Admit it, half of you Christians would support a theocracy | |
Jeffersons Blackberry User ID: 70078340 United States 11/27/2015 12:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Look bro, as an American I support the idea that we all have rights given to us by the creator. Don't fug with me and I won't fug with you. Sharia no, democracy no, a (true)representive republic? The best idea to date. “To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.”; Thomas Jefferson |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30775863 United States 11/27/2015 12:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28939771 United States 11/27/2015 12:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If it was based on what you percieve as 'true christian values', kept non-whites at bay, and united the western world under a common flag, the banner of Jesus, to fight (if necessary) against the rising Muslim onslaught. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70834962 It would overthrow democracy and all corrupt officials, prohibit usury, print its own interest free money, and transform and eventually unite the Catholic Church with the new overpowered religious State. Borders would be closed (only trading allowed) and all non-whites encouraged and to leave and supported, violently kicked out if refused. It would allow nations to remain sovereign, but they would have to follow the dictates of the 'empire' in times of crisis, and certain laws based on moral principles coming straight from the Bible as interpreted by the most capable minds. Would you support this order? Biblical moral principles are excellent standards, what's your issue against living right and respecting your fellow man? Any Christian who lives by biblical standards would never uphold some fleshy idea of supremacy. When Christ died on the cross, He made a way for every race. If you are in Christ, regardless of your race, you are my brother. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28939771 United States 11/27/2015 12:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70905892 Canada 11/27/2015 12:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 70834962 Argentina 11/27/2015 12:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I know, and that's the thing. Most americans on GLP would like non-whites to stay the hell out of USA, but they call themselves Christians. You can't have it both ways, at the core Christianity is egalitarian, all humans are equal in the eyes of God. The instinct to preserve ones races and culture, and strive for the best possible society, and protect it from the dangers of egalitarianism (communism) is polar opposite of Christianity. So what are you, Christian or a Nazi? They weren't Christian, and you know it. But they would had preserved better than anyone the European heritage, and no muslim would've set foot on Europe. Christianity paved the way for liberalism, liberalism leads to Communism. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68611762 New Zealand 11/27/2015 12:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 70834962 Argentina 11/27/2015 12:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If it was based on what you percieve as 'true christian values', kept non-whites at bay, and united the western world under a common flag, the banner of Jesus, to fight (if necessary) against the rising Muslim onslaught. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70834962 It would overthrow democracy and all corrupt officials, prohibit usury, print its own interest free money, and transform and eventually unite the Catholic Church with the new overpowered religious State. Borders would be closed (only trading allowed) and all non-whites encouraged and to leave and supported, violently kicked out if refused. It would allow nations to remain sovereign, but they would have to follow the dictates of the 'empire' in times of crisis, and certain laws based on moral principles coming straight from the Bible as interpreted by the most capable minds. Would you support this order? Biblical moral principles are excellent standards, what's your issue against living right and respecting your fellow man? Any Christian who lives by biblical standards would never uphold some fleshy idea of supremacy. When Christ died on the cross, He made a way for every race. If you are in Christ, regardless of your race, you are my brother. Thats why a true Christian theocracy would look like the soviet state, plus the christ |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 70834962 Argentina 11/27/2015 12:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 70834962 Argentina 11/27/2015 12:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Look bro, as an American I support the idea that we all have rights given to us by the creator. Quoting: Jeffersons Blackberry Don't fug with me and I won't fug with you. Sharia no, democracy no, a (true)representive republic? The best idea to date. :gun: Good. Now is the time to get back your republic, as envisioned by the founding fathers. You'll find their perspective had nothing to do with Christianity. |
