Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,502 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 652,268
Pageviews Today: 833,916Threads Today: 210Posts Today: 2,353
06:54 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Satellite photos of UFO crash site

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 154405
United Kingdom
10/13/2006 06:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Satellite photos of UFO crash site
On May 20, 1953, some kind of unidentified aerial craft allegedly crashed in a desert site near Kingman, Arizona. Just twenty-two days later on June 11, 1953, and 200 miles straight north on a dry lake bed east of the Fishlake National Forest an agency of the U. S. government took two dozen photographs of this large triangular feature in the dry lake bed. The triangle measured approximately 4,400 feet long and 2,700 feet wide. The nearest small town to the lakebed is Garrison, Utah. Three miles away is the U.S. Forest Services Desert Research Experimental Station known as DRES (no longer an active research station).
It is believed that within this large triangular earthen feature is buried a UFO:
[link to terraserverusa.com]
Notice what looks like a drill sample test hole with tailings (tailings pile approx. 100 yards wide). There is possible survey work (CLEARLY artificial, straight-edged triangle formation) in the center of the supposed impact zone. Also notice the splatter pattern caused by the crash in the ground along the top edge of the triangle.
The crash site is 282 KM SW of Salt Lake City, Utah.
Latitude & Longitude coordinates of the triangle feature: 113W 40'29.83" by 38N 37'.

Many serious UFO investigators believe a UFO that was too large to remove is buried beneath this triangular patch, the area being given this shape by the UFO crash recovery team in order to hide as much as possible signs of the heavy impact made by the UFO. However, the area still looks significantly different to its surrounds in satellite photos and the presence of manmade marks in such an isolated area is a challenge for the UFO sceptic to explain.
Here is a 1997 TerraServer photo of the area taken from 30,000 ft: [link to terraserver-usa.com]
The site still shows remarkable detail even after 44 years of weather and erosion. Seen at low zoom, there are very suggestive signs, indicative of impact by a heavy object, of changes in the ground in the area leading up to the man-made triangle. Notice all the bright flecks indicative of sandy areas of different chemical composition that reflect different shades of light. These features of areas where the top levels of sand were stripped away by the violent impact of the UFO are absent from the surrounding region, which has more uniformity in its surface color.

We do not have to rely on just aerial photographs. Details about the dead aliens allegedly retrieved from the site given in a signed affadavit by someone claiming to have been part of the recovery team can be found at: [link to ufos.about.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 154653
United Kingdom
10/14/2006 09:27 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Satellite photos of UFO crash site
bump
Ninelives

User ID: 139028
United States
10/14/2006 09:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Satellite photos of UFO crash site
Just a burn mark from the last nuke war 250.000 years ago.

explosion
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 154653
United Kingdom
10/14/2006 09:32 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Satellite photos of UFO crash site
Just a burn mark from the last nuke war 250.000 years ago.

explosion
 Quoting: Ninelives



Be sensible. Or has GLP become the Comedy Shop for failed comics?
Ninelives

User ID: 139028
United States
10/14/2006 09:40 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Satellite photos of UFO crash site
SUPPRESSED INFORMATION DOWNLOADS

[link to www.holyhealthy.com]
The Roman

User ID: 154500
Italy
10/14/2006 09:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Satellite photos of UFO crash site
SUPPRESSED INFORMATION DOWNLOADS

[link to www.holyhealthy.com]
 Quoting: Ninelives


hard to download anything from that site...at 5kbs average..
Matter is light. Energy is light. We are all light beings.

-Albert Einstein-

My Hobby: [link to www.radiogalaxy.eu]

....and so came the time of the X° and last Crusade, for Truth and Liberation...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 152785
United States
10/14/2006 09:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Satellite photos of UFO crash site
On May 20, 1953, some kind of unidentified aerial craft allegedly crashed in a desert site near Kingman, Arizona. Just twenty-two days later on June 11, 1953, and 200 miles straight north on a dry lake bed east of the Fishlake National Forest an agency of the U. S. government took two dozen photographs of this large triangular feature in the dry lake bed. The triangle measured approximately 4,400 feet long and 2,700 feet wide. The nearest small town to the lakebed is Garrison, Utah. Three miles away is the U.S. Forest Services Desert Research Experimental Station known as DRES (no longer an active research station).
It is believed that within this large triangular earthen feature is buried a UFO:
[link to terraserverusa.com]
Notice what looks like a drill sample test hole with tailings (tailings pile approx. 100 yards wide). There is possible survey work (CLEARLY artificial, straight-edged triangle formation) in the center of the supposed impact zone. Also notice the splatter pattern caused by the crash in the ground along the top edge of the triangle.
The crash site is 282 KM SW of Salt Lake City, Utah.
Latitude & Longitude coordinates of the triangle feature: 113W 40'29.83" by 38N 37'.

