Please God and GLP.. Help Expose these Criminals in Oklahoma

Bump for Awareness of the Crimes

I've transcribed the full complaint as sworn to by an officer of the Norman Police Dept. I have omitted information that would identify both you and other parties involved.

"I observed a video of McBeth at the above address at 0015 hours. McBeth was tearing out flowers from the front garden of Katherine (omitted) who has a VPO against McBeth (case # omitted). After McBeth destroyed the flowers he approaches the front door with a knife in his hand. McBeth then picks up the rocking chair from the front porch and walks South out of view of the camera. McBeth is contacted at approximately 1040 hours at (address omitted) his residence where he stated that he has the rocking chair in the backyard. The chair was recovered from the residence and McBeth was arrested on the below charges and transported to CCJC.

1. VPO violation
2. Larceny
3. KCSP
4. Vandalism"

I'm curious as to which of these charges you contest.

From examining the documents of the case it appears that your bail was set not only for the charges of concealing stolen property and and Petit Larceny but for a VPO violation and vandalism as well, this would explain the additional value of bond. If you indeed had a knife during the commission of the described act I'm somewhat surprised that you were granted bond at all. I do not say this in an accusatory manner but simply as comparison to other cases involving a weapon and VPO violation. Judges tend to be much less sympathetic to a defendant when such circumstances are present.

Elements contributing to your bond value are your past cases:

Issue: PROTECTIVE ORDER (PO)
Filed by: (omitted petitioner)
Filed Date: 04/10/2013


TELE, PLACING OBSCENE/HARASSING PHONE CALLS , in violation of 21 O.S. 1172
Date Of Offense: 08/14/2013

Per this case you are accused of threatening the PO holder through and as well as her sister. A warrant was issued on this charge


Count as Filed: VPO, VIOLATION OF PROTECTIVE ORDER , in violation of 22 O.S. 60.6
Date Of Offense: 01/14/2014

Although this charge was ultimately discharged due to eventual adherence to court order this was only after a violation and warrant issue.


I do see were your original bond although not granted at the $4000 per your request was reduced to $10,000. If you study similar cases you will find that the bond granted to you is not exorbitant and in fact would be significantly higher in other states for comparable charges.

I do not mean to imply that you are actually guilty of any of the above only that these are the charges against you that would be weighed in the determination of bond. When it comes to judges facts are simply black and white with no regard to circumstance. It is at times unfair but you will find this to be the case in most courts across the country. You may very well be, probably are a great person. You may have had good and logical reason for your actions but these things do not matter to the judge when he/she sets bail, it is all about the charges. Most assume that the truth will out in the end and that the bond will be exonerated, some simply don't care either way. Once again, not always fair but it is what it is.

From the documents I have read through it looks as if you have good council. That's what is going to make or break you on this case. But please take a small bit of advice, don't make anymore post here or elsewhere containing the identifying information that you have shared here. Not only is it not safe it could very well result in making your case worse. It is common place now for DA's and plaintiffs attorneys to do precursory social media research for upcoming trials in hopes of finding derogatory information to help build a stronger case to bring against you. Please be cautious and protect yourself from such possibilities. Please notify your attorney of the thread you've created here so that he can be prepared if it is used in court.

I wish that I could offer you more but I am very limited on what I can advise without potential repercussions to myself and position. If you do have questions I well answer those that I am lawfully permitted to do.

I'm sorry that I don't bring you better news but I wish you the best of luck in this matter.