jpop User ID: 70792523 United States 11/27/2015 12:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I know, and that's the thing. Most americans on GLP would like non-whites to stay the hell out of USA, but they call themselves Christians. You can't have it both ways, at the core Christianity is egalitarian, all humans are equal in the eyes of God. The instinct to preserve ones races and culture, and strive for the best possible society, and protect it from the dangers of egalitarianism (communism) is polar opposite of Christianity. So what are you, Christian or a Nazi? They weren't Christian, and you know it. But they would had preserved better than anyone the European heritage, and no muslim would've set foot on Europe. Christianity paved the way for liberalism, liberalism leads to Communism. You have no idea what you're spouting off about. Are you kidding? Is this a joke? |
Jeffersons Blackberry User ID: 70078340 United States 11/27/2015 12:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Look bro, as an American I support the idea that we all have rights given to us by the creator. Quoting: Jeffersons Blackberry Don't fug with me and I won't fug with you. Sharia no, democracy no, a (true)representive republic? The best idea to date. Good. Now is the time to get back your republic, as envisioned by the founding fathers. You'll find their perspective had nothing to do with Christianity. I fully understand that, but the forefathers relied on the average Americans "faith" to solidify their ideas. Jefferson, who is my favorite, wasn't Christian. I don't require my countrymen to believe as I. Just don't come telling me what to believe. “To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.”; Thomas Jefferson |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70661213 Canada 11/27/2015 12:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 70834962 Argentina 11/27/2015 12:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I know, and that's the thing. Most americans on GLP would like non-whites to stay the hell out of USA, but they call themselves Christians. You can't have it both ways, at the core Christianity is egalitarian, all humans are equal in the eyes of God. The instinct to preserve ones races and culture, and strive for the best possible society, and protect it from the dangers of egalitarianism (communism) is polar opposite of Christianity. So what are you, Christian or a Nazi? They weren't Christian, and you know it. But they would had preserved better than anyone the European heritage, and no muslim would've set foot on Europe. Christianity paved the way for liberalism, liberalism leads to Communism. You have no idea what you're spouting off about. Are you kidding? Is this a joke? Do you support having non-whites on U.S soil? Are you a Christian? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70904605 United States 11/27/2015 12:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65377317 Bulgaria 11/27/2015 12:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If it was based on what you percieve as 'true christian values', kept non-whites at bay, and united the western world under a common flag, the banner of Jesus, to fight (if necessary) against the rising Muslim onslaught. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70834962 It would overthrow democracy and all corrupt officials, prohibit usury, print its own interest free money, and transform and eventually unite the Catholic Church with the new overpowered religious State. Borders would be closed (only trading allowed) and all non-whites encouraged and to leave and supported, violently kicked out if refused. It would allow nations to remain sovereign, but they would have to follow the dictates of the 'empire' in times of crisis, and certain laws based on moral principles coming straight from the Bible as interpreted by the most capable minds. Would you support this order? Biblical moral principles are excellent standards, what's your issue against living right and respecting your fellow man? Any Christian who lives by biblical standards would never uphold some fleshy idea of supremacy. When Christ died on the cross, He made a way for every race. If you are in Christ, regardless of your race, you are my brother. You lost me there...that is your standard not mine...I want to retain the freedom of wearing mixed fabrics without being threaten of eternal damnation or other bullshit. The bible....as the torah and quran support slavery, killing of anyone with any idiotic excuse etc etc etc is there bibles circulating where all the bullshit has been edited out to not make you christian look bad?? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16128042 United States 11/27/2015 12:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Evangelical/Judeo Pre-trib Rapture Christians are having orgasms right about now. They are so insane they actually think being at the doorsteps of WW111 is wonderful. They actually think they qualify for heaven and will be whisked away into the clouds right before WW111 kicks off. The war they had a big hand in starting. These insane fools are going to take us all down. They are as crazy as the "chosen ones" and the Muslims if not more so. All of them should be rounded up and put in nut houses for being a danger to themselves as well as everyone else. . . |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 70834962 Argentina 11/27/2015 12:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Look bro, as an American I support the idea that we all have rights given to us by the creator. Quoting: