Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,870 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 908,122
Pageviews Today: 1,562,365Threads Today: 614Posts Today: 11,521
05:17 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Were the Beatles Mind Controlled Illuminati Agents and Was Paul Replaced in '66?

 
1966
User ID: 901110
United States
08/01/2010 04:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were the Beatles Mind Controlled Illuminati Agents and Was Paul Replaced in '66?
It could be. With a little bit of looking around at what is out there on the web, this is one possible timeline.

....
March 25, 1966
Friday
Oluf Nissen photographic studio, London. Photographic session with Robert Whitaker. `Butcher' photographs, and 1966 official handout photos taken. , Last public photo session by original Paul.

June 3
Friday
(Date of end of recording contract with EMI Records.)

Jun 22
Wednesday-
End of `Revolver' sessions. Last Beatle sessions with original Paul. But not the end of original Paul material. Many hours of original Paul material existed at Abbey Road and could have been incorporated into later albums, EPs, and single releases.

Wed.
6/22/66
INTERVIEW RECORDING: Interview taping and filming upon arrival in Hamburg, Germany. Hamburg Airport Aired UNK Unreleased. The Beatles begin their last European tour. It was customary, at each stop, to film their arrival and hold a press conference. (Note the lack of transit time following the end of the Revolver sessions and their arrival in Germany). This is made possible by the Beatle doubles;)

Jun 26
Sunday
Doubles Arrival in Hamburg. Concert at the Erns Merck Halle, Hamburg. End of tour of Germany. In downtown, fans face the police hours before the show.

Jun 26
Sunday
John Double visits Astrid, who gives him some letters written by Stuart shortly before dying.

Jun 27
Monday
Flight from Hamburg to Tokyo. The plane must land in Anchorage, Alaska, (cover story: to avoid a typhoon).

Jun 27
Monday
Flight from Hamburg to Tokyo. The plane and the doppelgangers are landed in Anchorage, Alaska, (reason given, to avoid a typhoon) Real reason-Original Paul killed in a car accident (June 26) in England. The plan is put into play.

Wed.
6/29/66
INTERVIEW RECORDINGS: Interview taping and filming upon arrival at Haneda Airport in Tokyo, Japan at 3:39 am and limo ride to hotel. (Shown on the "Anthology" video which gives the date as Thursday 6/30/66.) Aired UNK Released 1984 Video 1996
Press conference at the "room of beni-shinju (deep red pearl)" of the Toyota Hilton Hotel at 3:20pm. Unreleased if filmed or recorded. ( I suspect the 30 June 1966 arrival date is correct.) Certain distortions in the timeline reporting maybe were made in error. However it does seem that if Paul were dead a significant pause would have been necessary to develop a workable plan to deal with the problem.


Aug 01
Aired 8/6/66 Unreleased
Saturday
Double Paul appears on David Frost's `Phonograph', broadcast by BBC-radio. This is the first attempt to pass double Paul as original Paul. Double Paul passes the test.

Aug 11
Thursday
The Beatle doppelgangers arrive in the Logan Airport, Boston to begin their North America tour.

Aug 29
Monday
Concert at the Candlestick Park, San Francisco. Last Beatles doubles concert. Tony Barrow films and records the concert.

Oct 14
Friday
It is stated that Northern Songs Limited made a profit of 614,000 pounds in 1965.

Oct 28
Friday
Brian Epstein tells Sid Bernstein that there are no plans for the next North American tour.

Nov 09
Wednesday
Brian phones Arthur Howes, telling him they won't accept more live performances.

Nov 09
Wednesday
John visits the exhibition `Unfinished Paintings And Objects By Yoko Ono', at the Indica Gallery. [6 November, as infered from poster of exhibition?]

Nov 09

Wednesday
Brian reports that the Beatles contract with EMI has expired, although a new one is close to finalization. Long negotiations were had due to Paul Doppelganger replacing Paul original.

