The "Supposed" California UFO was a Missile Launch

what kind of crazy is this?

i linked your thread just above for consideration. Astro will probably bring balance back to the thread, hopefully. instead of the crap to make people question their reality biz

Look, I've had more than a few years of experience watching rocket launches of all kinds up close. You can either accept my input, or you can bitch at me. I don't have time to waste on you if you just want to bitch at me though.

I guarantee the rocket was a lot higher than 30,000 feet. If you're not near the initial launch site you won't hear it. You can see rockets that launch from Cape Canaveral clear across the other side of the state, but you won't hear it from there.

Thanks for the consideration! Just trying to get this information out there, thanks for including it in your thread!

I have a question Doc, why was there no light or smoke, trail from the launch location? It got light when it was already high up?

Haha, you haven't watched many rocket launches, have you? Ever see a pre-dawn or early-evening rocket launch? Just after dark but while the rocket still has line of sight to the sun at altitude? Little star? Not hardly.

Tell me, what time was the object seen?

Tell me, what time was the object seen?

Here's the manifest:

November 7, USS Kentucky successfully launched an unarmed Trident II missile, at around 6 p.m. local time, during a Follow-on CINC Evaluation Test at the Pacific Missile Range off the coast of Port Hueneme, Calif.
[link to www.uscarriers.net]

I realize it was nighttime, however, there was light present, so why would there not be a visible light right from the launch all the way through? I'm not trying to argue, I truly am perplexed by this.

Tell me, what time was the object seen?

Honestly I haven't even had time to get up to speed on all the videos/reports of what was seen yet, but based on the video I saw it does appear to be a rocket launch. I'm fully engrossed right now on trying to get my tracking software up and running.

The rockets usually have a red or orange glow on them when launched at dark, why the blue/green plume behind it?
Also looks like a distinctive blue line trailing behind at one point in the video?

The rockets usually have a red or orange glow on them when launched at dark, why the blue/green plume behind it?
Also looks like a distinctive blue line trailing behind at one point in the video?

Crazy, I just got home from getting groceries and got to see this from start to finish in my driveway. At first I thought a plane was on fire in the sky as there were spark flying off it.

Then it looked like a huge headlight lit up in the sky. After it disappeared there was a green aura in the sky where the light was.

Seeing the whole thing with my own eyes, there is no way that this was a missile.

Could have been a meteor, space object or UFO. What's more concerning is why the government is is lying about it being a missile because there is no way that was a missile.

It looks like the Russians did an ICBM launch from a submarine, right in the middle of U.S. war games off the California coast
This was a huge event, which was seen in Mexico, California, Colorado, Arizona, Nevada and Utah.

This is the official story:
Navy Strategic Systems Programs conducted the scheduled Trident II (D5) missile test flight at sea from the Kentucky, an Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine, in the Pacific Test Range off the coast of Southern California, a Navy spokesman said. 　

PROBLEM: Though there were war games scheduled, there was no missile launch scheduled (despite claims) AND HERE IS THE KICKER: According to the "experts" on various forums, Trident II missiles have a red flame, and Russian ICBM's have a stunning blue flame that leaves a huge blue trail long after the missile is gone. And this ICBM had a stunning blue flame that left a glowing trail in the sky for 15 minutes after the launch. AND HERE IS THE KICKER: ITS TRAJECTORY APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN ONE THAT WOULD HAVE MADE IT LAND IN SIBERIA. Figure the odds for that one. America would not test fire an ICBM on a trajectory for Russia!
If Russia really did do this, it would have definitely sent a message that goes something like: "You can't get us, we can be right where you are looking and you will still lose LA."

Now the only thing to be fully confirmed is that a Trident burns red. I do not know what does what, but there are experts out there reading that can confirm this. If the "experts" online are correct about the color of the flame, Russia just pulled a big one.
Keep in mind that U.S. forces may be doing a huge whitewash right now, they are claiming it was ours, but I think that would be expected to keep Americans from panicking. If Russian ICBM's really do burn blue, and the Trident has a history of burning red, then the only way this thing was not Russian is if America changed the fuel chemistry, which in an established weapons system is a really fat chance! And come to think of it, this is how this would be done for max effect: One minute before America was supposed to test fire a Trident, Russia fires theirs in close proximity to where America's was supposed to launch from. What would this mean? It would mean: We can break your encryption, know what you were going to do, hide from you right where you are looking and do it on your own schedule! I would not be surprised if that is what really went on. That would be quite the chess board.

Even if this missile really was American, the fact one got fired at all, at $31 million a pop for the type claimed, would send an ominous message. And what was the schedule for these war games? Not on the drawing board before that shoot down over Egypt.

And just the fact the glow should have been visible the entire time from launch. It was not.

From 3:15 you can see the same effect as the recent launch.

It looks like the Russians did an ICBM launch from a submarine, right in the middle of U.S. war games off the California coast
This was a huge event, which was seen in Mexico, California, Colorado, Arizona, Nevada and Utah.

This is the official story:
Navy Strategic Systems Programs conducted the scheduled Trident II (D5) missile test flight at sea from the Kentucky, an Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine, in the Pacific Test Range off the coast of Southern California, a Navy spokesman said. 　

PROBLEM: Though there were war games scheduled, there was no missile launch scheduled (despite claims) AND HERE IS THE KICKER: According to the "experts" on various forums, Trident II missiles have a red flame, and Russian ICBM's have a stunning blue flame that leaves a huge blue trail long after the missile is gone. And this ICBM had a stunning blue flame that left a glowing trail in the sky for 15 minutes after the launch. AND HERE IS THE KICKER: ITS TRAJECTORY APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN ONE THAT WOULD HAVE MADE IT LAND IN SIBERIA. Figure the odds for that one. America would not test fire an ICBM on a trajectory for Russia!
If Russia really did do this, it would have definitely sent a message that goes something like: "You can't get us, we can be right where you are looking and you will still lose LA."

Now the only thing to be fully confirmed is that a Trident burns red. I do not know what does what, but there are experts out there reading that can confirm this. If the "experts" online are correct about the color of the flame, Russia just pulled a big one.
Keep in mind that U.S. forces may be doing a huge whitewash right now, they are claiming it was ours, but I think that would be expected to keep Americans from panicking. If Russian ICBM's really do burn blue, and the Trident has a history of burning red, then the only way this thing was not Russian is if America changed the fuel chemistry, which in an established weapons system is a really fat chance! And come to think of it, this is how this would be done for max effect: One minute before America was supposed to test fire a Trident, Russia fires theirs in close proximity to where America's was supposed to launch from. What would this mean? It would mean: We can break your encryption, know what you were going to do, hide from you right where you are looking and do it on your own schedule! I would not be surprised if that is what really went on. That would be quite the chess board.

Even if this missile really was American, the fact one got fired at all, at $31 million a pop for the type claimed, would send an ominous message. And what was the schedule for these war games? Not on the drawing board before that shoot down over Egypt.

From 3:15 you can see the same effect as the recent launch.

Make a thread about this, please!