Jeffersons Blackberry Don't fug with me and I won't fug with you. Sharia no, democracy no, a (true)representive republic? The best idea to date. :gun: Good. Now is the time to get back your republic, as envisioned by the founding fathers. You'll find their perspective had nothing to do with Christianity. I fully understand that, but the forefathers relied on the average Americans "faith" to solidify their ideas. Jefferson, who is my favorite, wasn't Christian. I don't require my countrymen to believe as I. Just don't come telling me what to believe. :tiphat: All cool, but what would solidify and keep together such Republic is your countrymen belief/faith on the Constitution. So you do kinda require your countrymen to believe as you do, to live lawfully and peacefuly. The point of this thread is that a society set of moral/values is what keeps any form of government strong, and a decay in principles leads to what we have now, which is a joke. Strong empires had strong leadership, with a strict moral conduct, and the whole population had to follow it; regardless of religion/belief. Catholicism was a mixture of christianity and the old pagan tradition which it conquered, that's why it endured for so long. Christianity and imperialism are opposed. |
Wondering Mind User ID: 22054163 United States 11/27/2015 12:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No I would not ever support a theocracy. I would not ever support a national theocracy even if it was Christian. People have no control over who is elected except the choices of a few they are given. Right here right now and the majority of anything national is not at all national. It is global corporate government. It is a house of merchandise and that being aggressive pirating. It is no different than the days of empires pirate ships and competing one empire kingdom against the other. And warring and sabotaging continually over it. The churches that you would get on your backs in this nation as of today are not Christian at all right now. They are the same as what you see in the shipping lanes of the pirating one. Liars, thieves, schemers and avarice driven as well as stooges for political propaganda to their master. Some not even pushing for their nation except to send it to war for another not even ours. Church is not what it used to be and what small little ones with few members are they stay to their selves and and have little. I will never support the men of politics being the head of any church and it being our government. Or any other form of political religion. That is not religion that is political. That is worldly and men not God. Church is safer out in their church and there but not in the governemtn seats. Nightmare it would be a nightmare and draws all the worst kind in for the worst reasons. The most precious things are the simple things in life, always present in the simplest of minds. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 70834962 Argentina 11/27/2015 12:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Evangelical/Judeo Pre-trib Rapture Christians are having orgasms right about now. They are so insane they actually think being at the doorsteps of WW111 is wonderful. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16128042 They actually think they qualify for heaven and will be whisked away into the clouds right before WW111 kicks off. The war they had a big hand in starting. These insane fools are going to take us all down. They are as crazy as the "chosen ones" and the Muslims if not more so. All of them should be rounded up and put in nut houses for being a danger to themselves as well as everyone else. . . Yes, them 'chosen ones' are really good at controlling sheeple.. their goal being our complete annihilation. Inciting a religious war on the 21st century, now that's crazy. All sides being played against each other, again |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68866174 United States 11/27/2015 12:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Horse hockey. I've seen what happens in Christian cults.t and these modern day apostles and prophets are running the scam ob the church and politicians. Real ones are rare. The ones laying hands on trump or.Cruz maybe hear from God but they lean heavily into witchcraft. . Still a a politician who has wisdom is better than a a politician who gets their counsel from greedy witches. |
Jeffersons Blackberry User ID: 70078340 United States 11/27/2015 12:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Look bro, as an American I support the idea that we all have rights given to us by the creator. Quoting: Jeffersons Blackberry Don't fug with me and I won't fug with you. Sharia no, democracy no, a (true)representive republic? The best idea to date. Good. Now is the time to get back your republic, as envisioned by the founding fathers. You'll find their perspective had nothing to do with Christianity. I fully understand that, but the forefathers relied on the average Americans "faith" to solidify their ideas. Jefferson, who is my favorite, wasn't Christian. I don't require my countrymen to believe as I. Just don't come telling me what to believe. All cool, but what would solidify and keep together such Republic is your countrymen belief/faith on the Constitution. So you do kinda require your countrymen to believe as you do, to live