back and wait, and let the terrorists do their thing.

It worked: by October, the president was at an all time high in popularity, and the United States Congress was so frightened that it was willing to throw away our freedoms by passing a largely unread Patriot Act.

In addition, it has acted to insure its place by striking directly at the place that counts the most: the ballot box. Princeton University researchers have shown that Diebold electronic voting machines have been designed so that votes cast on them can easily be changed without leaving a trace. Whether this is incompetence or intention is unknown, but the fact remains that 10% of the voting machines in the United States are now suspect. And it must not be forgotten that the president of Diebold is a strong supporter of George W. Bush. He calls himself a Republican, but I do not think of people who support the president as Republicans at all. My guess is that 10% of voting machines will turn election after election to the president's supporter, wherever the races are close enough to make that possible, or the machines prevalent enough.

In November, again and again, we'll see surprises: actual votes differing from exit poll results, and Bush supporters winning by a hair.

Republicans stand for freedom and free enterprise, not for curtailing our freedoms and crushing the life out of small business and enterpreneurship. Those goals are as far as you can get from the Republican tradition almost as is possible. In fact, the last place you can find them is in the policies of National Socialism.

Almost the first thing that Adolf Hitler did upon his appointment as chancellor was to draw up legislation essentially ending freedom in Germany. Parts of it even read a good bit like the Patriot Act. And his system concentrated power in the hands of large corporations at the expense of small business. By 1938, the small manufacturing enterprise had been virtually eliminated in Germany, mostly via forced sales of companies to Nazi sympathizers, who then merged them into the larger corporations that had financed the sales in the first place.

No, what we have in Washington now is not Republicanism. It is a slightly more user friendly version of National Socialism, and at its dark heart is an irrevocable belief that the insiders know better how to run the country than the people.

Oddly enough, the reason republics work so well, fight so little and last so long is that the opposite is, historically, the truth: the people are very good at governing themselves, wise about hiring and firing leaders, intelligent about where they want policy to go.

Ideology can never be complex enough to respond correctly in all situations, and the more rigid the ideology, the less competent to govern it is. This is why Nazism and communism failed, and why European socialism works poorly. Socialism survives only because it is somewhat more flexible than communism, which attempts to impose its noble ideals on that most ignoble of creatures, us, the ordinary folk, who know what actually matters--home, family and a decent, peaceful life--far more than the deluded dreamers who concoct ideologies.

The president operates according to a rigid ideology, and so do his primary advisors, Rice, Rumsfeld and Cheney. And, I guess I must now add, that sinister old fool Henry Kissinger, who guided America to defeat 30 years ago and is apparently back again, doing the same thing.

Kennedy was going to get us out of Vietnam because he knew that central forces cannot win wars against guerillas. He knew this because he knew his American history. George Washington's Continental Army was a guerilla organization. The Minutemen were our Viet Cong...and our Madhi Army, for that matter.

Henry Kissinger brings to the table a profoundly European worldview. It was the inability of the European imperial organzations to cope with guerilla movements that lost them their empires. Try as it might, the British Army could not defeat the Mau Mau any more than we will defeat the Iraqi insurgents or the Taliban. Fighting such battles with organized military structures is impossible. Defeat is always certain.

The moment that I heard that Kissinger was in the background, advising the administration, I knew that we were doomed not just to some sort of stalemate in Iraq and Afghanistan, but to absolute defeat on both fronts.

Armies cannot fight ideas. It's that simple. NATO forces in Afghanistan brag that they have 'rooted out' hundreds of Taliban fighters every week or so. But the numbers never diminish, any more than the numbers of Viet Cong did. This is because this is not a battle between military forces. The other side doesn't exist as a military force. The other side is concealed in the minds of people hoping for a better life, longing for purity of spirit and excellence in their days, and willing to give their lives for a dream.

This is not something an army can defeat. How ironic that Henry Kissinger is so oddly indicted by the philosopher George Santayana's warning that those who would ignore history are condemned to repeat it. Kissinger has condemned us all to repeat history that he himself created, by ignoring it.

But, then, what can defeat the Taliban, what can defeat al Qaeda, what can defeat the Iraqi insurgency?

