Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,608 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 457,782
Pageviews Today: 582,725Threads Today: 111Posts Today: 2,286
04:45 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

RADIONICS, PSYCHOTRONICS, PSIONICS, PRAYER revisited, "Patient heal thyself"

 
global freedom now
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 155064
Canada
10/20/2006 01:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
RADIONICS, PSYCHOTRONICS, PSIONICS, PRAYER revisited, "Patient heal thyself"
Hey all of you truth/freedomfighters out there. I have updated my site [link to www.globalfreedomnow.org] with links to radionic devices. Just in case some of you are interested in undistracted continuous 24/7 meditative prayer state. Radionics is able to achieve what we wish to manifest because it is not distracted and continues generating our desired intentions 24/7. By creating a conjoined global prayer/ radionics network we shorten the amount of time it takes to fulfill our wishes. So lets get the STICK on manifesting the following:

Eliminate/ deprogram all negative destructive energies of whatever origin from our lives now
Attain all positive supportive energies of whatever origin into our lives now
Attain balanced harmonious existence with our selves, environment, Universe, Creator now
Attain balanced health, wealth and happiness now
Cause total global balance, peace, harmony and freedom now

Namaste
90%+/- of all physical problems have an underlying psychological root. Any unresolved emotions are the ones attracted into the participators life experience over and over again until these unresolved patterns are changed and integrated. That which is resisted, denied, suppressed or feared is a profound call for help -asGOODasGOD.com
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 152492
United States
10/20/2006 01:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: RADIONICS, PSYCHOTRONICS, PSIONICS, PRAYER revisited, "Patient heal thyself"
Are you profiting from the sale of the devices listed on your site?
globalfreedomnow.org (OP)

User ID: 155064
Canada
10/20/2006 02:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: RADIONICS, PSYCHOTRONICS, PSIONICS, PRAYER revisited, "Patient heal thyself"
Are you profiting from the sale of the devices listed on your site?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 152492

[link to www.globalfreedomnow.org] Profits the populace with wisdom and tools of empowerment/ freedom. This is a global healing endeavor!
90%+/- of all physical problems have an underlying psychological root. Any unresolved emotions are the ones attracted into the participators life experience over and over again until these unresolved patterns are changed and integrated. That which is resisted, denied, suppressed or feared is a profound call for help -asGOODasGOD.com
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 152492
United States
10/20/2006 02:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: RADIONICS, PSYCHOTRONICS, PSIONICS, PRAYER revisited, "Patient heal thyself"
Are you profiting from the sale of the devices listed on your site?

[link to www.globalfreedomnow.org] Profits the populace with wisdom and tools of empowerment/ freedom. This is a global healing endeavor!
 Quoting: globalfreedomnow.org


That's not an answer, is it?

So all of your posts are ad-spam?
globalfreedomnow.org (OP)

User ID: 155064
Canada
10/20/2006 02:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: RADIONICS, PSYCHOTRONICS, PSIONICS, PRAYER revisited, "Patient heal thyself"
Are you profiting from the sale of the devices listed on your site?

[link to www.globalfreedomnow.org] Profits the populace with wisdom and tools of empowerment/ freedom. This is a global healing endeavor!


That's not an answer, is it?

So all of your posts are ad-spam?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 152492



Prayer is not spam, it is a purification of karma. Being empowered with wisdom and age is not spam. Creating a FREE global planetary wide prayer network is not spam. There are no membership fees to join/ partake in my website. CIO
90%+/- of all physical problems have an underlying psychological root. Any unresolved emotions are the ones attracted into the participators life experience over and over again until these unresolved patterns are changed and integrated. That which is resisted, denied, suppressed or feared is a profound call for help -asGOODasGOD.com
chiptruth

User ID: 135078
United States
12/01/2006 02:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: RADIONICS, PSYCHOTRONICS, PSIONICS, PRAYER revisited, "Patient heal thyself"
if that person was trying to smash the state they did a pisspoor job...

------------------------------
Subject: Re: Energized shielding/

>I'm convinced that most, if not all supposed successes against true remote mind control as it is being done in the US (not just some less sophisticated impingement of energy on the
>corporal being) are just ruses. Whatever they are using, it is extremely penetrating, yet it is somehow able to interact with
>matter in the brain.
==============================
You say "ruses", I use the term "decoying."

When you add in the perp equipment's
injection-anywhere capability, even directional
attacks can be spoofed, making decoy sources
child's play. They can make a harmless
telephone junction box, say, emit powerful
microwave to convince a target that box is
targeting them. The goal is, obviously, to get
a target to complain to police that the telephone
junction box is harassing them, which will lead
to the target being tagged as mentally ill.

I do think that our members almost entirely
ignore the decoying possibility, much to our
confusion and detriment. To think that such
a sophisticated organization as the perps
would never think of decoying/ruses is very
shortsighted, in my opinion.

* Even with extreme decoying, we can still
look forward to eventual solutions, as long
as we keep ourselves AWARE of the full
range of capabilities the e-harassment perps
possess.

Not every target has experienced the most
advanced attacks, and so will naturally
doubt they are really happening. The way
I would handle that is, just keep reports of
things like, say, injection into the environment
at any point, on your "mental back burner."
In other words, don't "buy" it 100%, but at
least consider it at maybe an internal 50%
credibility level when considering your
experiments and countermeasures.