lawfully and peacefuly. The point of this thread is that a society set of moral/values is what keeps any form of government strong, and a decay in principles leads to what we have now, which is a joke. Strong empires had strong leadership, with a strict moral conduct, and the whole population had to follow it; regardless of religion/belief. Catholicism was a mixture of christianity and the old pagan tradition which it conquered, that's why it endured for so long. Christianity and imperialism are opposed. No, a strong country relies on those in charge to be responsible adults. Emotional children need guidance. Morality need not come from creed, but governance must be swift when dealing with infants. “To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.”; Thomas Jefferson |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 70834962 Argentina 11/27/2015 01:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No I would not ever support a theocracy. Quoting: Wondering Mind I would not ever support a national theocracy even if it was Christian. People have no control over who is elected except the choices of a few they are given. Right here right now and the majority of anything national is not at all national. It is global corporate government. It is a house of merchandise and that being aggressive pirating. It is no different than the days of empires pirate ships and competing one empire kingdom against the other. And warring and sabotaging continually over it. The churches that you would get on your backs in this nation as of today are not Christian at all right now. They are the same as what you see in the shipping lanes of the pirating one. Liars, thieves, schemers and avarice driven as well as stooges for political propaganda to their master. Some not even pushing for their nation except to send it to war for another not even ours. Church is not what it used to be and what small little ones with few members are they stay to their selves and and have little. I will never support the men of politics being the head of any church and it being our government. Or any other form of political religion. That is not religion that is political. That is worldly and men not God. Church is safer out in their church and there but not in the governemtn seats. Nightmare it would be a nightmare and draws all the worst kind in for the worst reasons. Separation of church and state looks good on paper, but eventually leads to the death of God, nihilism, as pointed by Nietzche. Otherwise, it depends on what the church 'preaches', its nature, what kind of state you'll get. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 70834962 Argentina 11/27/2015 01:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70834962 Good. Now is the time to get back your republic, as envisioned by the founding fathers. You'll find their perspective had nothing to do with Christianity. I fully understand that, but the forefathers relied on the average Americans "faith" to solidify their ideas. Jefferson, who is my favorite, wasn't Christian. I don't require my countrymen to believe as I. Just don't come telling me what to believe. :tiphat: All cool, but what would solidify and keep together such Republic is your countrymen belief/faith on the Constitution. So you do kinda require your countrymen to believe as you do, to live lawfully and peacefuly. The point of this thread is that a society set of moral/values is what keeps any form of government strong, and a decay in principles leads to what we have now, which is a joke. Strong empires had strong leadership, with a strict moral conduct, and the whole population had to follow it; regardless of religion/belief. Catholicism was a mixture of christianity and the old pagan tradition which it conquered, that's why it endured for so long. Christianity and imperialism are opposed. No, a strong country relies on those in charge to be responsible adults. Emotional children need guidance. Morality need not come from creed, but governance must be swift when dealing with infants. :usaflag: I respect true patriots. Get your country back on its feet. |
Dwillss User ID: 67871192 Canada 11/27/2015 01:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That's the problem, you can't see beyond the flesh. To even present such a question reveals a narrow mind with no understanding of anything more in-depth than what can be seen, smelled, touch and tasted. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28939771 I second this " I'd rather be hated for who I am then loved for who I am not" |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 70834962 Argentina 11/27/2015 01:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I know, and that's the thing. Most americans on GLP would like non-whites to stay the hell out of USA, but they call themselves Christians. You can't have it both ways, at the core Christianity is egalitarian, all humans are equal in the eyes of God. The instinct to preserve ones races and culture, and strive for the best possible society, and protect it from the dangers of egalitarianism (communism) is polar opposite of Christianity. So what are you, Christian or a Nazi? They weren't Christian, and you know it. But they would had preserved better than anyone the European heritage, and no muslim would've set foot on Europe. Christianity paved the way for liberalism, liberalism