Or is that even the question? One of the deepest of all Republican traditions has been unfairly called 'isolationism,' which conjures up notions of moronic hicks hiding their heads in the sand in order to avoid the Hitlers of the world.

The desire to look to one's own national condition first is a much more accurate way to describe the policies of such Republicans as Robert Taft, and it is a policy that our present gang of ideological adventurers would do well to consider.

It is argued by the administration that terror is bred in 'failed states' like Afghanistan, Sudan and Iraq. But Afghanistan was not a failed state at all, it was simply an extremely unpleasant one. It did not harbor al Qaeda, it wanted to get rid of al Qaeda. The Taliban knew perfectly well that an al Qaeda attack on the United States would be a death sentence for them. They were not psychotics at all, but politicians with a silly, nasty ideology that, frankly, is none of our business. We are not the keepers of the Afghans any more than we are the 'liberators' of the Iraqis.

We need people in office who can rationally and objectively rethink the way our nation addresses itself to the rest of the world. All we have managed to do over the past seven terrible years is create a pool of potential terrorists who were not there before we started, run up a national debt that will make our children curse the day the were born, and reveal for all to see the fact that our army is not an effective weapon in the modern world, because it is not the right weapon.

So this is what that dark entity, that has been trying to run this country unfettered since it murdered Kennedy, has finally accomplished: the same thing that the Nazis accomplished, and for exactly the same reason: ideology cannot be imposed on reality. It is always too simple to succeed in the subtle and complex arena of human affairs.

In 1895, Tsar Nicholas II ridiculed Bolshevik notions of reform as "senseless dreams." He might well have been talking to all of the dreamers of the next hundred years, the Bolsheviks, the Nazis, the American religious and economic ideologues of both the left and the right, all of them.

Nearly half a billion lives were lost over the attempts by the communists and the Nazis to impose their senseless dreams on others. Now, it's our turn. So far, we have lost only a few thousand in terms of human lives. There has as yet been no mass slaughter, no epochal disaster. But the foolish adventurism of the administration has made it more possible than ever that a really gigantic terrorist attack will be mounted.

If so, the result could easily be the ruin of our republic, and if, God forbid, it involves the sudden destruction of Washington, a turning point in American history so catastrophic that it is almost impossible to imagine.

This is where these corporate adventurers, religious extremists and their political cronies have taken us. Senseless dreams, for sure.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 646448
United States
07/19/2009 09:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Greys behind the NWO?
Lots of truth in that post
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 728148
United Kingdom
07/19/2009 10:25 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Greys behind the NWO?
William Bramley's book "The Gods Of Eden" shares the idea of a hidden alien presence controlling and enslaving mankind.

Worth a read - highly relevant.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 727808
United Kingdom
07/19/2009 10:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Greys behind the NWO?
Humans invented greys , now who do you think is behind NWO ?
FreeFlow

User ID: 456207
Austria
07/19/2009 10:30 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Greys behind the NWO?
Humans invented greys , now who do you think is behind NWO ?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 727808


So we have invented them, go figure!
You sure also think humans are responsible for all the atrocities and messes themselves ...

:zetaalien:
I am here to challenge your indoctrinated false belief that flaming queens don't use shovels ...
rocky
User ID: 675648
United States
07/19/2009 10:35 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Greys behind the NWO?
spell NWO backwards ( OWN!) it's them or us
EMETIME TRUTHS
every body here has something to offer
don't be shy, just tell the truth
there are people on this site that are very inteligent
let them formulate the equation
after all we are only one seed, but many cultures
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 727808
United Kingdom
07/19/2009 10:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Greys behind the NWO?
Humans invented greys , now who do you think is behind NWO ?


So we have invented them, go figure!
You sure also think humans are responsible for all the atrocities and messes themselves ...