Nov 09
Wednesday
Paul's false death date. The beginning of the disinfo PR campaign to hide the true date of Paul's demise. A necessary part of the plan since the Beatles(doubles) were on tour in the USA when original Paul was killed in a car crash.

Nov 10
Thursday
The newspapers report there will be no more Beatles' tours.

this is one possible timeline.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1054446
Netherlands
08/01/2010 04:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were the Beatles Mind Controlled Illuminati Agents and Was Paul Replaced in '66?
....someone bringing back a solid gold thread from memory lane

we're playing tonight isee
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 964953
United States
08/01/2010 04:24 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were the Beatles Mind Controlled Illuminati Agents and Was Paul Replaced in '66?
[link to www.indianinthemachine.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 947860
United States
08/01/2010 04:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were the Beatles Mind Controlled Illuminati Agents and Was Paul Replaced in '66?
photos make it beyond obvious it's a different person from 66 to 67.
plus if the below link content is legit...

[link to www.paulreallyisdead.com]
Da Swede

User ID: 1054483
Sweden
08/01/2010 09:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were the Beatles Mind Controlled Illuminati Agents and Was Paul Replaced in '66?
bump
There are lies, damned lies and 9-11!
[link to bryce2-2u.freeservers.com]
chattermouse
User ID: 261468
United States
08/01/2010 10:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were the Beatles Mind Controlled Illuminati Agents and Was Paul Replaced in '66?
this is the site you want if you really care about seeing the truth for yourself, it is really undeniable once you compare the pictures of Paul and "Faul" with your own eyes... [link to digilander.libero.it]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 964953
United States
08/01/2010 10:32 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were the Beatles Mind Controlled Illuminati Agents and Was Paul Replaced in '66?
one thing to consider....

Paul wasn't fully grown in 1964....and his nutrition improved dramtically that year....his family was poor....
chattermouse
User ID: 261468
United States
08/01/2010 10:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were the Beatles Mind Controlled Illuminati Agents and Was Paul Replaced in '66?
One thing to consider...

Sugarelf is a shilltarded troll whose probable goal is Cyber Herding, judging by the sensationalist hippy trippy new age bullshit link it posted.
333
User ID: 716020
United States
08/01/2010 11:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were the Beatles Mind Controlled Illuminati Agents and Was Paul Replaced in '66?
The Beatles were the best band ever.Dylan before each concert gives praise to JESUS CHRIST.
INK
User ID: 1049638
United States
08/01/2010 11:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were the Beatles Mind Controlled Illuminati Agents and Was Paul Replaced in '66?
This particular rabbit is hole is very deep. Also, do some research on Laurel Canyon in the late sixties, early seventies. It's all rotten.
INK
User ID: 1049638
United States
08/01/2010 11:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were the Beatles Mind Controlled Illuminati Agents and Was Paul Replaced in '66?
one thing to consider....

Paul wasn't fully grown in 1964....and his nutrition improved dramtically that year....his family was poor....
 Quoting: Sugarelf

Bullshit.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1033502
United Kingdom
08/01/2010 11:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were the Beatles Mind Controlled Illuminati Agents and Was Paul Replaced in '66?
i don't reckon the beatles were agents.
and as for lsd i thought leary was originally of the same mindset as huxley, ie keep it for the elites, the scientists intellectuals and artists etc. then along came kesey with a whole different idea : )
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1050536
United States
08/01/2010 11:30 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were the Beatles Mind Controlled Illuminati Agents and Was Paul Replaced in '66?
I think Leary admitted to being a CIA asset right?
 Quoting: rosswave

where do you think he got ALL THAT LSD when at harvard?

he didn't meet owsley until years later!

CIA baby!!
INK
User ID: 1049638
United States
08/01/2010 11:30 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were the Beatles Mind Controlled Illuminati Agents and Was Paul Replaced in '66?
all roads lead to t@vi$tock
including this very site

Remember where the 7/7 bombings were in London? (That name) Square. Coincidence? Hardly. They're in the shit up to their necks.