leads to Communism. You have no idea what you're spouting off about. Are you kidding? Is this a joke? Here, I'll let someone smarter than you and me explain it. Christianity is at the root of the evil that has corrupted the West. This is the truth, and it does not admit uncertainty. In its frenetic subversion of every hierarchy, in its exaltation of the weak, the disinherited, those without lineage and without tradition; in its call to "love", to "believe", and to yield; in its rancor toward everything that is force, self-sufficiency, knowledge, and aristocracy; in its intolerant and proselytizing fanaticism, Christianity poisoned the greatness of the Roman Empire. Enemy of itself and of the world, this dark and barbarous wave remains the principal cause of the West's decline. Christianity - take note- is not to be confused with what passes today for the Christian religion: a dead stump cut off from the initial profound impulses. Having disrupted the unity of Rome, Christianity first infected the race of blonde Germanic barbarians, thanks to the Reformation, and then penetrated so deeply, tenaciously, and invisibly that it infused current European liberalism and democratism and all the other splendid fruits of the French Revolution up through anarchism and Bolshevism. Christianity today informs the very structure of modern society (typified by the Anglo-Saxon model) as well as modern science, law, illusory faith in technology's power. The latter are permeated by the will to equalize, the will to numbers; by the hatred of hierarchy, quality and difference; and by a collective and impersonal vision of society, a society based upon bonds between mutually inadequate men, worthy of a race of slaves in revolt. There is still more. Christianity's root sense of "passion" and orgasm was shaped by promiscuity of the Imperial plebes in an atmosphere of messianism and millenarianism. Opposed to the serene superiority of Roman rulers, to the Doric beauty of the Pindaric hero, to the harmonious, chaste intellectuality of philosophers and pagan initiates, Christianity has resurfaced today in the irrational cult of the "élan vital", in the chaotic impetuosity of contemporary activism and Faustianism. The latter are crude entities that overwhelm the individual and drive him toward what he wants least. Already theologized by Calvin as the equation between God's will in action in the world and the absolute predestination of beings, today this cult has become a religion: a religion of "Life", of "becoming", of the "pure act". I have alluded to a Mediterranean tradition. This is no myth but rather an archaic reality whose existence the profane historical sciences have only recently begun to suspect. The epic and magical legacy of an affirmative and active civilization, a civilization strong in knowledge and strong in science, this tradition first imprinted itself on the elites of Egyptian-Chaldaic civilization, of ancient Greece, of Etruscan civilization, and of other more mysterious civilizations whose echoes can be found in Syria, Mycenae, and the Baleares. Infused with the spirit of paganism, it was then borne by the mystery cults of the Mediterranean basin until, against the Judeo-Christian tide, it became Mithra: Mithra, the "ruler of the sun", "killer of the bull", symbol of those who, reborn in the "strongest force among all forces" are able to go beyond good and evil, lack, longing and passion. Two destinies, two indomitable cosmic forces thus appeared, clashing over the legacy of Roman splendor. The tradition of the mysteries, apparently overwhelmed, assumed a more subtle existence. It was passed from flame to flame, from initiate to initiate, in an uninterrupted though secret chain. Today it surfaces here and there (albeit in a confused manner) in figures such as Nietzsche, Weininger, Michelstaedter who feel crushed under the weight of a truth that, although it is too strong for them, will triumph with the advent of a new being who will brandish it, hard and cold, against the enemy in the great revolt and coming battle in which the West's fate will be determined. Anti-Europe means Anti-Christianity. And anti-Christianity consists in the Mediterranean classical, and pagan tradition that is our own. This must be perfectly clear. Without a return to such a tradition, no liberation will be possible, no true restoration, no transfer of spirit, power, and empire into the realm of values. But let not our "anti" give rise to misunderstandings. They, not we, are forces of negation. They are the ones who sapped Rome, contaminated Wisdom, and destroyed aristocracy in the name of a reign of sentimentalism and humanitarianism ruled by "enemies of the world". And they did so in order to exalt a superstition according to which God is an executed man and enslaver of other men whom he condemns to damnation unless "grace" intervenes on their behalf. No more foolish or absurd fable has ever been devised than that which treats paganism as a synonym for materiality and corruption, while Christianity is, instead, associated with purity and spirituality. Yet this superstition still manages to inform so much contemporary thinking! No. The living and immanent spirit, spirit actualized as initiatory knowledge and power, glory of kings and conquerors, was unknown to the Semitic contamination. But not to the Roman, Hellenic, and