It seems short sighted to totally reject reports
by a number of other members over time as
"faulty perception" on their part, and you
do have a RANGE of credibility from 0% to
100%. You are not forced to either outright
believe or reject reports - assign a credibility
score, and let time determine whether your
internal score goes up or down.
chiptruth

User ID: 135078
United States
12/01/2006 02:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: RADIONICS, PSYCHOTRONICS, PSIONICS, PRAYER revisited, "Patient heal thyself"
Terms Other Than Mind Control
------------------------------------------

This article is a re-edited version of an earlier mailing list
article. The subject is whether the term "mind control" does more
harm than good. The focus here is word usage.

One problem with the term "mind control" is the "kook" association
reinforced in the popular culture as well as by certain victims (or
provocateurs) who sound "crazy." (The cointelpro-style provocateurs
want to keep the real victims discredited, if possible, because they
work for the victimizers.) Many other people are just citizens who
are kept ignorant of the known and documented history of mind control
and the state of the technology right now. Because of the popular
culture, these people may tend to want to ridicule the term mind
control. On the other hand, not all the popular culture references to
mind control are harmful to the victims; there are some deeper and
sharper popular culture references which take it seriously and raise
the ethical questions. Mind control also has a built-in "name
recognition" in the population, so perhaps someone who once ridiculed
it and learned that it all exists right now would be able to grow up
and consider the matter seriously.

One can either move from term to term as they are worn out, or stick
to the usual term even with its connotational baggage. I tend to use
different terms in different situations, for example avoiding the term
"mind control" in official correspondence except with a caution to the
reader before the term is introduced. But normally I tend to stick to
the popular term "mind control" (don't let the disinfo agents have
it). There is a good argument for not using the term, and good people
can certainly disagree on that point. Obviously not all people have
to use the exact same term if we all know we are talking about the
same thing.

Should the term be based on science? Or law? Or the poetry of
suffering? Or something else?

In science and experimental psychology there are physical quantities
and there are psychophysical quantities. (This is the objective
versus the subjective.) The classic example is of the frequency of a
signal versus its pitch. The frequency is what you measure with a
scientific instrument, while the pitch is the subjective sensation you
perceive. They are different things, but (due to the long evolution
of science) frequency is close enough to pitch when measured
physically versus psychophysically that people sometimes ignore the
distinction.

Many of the microwave hearing articles deal with the issues of "what
are the psychophysical correlates of the beam's physical parameters."
Knowing this one can then technologically create the physical event,
causing the psychophysical event in the person's "mind." That is, you
can modulate a microwave beam with the right pulsed waveform so that
if you "illuminate" a person with the beam he or she perceives as
sound whatever signal has been modulated onto it, including voice
signals.

So should a single scientific term be a physical description or a
psychophysical one? Can you rigorously define a term that encompasses
both?

There are different sorts of mind control, yet we all basically know
what we mean by "mind control victim." It is a specific case of
torture victim, which is a legal term in addition to being understood
in common language. Can we talk about mind control without talking
about victims? Not really, because we are assuming the nonconsensual
application of the technology in the fashion of rape. But in a larger
sense we are dealing with "mind rape" as the violent crime committed
with the nonconsensual use of brain interface technology. Of course
brain interface technology is only one aspect, and might not apply to
some victims of, say, PANDORA-style nonconsensual behavior and
conditioning experiments with microwaves of all sorts. And what about
all the mind control drugging victims like in the LSD experiments?
What about the victims of abusive and intentionally harmful hypnosis
techniques? (Politically there are few enough direct, witting victims
who are willing to talk about it and few enough people who care that
all MC victims need to stick together.)

In the spook business, the IG of the CIA called mind control
operations "clandestine operations to control human behavior" in a
report from the early 1960s.

Finally, would Frederick Douglass have preferred a scientific term in
his powerful speeches for human dignity? This is another area, the
real human experience of the torture victims crying out for freedom
and justice.

I do not think we're going to find a single common term that meets our
needs. We might be able to create or choose one and imbue it with the
same meaning which those on this list already know for the term mind
control. Perhaps in the spirit of science we could do a taxonomy of
all the sorts of mind control and the descriptive term for each, all
under the common root node of an overarching term. A cluster analysis
of victim survey reports might provide some useful info there, but
*good* experimental studies are hard to do, cost money, are subject to
co-optation by victimizers, and victims are not exactly in the best
positions carry them out or trust those claiming to.

There was a thread on some mailing lists a while back about whether
the term mind control is the right one for activists to use. These
are all the terms suggested by various people there, plus a few more.
Remember the target audience in letter writing, etc.


aggravated assault and battery with microwave weapons
assaults with improvised electronic and non-electronic
(pressure driven mechanical) components
assaults with classified weapons
behavior modification torture victims
biological process control
brain bugging
braintapping
conspicuous surveillance
defamation of character
directed energy weapons
electromagnetic harassment victim
electromagnetic pulse weapons
electromagnetic weapons
electronic mind control
electronic torture
high-tech surveillance and harassment victim
human biological process control
mind control torture victims
mind control victim
neuroinfluencing weapon
nonconsensual behavior control operation victim
nonconsensual behavior modification operation victim
nonconsensual behavior modification victim
non-lethal weapons
performance-degrading weapons
psycho-correction technology
psycho-electronics
psychological deception operations
psychological warfare
psychotronics
radio frequency weapons
remote monitoring of EEG sounds
sleep deprivation
sleep-disrupting weapons
targeted individual
thought inference via sensor data analysis
torture
torture-level surveillance and harassment operation victim
torture-level surveillance and harassment victim
torture victims
voice-to-skull covert operation victim
zapping victim


--
Mind Control: TT&P ==> [link to www.datafilter.com]
Allen Barker

News








This Flag Represents The Principle, "Fight For What You Believe In."



This Is The Rebel Flag, "You're Either Free Or You're Not."

-------------