 Quoting: FreeFlow



have u ever heard of world war 1 and 2 ?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 602429
United States
07/19/2009 10:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Greys behind the NWO?
I don't know if it's grays specifically. But I think some sort(s) of non-human are involved in the plans and activities of the PTB, at least at the highest levels. This is the core secret that they will kill for. It also spawns the factional infighting amongst the human element within TPTB.
 Quoting: Irish Jim, nli 120402


Revelation 16:12-14 (Amplified Bible)
12Then the sixth [angel] emptied his bowl on the mighty river Euphrates, and its water was dried up to make ready a road for [the coming of] the kings of the east (from the rising sun).(A)

13And I saw three loathsome spirits like frogs, [leaping] from the mouth of the dragon and from the mouth of the beast and from the mouth of the false prophet.(B)

14For really they are the spirits of demons that perform signs (wonders, miracles). And they go forth to the rulers and leaders all over the world, to gather them together for war on the great day of God the Almighty.


--

Bible calls them "loathsome spirits."

[link to www.google.com]

[link to revelationexplained.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 727335
United States
07/19/2009 10:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Greys behind the NWO?
[link to www.youtube.com]




------
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 729444
Israel
07/19/2009 10:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Greys behind the NWO?
rep...til...ians.

Really, you'd think they could come up with some thing a BIT more creative than lizards.....
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 729440
United States
07/19/2009 10:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Greys behind the NWO?
listen to bill cooper and phil schneider and the original montauk project videos. the kist of it is that reptilians control greys and the elite worship the reptilians, and so the government is cooperating with the greys, they abduct people to harvest the hormones created by people in the epitome of fear. they basically gather runaways for their proteins to feed the reptilians and grays.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 725590
Spain
07/19/2009 10:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Greys behind the NWO?
If reptillian entities were involved as theorised, and influencing global events,
 Quoting: Metamorphadite


Greys only contacted USA government. Only contact someones instead of all is for creating separation between the "chosen ones" and the rest of the populace. Giving to the chosen ones power in form of technology and knowledge and not to the normal people. Greys also acted along human history in many events where they could create separation. What other "chosen ones" can you find?

The goal of greys is we destroy ourselves and they have a new planet for them. They are not permitted to conquer a planet but they are permitted to answer and contact if they are asked to it. That is why they left crash their UFOs: to start contact.

It is not going to work. The grey future of fear and cataclism has been avoided in this timeline. This timeline will end with truth and everyone knowing the deep roots of evil. Awakening to the truths is happening each day instead of fearing. In some weeks or months more it will be clear all is finished, the dark will be scaping Earth or hung in my opinion. Make pop corn and enjoy the show. Next act seems the dark in Iran to have problems.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 727808
United Kingdom
07/19/2009 10:59 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Greys behind the NWO?
Greys only contacted USA government.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 725590



why would they do that, the usa isn't my representative nor anyone elses.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 727808
United Kingdom
07/19/2009 11:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Greys behind the NWO?
That is why they left crash their UFOs: to start contact.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 725590



they fly across the universe but crash into planets. LOL
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 602429
United States
07/19/2009 11:05 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Greys behind the NWO?
rep...til...ians.

Really, you'd think they could come up with some thing a BIT more creative than lizards.....
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 729444



"they are the spirits of demons"

[link to revelationexplained.com]

[link to www.google.com]
Texas Gisgaia
User ID: 581347
United States
07/19/2009 12:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Greys behind the NWO?
Over on the 'forbidden' RUMOR site (that always triggers the auto-ban for some ??? reason) there is very interesting thread & interview (on their radio show - in archives I presume) that definitely ties in with this thread and may give quite a bit of insight & confirmation for those with minds open.

The title of it is:

The Battle at Dulce to Stop an Alien Breeding Program Using Thousands of Young Women - posted on 8th July, 2009

The way to find the site is to go to Google and search these 4 words together: alien breeding women dulce and then click on the top link that comes up.
HoksHapsfep
User ID: 838636
Latvia
12/11/2009 12:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Greys behind the NWO?
Greetings!

I am brand new to this forum and just thought it would be a good idea to introduce myself and say "wuzup".

This is a stable site with a layout that I can look at - that is a seldom case!

I'm here to hang out @ get involved in this forum. How could I best participate?

Bye For Now!
wash them or
User ID: 968713
United States
05/12/2010 05:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Greys behind the NWO?
A source of to us from business She started retaining much of





GLP