ancient Oriental races. And he who rebels against Christian corruption, against all that plagues today's Europe, is alone in knowing the meaning of affirmation. He is not a denier but an affirmer. So today in Rome we bear witness to the pagan tradition and invoke the restoration of Mediterranean values in a pagan imperialism. The person who speaks and who is joined in this same spiritual reality by others - isolated, impassive, and rigorously aristocratic souls opposed to this world of merchants, shut-ins, and deviants - dissolves into this higher reality, conveyed through him to the one in whom the fascist movement is today resumed. Will we manage to feel that this is not about words, utopias, or romantic abstractions? Will we manage to believe that the most positive and most powerful realities are waiting to be unearthed by beings capable of anything and everything (realities that will dwarf everything fascism has accomplished to this point)? Can we persuade ourselves that all this is truly possible and a thousand forces over in the darkness waiting for an outlet? The identification of our tradition with either the Christian or Catholic tradition is the most absurd of errors. Roman spirit is pagan spirit ('Romanita' e' paganita'), and the imperial restoration of which I have spoken would be meaningless if it is not, above all else, a pagan restoration. Nothing could be more contradictory than to proclaim the resurgence of Rome without remembering that Christianity was one of the principal reasons for Rome's downfall, or to invoke the empire without realizing that the entire Christian vision of life negates the empire's premises. So will fascism dare to take up the torch of the Mediterranean tradition here where the imperial eagles began their conquest of the world under the Augustan, solar, and regal power? Will fascism dare to take up the torch here in Rome where the ironic vestiges of the only hierarchy Christianity was ever able to devise (through self-deception) remains present? Better neither to hope nor to despair. Time will tell. Hegel said "the idea does not hurry", and what already is cannot be transmuted by what is not. The values that we affirm are that circumstances and men present themselves such that they can shape a given period of contingent historical and temporal things; that such an event is of less interest to us than those whose truths are impeded by this historical contingency. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 70834962 Argentina 11/27/2015 01:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70904436 Hong Kong 11/27/2015 01:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If it was based on what you percieve as 'true christian values', kept non-whites at bay, and united the western world under a common flag, the banner of Jesus, to fight (if necessary) against the rising Muslim onslaught. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70834962 It would overthrow democracy and all corrupt officials, prohibit usury, print its own interest free money, and transform and eventually unite the Catholic Church with the new overpowered religious State. Borders would be closed (only trading allowed) and all non-whites encouraged and to leave and supported, violently kicked out if refused. It would allow nations to remain sovereign, but they would have to follow the dictates of the 'empire' in times of crisis, and certain laws based on moral principles coming straight from the Bible as interpreted by the most capable minds. Would you support this order? Nope. Until Lord Yeshua himself comes back and cleans up the world, what you describe would only be a deception orchestrated by Lucifer. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 70834962 Argentina 11/27/2015 01:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If it was based on what you percieve as 'true christian values', kept non-whites at bay, and united the western world under a common flag, the banner of Jesus, to fight (if necessary) against the rising Muslim onslaught. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70834962 It would overthrow democracy and all corrupt officials, prohibit usury, print its own interest free money, and transform and eventually unite the Catholic Church with the new overpowered religious State. Borders would be closed (only trading allowed) and all non-whites encouraged and to leave and supported, violently kicked out if refused. It would allow nations to remain sovereign, but they would have to follow the dictates of the 'empire' in times of crisis, and certain laws based on moral principles coming straight from the Bible as interpreted by the most capable minds. Would you support this order? Nope. Until Lord Yeshua himself comes back and cleans up the world, what you describe would only be a deception orchestrated by Lucifer. Do you see this 'second coming' as violent or peaceful one? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70907404 Australia 11/27/2015 01:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Look bro, as an American I support the idea that we all have rights given to us by the creator. Quoting: Jeffersons Blackberry Don't fug with me and I won't fug with you. Sharia no, democracy no, a (true)representive republic? The best idea to date. :gun: you're a slave. you just don't realize it because FREEDUMBS |