Many serious UFO investigators believe a UFO that was too large to remove is buried beneath this triangular patch, the area being given this shape by the UFO crash recovery team in order to hide as much as possible signs of the heavy impact made by the UFO. However, the area still looks significantly different to its surrounds in satellite photos and the presence of manmade marks in such an isolated area is a challenge for the UFO sceptic to explain.
Here is a 1997 TerraServer photo of the area taken from 30,000 ft: [link to terraserver-usa.com]
The site still shows remarkable detail even after 44 years of weather and erosion. Seen at low zoom, there are very suggestive signs, indicative of impact by a heavy object, of changes in the ground in the area leading up to the man-made triangle. Notice all the bright flecks indicative of sandy areas of different chemical composition that reflect different shades of light. These features of areas where the top levels of sand were stripped away by the violent impact of the UFO are absent from the surrounding region, which has more uniformity in its surface color.

We do not have to rely on just aerial photographs. Details about the dead aliens allegedly retrieved from the site given in a signed affadavit by someone claiming to have been part of the recovery team can be found at: [link to ufos.about.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 154405


Pretty much falls apart when you use [link to maps.google.com]

with coordinates of:

38.63172 -113.67448

Zoom in and you'll see there's nothing special going on. That's what you get when you use a crappy aerial photograph.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 152785
United States
10/14/2006 09:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Satellite photos of UFO crash site
I'll make it easier for you:

[link to maps.google.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 154653
United Kingdom
10/14/2006 09:58 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Satellite photos of UFO crash site
I'll make it easier for you:

[link to maps.google.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 152785


Nothing going on? You have got to be kidding! It STILL looks anomalous - even 53 years later. Nice try. But your dismissal doesn't pull any force. The origianl pics are just as good as these more recent ones Any way, you either ignore or are ignorant of the considerable circumstantial evidence provided by eyewitnesses over the years. Before offering knee-jerk reactions, do some research.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 154653
United Kingdom
10/14/2006 10:03 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Satellite photos of UFO crash site
And don't give me the argument that photos are more reliable when they are more recent. The opposite is true here. Over time, anomalous feature are eroded by wind and rain. Hence the older photos, which CLEARLY do reveal man-made straight lines forming triangles, and survey post holes, are more reliable for deciding whether this area really was turned over by the military. Your logic is back-to-front, I am afraid.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 152785
United States
10/14/2006 10:07 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Satellite photos of UFO crash site
And don't give me the argument that photos are more reliable when they are more recent. The opposite is true here. Over time, anomalous feature are eroded by wind and rain. Hence the older photos, which CLEARLY do reveal man-made straight lines forming triangles, and survey post holes, are more reliable for deciding whether this area really was turned over by the military. Your logic is back-to-front, I am afraid.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 154653


If you think something's there, why don't you truck your silly ass out there with a metal detector.

Here's a map. If you're so convinced take a trip.

[link to maps.google.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 154653
United Kingdom
10/14/2006 10:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Satellite photos of UFO crash site
Ah. I see you have given up the argument by resorting to name-calling. If you were versed in the subject, you would know that there has been A GREAT DEAL OF FIELD INVESTIGATION in the last couple of years. In fact, one of the world's most experienced investigators into UFOs, an Emmy-award winner, has reported to an international conference the results of her investigations.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 149449
United Kingdom
10/14/2006 10:27 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Satellite photos of UFO crash site
Are there any pictures from before 1954?

To be honest this just looks like a dried up lake bed you can see the small channels that run off it!

What were the results of the tests you say were carried out?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 154653
United Kingdom
10/14/2006 11:08 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Satellite photos of UFO crash site
Are there any pictures from before 1954?

To be honest this just looks like a dried up lake bed you can see the small channels that run off it!

What were the results of the tests you say were carried out?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 149449


It's the photos taken in 1953 and 1997, not current ones, that clearly show that the ground has been dug over into the rough shape of a triangle. No, there were no satellite photos in 1953. The ones take by the US government were from a high-flying plane. Of course, after all these years, much of the human-made features would have become too blurred to convince some people who have not seen the earlier ones. So you need to examine the earlier photos of 1953 and 1997, not the current satellite photos.

Among many other out-of-place features found by this investigator were a heavily padlocked door set into the side of a mound that stretched over the site.
For details, go to [link to www.earthfiles.com] where you will see four reports entitled "An alleged 1953 UFO crash and burial near Garrison, Utah." (11/10/05 & 11/1105). To read them, you will need to subscribe.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 33106993
United States
01/18/2014 07:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Satellite photos of UFO crash site
DRES

News








We're dropping truth bombs like it's the end of days!