Agree. TPTB's symbology is everywhere - it's actually getting quite entertaining to see how they operate - it's called hiding in plain site.
 Quoting: JoJo 206814

Yes, but it would be more entertaining and less horrifying if innocent people didn't get killed by them and their little "messages" to each other.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1033502
United Kingdom
08/01/2010 11:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were the Beatles Mind Controlled Illuminati Agents and Was Paul Replaced in '66?
I think Leary admitted to being a CIA asset right?

where do you think he got ALL THAT LSD when at harvard?

he didn't meet owsley until years later!

CIA baby!!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1050536

i think the cia funded the research at sandoz looking for mind control/spy cracking drugs and then it went available to researchers to put experiments together. i read there were posters in colleges saying do you want to be schizo for a day type of thing. i think that was in storming heaven : lsd and the american dream by jay stevens ?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1033502
United Kingdom
08/01/2010 11:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were the Beatles Mind Controlled Illuminati Agents and Was Paul Replaced in '66?
it was either that or the electric kool aid acid test by tom wolfe
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 964953
United States
08/01/2010 11:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were the Beatles Mind Controlled Illuminati Agents and Was Paul Replaced in '66?
One thing to consider...

Sugarelf is a shilltarded troll whose probable goal is Cyber Herding, judging by the sensationalist hippy trippy new age bullshit link it posted.
 Quoting: chattermouse 261468


I just posted a link that was refered to earlier in the thread....

settle down there Leroy....
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 964953
United States
08/01/2010 11:46 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were the Beatles Mind Controlled Illuminati Agents and Was Paul Replaced in '66?
one thing to consider....

Paul wasn't fully grown in 1964....and his nutrition improved dramtically that year....his family was poor....

Bullshit.
 Quoting: INK 1049638


Paul was 22 in 1964....human males can and do grow up to and past that age....
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1050536
United States
08/01/2010 11:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were the Beatles Mind Controlled Illuminati Agents and Was Paul Replaced in '66?
I think Leary admitted to being a CIA asset right?

where do you think he got ALL THAT LSD when at harvard?

he didn't meet owsley until years later!

CIA baby!!

i think the cia funded the research at sandoz looking for mind control/spy cracking drugs and then it went available to researchers to put experiments together. i read there were posters in colleges saying do you want to be schizo for a day type of thing. i think that was in storming heaven : lsd and the american dream by jay stevens ?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1033502

yep CIA bought all sandoz product and demanded more!!

hogs!! HAA!
Da Swede

User ID: 1054483
Sweden
08/01/2010 11:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were the Beatles Mind Controlled Illuminati Agents and Was Paul Replaced in '66?
one thing to consider....

Paul wasn't fully grown in 1964....and his nutrition improved dramtically that year....his family was poor....

Bullshit.


Paul was 22 in 1964....human males can and do grow up to and past that age....
 Quoting: Sugarelf


Yes, perhaps.....but consider the very different earlobes, profile (chin) and so on... The height....yea, possibly, but not the ears !!
There are lies, damned lies and 9-11!
[link to bryce2-2u.freeservers.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 964953
United States
08/01/2010 12:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were the Beatles Mind Controlled Illuminati Agents and Was Paul Replaced in '66?
one thing to consider....

Paul wasn't fully grown in 1964....and his nutrition improved dramtically that year....his family was poor....

Bullshit.


Paul was 22 in 1964....human males can and do grow up to and past that age....


Yes, perhaps.....but consider the very different earlobes, profile (chin) and so on... The height....yea, possibly, but not the ears !!
 Quoting: Da Swede


an interesting possibility....
Da Swede

User ID: 1054483
Sweden
08/02/2010 04:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were the Beatles Mind Controlled Illuminati Agents and Was Paul Replaced in '66?
bump
There are lies, damned lies and 9-11!
[link to bryce2-2u.freeservers.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1086361
United States
09/01/2010 04:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were the Beatles Mind Controlled Illuminati Agents and Was Paul Replaced in '66?
OK OLD DUDES...the Beatles, Rolling Stones, and Beach Boys all sucked.
and they continue to suck.

