Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,771 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,122,966
Pageviews Today: 1,877,916Threads Today: 762Posts Today: 12,807
07:07 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Is WW3 even possible without USA involvement?

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 71024908
Namibia
01/07/2016 12:46 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Is WW3 even possible without USA involvement?
.

World War is generally going to be between the two following Super powers. Who eventually fights on which side is up for debate

TEAM A- RUssia/China/Arab Alliance
vs
TEAM B - Europe/USA/Nato Alliance.




If we look at Syria, it could be said it is basically a proxy War over ensuring key strategic territory.
Team A - (mostly Russia), see current interventions by Team B there as a direct threat. They have even said so just a few days ago.


The Syrian crisis does have the potential to grow and grow, and if WW3 is coming in the next decade or so, I think history will see Syria as the start of it.


BUT- if the USA changed direction, like imagine if Trump is not full of shit, gets in and ACTUALLY implements a policy of non intervention in foreign affairs- HOW COULD WW3 possibly begin.


Without the US backing them - Europe and Nato would never be stupid enough to take on Russia, or provoke it via proxy wars near its borders.

Without US involvement WW3 would likely never start in the first place.

IN short - I am saying - maybe Trump is our only hope.

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 71142321
Australia
01/07/2016 12:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Is WW3 even possible without USA involvement?
Hasn't the US run out of certain types of bombs due to 2 decades of warmongering.?

abombabomb
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 70441559
Australia
01/07/2016 01:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Is WW3 even possible without USA involvement?
.

World War is generally going to be between the two following Super powers. Who eventually fights on which side is up for debate

TEAM A- RUssia/China/Arab Alliance
vs
TEAM B - Europe/USA/Nato Alliance.




If we look at Syria, it could be said it is basically a proxy War over ensuring key strategic territory.
Team A - (mostly Russia), see current interventions by Team B there as a direct threat. They have even said so just a few days ago.


The Syrian crisis does have the potential to grow and grow, and if WW3 is coming in the next decade or so, I think history will see Syria as the start of it.


BUT- if the USA changed direction, like imagine if Trump is not full of shit, gets in and ACTUALLY implements a policy of non intervention in foreign affairs- HOW COULD WW3 possibly begin.


Without the US backing them - Europe and Nato would never be stupid enough to take on Russia, or provoke it via proxy wars near its borders.

Without US involvement WW3 would likely never start in the first place.

IN short - I am saying - maybe Trump is our only hope.


 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 71024908


Of course not. But the same could be said for Russia and possibly China & UK. It is all still a proxy between US & Russia. When the proxies get too hot the big boys battle.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 71123403
United States
01/07/2016 01:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Is WW3 even possible without USA involvement?
bible says it will be muslim against muslim

then the whole world gets involved then god wipes out

the muslims with the plagues..
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 71024908
Namibia
01/07/2016 01:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Is WW3 even possible without USA involvement?
Of course not. But the same could be said for Russia and possibly China & UK. It is all still a proxy between US & Russia. When the proxies get too hot the big boys battle.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70441559


I sort of agree.

Its basically UK and Europe interests vs Russian Interests.

As in WW1 and WW2

Without US baking though, maybe the UK and Europe would chill out and back away from the fire this time.

And without Chinese and Arab backing, maybe Russia too would chill out and back away from the fire this time.

I am not sure who is the real aggressor here, if anyone, or if everyone, but I do think that it might be possible that if the US decided to not be in the fight, the whole situation might diffuse into some sort of peaceful solution.

I guess its super complicated though.

So many historic treaties binding countries together.

Maybe the US simply has to be involved due to treaties etc.





GLP