Wings sucked too.

And I never had much use for Nirvana.

I must be truly evil because I don't follow popular culture too much. Or even any of the myraid flavours of the subcultures.

I do my own thing...and I don't need big pharma or the local drug dealer to help me.

but this is a very interesting thread. I know dick about the Beatles - except that thier music is terrible.


Tell us which bands and/or musicians do not suck, in your opinion.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 157925




hey man. FUCK YOU! if you think the beatles sucked and 'still suck' then you don't know shit and you deserve to get hit by a bus. the beatles were the best thing that happened to music and you're a piece of shit! no one cares if you do your own thing. that's probably why you're a fucking loner! go eat shit and die
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1086211
United States
09/01/2010 04:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were the Beatles Mind Controlled Illuminati Agents and Was Paul Replaced in '66?
Paul wore a wig and was 5'9".
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1086211
United States
09/01/2010 04:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were the Beatles Mind Controlled Illuminati Agents and Was Paul Replaced in '66?
Paul's girlfriend dropped the new Paul and never spoke about it again.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1086329
Canada
09/01/2010 04:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were the Beatles Mind Controlled Illuminati Agents and Was Paul Replaced in '66?
[link to video.google.com]

Mind control.. Microwave weapons..Strange things afoot..

Beatles..Maharishi Mahesh Yogi comes to mind when I saw your Title. Yes I think culture is given to us. Those who follow grow rich. Those that don't...well (place plot here)

Everything is a battle to change the mind to a way of thought. Nothings changed for hundreds of years. I hold the knowledge that will help you is the mantra.

Reinforce your brain with knowledge. Know thy foe. Learn and think like him. Be his shadow. Be the good to his evil.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1086211
United States
09/01/2010 04:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were the Beatles Mind Controlled Illuminati Agents and Was Paul Replaced in '66?
They never wanted Ringo he was forced on them.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 739044
United States
09/01/2010 11:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were the Beatles Mind Controlled Illuminati Agents and Was Paul Replaced in '66?
They got by "with a little help from their friends".

John said once. "I sold my soul for this you know".


He is assumed to have said:

I sold my soul to the devil.
(As quoted in Lennon by Ray Coleman )

[link to en.wikiquote.org]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 157707

No, no devil. Just 'sold his soul' as in sold out. This remark was from his Beatle hating phase. There was also some comment about how he ended up surrounded by the same kind of people he hated when he was in school. John was always rebellious about some of the stuff the Beatles had to do, the 'nice' image and the people they had to be nice to because that was what Brian Epstein wanted them to do.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 739044
United States
09/02/2010 12:27 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were the Beatles Mind Controlled Illuminati Agents and Was Paul Replaced in '66?
I'm really tired of people making the Beatles look like the drug gurus of the 60s. All they did was admit that they took drugs for a while, they didn't invent the drug culture or promote it. There was already psychedelic music coming from CA when the Beatles did Sgt. Pepper. The Beatles were trying to find a way to compete with the Byrds and other bands with that sound. The Beatles songs had very few drug references compared to other bands. They never encouraged people to take drugs. Why should they have lied about doing drugs when everyone else was doing it before them? They didn't invent the hippies or the hippie culture. In fact, George Harrison was really put off by the hippies in Haight Ashbury and basically made the comment that they should "take a bath, cut their hair, get a job" (a popular saying about the attitude of older people about hippies) Maybe not those exact words, but that was the message. He said something like- they were just a bunch of dirty, spotty kids on drugs who weren't doing anything productive.
There are a lot of positive messages the Beatles put out but I don't think they were trying to push their beliefs on anybody. They were just being themselves and being honest about who they were.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1086894
United States
09/02/2010 04:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Were the Beatles Mind Controlled Illuminati Agents and Was Paul Replaced in '66?
[link to www.contactmusic.com]





GLP